Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progeny
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted (in effect) by reversion to the original disambiguation page. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completely nonnotable band, having an album "slated for release" and a tour not confirmed yet isn't good enough. Bordering on speedy. GrahameS 06:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating article on their bass player.
- Speedy Delete Both Progeny as " an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)" and Keven Hammonds-McArthur as "an article about a person that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)". It's also crystal balling (their first album is yet to be released), a vanity page and they fail WP:BAND. Also Delete Progeny Discography, which seems to be something of a contradiction in terms and invites readers to visit their myspace "to listen to some of the tracks". Wikipedia is not a web host. --IslaySolomon 06:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete the bass player. I just reverted progeny to its previous state as a disambig page. Opabinia regalis 06:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete the bass player. Speedy close as to Progeny because the nomination is moot. Tagged as such. MER-C 07:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.