Asian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,524,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $83,937, a difference of 41.1%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $72,402, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $82,166, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $49,997, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $34,960, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 68.6%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 62.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.49, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.71%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.4%), bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.4%).