Wikipedia:Featured article review/Westgate-on-Sea/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 8:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Epbr123, WP Kent, WP Cities, WP UK geography, notified 2020-11-5
Review section
This one is not particularly close, despite being a recent TFA. Questionable web sources, books without page numbers, but the largest issue is out of date. Newest thing in history in 2001. Demographics is missing the most recent census. Economy: 2001. Politics has one statement post-2007. This is so horrendously out of date that it is not close to FA standards. If the article can be brought up to date, the lesser issues shouldn't be too hard to fix, but there's about a decade's worth of new material that needs added. Hog Farm Bacon 06:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FAR: no improvements (t · c) buidhe 02:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged as needing update and further sources. I also have comprehensiveness concerns: the town was founded in the 1860s but the demographics, economy, and politics sections say almost nothing about the 19th- or 20th-centuries. The education section appears to have been split with the school and college foundations mentioned in the history section and only recent statistics given in the education section. DrKay (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Out of date and not comprehensive per above. Hog Farm Bacon 03:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - very, very out of date and far from being representative of Wikipedia's best work, sadly Spiderone 16:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.