Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Surak

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for verifiability and notability concerns addressed below. Der yck C. 20:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Surak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find anything for this subject. Is it the same one discussed here? If so, that doesn't change much, since there don't seem to multiple secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing in GNews. Not notable. Perchloric (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the problem with musicians like this, is that even if they were influential in their scene, there's not a great deal of material we'd consider reliable on them. With that said, WP:V concerns do apply here. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.