Nepalese vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Nepalese
Alsatian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Nepalese
Alsatians
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,511,115 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,194,745 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 0.010%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Alsatian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 64.2% | 48.4% |
Range | 61.7% | 46.3% |
Mean | 20.5% | 21.1% |
Median | 19.5% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 25.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Alsatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |