Celina Moon took the Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) certification course provided by CCRPS, with a focus on ICH GCP to support her career transition into clinical research.
In preparation for further accreditation for CCRPS, we are conducting case studies with graduates to discuss their experience in our course in 15-30 minute interviews with our clinical research educator, Courtney. We invited students to share their feedback asking extensive questions on why they chose the course, what they felt while taking the course, and how the course has helped them after completion. Today, we share Celina Moon's feedback provides valuable insights into the strengths and areas for improvement within the ICH GCP course. Her suggestions for more interactive and engaging content delivery, along with the inclusion of practical examples, could enhance the learning experience for future participants, especially those new to the field. Her positive assessment and the constructive criticism will be instrumental in refining the course to better meet learner needs and expectations.A graduate case study interview from Celina, a recent graduate of our ICH GCP course program.
Key Takeaways
● Celina found visual aids such as graphs, tables, and bullet points extremely helpful for her learning style, emphasizing the importance of visual elements in grasping complex information.
● She appreciated the ability to download course materials for future reference, suggesting it added significant value to her learning experience. However, she recommended including real-world documents like informed consent forms to better anchor the theoretical knowledge within practical contexts.
● Celina noted that the initial course delivery was too rapid and monotone, which made it challenging for newcomers to absorb the information effectively. She suggested a slower and more engaging presentation style to improve comprehension.
● The course notably boosted Celina’s confidence, reaffirming her decision to transition into clinical research. She found the adverse event/safety reporting section particularly valuable, highlighting the ethical treatment of human subjects, which resonated with her professional values and goals.
Visual Learning Tools:
● Celina highlighted the effectiveness of visual aids like graphs, tables, and bullet points, which helped her understand complex information more easily.
Interactive Features:
● The right-hand community feedback section was particularly useful, providing a platform for previewing key points and reinforcing learning, which Celina found beneficial for understanding and organizing the course material in her mind.
Content Depth and Relevance:
● Celina sought a comprehensive ICH GCP course to aid her career transition and found the course to be detailed and informative, adequately covering the necessary aspects of clinical research.
Enrollment Motivation:
● The platform was easy to navigate, though initially, Celina missed the downloadable materials, suggesting these could be made more prominent.
Favorite Moments:
● Celina appreciated the course's use of visual aids and the right-hand community feedback section, which helped preview and reinforce key points, aiding in her understanding and retention of course material.
Course Content:
● She was looking for an ICH GCP course to support her career change and found the course's depth and detail both adequate and informative.
Experience with Learning Platform:
● The platform was easy to navigate, though initially, Celina missed the downloadable materials, suggesting these could be made more prominent.
Impact on Professional Confidence:
● Completing the course significantly boosted Celina's confidence in her ability to transition into and succeed in the field of clinical research. The course reassured her about her career change and enhanced her understanding of the ethical treatment of human subjects, which was crucial for her professional identity and values. …...more
...more
Show less
