Hungarian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hungarians

Cherokee

Good
Fair
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Hungarian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,711,438 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Cherokee.
Hungarian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Hungarian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $37,203, a difference of 22.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $80,843, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $86,125, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $34,742, a difference of 13.7%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricHungarianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,426
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,609
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Good
$86,920
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,795
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,309
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,510
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,247
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,544
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,913
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,673
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.9%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricHungarianCherokee
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Good
13.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.2%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHungarianCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHungarianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.22%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHungarianCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHungarianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.8%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricHungarianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Hungarian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Hungarian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricHungarianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%