User talk:Rahio1234: Difference between revisions
→April 2024: Reply |
m Archiving |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". [[User:Wish l|Wish l]] ([[User talk:Wish l|talk]]) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |
It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". [[User:Wish l|Wish l]] ([[User talk:Wish l|talk]]) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
Please read your [[User_talk:Wish l|talk page]] [[User:Rahio1234|Rahio1234]] ([[User talk:Rahio1234#top|talk]]) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |
Please read your [[User_talk:Wish l|talk page]] [[User:Rahio1234|Rahio1234]] ([[User talk:Rahio1234#top|talk]]) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== April 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 10:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Please don't block my account [[User:Rahio1234|Rahio1234]] ([[User talk:Rahio1234#top|talk]]) 10:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Please actually read the IP's explanation on the edit summary before reverting or throwing a wall of user warnings. I am not sending this to ANI/EW, but if anyone else sees anymore reverts it will definitely get both sides in trouble. [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 10:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|policy on multiple accounts]] before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your [[IP address]], which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-login --> [[User:AlphaBetaGamma|ABG]] ([[User talk:AlphaBetaGamma|Talk/Report any mistakes here]]) 11:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Don't blocked my account pls [[User:Rahio1234|Rahio1234]] ([[User talk:Rahio1234#top|talk]]) 11:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:18, 23 April 2024
March 2024
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to MapleStory: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome
Thank you for reverting some very problematic edits at Neolithodes brodiei and Neolithodes. I have removed the false positive report from ClueBot: it is usually very good but it does make mistakes. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse or feel free to ask me. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Rahio1234 (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reversions
Hi, just an FYI that there's no need to tell a vandal their edits have been reverted if they've already been warned by somebody else for the edit. You may find these templates useful for warning users, or alternatively the Twinkle tool (automated). AbsoluteWissen (talk) 12:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
True black hair is rare, It's estimated that only 2% possesses true black hair
It's unfair to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black". Wish l (talk) 12:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please read your talk page Rahio1234 (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)