Talk:Mai Kadra massacre

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because it is under construction and I am adding detail as we speak.--Varavour (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Premature assignment of blame

On reading the ingress, I was led to understand that the TPLF committed the atrocity, but reading further, I understood that this claim is disputed and that government forces have also been blamed. As a casual reader who knows nothing of this conflict, reading that ingress in an instant seemed to color the parties of the conflict very starkly in a way that on further reading, seems dubious. The ingress ought to be edited to reflect how unclear the information regarding this event still is.

Sincerely, Sanna A, Sweden 159.242.234.119 (talk) 21:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Just because one party denied it doesn’t mean that they didn’t do it. There is enough evidence showing that they did do it for inclusion. Flalf^Talk 22:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Unless I've misread them, the Thomson Reuters and Telegraph reports at most only have one witness with a discordant report for "Moya Khadra"; one case is for an unnamed town; some are for Humera. A separate article could be broken off for Humera massacre if the reports are serious enough. Boud (talk) 00:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I concur with the concerns of Sanna A. The ingress until minutes ago was misleading in the context of the full article. This article covers a highly-controversial event related to an ongoing conflict; as such, editors should be vigilant about maintaining objectivity and clarity regarding assertions made and the nature of their sources.108.48.44.199 (talk) 02:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

There's no dispute about the principles of WP:NPOV for the WP:LEAD, which it can't hurt to call the "ingress" for the sake of this discussion. Feel free to discuss specific edit disagreements here. Boud (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I added allegedly. Flalf^Talk 21:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Most of the victims per Amnesty and EHRC; and Thomson Reuters

In the Amnesty International report I see:

• the Amhara regional government’s media agency AMMA reported there were around 500 victims, adding that they were primarily non-Tigrayan residents of the town.
• immediate sentence following: A man who is helping to clear the bodies from the streets told Amnesty International that he had looked at the state-issued identification cards of some victims, and most were Amhara.

EHRC preliminary report to media after a 6-day mission:

• hundreds of people they identified as ethnic “Amharas and Wolkait origin”,

So either "mostly Amharans" or "non-Tigrayans" seems to match the two sources.

The Thomson Reuters report has one witness interviewed by a journalist who said that Tigrayans were the victims: Barhat, 52, said she fled from Moya Khadra after people from the Amhara region, which borders Tigray and whose rulers back Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, attacked them. "They killed anyone who said they were Tigrayan."

Based on the depth of information in the various reports, I think that the Thomson Reuters refugee interviewee only counts as an "alternative" point of view, and does not override the Amnesty and EHRC reports concerning "most" of the victims, given the present sources that we have.

Boud (talk) 22:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The EHRC preliminary report posted on GAFAMdocs (the EHRC presumably does not know that it should manage its own webpage independently) gives a lot more depth than the newspaper report. Boud (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I would note that every indication suggests that the events described in the Reuters report and the Telegraph are also claimed to have taken place in Mai Kadra as opposed to another towns. In particular, the reference to a "town near Humera" should be clearly taken to mean Mai Kadra. Hence, the separation between events in Mai Kadra and "events in the region" would appear to be fallacious. I will add some things from reports from CNN and AFP which provide independent verification. As for the website I would not be so hard on the EHRC; they are grossly underfunded and hosting a reliable website in Ethiopia is a real pain. --Varavour (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

If you think the separation between Mai Kadra and Humera is misleading, then giving specific quotes here would probably be useful, especially given what has been verging on edit wars here, especially by IPs. I'm not saying that you shouldn't edit the article, but details here may help shortcut edit wars, and especially help editors aiming at NPOV (hopefully most, though a few need some time to learn). If federal forces went on a "vengeance" rampage on the way to and in Humera, then that info will hopefully be collected and published.

On the EHRC and a website: it's not a question of funding and hosting a website necessarily locally; it's a question of knowledge: there are plenty of independent, well-reputed alternatives to GAFAM available, which would certainly be better than googledocs. Boud (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• Please note that the Amnesty International article states that the perpetrators could not be independently verified. They are citing Amhara Government Media Agency and phone calls with people accompanied government forces, whilst the Tigrayan media and refugees say the exact opposite. Contact with the Tigray region is completely cut off, and the Ethiopian Government has refused to allow independent investigations. They have only allowed the Government headed EHRC to investigate so government backed reports should be taken with caution as they are unlikely to implicate the government themselves. A.y.187 (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

• @A.y.187: I see nothing in the Amnesty report about telephone calls. It's true that face-to-face interviews are more reliable than online (or only audio, e.g. telephone) interviews, but this is not a major argument against the reliability of the investigation. More importantly, the Amnesty report does not say that it is only citing Amhara Government Media Agency; it quite clearly talks about several interviews and gives a fair amount of details of its investigation. There are no particular reasons to expect Amnesty to be biased to one side or another here.

The FT article is new and reports info from a second refugee, that's significant.

Another point which is significant in the Amnesty report is the witnesses who were available for interviews: witnesses, who were providing food and other supplies to the Ethiopian Defense Forces (EDF). People who were attacked by the ENDF (= EDF) or ENDF-associated forces (Amhara militias) would probably be afraid to provide food to the ENDF; they would be more likely to be in hiding or have fled to Sudan.

The degree of independence of the EHRC from the government is an important point - please help develop the article Ethiopian Human Rights Commission - currently it says that a critic of the EHRC, Bekele, was appointed director in Feb 2019, so it appears that the EHRC is not as dependent on the federal government as it used to be. But the more sourced information we have, the better. Boud (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

• It seems that most of the international media don't have deeper knowledge what was happened and what was going on in the country. To understand this and figure out the right information, it is critical to understand the situation from the complexity perspective of the country and even it is important to have at least 30 years back history of the country. Unfortunately, most of the international media become victims (knowingly and/or unknowingly) of the strategic and systematic propaganda of the TPLF and its fabricated information. So it is important to differentiate between the fact and fake news (false information). Of course I have to acknowledge BBC that figured out the fake news of TPLF (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54985545). The amnesty international and the independent Ethiopian human right commission have investigated the situation from the place and provided documents (reports) to the world, so I think, it is better to consider those information as source and to get the fact what happened in Mai Kadra. One thing that the international media, primarily Reuter and NYT, failed to investigate is that the TPLF had systematically deployed its supporters to Sudan and some of the so called "Samri" youth group who conducted this barbaric massacre had fled to Sudan, after the defeat of the TPLF loyal force by the Ethiopian army. These groups joined refuges camp in Sudan and disseminated false information to the international media and that is why I said above, it is critical to have a deeper knowledge of the situation, historical perspective and strategic agenda of TPLF. In fact there are also some clues that the WHO general, member of the TPLF, tried to pressure the Ethiopian government although he denied it (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/11/19/ethiopia-who-tedros-criminal-military-tigray/) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-55001328.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.252.171 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

References

Sources now suggest parallel massacres

This is just a reminder that this en.Wikipedia article cannot get closer to the truth than the reliable sources. The sources we have do not directly contradict each other. If all the witnesses have spoken truthfully and been accurately quoted/summarised by Amnesty, EHRC, Reuters, and the FT, then there have been successive, or partly simultaneous, massacres in Mai Kadra by Samri and the Amhara militias. (Sounds like the UN Security Council will need to get the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate, given that Ethiopia is not party to the Rome Statute of the ICC.) Boud (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

I started the article Humera massacre, since the number of sources seems strong enough.

For anyone thinking of an overview article, the sources we have now point to:

• Humera Airport massacre - 70 victims - date could be sometime before 10 November when the ENDF arrived; or could be by the ENDF/Amharans after they arrived and before 29 November when the one source (Ethiopian Broadcasting Corporation, repeated in multiple media) reported it, attributed to TPLF by anonymous military person;
• Mai Kadra massacre - 700 or more victims - 9-10 November - Amnesty + EHRC say by Samri (Tigrayans) against Amharans; two refugees say by Amharans against Tigrayans;
• Humera massacre - 20 or more Tigrayan victims - has to be sometime before/on or around 12 November, the day when the ENDF officially took over Humera; three Western mainstream media sources interviewing refugees;
• ethnic murders taking place "on the road" - dates, locations unknown, interviews with refugess in Western mainstream media.

I don't see any point creating Humera Airport massacre with only one source that has very little information (one human body per grave? forensic analysis to estimate dates of deaths? independent human rights investigation team/prosecutors' team invited to investigate?). A probably uncontroversial title for an overview article could be Human rights violations during the Tigray conflict. This could have more details of the cases at unidentified locations and dates. Boud (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Amnesty International 12 Dec 2020 (ref name="AP_Shadowy_massacre", currently ref [12],): Amnesty researcher Fisseha Tekle told an event on Tuesday as fears grow about atrocities elsewhere in Tigray. "Other credible allegations are emerging ... not only in Mai-Kadra but also" in the nearby town of Humera, the town of Dansha and the Tigray capital, Mekele. Tuesday = 8 December. So that makes: Humera Airport massacre (if we get enough sources); Mai Kadra massacre; Humera massacre; Dansha massacre (if we get enough sources); Mekelle massacre (if we get enough sources); "on-the-road" massacres. AFP visited Dansha, which was one of the locations of the 4 November Northern Command attacks, and didn't report any testimonies of killings of civilians, it only reported on the 4 November lethal battle between soldiers/militias and an apparently calm aftermath. AFP doesn't seem to have interviewed Tigrayans in Dansha - they might have fled or might have felt at risk giving interviews. Boud (talk) 23:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

References

The incident at Mai Kadra with 600 victims seems to dwarf all the later incidents. May I ask what is your motivation for wanting so badly a separate special dedicated article for every possible alleged incident of ten or twenty people dying in wartime, in this particular war? And there are at least three other conflicts going on now in the world. KZebegna (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I think you missed the words (if we get enough sources). This is an encyclopedia.

• Check out List of massacres in Syria for a precedent. I count about 22 individual pages of massacres there with the median number of victims per massacre article being somewhere around 50 or so, and most in the 20-200 range. There are about 8 massacres listed without dedicated Wikipedia pages.
• Another example: List of massacres in France#Post-War: about 24 massacres; 23 have individual articles, only 1 (the most recent) does not. The number of victims per massacre has a median of something like 5 to 7. There's a high-number tail with a few massacres of over 100.

Is there any reason why massacres in Ethiopia should be less covered in en.Wikipedia than massacres in France? Are massacres of Ethiopians less notable than those of French people? Are massacres of Syrians less notable than massacres of French people?

Regarding "wartime": militarily unjustified killings of civilians have been illegal since nearly a century ago; these are not part of legally permissible military actions.

Regarding other conflicts: you are welcome to edit articles for those other conflicts. Boud (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

No they aren't - I have to say you made your point quite well. I didn't realize so many smaller events in Syria and France were so listed, but now that you've shown me that they are, carry on with what you have been doing by all means! KZebegna (talk) 00:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Issues raised by 89.247.252.171

Here I put quotes like this with {{tquote}} and respond.

• It seems that most of the international media don't have deeper knowledge what was happened and what was going on in the country.
  • That's quite possible. But we can only use information based on external sources.
• To understand this ... most of the international media become victims (knowingly and/or unknowingly) of the strategic and systematic propaganda of the TPLF and its fabricated information.
  • Again that's possible, but we should not be Manichean. International mainstream media may partly be duped, but they do do some forms of fact-checking themselves and do tend to word their reports carefully.
• So it is important to differentiate between the fact and fake news (false information).
  • Ideally, yes. So the question is how? Do we only choose the mainstream reports with which we agree personally?
• Of course I have to acknowledge BBC that figured out the fake news of TPLF (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54985545). The amnesty international and the independent Ethiopian human right commission have investigated the situation from the place and provided documents (reports) to the world, so I think, it is better to consider those information as source and to get the fact what happened in Mai Kadra.
  • Well yes, we do use BBC and Amnesty International sources.
• One thing that the international media, primarily Reuter and NYT, failed to investigate is that the TPLF had systematically deployed its supporters to Sudan and some of the so called "Samri" youth group who conducted this barbaric massacre had fled to Sudan, after the defeat of the TPLF loyal force by the Ethiopian army. These groups joined refuges camp in Sudan and disseminated false information to the international media
  • That's quite possible. But it's also possible that Reuters and FT (in this case) were aware of the likelikhood of Samri refugees being responsible for the Mai Kadra massacre and lying; and that the news agencies' reporters did their best to judge this by all the usual ways that journalists try to judge the truth.
• and that is why I said above, it is critical to have a deeper knowledge of the situation, historical perspective and strategic agenda of TPLF.
  • For this particular article, we already have a subsection mentioning the claim that refugees might be people responsible for war crimes who have fled and pretended to be victims. But we cannot use that information to ignore the reports by Reuters and FT. The reader of this Wikipedia article has to judge for him/herself which information to believe based on the reports. We give as much detail as we can. Generally, the more information is provided, the easier it is to detect (or find hints of) falsifications.
• In fact there are also some clues that the WHO general, member of the TPLF, tried to pressure the Ethiopian government although he denied it (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/11/19/ethiopia-who-tedros-criminal-military-tigray/) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-55001328.
  • Wikipedia articles can only give information based on sources. If you can find sources that show that the particular Reuters and FT articles that we currently have are based on refugees who lied, then please provide that source. For a source (newspaper) that is normally accepted as "reliable", it would be unlikely that we remove the source; instead, we add the other sources that have counterclaims.

In any case, if you make an edit and someone reverts it, then that's a good moment to discuss the specific edit here on the talk page and search for consensus. If you want to make an edit that removes information sourced to Thomson Reuters (name="Reuters_11_12_2") or the Financial Times (name="ft_9_12"), then please propose that here, and then we can see if there is consensus to remove the information on the grounds that Reuters and FT might have been fooled by the TPLF. I'm going to fix one error that I see: the "Reuters_11_12_2" refugee only refers to Amharan militias, not to the ENDF. This correction is based on matching the sources to our Wikipedia article, without interpretations related to TPLF propaganda. Boud (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Re "we should not be Manichean" - I agree wholeheartedly that "Manichean" is what we should not be, and in fact exactly what we should always reject, especially as an encyclopedia - but what does that word mean to you? Could you please clarify the context of saying that here? KZebegna (talk) 14:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Well, in this context, the Manichean point of view seems to be "federal government = good + honest; TPLF and all ethnic Tigrayans = bad + lying" and to associate all formal and informal armed forces and witness statements strictly within one of these two categories. If by "context" you mean the editorial context, then see this edit, this edit, or this edit, which have in their edit summaries: Any report based on refuges from Tigray is highly suffering from strategically fabricated information of the TPLF. Removing the word "Any" and adding a qualifier such as "may" or "might" would have made the statement a lot less Manichean. Boud (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Lol, OK, thanks for explaining. Yes, I agree with that. 'Manichean' can mean so many generally unsavory or sinister things with different people, as they were actually a crypto sect with secretive rituals! KZebegna (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Edits of IP 37.116.65.226

IP user 37.116.65.226 made several recent edits such as this one at 23:08, 11 December 2020, with the edit description "the reference articles of Reuters and the financial times do not state the involvement of the Ethiopian Federal army or the Amhara Militia to the massacre". Here are quotes from the sources:

• Reuters Barhat, 52, said she fled from Moya Khadra after people from the Amhara region, which borders Tigray and whose rulers back Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, attacked them. "They killed anyone who said they were Tigrayan. They stole our money, our cattle, and our crops from our homes and we ran with just the clothing on our backs," she said.
• Financial Times But those fleeing the violence give accounts of brutality on all sides, including by Ethiopian federal forces, Amhara special forces and irregular Amhara militias. They say people had their throats slit, were shot in the neck, execution style, or attacked with machetes, and dogs were seen feeding on dead bodies.
• FT: ... Tigrayan student Abrahaley Menasew gingerly touched the stitches in a wound on his head as he lay on a rickety bed. He said the injury was inflicted by an axe after he was dragged from his home in Mai Kadra by Amhara militiamen. His neck and wrist were slashed with a machete, he said, and he almost lost his hand.

Boud (talk) 01:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:NPOV complaints in the whole article, including LEAD

Hello everyone, this page has many WP:NPOV issue, against Tigrayans and Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF).

• Let us start from the first sentence in the LEAD:- It is not only Thomson Reuters and the Financial Times that attritubed responsibility to the Amhara militias, it is all the below listed media outlets' articles. They include CNN, The Guardian, Yahoo! News, BBC, The Daily Telegraph, The New York Times, NBC News, Sky News, Associated Press (AP), Al Jazeera, The Sydney Morning Herald and even more. Listed are the exact reference from these outlets, that attribute responsibility to the Amhara militias (and&or other Abiy Ahmed ailed forces). Let us not try to promote the other side and discredit the Tigrayans victims and TPLF.

1. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/dec/02/tigray-war-refugees-ethiopia-sudan
2. https://sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/escape-massacre-ethiopians-recall-tigray-092740037.html
3. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/africa/ethiopia-tigray-sudan.html
4. https://www.nbcnews.com/video/refugees-from-ethiopia-mass-in-sudan-border-from-conflict-in-tigray-96440901567
5. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-ethiopia-conflict-sudan-bombings-idUKKBN27T1OL
6. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w172x2z2d5prcjz
7. https://us.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/12/07/ethiopia-tigray-tensions-refugees-sudan-eritrea-horn-of-africa-elbagir-pkg-intl-ldn-vpx.cnn
8. https://www.smh.com.au/world/africa/ethiopia-may-be-on-the-edge-of-genocide-20201122-p56gum.html
9. https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28A1M7
10. The Telegraph’s official YouTube channel report:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjCfsQWqIo4
11. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/14/fleeing-war-ethiopians-recount-horror-of-tigray-violence

• Furthermore, media outlasts like Associated Press (AP) have reported that Amnesty International (Amnesty) has changed its position; that is, even Amnesty is now saying that both Tigrayan ethnic and Amhara ethnic were possibly targeted. This is the exact quote from the below more recent AP article link:- It’s possible that civilians from both ethnicities were targeted in Mai-Kadra, Amnesty now says.

1. https://apnews.com/article/sudan-ethiopia-massacres-d16a089f8dcb0511172b5662b9244f78

• The communication blackout that is withholding from international journalists from documenting the Tigrayan victims stories in Tigray is not mentioned well . (I'm talking about the internet, phone, mobile, electricity that has been disconnected to Tigray region during this war. Even running water has been disconnected.) We know Abiy Ahmed's government cuts communication whenever. According to Human Rights Watch and NetBlocks, politically motivated Internet shutdowns have intensified in severity and duration under the leadership of Abiy Ahmed despite the country's rapid digitalization and reliance on cellular internet connectivity in recent years. In 2020, Internet shutdowns by the Ethiopian government have been described as "frequently deployed". Access Now said in a statement that shutdowns have become a "go-to tool for authorities to muzzle unrest and activism." His government will the cut internet as and when, "it's neither water nor air" have said Abiy.

Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 07:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

• There is a misleading sentence that says The Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, an independent agency of the Ethiopian government.... Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, is known to be NOT an "independent agency", and there is no reference added anywhere in Wikipedia that says it is an "independent agency". In fact, it is more know to hide situations and mislead the public by echoing the Ethiopian government's position. Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

References

Missing talk-reflist added by Boud Boud (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Sources for perpetrators or victims of Mai Kadra massacre

No, we do not start with modifying the lead. First we update the body of the article. If it then makes sense to update the lead, then that can follow. If you disagree with any of the analysis below, please here in this talk page give the specific quotes to support your claims.

You stated It is not only Thomson Reuters and the Financial Times that attritubed responsibility to the Amhara militias, it is all the below listed media outlets' articles.

1. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/dec/02/tigray-war-refugees-ethiopia-sudan

I do not see "Mai Khadra" at all in this article. This article does not support your claim.

2. https://sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/escape-massacre-ethiopians-recall-tigray-092740037.html

This is a poor source, at "sports.yahoo.com"; I found a better version, where AFP is attributed. Witness Messah Geidi attributes the massacre to "the army". We can quote that, but it's not clear which particular security forces s/he is referring to. I've done this.  Done

3. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/africa/ethiopia-tigray-sudan.html

The move is likely to lead to violent Tigrayan reprisals, he said, as may have already occurred in the town of Mai Kadra, where human rights groups have said forces loyal to the liberation front massacred as many as 600 people, most of them Amhara. The attribution of the massacre is to "the liberation front", meaning the Tigray People's Liberation Front.

4. https://www.nbcnews.com/video/refugees-from-ethiopia-mass-in-sudan-border-from-conflict-in-tigray-96440901567

This appears to point to a video. It would be best if you provided a transcript (quote) if you wished to consider this as a source. Keep in mind that an archive of the video must exist: WP:PUBLISHED "Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist."

5. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-ethiopia-conflict-sudan-bombings-idUKKBN27T1OL

This is the Thomson Reuters source that is already used in the article.

6. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w172x2z2d5prcjz

This appears to point to an audio file. Same situation as for the video.

7. https://us.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/12/07/ethiopia-tigray-tensions-refugees-sudan-eritrea-horn-of-africa-elbagir-pkg-intl-ldn-vpx.cnn

This appears to point to a video. Again the same situation as above.

8. https://www.smh.com.au/world/africa/ethiopia-may-be-on-the-edge-of-genocide-20201122-p56gum.html

Burani's descriptions of knife massacres chime with an Amnesty International investigation that last week concluded hundreds of civilians had been hacked or stabbed to death in the city of Mai-Kadra, in what appears to be an ethnic cleansing. This article does not support your claim.

9. https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28A1M7

I do not see "Mai Khadra" at all in this article. This article does not support your claim.

10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjCfsQWqIo4

Again, a youtube video. In principle might be usable, but see above.

11. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/14/fleeing-war-ethiopians-recount-horror-of-tigray-violence

the TPLF in a statement denied allegations that scores or even hundreds of civilians were "hacked to death" on Monday in the town of Mai Kadra. ... Ethiopia's Human Rights Commission, appointed by the government but independent, has sent investigators to Mai Kadra, ... Gidey Asafa said the fighting had forced her and her family to flee Mai Kadra with nothing but the clothes on their backs. ... "We saw people being slaughtered. There was blood all over. We fled because we didn't want to die," she told Al Jazeera. "Some women lost their husbands. We came with nothing but our lives. These clothes were given to me by the people here." There is no information here attributing the massacre to the ENDF or Amharan militias.

So out of the 11 sources that you listed:

• 5 fail to support your claim: 1, 3, 8, 9, 11
• 1 source weakly supports your claim: 2 but only states "the army"; this is now done
• 4 video/audio that require an archive (not provided) and would best need a transcript: 4, 6, 7, 10
• 1 redundant with existing source(s): 5

There is no need to use bold to shout in making a point. The AP article citing Amnesty does indeed state It's possible that civilians from both ethnicities were targeted in Mai-Kadra, Amnesty now says.. We could include that in the body of the article, but certainly not the lead, because it's a weak claim. Using bold does not make the claim any stronger. Boud (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC) minor fix (numbering) Boud (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Internet communications blockade

It seems to me valid to briefly mention this in context in this article, although if it's not connected directly to Mai Kadra, anything more than a brief mention risks getting into WP:SYNTH. @KZebegna: you might wish to comment on this. Boud (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ideally there will be a source that has already made some kind of point about communications disruption in relation to this topic. In my own observation fwiw, when the TPLF was in power they would shut down communications several times, especially toward the end, and we could actually see for ourselves all internet traffic from Ethiopia drop down to zero. We haven't seen anything like that since Abiy's government. Maybe because this time they had only cut one region's traffic and not the whole country, but reports are that now communications have been reestablished for Tigray, meaning they were shut down for about a month. KZebegna (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

EHRC independence

You are correct that this article is not the place to summarise whether or not the EHRC is genuinely independent. This is now done.  Done Boud (talk) 11:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Replay to "Sources for perpetrators or victims of Mai Kadra massacre"

@Boud:, you seem to have misunderstood my points for the listed article. My first and main line was “Hello everyone, this page has many WP:NPOV issue, against Tigrayans and Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF).” So if they say the “the army” then I have made my point with the references. “The army”, the Amhara paramilitary, the Fano Amhara militias, president Essays Afewerki Eritrean’s forces are all on one side (allied with Abiy Ahmed), against people of Tigray and TPLF. However, my references many times also explicitly say Fano and Amhara militias. And even if “the army” is doing it, the ideology comes from the Amhara imperialists. That is why I spontaneously said the Fano Amhara militias, but they are all on the same side. And my WP:NPOV point is NOT that which exactly (from the federal army, the Amhara paramilitary, the Fano Amhara militias, president Essays Afewerki Eritrean’s forces) are committing the killing & massacres. My WP:NPOV point is that it is being committed by one (or all) of Abiy Ahmed allied forces, but the other side (Tigrayans and TPLF) are being blamed.

• I added this as bold since it is very important to my WP:NPOV claim, thought I listed it second before. It does not need to be included as bold in the article, but it has to be included. I write again and sorry to use bold, but I sometimes use it to pin-point my main points:- Furthermore, media outlasts like Associated Press (AP) have reported that Amnesty International (Amnesty) has changed its position; that is, even Amnesty is now saying that both Tigrayan ethnic and Amhara ethnic were possibly targeted. This is the exact quote from the below more recent AP article link:- It’s possible that civilians from both ethnicities were targeted in Mai-Kadra, Amnesty now says.

• https://apnews.com/article/sudan-ethiopia-massacres-d16a089f8dcb0511172b5662b9244f78

Here I list what I meant by these reference support my WP:NPOV against Tigrayans and TPLF claim. .

1 https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/dec/02/tigray-war-refugees-ethiopia-sudan

This says Tela moves gingerly, and has bandages wrapped around his calves and wrists. He said federal soldiers had found him in Humera and beaten him until he was covered in blood and could not walk, then passed him over to a brutal militia force of ethnic Amharans called the Fano. He said the Fano had been tasked with destroying the city and “finishing” Tigrayans.The Fano had taken over a judicial court in Humera. Barely mobile and gushing blood, Tela said he was allowed to heave himself away. Gesturing a knife to his neck, he said he saw a man in his 30s beheaded with machetes. Refugees in the camp reel off accounts of horror they either witnessed themselves or heard from others. In a makeshift ward in a room near the back of the camp, some show wounds they say were caused by knife and machete attacks by Fano militia. For the last month, Tefera Tedros, a 42-year-old surgeon, has seen the results of the violence up close. Before war broke out he divided his time between a government hospital and a private clinic. “It was very successful,” he said. “I was maintaining [a good life], sending my kids to school, and all the basic necessities. Now everything is gone.” Tedros said his hospital in Humera received 15 dead civilians on the first day of shelling on 8 November. “But those who were not brought to the hospital, who died on the streets or at home, were uncountable,” he said.

2 https://sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/escape-massacre-ethiopians-recall-tigray-092740037.html

This says If you are Tigrayan and captured by government soldiers, you are in trouble, said the 24-year-old. "They ask you, with a gun pointed at you, if you belong to Tigrayan forces," he said. "At the slightest hesitation, you are dead. They shoot you down on the spot and leave the body in the street." Pleading with them that you are a civilian does not make a difference, said Burhan. "They beat you, sometimes to death, or they take you with them to an unknown destination -- and I doubt if you come back alive from there," he added. "It's terror." Burhan managed to escape to Sudan, trekking through the hot bush across the border, but he was separated from his father, mother and two sisters on the way. "I don't know if they're okay," he said.....'Slaughtered like sheep' - To escape, Messah Geidi split from his wife and four-year-old son -- and he cannot forgive himself. "I don't know where they are, and if they are still alive," he said. Geidi comes from the southwestern Tigray town of Mai-Kadra, where Amnesty International said last week that "scores, and likely hundreds, of people were stabbed or hacked to death". The rights group cited sources saying the killings were perpetrated by TPLF forces, while the UN warned of possible war crimes in Tigray, condemning "reports of targeted attacks against civilians". But several refugees at the Sudanese camp said federal troops had committed atrocities. "I fled Mai-Kadra, because the army slaughtered the young people like sheep," Geidi said. Almost everyone reporters speak to in Um Raquba has a tragic story -- except 32-year-old teacher Takli Burhano. Burhano, arrested in Mai-Kadra, said he was beaten from 4:00 am to 11:00 pm. Then a soldier grabbed him, and decided to execute him. But as he readied for death, another soldier stepped in to stop the killing. "One soldier went up to his commander and told him 'you can't do that, he was my teacher.'" Burhano said. "He saved my life."

3 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/africa/ethiopia-tigray-sudan.html

This says Mr. Ashenafi, 24, was racing on his motorcycle to the aid of a childhood friend trapped by the Ethiopian government’s military offensive in the northern region of Tigray when a group of men on foot confronted him. They identified themselves as militia members of a rival ethnic group, he said, and they took his cash and began beating him, laughing ominously. “Finish him!” Mr. Ashenafi remembered one of the men saying. As they tightened the noose around his neck and began pulling him along the road, Mr. Ashenafi was sure he was going to die, and he eventually passed out. But he said he awoke alone near a pile of bodies, children among them. His motorcycle was gone.

4 https://www.nbcnews.com/video/refugees-from-ethiopia-mass-in-sudan-border-from-conflict-in-tigray-96440901567

This is even a very spacial video, it shows a Tigrayan ethnic people who are surviving witnesses & currently refugees in Sudan, with knife wounds expressing the horrors they experienced. @Boud: please make it archived or whatever the process is to be able to reference it. You know the process better.

5 https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-ethiopia-conflict-sudan-bombings-idUKKBN27T1OL

This says Reuters spoke to a dozen refugees. Many of them described seeing dead bodies strewn alongside the roads as they fled under cover of darkness, fearing they would be found and killed. They said they expected many more Ethiopians to join them in Sudan in the coming days. Barhat, 52, said she and others had fled from Moya Khadra after people from the Amhara region, which borders Tigray and whose rulers back Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, attacked them. “They killed anyone who said they were Tigrayan. They stole our money, our cattle, and our crops from our homes and we ran with just the clothing on our backs,” she said.

6 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w172x2z2d5prcjz

A BBC-News audio interview with a medical doctor who fled to Sudan from western Tigray due to the civil war. He describes the massacres & atrocities being committed by Abiy Ahmed allied forces (the FANO Amhara ethnic militias). Again @Boud:, please have it archived.

7 https://us.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/12/07/ethiopia-tigray-tensions-refugees-sudan-eritrea-horn-of-africa-elbagir-pkg-intl-ldn-vpx.cnn::::

This CNN video, shows the stories of several Tigrayan refugees in Sudan, how they were being massacred by Abiy Ahmed allied forces (including being beaten by president Isaias Afwerki's forces)

8 https://www.smh.com.au/world/africa/ethiopia-may-be-on-the-edge-of-genocide-20201122-p56gum.html

This says The Amhara [militia] cut off the heads of four children. They cut the babies out of pregnant women. I saw it with my own eyes," says Burani, 35, who has just trekked two days across mountainous terrain with no water to find safety in neighbouring Sud an. Composing himself, he pleads for help. "Why is the world looking at what's happening? Why is no one helping us?"

9 https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28A1M7

This says "Like other mainly Tigrayan refugees who have fled to Sudan, Berhan blamed the violence on government forces and allied militia....'This is inhumane, slaughtering people, stealing all their belongings, I feel the world has betrayed Tigray because people are doing nothing while people are being killed,' said Berhan."

10 The Telegraph’s official YouTube channel report about Mai Kadra massacre witnesses:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjCfsQWqIo4

Please someone who knows how to do this, have this video archived. It a reporting by an independent international journalist telling that the ethnic Amhara militias and government forces massacre Tigrayans with machete. @Boud: you are a human-being, who can open and see this only 2 minutes video, don't you think it supports my claim that mainly ethnic Amhara militias are responsible for the massacres in Mai-Kadra and other places in Tigray?

11 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/14/fleeing-war-ethiopians-recount-horror-of-tigray-violence

This says In Sudan’s Gadarif state, Gidey Asafa said the fighting had forced her and her family to flee Mai Kadra with nothing but the clothes on their backs. “We saw people being slaughtered. There was blood all over. We fled because we didn’t want to die,” she told Al Jazeera. “Some women lost their husbands. We came with nothing but our lives. These clothes were given to me by the people here.”... Niqisti, 42, said her brother was shot dead by government-allied militiamen in front of their home in Humera, in Tigray state, and her small restaurant was looted. It was not possible to verify her account. “They bombed with artillery, and the air force raided,” said Asmara Tefsay, a 31-year old mother. “Then we saw the soldiers approaching and I fled with my two children, my mother and my father.” The refugees quoted by news agencies appeared traumatised by the sheer intensity of the bombardments they say were carried out by the Ethiopian army. Many told stories of artillery attacks and shooting in the streets, with fighting spilling over into neighbouring Amhara state. “I saw women giving birth on the road, but then continuing to walk because they feared the Ethiopian soldiers would kill them,” said Roni Gezergil, a female engineer aged 25. By the way, Gidey Asafa is a typical Tigrayan name. And in the video on the same article it says “The government wants to get rid of Tigrayan people, so we fled. People have been slaughtered with knives, pregnant woman has had their bellies open, the government is bombing civilians and killing us all.”

12 This reference I didn’t even list before:- https://www.africanews.com/2020/11/25/amnesty-international-releases-findings-on-mai-kadra-massacre/

This says A different story of the massacre can be found a short distance to the west, in the mushrooming refugee camps across the border in Sudan. "Ethiopian soldiers and Amhara militiamen entered the town and fired into the air and at residents," Marsem Gadi, a 29-year-old farmer who fled with thousands of other Tigrayans to the Um Raquba refugee camp, told AFP. "We ran out of town to find safety. I saw men in civilian clothes attacking villagers with knives and axes," he said. "Corpses were lying in the streets." When Marsem made it home later his house had been looted and his wife and three-year-old son were gone. "I don't know if they're still alive," he said. After that, he fled to Sudan. Other refugees shared similar tales of attacks by pro-government forces, not TPLF. Elifa Sagadi said she too ran for the safety of nearby fields when the gunfire started. "On the road I saw at least 40 bodies. Some had bullets in their heads, others had been stabbed," she said of her return. "When I went home, my house was on fire and my husband and two sons had disappeared." At one part this article says the Amnesty International representative (researcher) sent to Mai-kadra was Fisseha Tekle. Perhaps we should create a Wikipedia page for him, to give the readers a complete picture, as he may have personal bias (due to his Amhara ethnicity). Even though not said in this article, the Amnesty International representative that was sent to Mai-kadra is an Amhara ethnic himself. Furthermore, the preliminary investigation and report only includes interview with the people that where in Mai-Kandra when it was under the Fano & the Amhara paramilitary's control (or with the people who fled to Amhara region), so they are most likely all Amhara. But most of the real victims (the Tigrayans) appear to be dead or have fled to Sudan from the Amhara paramilitary, from the federal army and from the Amhara Fano militias. Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

There is no point repeating a vague general claim about anti-TPLF bias that you cannot support from the sources. This is an article mainly about the Mai Kadra massacre, not about the killings during the Tigray conflict in other locations (even though are some sections about other similar events). You listed 11 references, of which only 1 was easily verifiable to give a weak extra support for the claim that "the army" was responsible for the massacre. (And no, I am not going to do your work for you in innovating by discovering how to archive videos and audio files.)

This article is already NPOV-ed. If you read the talk page properly, you'll see that some editors wished to remove all reports claiming Amharan responsibility for the massacre in Mai Kadra. This article already has the two versions of the story clearly indicated. You cannot expect this article to blame the ENDF and Amharan militias for the Mai Kadra massacre in ways that are not supported by the sources.

When I asked for quotes, I did not mean that you should bombard this page with a huge amount of quotes that are unrelated to the point you wish to make. Reports that are not about events in Mai Kadra are irrelevant to the main body of this article. One good quote that is logically coherent in terms of supporting a claim based on the source would have been enough. Boud (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Wolkait - elementary English logic

I reverted the reverted the edit related to Wolkait. We go by the sources. This is what the EHRC reports says in relation to Welkait/Wolkait: Wolkait is the local name for people of Amhara descent who were born or have long resided in Wolkait Woreda. ... People of non-Tigrayan ethnic origin, and especially of Amhara and Wolkait origin ... ... to differentiate people of non-Tigray origin from the rest and raided all the houses/huts, stretching from the neighbourhood known as "Genb Sefer" up to the area called Wolkait Bole (Kebele 1 Ketena 1) which is largely resided by ethnic Amharas. They detained up to 60 people they profiled as Amhara and Wolkait ...

So EHRC clearly see "Welkait" or "Wolkait" as a "non-Tigrayan" ethnic group. That's what we have in the source. That's what we use. Boud (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

The correct, elementary English logic

@Boud: Ethiopia has around 80 ethnic groups (these ethnic groups are recognized by the Ethiopia constitution), and non of them is Welkait (Wolkait). Welkait is a district name. Now the Ethiopian government is calling a group of people (or subgroup) Welkait for its political strategy of annexing west Tigray (Welkait land) to Amhara region (which was the main reason behind its war on Tigray, I can bring references for this). But there is no such ethnic group (or group of people) called Welkait before. The historical and (until the war) inhabitants of Welkait are over 90 % Tigrayan ethnic (as you can see on the Wikipedia page of Welkait population census).

@Boud:, Let me ask you a question:- If one black African women (decedent of black African immigrants for example), was born in America and lived there for her whole life, do you call her race white? Or do you call her race America? NO, you don't. As simple as that. You call here African race American citizen (a.k.a African-American). Or you call here black-American also. But you don't say her race is American (there is no such race called America, it is a citizenship, and a country's name). Her race is still black (African), even if she lived in America her whole life.

Elementary English logic:- then how come you (or EHRC) call this peoples' ethnicity Welkait (after a district name). They don't speak a different language, or are different ethnic group. The Ethiopian constitution recognizes around 80 ethnic groups (which all have their own distinct native language). EHRC making up an ethnic group for land annexation (political game), so to serve the hidden agenda of Ethiopian government’s war and its Mai Kadra massacre, is sad. It is very sad that the Ethiopian government is massacring Ethiopians (both Amhara & Tigrayans) to serve its hidden agenda of Amhara imperialism and land annexation. It is only fooling itself, as the bible says “For there is nothing hidden which will not be revealed, nor has anything been kept secret but that it should come to light”.Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 10:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nonetheless, you can still put it as Welkait ethnic group, for the result of the "EHRC report".

However, the Amnesty International report did NOT say Welkait ethnic group. Amnesty said Amhara before, now it says both Amhara & Tigrayans (according the AP article). Therefore, you should say either only Amhara, (or Amhara & Tigrayans). However you can NOT says Amhara & Welkait in the Amnesty International preliminary report result, since it does not say so. Let us please not copy the Ethiopian government's EHRC propaganda into Amnesty International's report result, and make up an ethnic group (or subgroup) not said in the Amnesty International report. Even if the EHRC report says Welkait (group of people or ethnic group), the EHRC can not automatically make up an ethnic group (or subgroup), for all. I wrote this as bold since it is my main point, for how the page should be corrected. Sorry, if you don't like me wring in bold sometimes, but it is mostly to make my main point on how to move forward. Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 04:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

We seem to be getting towards consensus on the idea of how to use sources very specifically and avoid WP:SYNTH.

For the purposes of this talk page (not the article), the relevant definitions of "ethnic group" (or "race") in this context depend on how the direct and indirect perpetrators (those who did the killing or ordered or allowed the killing to take place) thought. Sooner or later (unfortunately, probably later rather than sooner), there will very likely be war crimes trials in relation to the current Tigray conflict. The Ethiopian constitutional definition of ethnic groups will very likely be mentioned, but witness statements such as "he said to kill those people because they are X-ian" or "I gave that order to kill the X-ians who were in location Y" or "My superior told me that the X-ians in location Y had to be killed because of [stereotype Z or rumour W]" will probably count more than consitutional definitions of X-ian. There are many pdfs of the International Criminal Court (ICC) cases linked from the ICC page for anyone interested. (Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer.) Boud (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Would it be correct to say that the people in question are a bilingual group that know both languages so well they are in the middle, and may want more self determination than the TPLF wanted to give them? In saner times there could be a plebiscite to see what region most of them wanted to be included in or how autonomous they wanted to be. KZebegna (talk) 17:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

@Boud: I understand your point of view, and I can relate to it (a Nobel laureate vs a some party called TPLF, who do you trust??). But that is exactly why these massacres are happening; some people think they will be trusted over others no matter what massacres & war crimes they pre-master-plan commit. God willing, I hope there will an independent international trail so that the real perpetrators can be exposed (they are now running the Ethiopian government). Here is another news article from yesterday related to this page, from Vice :-

13 https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjpzqw/hes-planning-to-exterminate-us-all-ethiopians-speak-of-ethnic-massacres

This says “First, I want to save my life. Food and clothes come later,” he said from the truck bed. Kahsay fled from his native Ethiopia, without notice and in the middle of his usual work day, leaving behind all of his belongings and any knowledge about his loved ones. He is part of the first wave of Ethiopian arrivals in Sudan, refugees fleeing war in the country’s northern Tigray region. He was working as a day labourer on a farm near the city of Mai Kadra when Ethiopian government-aligned ethnic militias known as Fano, from the neighbouring region of Amhara, descended. “Fano from the Amhara region came, then took us all out from our homes. We saw our neighbours killed and slaughtered, in the same way as you cut wood, with an axe and knife,” Kahsay told VICE World News. As chaos tore through the city, Kahsay said Ethiopian federal forces stood by as Fano fighters went door to door, demanding to see IDs in order to identify ethnic Tigrayans. “We managed to escape and hide in a field for four days. On the fifth day, we made our way to the Sudanese border,” he explained, adding that Fano militants continued to terrorise civilians attempting to flee to Sudan. On the way, he said, “youths were sent to kill us. [A group of] more than 70 were trying to kill us. We hid ourselves in the fields. They hunted us. On the way many were killed. We passed many dead bodies.” In his own group of eight, only six of them made it to the border. “They checked the IDs of people...if they find someone with Tigrayan origin…[they] slaughter with a knife.” As Kahsay spoke of his journey from the relative safety of the camp in eastern Sudan, women and men sitting nearby wept quietly, reliving their own recent horrors as he spoke. The violence he described was echoed by many firsthand accounts told to VICE World News at border crossings and at two new refugee camps that aid agencies are hurriedly setting up to accommodate the crush of over 50,000 new arrivals in under two months.

They are NOT "in the middle" as User:KZebegna says, (that is even an insult), they are Tigrayans. Read the articles above about interviews with the people of west Tigray, they say they are Tigrayans. They don't call themselves Welkait or something in the middle. Welkait (west Tigray) is there ancestral district & home, their native language and ethnicity is Tigrigna and Tigrayans respectively. One of the witness even said that he tricked the Fano militias to let him pass by speaking his second language Amharic fluently, but he doesn't identify himself as anything else but Tigrayan. His exact words were, he "tricked" them. Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 08:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Boud: FYI, if you don't know, west Tigray and and Metekel Zone (of Benishangul-Gumuz Region) are the two main lands Amhara imperialists are working to annex into the Amhara region; but which they couldn't find legitimate reason to do so. The Amhara imperialists (who are currently dominating in the Ethiopian federal government) have been searching so hard for around two years now, to find and excuse to fulfill their land annexation plan. And guess what? These two areas are where massacres are happening, out of the views of cameras. THINK. For example, there was a massacres of around 100 people yesterday. Guess what the master-planner who wants to be the last person to be suspected does just before the massacre? ( https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/23/at-least-102-killed-in-massacre-in-western-ethiopia-after-abiy-visit ) To find the answers, think like the police; who is going to profit from these massacres? It is clear that these massacres going to be used as a pretext to annex west Tigray and Metekel Zone into Amhara region. See the full wider picture to identity the real perpetrators, is just what I am saying. Think again what you will do, if you master-plan a massacre for around two years, and want to blame your enemy for it and use it for your land annexation plan:- you let a selected Amnesty International investigator to briefly enter to support your claim (without seeing the full picture), then you deny any international investigators in again:-

• https://addisfortune.news/news-alert/ethiopian-authorities-reject-outside-independent-investigation-on-massacres/
• https://todaynewsafrica.com/u-s-calls-for-independent-probe-into-massacres-in-tigray-region-in-ethiopia/

Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

• Please go by the sources. Please keep in mind that although a little discussion of context is acceptable on the article talk pages, the talk page is for building an encyclopedia. It is not a WP:FORUM. Personally, I find your Manichaean hypothesis of explaining the Mai Kadra massacre unrealistic. My hypothesis is not Manichaean: Aung San Suu Kyi is an excellent example of a Nobel Peace Prize winner who played a major role in the promotion of democracy but then as a national leader failed to act against a genocide in her country (this doesn't mean that Abiy is a close analogy; it only means that Abiy's Nobel Peace Prize is only one clue to sociological understanding, among other clues). It is also well-known that the TPLF is not just "some party". In any case, this article is not the place to search for references or discuss editing of Abiy Ahmed or Tigray People's Liberation Front. So, back to the actual work for this article:

The Taipei Times version of the AFP article is better than the money.yahoo.com one, because Taipei Times overtly states that it uses material from AFP.

The Vice source that you added clarifies the point about "the army": The TPLF constitutes both the political party that runs the regional government there and the regional army which dwarfs the manpower of the federal army in the region. So we have "the regional army" and "the federal army". We cannot do original research by interpreting "the army" to mean "the federal army". Boud (talk) 20:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Boud: My point when said "some party called TPLF" was not how you took it. TPLF have an over 45 years of admirable, heroic world class history, as the world knows. TPLF is not even being directly accused for the massacre by its enemies; they are instead accusing TPLF of aiding a group we never heard of before (called Samri). I suggest actually the creation of a Wikipedia page for Samri, for the readers to fully understand the true masterminds of these massacres.

I think the Yahoo version is better since it has the original news from Agence France-Presse (AFP), so I'm adding it back. I was the first person to bring this article, so if a mirror page occur (and/or a WP:OVERCITE), then it is from you, not from me. You can add the Taipei Times version if you think it has significant difference, but the original AFP news from Yahoo should stay regardless. Furthermore, please do not remove AFP in the text as one of the news agenesis reporting the testimonies of the refugees in Sudan.

Watch out not to do WP:SYNTH by implying the "the army" means Tigray's paramilitary-police (& militias that support TPLF). Synthesizing different articles in different context and concluding that the Tigrayan refugees mean Tigray's paramilitary-police (& militias that support TPLF), when they accuse "the army" of massacre war crimes on them, could be a WP:SYNTH. Loves Woolf1882 (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

There is TPLF's opinion of themselves, which seems to be pretty high and proud of themselves for whatever. And then there is everyone else's opinions of TPLF, which you claim is also exceedingly high, when you say "as the world knows", claiming yourself to speak on behalf of "the world" opinion, in other words claiming to speak for everyone else's opinion, which you say is pretty similar to TPLF opinion. If you cannot really tell the difference, I do not think you know how to keep wikipedia with even a neutral appearance, it's like you want wikipedia to be openly a team player with TPLF, not to mention "right great wrongs" done to the TPLF... Or am I misreading this? KZebegna (talk) 10:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

@Loves Woolf1882: You could make these discussions a lot simpler by dropping all the original research, considering the possibility that editors making good faith edits can make errors, and presenting your argument in a brief, clear way. The two things that I missed earlier, and that you could have said, are:

• The money.yahoo mirror of the AFP article has an AFP icon. There is no text crediting the AFP, which is why I missed it. So you have no evidence supporting your claim that this is the "original AFP news"; instead, you have a credible claim to say that AFP is given credit by an icon (a small file containing an image).
• Immediately before the Geidi sentence about "the army", there is a sentence But several refugees at the Sudanese camp said federal troops had committed atrocities. It is clear that this sentence is an introduction to the following sentence; so the intended meaning of the following sentence is that "the army" is the ENDF.

So you happen to have been right. But you didn't show that you're right. I've done the work to show that you're right (on this particular point).

Regarding admirable, heroic world class history, as the world knows, I fully agree with KZebegna that you need to separate your own opinions (which you're welcome to briefly mention, at least on your user page) from sourced opinions that are usable on en.Wikipedia. And you have to do your best in trying to edit in a way that is not biased in favour of your own opinions. Boud (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)