Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Portugal
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Portugal
Cherokee
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,164,534 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $80,843, a difference of 18.1%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $72,682, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $86,125, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $54,133, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,412 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,984 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,740 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,304 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,182 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,788 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,105 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,512 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,203 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,924 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 37.0%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Fair 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Average 13.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.2% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.4%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.3% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.3% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.9% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.1% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Cherokee |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |