Commons:Кандидате пентру имаджини ексчеленте
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Дакэ консидери кэ ексистэ о фотографйе пе Коммонс суфичиент де атрактивэ ка сэ се афле пе паджина Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте, атунчи те ругэм инклуде-о ын листа де кандидате едитынд ачеастэ паджинэ. Дакэ ексистэ ун консенс дженерал дупэ 15 зиле, имаджинеа ва фи трансфератэ ла Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте.
Пропунери
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 22:08:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Saharna Monastery, Saharna, Moldova. It's considered one of the biggest centres for religious pilgrimages in Moldova. The legend says that a monk from the monastery once saw the shining figure of Saint Maria on the top of a rock. When reaching that spot the monk saw a mark of a footstep on the ground. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This was on my list to nominate Cmao20 (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 22:03:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info RetroChoir of the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. The temple was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the ray of sunlight Cmao20 (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 21:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
- Info Albert Edelfelt: The Luxembourg Gardens, Paris (1887) - uploaded by Susannaanas - nominated by --Thi (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Schlosskirche
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 20:46:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Looking east towards the altar
-
Looking west towards the organ
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info A long time ago (some years now) I left DXR a note on his talk page pointing out a stitching error in the first of these two pictures, and he kindly corrected it for me. Looking at the picture again now, I think it is interesting enough to be worthy of FP, together with its companion piece, the view of this church's nave in the opposite direction. The Schlosskirche, or literally castle church, is a German baroque building constructed in the mid eighteenth century and adjoining the castle/palace of the town of Bad Mergentheim, where the Teutonic Knights once had their base. It is a notable landmark and I think these pictures give a good impression of the interior, including the beautiful ceiling frescoes (which you can see even more clearly in this picture which is IMO FP in its own right but may not fit into the scope of this set). created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 19:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info All by Kritzolina. Wikimania 2024 made it possible for me to visit the KZs in Auschwitz for the first time. I did not plan to take pictures, but some happened. This one feels like it could work to show some of my feelings there. I am not sure about the gallery for this image. Please feel free to change the gallery to a more fitting one, if you have a clear idea of wher to put it. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Effective composition that highlights the horrible nature of this place Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't work for me. Does not stand out from ordinary images.--Thi (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing position of Amathuxidia amythaon (Doubleday, 1847) - Koh-i-Noor puddling on rotten fruit WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 17:51:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava RoyAnitava Roy|]] -- Anitava Roy (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment a strange green noise under the mouth --Wilfredor (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very good picture, nice and sharp, but I agree with Wilfredor, that speckled pattern in the background under the mouth could do with some work. Also I had to fix the gallery again. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Heilbronn - Böckingen - Ziegeleipark - Ziegeleisee - Ansicht von Osten im Frühling (2.2, mit Schwan).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 14:13:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The Ziegeleisee in the Ziegeleipark in Böckingen, Heilbronn, Germany, view from east in spring. Created on the site of a former brickyard, this pond has become home to so many plant and animal species that it has been declared a protected biotope. While I took some photos, a mute swan swept over the water and added a nice extra to the picture ;–). All by – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per comments on my talk page, superb composition and light, and I love the swan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The beauty lies in the detail of the landing (or taking off) swan. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 P
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Salzburg seen from Kapuzinerberg at golden hour
-
Salzburg seen from Kapuzinerberg at blue hour
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Austria
- Info Two identicals views at golden hour and blue hour from Kapuzinerberg to Hohensalzburg Fortress and the historic center of Salzburg, federal state of Salzburg, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Two excellent captures of one of the most famous views of that famous old town. I am not 100% sure whether the set rules apply here or not; but I support either of the two images, whether together or each on its own. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Stunning work, and thank you for spending time doing all the annotations to show us what we're looking at. Cmao20 (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Supportǃǃ Two perfect panos, I'm astonished... – Terragio67 (talk) 12:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile#Antofagasta Region
- Info created by Silvio Rossi, uploaded by Tuvalkin, nominated by Yann
- Info The Lascar (left) and the Aguas Calientes (right) volcanoes, located in the Central Volcanic Zone of the Andes Mountains in Chile.
- Support I like the pastel colors, and the composition. Only one FP of nature of Chile. -- Yann (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hem, luckily, about 30 FPs of nature in Chile (the link was broken). – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the composition a lot but I'm not sure about the image quality. There is not a lot of detail at full size - perhaps due to heat haze of some sort? I'm not quite convinced it's one of our best when we have Chilean landscapes like this but appreciate it's a slightly harsh vote Cmao20 (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 09:26:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 10:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 08:48:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by unknown photographer, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
- Info Three Nobel Prize laureates in physics photographed in 1931. In front row from left to right: Albert A. Michelson (1907 laureate), Albert Einstein (1921 laureate), Robert A. Millikan (1923 laureate). In back row from left to right: astronomer Walter Sydney Adams, mathematician Walther Mayer, historian Max Farrand.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 08:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good group photo, nice with the signatures, solid reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great historical value and well restored Cmao20 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per my support on the English WP FPC page. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2024 at 07:54:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
- Info St. Mark's Church, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot, drone. -- Mile (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely church, nice composition and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 21:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
- Info created and uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 21:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Algeria
- InfoDecoration of the upper facade of the minaret of the Mosque of Mansourah in Tlemcen, built during the siege of the city in 1303 by the Marinid dynasty. The minaret was one of the three tallest in the world at the time, standing at 45 meters, alongside the Giralda in Spain and the Koutoubia Mosque in Morocco, all inspired by the architecture of the minaret of Qal'at Bani Hammad. .Created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support But the Qutb Minar is older and higher. ;o) Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Minarets in the Maghreb (North Africa + Al Andalusia) are unique in the world, all in rectangular form and all inspired by the first mosque in the region, the Great Mosque of Kairouan. Riad Salih (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might benefit from slight perspective correction to try to get all the verticals straight, however, this is a really cool motif and a great picture. Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The minaret isn't perfectly symmetric due to the many restorations. Riad Salih (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful -- Inu06 (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Its leaning to left. Rotation nedeed, but i would not go distiortion correction or skewing, then upper part will be much wider than bottom and horizontal lines are sugesting to rotate - just rotation. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just want to second Mile’s hint. Is that minaret leaning in reality? If not, the photo would benefit from a small clockwise rotation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 20:59:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Evening view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c|u|n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality and a sensitive, subtle mood but I'm not sure I find this one extraordinary enough for FP. I'll live with it for a while. Cmao20 (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not as eye-catching as some other photos from the wonderful Japanese parks and gardens, but I love the serene mood and subtle beauty. Thanks to the perspective even the electricity pylon with its wires fits well into the composition, that’s quite an achievement. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Papilio polytes (Linnaeus, 1758)- Common Mormon (Male) (2) WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 16:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure about this one. Pretty butterfly, great composition and bokeh. Also huge resolution (104 megapixels) but perhaps too huge. The detail at full size isn't there and it makes me wonder if upscaling has taken place because the edges of the butterfly appear pixellated and the camera's native resolution is only 32.5 megapixels anyway (see EXIF data) so it seems like something's not right. Cmao20 (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also I fixed the gallery + nominator but it'd be nice if you could fill that in yourself in future. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- thanks Anitava Roy (talk) 17:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also I fixed the gallery + nominator but it'd be nice if you could fill that in yourself in future. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 14:55:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamuses)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would be better still if he was facing towards rather than away from the camera, but regardless, excellent capture Cmao20 (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 14:37:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by James Montgomery Flagg, uploaded by Wcamp9, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic poster, very high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 14:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This smaller file is already featured. --Thi (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah thanks. So it should be a delist and replace. This one is not only bigger, but of better quality. Yann (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I will nominate again as delist and replace, and it actually requires a cleaning first. Yann (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Eurema brigitta (Stoll, 1780) - Small Grass Yellow (3) WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 13:39:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Small overexposed area between body and wing and some colour fringing at the legs, but overall beautiful and very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:51:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Here we have always an image of the town hall of Mont-de-Marsan as FP:
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful architectural photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Conditional s, but you must clean those "CA lines on border", anoted. --Mile (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and lighting (here modern, less yellowish floodlights are used). Agree that a careful check for CAs etc. would be welcome – e.g. at the left edge of the building and roof. – Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe a bit of a crop on the right would improve. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1st WB is off, i would put yellow down, or try whole temp to put down. Then garbage bin in front and 2 light bean disturb. Quality is good. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The yellow appearance of the façade is probably due to the floodlights used for the lighting (older floodlights often create a very warm tint); a comparison with the foreground and the sky shows that the white balance is not really off. So either we keep the whole appearance, saying that the lighting makes the façade that yellow, period (actually yellowish façades are common in blue hour shots); or only the yellow of the façade should be reduced, not the global temperature (the latter would make sky and foreground totally unrealistic). – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Aristeas i tried here, global temp wont work, but problem is i dont know original color. Temp of lights really made worst. But i see down is OK temp and sky somehow. --Mile (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Mile Wow, thank you very much, that’s a great attempt. Yes, the original colour is the question. But when comparing other photos in the category, I would say that your version seems very likely – when the Basilica looks more or less like this in daylight and like that at sunset, it should look more or less like in your version with enlightment at blue hour. – @Tournasol7: Would you like to upload Mile’s version (or something similar, if you prefer to do these edits yourself) under a new filename (because it’s clearly an edited version) and to offer it as an alternative version in this nomination? It would be interesting to see which version voters prefer. Of course it’s your photo and naturally it’s up to you how you want to proceed! – Aristeas (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 10:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
- Info Square image with fractal elements full of circle shapes created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting pattern, but I find the colors unpleasant. It seems there is color noise. Yann (talk) 10:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Ah yes, it turns to purple colors on pixel level. This is because the color comes from a color gradient, that cycles with every iteration (deeper into the fractal) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 04:41:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 04:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like the concept but the brush/masking marks on the right-hand side are very visible currently. I also find the metal object at the very bottom right a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 06:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have changed things. The background has improved in my opinion, even though I didn't find it annoying before. I also removed the visible part of the front headlight from the picture, but I didn't find this disturbing either. --XRay 💬 08:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for that. The headlight at bottom right was merely personal taste; I would not oppose if you as the photographer prefer to keep it. The brush marks on the other hand were IMO a major issue and the photograph looks much improved in the latest version. Very happy to support now. BigDom (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pars pro toto for the whole luxury car, espec. with the pretty reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 04:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 04:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2024 at 01:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and cool to get a photo with people praying. Cmao20 (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 04:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support very interesting shot -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support woah, that's a pretty amazing capture of people praying. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The monk in the middle looks like he has a loud noise in his back and neck, do you think you can improve this? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is a 1.3 s shot taken with a tripod, so possibly the people slightly moved during this relatively long time lapse. In my opinion it is still decent noise level, unless you pixel peep -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and very educative. Basile, there is a small, but rough transition between smooth and noisy at the mat (?) – see image note. I do not mind the noise (it’s just natural in this dark place), but the fast transition bothers me a bit. Could you take a look and apply a little bit of local noise reduction there (and maybe at some similar small spots)? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you! Now it looks consistent. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 21:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Marukha River valley, Arkhyz, Russiа
- Info created by Deodat Gautier - uploaded by Deodat Gautier - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be a bit sharper but I like it. Cmao20 (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mesmerizing -- Inu06 (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add EXIF data? Or at least some information (date, time, location, camera settings, etc.). --Yann (talk) 08:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Date: 03.05.2021
- Time: 01:10
- Location: Arkhyz, 43.622340, 41.444195
- Camera: Canon R6
- Lens: Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4
- Exposure: 19х16s (wo filter) + 19x16s (diffusion filter)
- ISO: 3200
- Dark, flat corrections.
- Software: Sequator 1.6.1, Adobe Photoshop Deodat Gautier (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, thanks! Yann (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The image makes me miss the times I've gazed upon the milky way camping in the Himalayas. Soon again, hopefully. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic to imagine we would see this if we had better eyes -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – I have taken the liberty to rename the file (and to update this nomination subpage) because the old name “Milky Way.jpg” was a bit too general to be useful. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 21:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals / Sea lion. JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info created by Елена Верещака - uploaded by Елена Верещака - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A striking sight, but very noisy. I like it a lot but I'm no longer convinced it is amongst our best with the high standard of underwater photography we have seen from users such as Poco a poco recently. I'm also not sure whether it's a proper underwater photo or just an aquarium photo. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like an underwater shot, the head of the sea lion is above the water. An interesting view but the quality is pretty low. And yes, there is lack of information, there isn't even a single category Poco a poco (talk) 15:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Agree with Cmao20. Taken from above, not under water, but we need more information. We should be able to get the species -- there are only six of them, after all. There is one species in Russia -- Steller -- but I don't know how to tell the difference between it and e.g. California from this photo. The color/clarity of the water make me think it's an aquarium shot, but that could just be my ignorance. Regardless, it could use some denoising (though at 12,800 ISO, a lot of detail may be lost). Happy to support if these issues are fixed. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 17:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
- Info In 1691, Count Michelangelo Maffei, who had already had the salt warehouse built, had this powerful building built as a defense against pirate attacks. The main function of the Tower was that of defence, to signal attacks by bandits and raiders and to defend the precious resource of salt, kept in the adjacent warehouse. The Tower could also accommodate the guards who lived in it and made it an independent building, equipped with fireplaces, external water collectors, showers, drainage systems and other utilities. It is inspired by an ancient drawing by Michelangelo Buonarroti, created to defend the coastal areas of the Papal State and preserved in the archive of the Reverend Camera Apostolica. With a square plan with a side of 13 and a height of 23 metres, with walls 3 meters thick, the Tower was a real fort, with numerous openings, windows and loopholes equipped with short and long range armaments. Today it is owned by the municipality of Cervia and is home to the tourist office. Created - uploaded - nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. I'd appreciate it if you copied this cool info to the image description. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your remark and support. Terragio67 (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great detail as usual but the subject itself doesn't look extraordinary to me. It looks in fact almost so strongly renovated that it looks modern. Poco a poco (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2024 at 14:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- InfoThe Resurrection Monastery (Voskresensky Monastery) or New Jerusalem Monastery (Novoiyerusalimsky Monastery). Istra all by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality, colours and composition, and I love the balloon. Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Delicate colors and contrast in a well-balanced composition. Terragio67 (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Architecture, light and the colorful balloon adding poetry to the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the way the balloon echoes/inverts the cupolas. BigDom (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question The globe appears to be sharper than the trees that are closer, and there is also a distinct white border on the globe. Could you explain this? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Fortunately, I always keep the RAW files. I took many shots since there were people walking around. I've now uploaded a few of them to cloud storage so you can see that the hot air balloon wasn't added in Photoshop. https://disk.yandex.ru/d/250pA7j438AZuQ Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Baloon added some more vibrance. --Mile (talk) 08:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support word for word per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 23:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
- Info created by Savile Lumley - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous poster. FP for sure. Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It even has its own article. Yann (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support What year is this? Wolverine XI 21:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: March 1915 publication, a bit earlier for design. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 16:25:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info View of the town of Werfen, Austria, taken from Hohenwerfen Castle which overlooks the town. I like the light, and how the river acts like a gentle leading line. Poco has a couple of FPs of the castle but there are none of the town. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nom! :) Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic panorama, viewpoint and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 10:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile --Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Lovely view and nice light but the cut-off athletics track at the bottom is a bit distracting. BigDom (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid view, great sky. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 15:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info Dar El-Beida, Fez, Marocco (الدار البيضاء, فاس). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Dar El-Beida = White House, and that is same name for Casablanca in Arabic.
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really like this. Great image quality, well framed, beautiful place and eye-catching walkers to add counterpoint. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- good depiction of architectural designs Inu06 (talk) 3:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 05:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really good compostion, the photographer really had a focus on how the composition should look like. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 12:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A good shot of a nice temple, but the lack of symmetry (path vs first temple and first temple vs second temple) is a minus that is not compensated with extraordinary detail or light. Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Architects chose an asymmetrical architecture a few centuries ago, and I find the tree adapts nicely to its atypical environment in 2024 :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wonder if I'd prefer a shot taken a few paces forward, so that it focussed more on the temple entrance and a bit less on the surroundings. I find the perspective a tiny bit wide here (slight distortion on the tree). But this is a beautiful place and well photographed so I'd be happy to see it become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Totally agree, and I have this view on my computer. But there are things I like also in this large composition: the stone wall, the stone buried in the ground on the left, and above all the single tree, alone in the sky, that completely breaks the symmetry. Thank you very much for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the combination of symmetry with asymmetry. – Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 11:31:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Twilight view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 11:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 11:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, same here, great light but that's it. The power mast is too prominent and otherwise is the compo overal not extraordinary IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Actually mildly prefer this to the other one because the pinkish light is soft and lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Not using any filters. --Laitche (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 14:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Laitche (talk) 20:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 07:50:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info Sculptural group "The Taming of the Horse" by Peter Clodt, one of the four compositions on the Anichkov Bridge in St. Petersburg all by me -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, compo as 1st. Some tight crop on left and maybe on top but quality and compo make it. --Mile (talk) 08:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support You found a nice angle. The light halo around the monument could be seen as a disturbance, but it must be considered that it also enhances the outline of the monument with the background of the sky creating an effect of prominence, I assume you wanted. I took the liberty of changing captions and category, double check, please. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop is too tight at the left and at the top, IMO. Interesting angle but the cut out feet are a bit disturbing as part of the composition. Perhaps because the framing is very short -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I see a new version has been uploaded yesterday. Which makes my comment obsolete and inaccurate. It's always better to warn participants about changes happening in the background, when their constructive criticism is relevant / taken into account, so that we can follow. But I also have the impression that the clouds are posterized. Not convinced enough by the exceptional nature of the photo cropped at the bottom, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree and not sure about what is extraordinary about this scultpure (as no information is provided). Poco a poco (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport I do think the crop particularly on the left is a bit tight. The picture needs lead room there. Nevertheless it is a striking perspective from which to view this sculpture, and the image quality is very good. Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Full support now that the crop is improved, but in future, Елена Нечипоренко, it would be appreciated if you tag all voters (both support and oppose) when you make a major change to a picture during a nomination, so that they know they should re-evaluate their vote based on the new version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the remark, I'll take it into account. Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Full support now that the crop is improved, but in future, Елена Нечипоренко, it would be appreciated if you tag all voters (both support and oppose) when you make a major change to a picture during a nomination, so that they know they should re-evaluate their vote based on the new version. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Boca da Baía de Guanabara e orlas artificiais - Parque do Flamengo, Fortes Históricos de Niterói, Monumento Natural do Pão de Açúcar, orla marítima de Copacabana - Rio de Janeiro - 20240623064031.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 11:27:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The greatness of Rio de Janeiro is breathtaking. -- ★ 11:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but sure, it has the wow-factor. Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support More "Wow" than technical issues. --XRay 💬 16:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breathtaking view, great mood. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2024 at 07:27:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Sunrise view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light but the compo overall is not so extraordinary and the power mast in the middle atracts to much attention Poco a poco (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support In spite of the power line, the mood is enough to convince me. I can even take it as a commentary on nature being slightly marred by mankind. But I will understand if the photo fails for this reason. Cmao20 (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info Not using any filters. --Laitche (talk) 02:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 14:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Laitche (talk) 20:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 20:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Asia
- Info created by European Space Agency - uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. These satellite pics don't always have an outstanding composition to match the technical quality but this one does. Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 – educative and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 14:29:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Satisfying composition but the image seems muted/underexposed to me; there are hardly any highlights/whites in the whole photo. I can see some halos around the trees and to the left of the tower also, so processing could be improved. Same composition on a day with more interesting weather/light (nice clouds or a colourful sunset, maybe) could be a winner. BigDom (talk) 10:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 13:50:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition and good image quality in spite of slightly unsharp bottom right corner. Great drone photo. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem here is i cant fix my eyes on something. I suppoose i should on building in bottom, but crop is bad, if castle is main, also crop is strange. I think you should cover more bottom or move camera back or tilt down. Quality is fine. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Mile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 12:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a visually pleasing shot where the cityscape with its vibrant rooftops and the fortress on the hill blends well with the green landscape, creating a balanced and harmonious composition. -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 14:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 13:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support A great capture but I feel like the details are not as good as your usual. It feels like perhaps noise reduction has gone a bit far. Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me. Wolverine XI 19:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 10:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good quality and combo but detail level lower than other FPs in the category Poco a poco (talk) 12:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting front view of an animal in its natural environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 13:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info All by me Jacek Halicki -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fun facts: 1) I can say without a shadow of a doubt that 99% of Brazilians wear Havaianas flip-flops (I have a pair from the Simpsons line); 2) Havaianas means Hawaiians (in the feminine form). ★ 18:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I've been going back and forth on this but I don't see it as great object photography. It's good quality and there's nothing wrong with it but IMO it's missing outstanding light. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 08:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Czech Republic
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo, I'd like to see the complete reflection but I understand that may not have possible in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I wouldn't call the architecture extraordinary, the reflection is cropped, resolution rather low for this kind of shot and it feels underexposed. Sorry, not a FP to me. Poco a poco (talk) 13:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice scene and I don't mind the cropped reflection (IMO it's better than awkwardly placing the horizon in the middle) but I agree with Poco that it is underexposed and rather small. Also, the description is lacking and neither it nor the categories tell us what building(s) we are looking at, only the name of the pond. BigDom (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Since there is a reflection, the crop is unfavorable. Really a bit dark and small. --Milseburg (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 08:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info created by Adygrafix250 - uploaded by Adygrafix250 - nominated by Adygrafix250 -- Adygrafix250 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adygrafix250 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Face out of focus, bad composition (missed more at top, bad crop) -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Good, sensitive portrait but I am not convinced it is as sharp as some we have seen here particularly ones presented by Charlesjsharp. The head does seem out of focus. Also the nomination itself needs some more work - I have refined the gallery link (we need the family - 'mammals' is too vague) - but the file name is emotive rather than descriptive and thus does not comply with guidelines. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Cmao20. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2024 at 03:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info A visual of Maqam Ibrahim (Station of Abraham) in Great Mosque of Mecca, created by معتز توفيق اغبارية - uploaded by معتز توفيق اغبارية - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saudi Arabia needs more attention. ★ 11:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree, besides this photo is interesting and well done. Terragio67 (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It is quite small and has visible blue chromatic aberrations, but the composition is good and I guess it will be hard to get better photos unless we have more Muslim Wikimedians. Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per above it will be hard to get better photos unless we have more Muslim Wikimedians --RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. ImamAnik (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good compo, but nothing extrardinary to me and there are purple/blue fringes around the people contours. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I respect your opinion but remember that the photo depicts a religious ritual in the Great Mosque of Mecca, the top site of Islam, something very noteworthy. ★ 16:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
weakOppose Interesting scene but nothing is particularly sharp, neither the people nor the structure; has CAs.'Weak' because of the point about limited access (ban on non-Muslims visiting).--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)- The image is a much smaller crop of the bigger original. I guess the point about access doesn't really stand if a big (but not zoomed in) image of this already exists on commons. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info CA is gone and sharp @Sebring12Hrs and UnpetitproleX: --Wilfredor (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support At least much better than the older photos of that holy place I know from books etc. … I like the wide variety of people of different ages, etc.; the photo seems to show that pilgrimage really unites the faithful independent from their origin, status, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This alternative needs explicit approval of the nominator
|
---|
Edited from original[edit]300px|Maqam Ibrahim (Station of Abraham) in Grand Mosque of Mecca
|
File:Male Chaffinch - Fringilla coelebs.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 18:46:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info Proposed replacement to the chaffinch picture I recently nominated for delisting. More than twice the resolution of the previous FP, much sharper, and with more accurate/less oversaturated colours. IMO the best image of a male chaffinch on Commons. created by Caroline Legg - uploaded by Jirib - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- dama 22 anaya 200.68.168.142 02:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Terragio67 (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality photograph. Wolverine XI 19:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Though want a bit more space on the left side. --Laitche (talk) 10:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ImamAnik (talk) 11:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, thank you for finding and nominating this one. – Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 13:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
- Info created by المصور أنس الحاج - uploaded by Mr. Ibrahem - nominated by Abo Yemen -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Abo Yemen✉ 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Certainly an impressive sight but I'm unconvinced that the resolution is sufficient for FP in 2024, plus the vignetting in the top right corner disturbs me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- well the picture was taken 10 years ago. ill try to remove the vignette tho Abo Yemen✉ 18:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 does this look good? Abo Yemen✉ 11:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell Abo Yemen✉ 11:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's definitely better. I would give this version a mild support given irreproducibility value of a skyline in Yemen. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The vignette on the right-hand side is the most annoying Ermell (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell i dont see any vignette on the right-hand side on the new version? Abo Yemen✉ 09:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- The picture is darker on the far right side and it looks as if it was taken through a window. Ermell (talk) 19:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell i dont see any vignette on the right-hand side on the new version? Abo Yemen✉ 09:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell Abo Yemen✉ 11:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective correction required --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- may I know what is wrong with the perspective? Abo Yemen✉ 13:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Verticals should be straight Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- may I know what is wrong with the perspective? Abo Yemen✉ 13:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yemen, rare to see. --Mile (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, vignetting, but now it's a war zone; another photo like this one is almost improbable. ★ 14:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cmao20 Ermell (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Also too hazy in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure the white balance is correct. Was a filter used for this photo? The upper right corner looks weird and too dark. Interesting view but I agree with others the resolution is very limited for a panorama -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per abpve Poco a poco (talk) 12:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective, sharpness, vignetting... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 14:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info A visual of a Kashmiri lady on a Shikara (a wooden boat in Dal Lake) with houseboats in the background, created by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - uploaded by Abid Sidiq Ahanger - nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Inu06 (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced, sorry. The compo is boring (centered), the subject cannot be seen good, I'd rather see her face not her back and the lighting is not good and it's overall underexposed Poco a poco (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For the diversity of opinions, I find the light attractive, but not the framing, cut too tight at the top. Unbalanced composition in my view, with the roofs missing. Nice colors but possibly underexposed image, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco and Basile, sorry. As happy as it makes me to see a Srinagar nom, not FP worthy imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Unbalanced compo.Ermell (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2024 at 00:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info The entire Saxony-Coburg-Gotha family and further relatives at Coburg in 1894! From Queen Victoria to the Kaiser Wilhelm II and to the soon-to-become tsar Nicholas II, they are all there. A remarkable little piece of history. I searched for the photo among all with the highest resolution, taking off the yellowish atmosphere to make it even better. / Created by the photographer Eduard Uhlenhuth (1853-1919) - uploaded and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A cool bit of history indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is average, but for the historic value, and the various people's mood. Yann (talk) 09:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 20:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science#Science
- Info created by Alexander von Humboldt - uploaded by Sette-quattro - nominated by Sette-quattro -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting diagram, and high resolution, but we can have a better color balance and contrast: File:Alexander von Humboldt - Diagram of a cross-section of the earth's crust, edit.jpg, trying rolling back paper ageing. Yann (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nice! Actually, I like the original scan, I feel it more 'natural' - or better, close to the source - given the age of the diagram. Sette-quattro (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing historical scientific visualization of the Great Alexander von Humboldt from 1850. Ventolinmono (talk) 22:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quote @User:Yann for the alternative file, an excellent infographic. --LucaLindholm (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but there is a vertical line with some problems of resolution, form the letters: See_Thiere und Pflandez at the top, to GOTHA at the bottom. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Solid reproduction of one of Alexander von Humboldt’s famous diagrams which helped much to explain and popularized the connection between geology, geography, and biology. – Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2024 at 10:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info Grand dieu du Sefar is the most famous cave painting in Sefar in Tassili n'Ajjer in ALgeria. In fact this cave painting is located in Algeria, Djanet in the park Tassili n'Ajjer in a precise place named Sefar. This is one of more than thousannds of cave paintin discovered by Henri Lhote and his team and they was guided by Djebrine Machar a Touareg guide who was known for a great expertise in the great Sahara's cave paintings.
- Abstain as author --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
All by me IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is it genuinely paler on the left hand side or is that a consequence of light conditions at the point when this photo was taken? Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- To answer your Question this is an other image tken of outside the cave so you can see all the painting from the left to the right which is limted by rocks.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_dieu_du_Sefar_02.jpg
- but for tis image Itried to focus on the most visible part to the left you can see only small symbols that are keeping to evolve and improve in paintig skills to the right. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's interesting enough to be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's underexposed, no information about the paintings/cave provided Poco a poco (talk) 08:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello dear Poco: I added the details in the description and the info above. But there is no explanation of the meaning of the painting there is only interpretations such as women bowing to a God...
- For the exposure I will try to improve it for tomorrow IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again dear Poco I improved the exposition. Have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 22:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 22:20:11
→
- Info In favor of the Adam Cuerden's levels adjusted version. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 22:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace ---SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace .--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 20:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info Overview of the Upper Zagedan Valley with the mountain cirque formed by ancient glacial erosion and high-altitude lakes. Zagedan Ridge, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support woah that's impressive. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view and striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Croped horizon. To me File:Zagedan Ridge, Zagedan Valley, Caucasus Mountains.jpg looks superior. --Milseburg (talk) 10:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was actually hesitant about which of these two versions to nominate and after a few minutes of contemplation finally decided to post this one because it felt more immersive and articulated for the cirque and the nearby lakes and rock formations. The other looks more conventional, more typical of how skylines are usually portrayed. But it could also be criticized in relation to this one, because while it has the horizon and distant peaks included, it also has the bottom near field view abruptly cropped out, shifting and dissipating the focus and exposure further away from the cirque into infinity. I don’t think either one of them is much better than the other. --Argenberg (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Picturesque landscape, stunning view. Like I Milseburg (see above), I may have preferred File:Zagedan Ridge, Zagedan Valley, Caucasus Mountains.jpg, but both are fine photos. – Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2024 at 13:06:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose FP is "one of the best images on Commons". The image does not have anything that is out of the ordinary. As this bench seems to have some historic interest, you could nominate as a Valued Image. --Tagooty (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light, and the textures in the wood at full size. Quality is v good. And the caption makes it interesting because this is all that's left of the old station as a new station has been built around it. Not immediately stunning but FP on reflection, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Tagooty. Yann (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light, appropriate use of DoF, good quality and interesting subject. I sat on one of these very benches myself in June this year. BigDom (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 08:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 19:52:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality and very striking composition, however the file page needs work, it contains a link to a black and white version of a completely different photograph, plus I think I would like a geotag for a photo like this where it's not clear to me where in the world it is. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dear @Tomascastelazo: , could you please tidy up the file description page a bit, as suggested by Cmao20? I would like to support your beautiful photo, but I cannot do so as long as the description is a mess ;–). Thank you, – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment And we need a working gallery link (Places is just a redirect page nowadays); I have set it to Places/Agriculture for now and will add a new “Mexico” subsection to it if this nomination is successful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Until issues are fixed. I don't even know where it is except somewhere in the state of Jalisco, which is a big place. An FP should be useful for the project as well as just a great photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 04:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info View of the Waddenzee behind the sea dike at Paesens-Moddergat towards Schiermonnikoog (Breakwaters). The Wadden Sea is a unique tidal sea (UNESCO World Heritage) The photo consists of 6 more or less horizontal layers. Sky, mud, breakwaters, water, green and ground.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks "wow" for me. Wolverine XI 09:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Like a flag. Really cool IMO Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Painterly, beautiful and somewhat melancholic scene, with delicate and harmonious pastel colours. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing in its simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The Wow is between the lines, so to speak. The best Wow for me. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The picture is very busy/messy looking towards the bottom and it's unappealing to me Henrysz (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Milseburg (talk) 10:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per supporters above. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, the compo is not working for me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 13:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2024 at 00:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info The mihrab of the Mosque of Sidi Bellahsen in Tlemcen, built during the Zayyanid dynasty in 1296. Created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool place and good composition outweighs the fact that it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose CA and noise as well as the burnt highlights spoil the image. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Ermell, I appreciate your feedback. I've made improvements by reducing the noise and fixing the chromatic aberration. Riad Salih (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts but I don't think the FP standard will be reached. Sorry. Ermell (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. Is there a possibility for this one? Riad Salih (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts but I don't think the FP standard will be reached. Sorry. Ermell (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Ermell, I appreciate your feedback. I've made improvements by reducing the noise and fixing the chromatic aberration. Riad Salih (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd vote for that one too but I think it could do with having a cooler white balance. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have some similar from Marocco, problem is wooden roof, which are so uninterested. But yours at least some combo with light so cold-warm combination. Problem is ISO to big - noise. And trunks which cover roof decoration also spoil it on your pic. Second one is better than this but i doubt i would support. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)