Danish vs German Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
German
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Danes
Germans
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs German Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,459,007 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,937,968 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 9.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | German |
Minimum | 0.79% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.2% | 95.8% |
Mean | 23.1% | 18.0% |
Median | 14.1% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 15.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Germans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Switzerland (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (14.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Basque (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |