Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayahan'ın En İyileri No.1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy to User:Coderenius/Draft:Kayahan'ın En İyileri No.1. Bgwhite deleted what became the mainspace redirect under CSD criterion R2.(non-admin closure) Altamel (talk) 05:23, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kayahan'ın En İyileri No.1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not qualify under WP:NALBUM. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: This article is notable enough, it is merely not finished yet. Please give me time to improve the article instead of deleting it on the spot. Eventually, it will qualify for WP:NALBUM. Be patient :) Thanks, Coderenius (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: There we go, now a source is added to the article, please be patient. It seems as though you're thristy to delete this article, since you found it and pounced on it. I don't mean to cause any kind of disruption, trust me. Just give me some time, and some WP:TEA perhaps? Thank you very much, Coderenius (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: Actually, I have take a few things into account and now I do realize that it's probably best that I just move the article into my user subdirectory as a draft. Sorry for the earlier haste, I had no intention of coming off as rude. I was simply a bit alarmed by how quickly it happened :) No worries, and the best, Coderenius (talk) 22:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: It is done and the article is now moved out of the article namespace. When it is improved upon enough, it will be moved back, or requested to be done so. :) Greetings to you from the states, Coderenius (talk) 22:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy, as this is the author's wish and it's possible this will eventually be notable. It's fairly clear this should have been a userspace draft. The article has already been moved by Coderenius to his userspace at User:Coderenius/Draft:Kayahan'ın En İyileri No.1. In the future, Coderenius, please do not move an article with an active AfD discussion. Write in the AfD discussion what you'd like to happen to the article and a rationale for it. Moving the article and removing AfD tags makes it harder to have a full discussion. ~ Rob^Talk 22:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rob, I will do so in the future. I am new to AfD, so I'll make sure to follow these steps and take your, Samwalton9, and CeeGee's advice in the future. The best, Coderenius (talk) 22:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.