Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/09

8 November 2024

10 November 2024

Deletion requests on 9 November 2024

November 9

File:Stara značka ugostiteljsko-turističkog poduzeća 'Union' Čakovec.JPG

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Silverije (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info The uploader @Silverije has responded to the deletion nomination on the file page itself, below the deletion template (see diff). Silverije, I'm pinning you so that you can provide any further information on this deletion nomination page to make it easier to find for the closing admin who will decide this file's fate. Nakonana (talk) 12:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, specify which further information should I provide? I've already said that an old pin badge of UTP Union Čakovec, a firm that exists no more, is pictured. It existed in former Socialist Republic of Yugoslavia and it's part of history. There is no copyright here. The badge itself is property of the uploader. --Silverije 20:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usually the designer of the badge would be the copyright holder. And oftentimes, copyright stays valid until around 70 years after the designer's death (but it varies by country). So the central questions would be who designed it and when did that person die. Publishing circumstances of the badge might also be relevant. For example, when and where it was first published, and whether it was a work for hire (e.g. for a government job). For details see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Yugoslavia and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Croatia. Nakonana (talk) 00:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This badge is around 50 years old. It is not known who designed it, when did that person die, when and where it was first published and whether it was a work for hire, because the company which knew all these answers exists no more. And what to do now? --Silverije 23:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mission Mind Control - USgov.webm

Copyright violation: while this file was apparently obtained from NARA, it appears to be a recording of a 1979 ABC News TV broadcast ([1]), not a US goverment publication. Copyright notice is visible at 58:36. Omphalographer (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:University of Malaya (UM) coat of arms.png

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not old enough to be public domain, I take it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MikeRoffe143, I do not think Mike Roffe Lee Yi Man could own the copyright. Your edits [2][3]. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 13:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. That's not my question, though. I assume it's not old enough to be public domain, but that's the only way it could be acceptable for Commons to host the image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same as COM:Deletion requests/File:Logo Universiti Malaya Horizontal Color.png. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 02:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massachusetts Avenue surface station, September 2011.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The mural was painted in 1980 and does not appear to have copyright notice nor copyright renewal, so {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhenkanal, Odisha, India - panoramio (4).jpg

Wedding not for any public use JAMKUM (talk) 07:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep privacy is not important, because it's just a COM:Non-copyright restrictions. "Weak keep", however, since I am uncertain if the possibly-copyrighted décor shown passes COM:FOP India (as a "work of artistic craftsmanship"). If it's not meant to be a permanent décor, then the Panoramio import needs to be deleted, unfortunately. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:第55屆金馬影后謝盈萱.jpg

source is cc-by-nc-3.0, not free copyright shizhao (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

在我上傳照片的時候，國家文化記憶庫是標記公眾領域標章（PDM，Public Domain Mark），之後的某一時間點才該網頁才更改成cc-by-nc-3.0。先前好像有人提到對方修改公眾領域標章標示的話，維基媒體共享資源還是需要刪除，那麼也麻煩把金馬獎的相關照片做同樣處理。--KOKUYO (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Initial license was PDM, which is ok on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greenwich Logo 2008-2016.png

This image is possibly eligible for copyright in the Philippines but not in the United States. Please see see COM:TOO Philippines Trade (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacob Merkelbach, Afb 010164033195.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Dennis Brown as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: License says prior to 1929, the information says 1946. Based on my experience with the tanning industry (which is extensive), the 1940s is correct, so it can't be in the public domain. Yann (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First some background: Dutch photographer Jacob Merkelbach and his daughter Mies Merkelbach made more than 50,000 photographs ("Atelier Merkelbach"). Their collection was bought by Amsterdam Archives. >36,000 photos were digitized and made available Public Domain ("Auteursrechtvrij") at the website of the Amsterdam Archives. This photograph is part of a set that Atelier Merkelbach made for Philips: 50 photographs of women with radio's, electric clocks, tanning lamps and fluorescent light bulbs. All these photographs were made in 1945-1946. About 2.000 of the Merkelbach photographs have so far been copied to Commons, and these photographs are used onWiki 2600 times. All photographs that I have seen (about half of the collection) carry the same copyright mention at the Amsterdam Archives: "auteursrechtvrij", without any directions for usage ("gebruiksvoorwaarden"). It might be wise to change the current license in Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 14:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am more likely to believe the archive than some random dude with "[extensive] experience with the tanning industry" to know what tanning looked like in the 1940s. --RAN (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wales coast path logo.JPG

This logo is not licenced under CC-BY-SA as per the image description page. It is a work of a UK government organisation (NRW) created in 2012, so is still under Crown Copyright and I cannot find anything to indicate it has been released under the Open Goverment Licence (or any other free licence). The brand guidelines [4] state it is made available for non-commercial use only. The threshold of originality is very low in the UK, so I believe that this dragon-tail shell design would exceed the standard to be considered original. Cymru82 (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, not under free licence per logo guidelines. Dank Jae 14:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment further: The dragon-shell logo, as per nom, probably meets COM:TOO UK, so it may be possibly uploaded as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} on Wikipedia itself, but not here. So the change to PD here is likely not suitable. Especially as this logo is clearly more complex than other logos deemed copyrighted here like the Edge Magazine, ITV and NHS Wales. No other organisation uses a dragon-shell, and is not just a typeface. Dank Jae 10:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, probably can be licensed under pd-logo. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - agree with Dmartin969. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 08:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I fixed the license and author information. Dmartin969 (talk) Dmartin969 (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icon of Discord.png

This file was initially tagged by Rubýñ as Copyvio (Non-free logo. English Wikipedia hosts it as such at w:en:File:Discord logo.svg.) Trade (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This work is registered in the United States Copyright Office (see here) and so it is protected by copyright. This is the logo being registered; the registration date lines up with when they decided to edit their logo in May 2021, and they mentioned the name of the logo is Clyde in their blog post announcing the new branding. Rubýñ ^(Scold) 17:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep image is not eligible for copyright, and does not have copyright notice. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Simple logo--Trade (talk) 10:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thibaut120094: That enwiki "fairuse" one was uploaded by you, do we have ideas that registered one has "Discord" wordmark? And could be simple by just removing this wordmark? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Norako0227 (talk · contribs)

Potential copyright violation. Low resolution and missing EXIF data. COM:VRT is needed.

SCP-2000 14:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no reason to believe this isn't uploader's own work. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]