Immigrants from Guatemala vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Nonimmigrants
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Nonimmigrants
24.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,364,568 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 24.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Nonimmigrants |
Minimum | 3.0% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 90.5% | 47.5% |
Range | 87.4% | 36.9% |
Mean | 32.5% | 21.2% |
Median | 27.7% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.1% | 22.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Nonimmigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.21%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |