Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 5th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitte den Eintrag löschen. Das Duplikat vom 05.11.2020 ist korrekt und inhaltlich umfangreicher. Historiker FL (talk) 00:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, dupe of File:Moltkestraße 25.jpg. --Achim (talk) 08:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't actually own the rights to it Athleteupdates (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I will re-upload it. I need to change the licensing. EmCollin (talk) 05:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will re-upload it. I need to change the licensing. EmCollin (talk) 05:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyright © 2020 Easy Earned Money All Rights Reserved. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Popopoplpkp 192.124.203.11 14:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake TARGET OF SUCCESS BY ARJUN SINGH (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright game's role derivative works. -akko (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 16:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thghgngn non. Did vmgmg 98.113.116.215 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirected to File:Ambigramme Penelope.jpg by uploader, assuming to be a request for deletion AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, not a request for deletion, AntiCompositeNumber. So you may withdraw -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn per explanation. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JamesRock2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright game's role derivative works.

-akko (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal graphic, out of scope. And no source of individual images. P 1 9 9   01:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Class project using Commons as a webhost. --Herby talk thyme 08:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of non-free Google Maps. P 1 9 9   01:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 08:37, 9 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 15:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gwyn77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works: missing EXIF data or FB in EXIF data. File:Monument of Andres Bonifacio.jpg is a tiny copy of File:BonifacioMonumentjf9933 13.JPG.

P 1 9 9   01:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Channel NorthAfrica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works but screengrabs (all different map styles and formats). Unreliable uploader, all other uploads already deleted.

P 1 9 9   02:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Billy Guilfoyle

[edit]

Copyrighted image from the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, not released under a free license. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria images for more info. --Calistemon (talk) 05:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo of a photo. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, not full resolution, other author in exif - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 19:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to small size and missing metadata, own work is unlikekly, probably copyvio. Uploader is indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Astrabeck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucianomollica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, claimed as own work but clearly promo photos that have been scanned

Gbawden (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turkicpatriot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 19MGM56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esteban Rela Romero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kayloo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted cover Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 00:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

videogame withh copyright Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 00:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, uploaded for ru:Дарья Дунич, фотограф, a promotional article on a non-notable person. Wikisaurus (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossible to use resolution of a partially cropped Brett Kavanaugh. Per COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 00:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

listed as own work, definitely not own work. This is the source. Aṭlas (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work but taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9   02:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. OTRS-permission from OWASP is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Klicky was deleted due to non-notability and en:user:KlickyMEDIA was indefinitely blocked due to promotionality. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple logo, because searchlights on both sides do not consist of simple geometrical figures. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope, private image, selfie Migebert (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope, advertising Migebert (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phạm Phương Ngàn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abu Saeed Sabuj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted cover Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minoraxtalk 05:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover with copyright Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 05:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficent permission. All just screenshots from music video without proper licensing --18:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & orphaned chemical 3D model with too large margins. Have File:Methyl-formate-3D-balls.png as better version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurred, no location information, no possibility of identification = no educational use, out of Commons scpoe MPF (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The United States does not have freedom of panorama for sculptures. The statue was created in 2007 and its images are protected by copyright.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pd complex lgo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Hasley 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rather low resolution flier for a political candidate. Disclosures are indecipherable. Doubt potential COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion 167.57.45.170 23:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1= Copyright held by Louis Perrey|source= https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/bourgogne-franche-comte/les-micronations-se-sont-reunies-hier-aigues-mortes-1093863.html}} CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner' request Eukoli (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer accurate Jaguarfc0102 (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, appears to be a scaled-up version of File:Altan Khan.jpg, not a larger original AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Thomas F. Starke Copyright holder 2019 - tfsPressefoto per exif, not own work, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 15:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A google image search finds this photo on the web incl https://medellin.unal.edu.co/egresados/beneficios/26-egresados/417-casa-del-egresado.html but my browser won't open it. Unlikely to be own work though Gbawden (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official photo, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 15:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexazerio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The 3D models are unlikely to be own work; these files are likely also out of scope. Les modéles 3D ne sont probablement pas un travail personnel, et les images sont probablement hors périmètre.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.

COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if I understand it right, in fact the whole category Category:Cosplay of Star Wars should be removed? Ferran Cornellà (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.

COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if I understand it right, in fact the whole category Category:Cosplay of Star Wars should be removed? Ferran Cornellà (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I don't understand the selective choice of images for this deletion, when hundreds of similar ones exist. We should be consistent. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Salve a tutti colleghi wikipediani. Sé ho capito bene il problema è legato alla copyright dell'aspetto. Tecnicamente si può definire una violazione solo sé chi a fotografato a acquisito una immagine che contiene materiale ufficiale protetto da copyright, mentre foto di questo genere (amatoriali) non rispecchiano l'effettivamente un soggetto che indossa materiale ufficiale, ma copie non conformi o custom. Il soggetto che ho acquisito è un individuo che non indossa un costume ufficiale e non alcuni elementi sono custom realizzati per assomigliare.---0 Noctis 0 (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@F3RaN: Not all pictures from this category, actually there are some pictures which were published by the official Star Wars account on Flickr under free licence, most of them are in this category : Category:Files from the Official Star Wars Flickr stream. --Cody escouade delta (d) 18:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright note 1992/1993 Corinda Publications Pty Ltd., Brisbane, Australia. 4ing (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright was renewed in 1984. This is therefore a copyright violation. Mo Billings (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No documentation of a licence. Seems to be copied from https://amboltaudio.com. The site does not quote a licence.   Dyveldi    19:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to a license. The picture seems to be copied from https://www.toresandbakken.com. The netsite has not published a licence.   Dyveldi    19:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use to the project: poor quality photo that has nothing to do with a shaggy dog story, but is AFAIK of some non-notable person 83.251.189.78 20:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is not by the the uplaoder (as claimed) but by professional photographer Olivier Allard, as can be seen on the left side of the photo, so under copyright Culex (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non encyclopédique Sebicux (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality cropped version of File:李廷玉.jpg with excessive JPEG artifacts. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As much as I would love to be able to use this image, it is from a copyrighted Elsevier paper, see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667120302603 Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution (and arguably better) photo at File:John James.png from the same source. Per COM:Redundant. This category has several unused screenshots. BriefEdits (talk) 21:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mostly unnecessary screenshot. All the headshots from the subject's category are extracted images anyways. This one is quite low resolution as it's taken from a mobile device and doesn't offer anything new that's not already included in the original file, File:Justice Kennedy's Retirement Raises the Stakes (John James).webm. Per COM:NOTUSED and COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mostly unnecessary screenshot. All the headshots from the subject's category are extracted images anyways. This one is quite low resolution as it's taken from a mobile device and doesn't offer anything new that's not already included in the original file, File:Justice Kennedy's Retirement Raises the Stakes (John James).webm. Per COM:NOTUSED and COM:Redundant. BriefEdits (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misstaken informations Robsonrrj (talk) 00:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 06:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS, and No FoP in Japan for artistic works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego sculptures in Legoland Japan. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1945 memorial, no FoP in Greece Buidhe (talk) 04:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non necessario Fabio0007 (talk) 00:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo on the campaign sign is presumably copyrighted. This temporary 2d poster isn't covered by COM:FOP Canada. -M.nelson (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Delete: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo on the campaign sign is presumably copyrighted. This temporary 2d poster isn't covered by COM:FOP Canada. -M.nelson (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comic previously uploaded here, the Commons uploader does not appear to be the same person as the Reddit uploader/image creator. Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by mistake uploaded someone else's picture Debashritaiitmandi (talk) 04:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems beyond TOO in China and South Korea Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fyi, Crossfire logo.jpg was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crossfire logo.jpg. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Microbiology Society [1] Graham Beards (talk) 07:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Given the date then it would seem likely that the society may have a claim on this image. So no opposition. Victuallers (talk) 09:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It's a green lock article, which only means it's free to read content. It's only the orange lock articles which are cc-by: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/rights-and-permissions Mvolz (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request. This media file was mistakenly uploaded and should be deleted. Sorry for that. Игорь Гордеев (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request because of bad quality of the photo. File "Ganimede 2a.jpg" is a good substitute for "Ganimede 2.jpg". Thanks. Игорь Гордеев (talk) 08:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request because of bad quality of the photo. File "Ganimede 3a.jpg" is a good substitute for "Ganimede 3.jpg". Thanks. Игорь Гордеев (talk) 08:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and painful to look at. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Tasnim}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Lacerta bilineata, Chausey - img 37194.jpg Pmau (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request. This file was used as a temporary file and currently no longer needed. Игорь Гордеев (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree layouts of metro station projects. Also no FOP in Ukraine.

Brateevsky {talk} 10:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El autor Antonio Valverde "Ayalde" murió en 1970. El cuadro es de 1967 Error (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El autor José Sarriegui murió en 1967 Error (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image of the official letter pad of any seminary can't be someone else's "own work". TheAafi (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to have a picture clicked by me on the internet any longer. Mourya.pesala (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to have a picture clicked by me on the internet any longer. Mourya.pesala (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to have a picture clicked by me on the internet any longer. Mourya.pesala (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to have a picture clicked by me on the internet any longer. Mourya.pesala (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo, not own work Triplecaña (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploader by sock of serial copyright violator--both accounts primary (sole?) focus has been this subject matter. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 15:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1948 photo, not own work, needs more info to determine license status Gbawden (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the flag Mr. Zelenko. I am the Wikipedian in residence for atj.wp and I will inform Mr Luc Patin about the copyrights in Commons. The picture comes from the husband of Mrs Echanquan and he's not familiar with computers, so we will give him a hand to go through ORTS procedure. It is a sensitive situation (Death of Joyce Echaquan), so I will put the template {{OTRS pending}} in the description of the file until OTRS agent process the ticket. Thank you again for the flag. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Einkimadu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pd complex lgo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright tag Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pd complex logo Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicity - File:Flag of Mississippi (2001–2020).svg + provocative filename Vachovec1 (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicity - File:Seal of Mississippi (2014–present).svg Vachovec1 (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

claimed to be "own work" created today, but pic is at least 70yrs old! Lugnuts (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred picture Navigator84 (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Navigator84: Is this out of scope for us, if not, please try tagging {{Blurry}} first, then wait for the higher solution one before next deletion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It sure appears out of scope and unlikely someone is going to upload a less-blurry version of a toyota with winky dink flowers and graffiti all over it. --Missvain (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked Tekstman (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A watermark on a PD image isn't necessarily a deletion rationale. --Missvain (talk) 01:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is misleading and misleading. Not a logo of the «Eko Market» chain of stores Олексій Непота (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what? this 100% copy image with official cite eko.com.ua. This logo is on their products and stores (google search).--Чорний Кіт (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already there as "Kash 95 019.jpg", and in higher resolution also. Dosseman (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong colours and sizes. Not used, replaced by File:Xiaomi logo.svg. — kashmīrī 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per Special:Permalink/311148394. Green Giant (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a poor quality image. It vector version of the highest quality be used in place of this raster image Олексій Непота (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Migebert as no permission (No permission since) Image is still on copyright and cannot be on commons. Migebert (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Idkors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works as stated, the copyright status is unclear.

VLu (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that User:C. BERNARD1975 is the author of the 1978 poster Error (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A few month ago we deleted this file due the lack of permission, see File:Discovery science logo history.png. Regasterios (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A few month ago we deleted this file due the lack of permission, see File:Discovery Channel logo.png Regasterios (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A few month ago we deleted this file due the lack of permission, see File:Ozonetv logo.png Regasterios (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are Soviet topographic maps CC-BY-SA? I have never heard about it, though I can be missing something of course. Ymblanter (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable silhouette with no location information, = no educational use, out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner request The-UKOLI (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been suggested by other users due to errors in the content. Jordiventura96 (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete (Thank you.) The creator confused the permutohedron and the related Cayley graph. See the talk page for details. Watchduck (quack) 11:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I already uploaded a vector version extracted directly from one of the STF publications (see File:Logotipo do Supremo Tribunal Federal.svg), there is no need to keep a raster version. The JPEG files that reference this PNG file use a template that used the PNG file, was changed to use the SVG file, but for some reason the Commons server didn't update the information on the PNG file. Joaopaulo1511 (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L’immagine non è completa ed è tagliata Fabio0007 (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Profil compte Twitter de la personnalité https://twitter.com/leacastelmusic (autre lien)~ Antoniex (discuter) 10:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF: Autor Tomas Martinek Držitel autorských práv Tomas Martinek Svajcr (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2020 Gourmet Academy via https://www.gourmetacademy.cz/marek-fichtner/ Svajcr (talk) 13:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source? Beshogur (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
© 2020 - STM. --Brateevsky {talk} 15:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs OTRS ticket Caulfield (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Next time, please request permission rather than nominating for deletion. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs OTRS ticket Caulfield (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Next time, please request permission rather than nominating for deletion. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
See User talk:Clindberg#Incidental? for further reference, but I don't think Commons can keep this file as licensed per COM:PCP.
There are actually two copyrights which need to be taken into account here: the first one for the photo is covered by the Flickr license, but the second one for the restaurant sign imagery isn't. Since the whole focus of the photo seems to be the Peko-chan imagery, it's unlikely the sign would be considered COM:DM. Therefore, the copyright status of the sign imagery needs to be taken into account.
The sign imagery seems too complex to be {{PD-logo}} per both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Japan, which means that Commons can't keep it without it being released under a free license by en:Fujiya Co.. A blurring of the Peko-chan imagery (the text below the image seems fine) might be an option to outright deletion, but that seems to defeat the whole purpose of the photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. To me, the image seems to not focus on the figure enough to truly throw it into being a derivative work of the sign. Not helping is a) that my eyes are also drawn to the other sign and the parts of the interior we can see through the window and b) how washed-out the sign is, rendering the nose and mouth kind of invisible. It feels like COM:DM#3 (small part of a larger work) plus COM:DM#5 (shown with insufficient detail/clarity) to me. I guess one could argue that this shot was trying to get in the window and the sign to the best of their ability, as well as that DM#5 applies more to awkward angles than it does washing out, especially when a good amount of it is visible. But as a whole? I think a DM tag should be OK here. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC) P.S. Pinging @Clindberg.[reply]
It's borderline to me, but it feels like the photo was trying to encompass both signs, and not much else. Possibly that qualifies as a "larger scene", as it's not focusing on the clearly copyrighted work in particular, though it is intentionally included. I'm not going to argue too hard for deletion though, as it would be pretty edgy. You can get into arguments that the photo is just of whatever logo the restaurant happened to have, not because of any particular expression contained in it. It's the type of deletion that causes the most frustration amongst other users, since there are likely no clear-cut precedents, but it's at least arguable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per User:Brainulator9, DM, the logo is too washed out to be useful in reproductions. --P 1 9 9   21:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Redundant. This image is a near 1:1 duplicate of File:Roosevelt Hall 20181013 (04).jpg but blurrier. Could delete safely as it's currently not used. BriefEdits (talk) 21:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm guessing that they are two different shots; frankly, even discussing this is a bit of a waste of time since the presence of the file is certainly harmless, but I have no problem with deleting it, as long as there is a redirect so that any external references don't get broken. - Jmabel ! talk 00:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9   21:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pages created by IN

[edit]

Only translated few word or country name, such as "See also". Not useful for reader --SCP-2000 15:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-sysop closed): There are no policy restricting this type of behavior. ---akko (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pages created by Q28

[edit]

Same as the reason of previous deletion request. Out of scope and not useful translation. This user created same kind of translation pages in Mediawiki Wiki and these pages has been deleted by admin mediawikiwiki:Topic:Wdbd7nfaow5hlf5k. --SCP-2000 14:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: Even the username of this user has been changed, I would not like to create another deletion request, which is related to same pages and problem. Thank you. --SCP-2000 14:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SCP-2000: These pages will be preserved because there are no guidelines to restrict the behavior of create these pages.--Q28 (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Commons:Project_scope/Pages,_galleries_and_categories. Even these pages are related to Commons projects, they are definitively no educational useful based on common sense. Please note that we are not a bureaucracy. Even if there is no any policy or guideline to restrict this kind of behavior, it does not means it is accepted (For example, we don't have Civility policy, but it does not means we can attack others.). Thank you. SCP-2000 12:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Most of your quotes are from enwiki, and they may not apply to Commons.--Q28 (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, based on your edits in your userpage, seem that you have made unconstructive edits to raise your edit count. SCP-2000 12:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very small percentage of my edits.--Q28 (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of Abraham Neyman appears at the professor's profile webpage and another webpage. I tried finding pre-2014 versions of the webpages without avail. However, that doesn't absolve the photo's potential copyright dispute. George Ho (talk) 10:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm going to assume good faith here and let the uploader have a chance to send permissions to OTRS. We'll proceed accordingly based on the result. Missvain (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Boba Fett, and Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.

COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character designs. So, these are not permitted.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.

See also the previous deletion request.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, It's fan cosplay. Read Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Spiderman_and_child.jpg, case by case decision. --Clodion (talk) 09:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Clodion, please see above DRs. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per @Jim in this case, not a valid reason for deletion, please also consider requesting undeletion for your "successful" deleted files, thx. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Liuxinyu970226, Please accept these results.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I have once seen one closure here on Commons about the differencve about acceptable cosplay and protected costume. If we see the person's face - it is more likely to be cosplaying, if it is a completely full costume closing face - it is more likely to be copyrighted costume as there is no focus on a person, just on a protected DW of the character. --rubin16 (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on a existing character design. So, these photos are not permitted.

See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chewbacca, Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So now we're going to delete ALL cosplay photos? You're going to delete entire categories of them? Nightscream (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters, and per COM:COSPLAY. See also above DR.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentIn my humble opinion, @Yuraily Lic is a Star Trek fan... --JackJackpot (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Yuraily Lic is nota Star Trek fan... :) -- Ra Boe watt?? 21:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per above DR.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, It's fan cosplay. Read Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Spiderman_and_child.jpg, case by case decision. --Clodion (talk) 09:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Clodion, please read what I wrote above. These are based on existing character design. So, these are not permitted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep@Yuraily Lic: Below the TOO in this country, and please consider nomination four files deleted above for undeletion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Liuxinyu970226, Please accept these results.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commment This is absurd. Almost all cosplay is based on existing designs. Might as well delete the entire Cosplay category. Nightscream (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Please see these DRs. All nominated files have been deleted.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, It's fan cosplay. Read Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Costumes_and_cosplay -- Ra Boe watt?? 20:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Identifikation: Es handelt sich im Bild um Abt Anton Moser von Michaelbeuern. Melchior2006 (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another solution: rename it. --Melchior2006 (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, wrong identification is not a reason for deletion. @Melchior2006: can you give some reference for the correct person on the image? And request renaming? I added a note on the image with a link to similar one with name Anton Moser. Elly (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions; I added the info and will request renaming. --Melchior2006 (talk) 06:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor places as {{FoP-China}} specifically requires outdoor place.

Wcam (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. No indoor FoP.--Roy17 (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perhaps the {{FoP-China}} tag on the category is incorrect: these subway stations are indoors. Chinese freedom of panorama does not extend to the artworks located in the interiors. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Beijing Subway stations#Files in Category:Murals in Beijing Subway stations 1. I didn't nominate some others in the category (File:A DK16 train entering Xizhimen station.jpg, File:Beijing Subway - Pinganli Station - Hall.JPG, File:Beijing Zhongguancun station Ofo concourse ads June-2017 01.jpg, File:Concourse of Shilipu Station (20160909092540).jpg, and File:Nanluoguxiang Station (Line 6) 20131109.jpg) since these are probably COM:De minimis, but the apparent lack of mention of de minimis in Chinese copyright law makes applicability of de minimis problematic (similar to South Korean situation, like this). Some murals are "old/ancient-looking", perhaps {{PD-China}} apply? A deletion request is hereby set forth to allow room for discussion.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: Attention please, the {{FoP-China}} is currently subject to this discussion: Commons:Village_pump#Copyright_law_change_in_Mainland_China, in short, this means that the "no FOP for indoor artworks in China" will probably no longer true (at least since the next year). But if they are all not fall under our scope, that can remain be a valid deletion reason. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: I will also put the notice of the ongoing discussion in other pending Chinese FOP cases relevant to indoor works. For scope, however, I believe these are all useful and should not be an issue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. No indoor FOP per COM:FOP China. Eti15TrSf (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted most, kept 12. FoP is allowed for Indoor as wel. But according to Template:FoP-China, images of artwork can be used only if the author and the name of the original work is attributed. I deleted those without attribution. 12 of them could be kept because they had attribution of the original artist and title, most -if not all - of these uploaded by @N509FZ: and @Hat600: . When artist was mentioned but title was missing I decided to keep the image for now. File:三元桥站10号线站厅装饰 20131122.JPG and File:三元桥站10号线站厅装饰.jpg were kept because I consider the artwork (a worldmap) is PD. Elly (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indoor murals allowed on commons per COM:FOP China.

Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: assumption on much more broad FOP in the upcoming new copyright amendment may run counter to COM:PCP (similar to w:WP:CRYSTAL). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak support。不过有的有 Comment:1)File:北海揽胜.jpgFile:东四记忆 02.jpgFile:名家一猜.jpgFile:联古通今.jpg用于说明站厅,构图时无法避开艺术墙。2)房山线的浮雕艺术墙,包括绿色家园长阳新曲岁月留痕地质原源科技奇想数理空间由于位于高架车站,并与室外环境充分连通,可以视作室外艺术品处理,即符合FoP要求。BIT0865 (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BIT0865, File:北海揽胜.jpg, File:东四记忆 02.jpg, File:名家一猜.jpg, and File:联古通今.jpg do not count as COM:DM as a substantial part of the picture is the mural. See File:北京地铁北海北站2.JPG, which shows the concourse of Beihai North that shows very little part of the mural, and COM:DM does apply there. Also, while the Fangshan line station art is in elevated stations, it still counts as indoor, as there is a roof covering the entire platform. For those who are not familiar with what a Fangshan line elevated station looks like, see this. Eti15TrSf (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:北海揽胜.jpg已找到替代图片,可以 Delete,其余待议。BIT0865 (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:BIT0865, a picture can't be kept because there is no alternative. That is not a valid reason for keeping. Eti15TrSf (talk) 06:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, for the mentioned stations, there is a picture of the concourse that shows very little to no part of the mural. For Dongsi station, there is File:Concourse of L6 Dongsi Station (20170922165703).jpg. For Beiyunhe East, there is File:Concourse of Beiyunhe East Station (20190103135038).jpg. For Lucheng, there is File:Concourse of Lucheng Station (20180728153702).jpg. Eti15TrSf (talk) 06:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Eti15TrSf: In this case, artworks of Xijiao Line (a tram line) (if available) are also "not yet OK, because they are considered as indoor artworks"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: , Xijiao line stations are likely considered to be outdoor, because the station is not completely covered in the roof, and is mainly open to the elements. Most elevated stations literally look like a building, but the Xijiao line is not. Eti15TrSf (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most, kept 7. FoP is allowed for indoor as well as outdoor. But according to Template:FoP-China, images of artwork can be used only if the author and the name of the original work is attributed. I deleted those without attribution, based on translation of the Chinese text with Google translate. 7 of the images could be kept because they had attribution of the original artist and title. If only the artist name was attributed, I chose to keep the image, as the extensive description might contain the title. Elly (talk) 23:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't even a mural, this is an advertisement. This could be a possible COM:DW because the advertisement belongs to Ofo bike, and no evidence of permission is there to upload the file to Commons.

Eti15TrSf (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Eti15TrSf: Are we really sure that it's the good time we delete them? based on Commons_talk:Copyright_rules_by_territory/China#Copyright_law_change_in_Mainland_China, the 2020 amendment of PRC copyright law will allow FOP for indoor artworks. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Liuxinyu970226, they need to be deleted until the new copyright law is in effect. We can undelete when the new copyright law is official, but until then, we need to abide by the current law, which says no indoor murals on commons. Also, please see COM:PCP. Eti15TrSf (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment somehow agree with Eti15Trsf on FOP and PCP, but for this particular image, I doubt this will be covered, even by the upcoming law. Ads are usually temporal in nature. Unless the law has no references on permanence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it is temporary, this specific image needs to be deleted because it is copyrighted. Eti15TrSf (talk) 16:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:JWilz12345, do advertisements fall under FOP? Whether they fall under FOP or not will decide when it gets undeleted in June 2021. Eti15TrSf (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not familiar with Chinese law despite being a Chinese-Filipino myself (I'm more familiar with our no FOP situation. But usually ads do not fall under FOP in most jurisdictions (e.g. European like Austrian or Spanish), because only permanent artistic works are covered. What is the wording of the Chinese copyright law (and the official/semi-official English translation), and what is the scope of the Chinese FOP (does it also benefit ads)? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I unfortunaly don't know the answer to that question. Eti15TrSf (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JWilz12345: In Chinese, “可以不经著作权人许可,不向其支付报酬,但应当指明作者姓名、作品名称,并且不得侵犯著作权人依照本法享有的其他权利。”BIT0865 (talk) 11:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It says in COM:FOP that The works to which the FOP exception applies vary widely from country to country. The exception generally applies only to works on permanent public display. Unless the ads are permanent or still in the station, it has to be deleted, because FOP does not apply here. Eti15TrSf (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@N509FZ: , when you recently visited Zhongguancun station, were the Ofo ads still in the station concourse? Eti15TrSf (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, ofo was bankrupt already.--N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 01:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Then  Delete the photo as it does not fall under FOP. Eti15TrSf (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Info @Eti15TrSf: the copyright law amendment took effect in June 2021, and indoor works are now OK. See COM:FOP China. But the requirement of artist's attribution has become mandatory, which means authors of these nominated files must be attributed. Research should be conducted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deleted, FoP is allowed for indoor as well as outdoor. But according to Template:FoP-China, images of artwork can be used only if the author and the name of the original work is attributed. This image does not include attribution of the original artist and title (of the ads), only the brand name. Elly (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need a source, author, and evidence of permission for colorization. The watermark indicates that Marina Amaral colorized this image from a grayscale version (compare File:Otto Von Bismarck.jpg, File:Bismarck1894.jpg). This is not a "faithful reproduction", so the added colorization is protected by copyright. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your proposal. This picture is in the public domain since a long time. Indeed the colorization isn't sourced, but it's not necessary to delete this pic. - Bzh-99 (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's a threshold of originality question. If the colorization is above the threshold of originality in the US, it is a non-free derivative work. Current US Copyright Office guidance in Compendium § 313.4(K) is that "merely [adding] or [changing] a few colors that appear in a preexisting work of authorship" is unlikely to be copyrightable, but there is a threshold where "an original combination or arrangement of colors [...] results in a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work that qualifies as an original work of authorship." See also the registration decision and regulation in ML-366 and ML-390. It appears that the colorization was done in Brazil, which has a high threshold of originality, so the colorization may be free in Brazil but not in the US. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. By coloring the PD image, Marina Amaral created a new creative work. There is no permission of Marina Amaral to publish this image. Please compare this with the Mona Lisa painting with added moustache by Marcel Duchamp. The new work is copyrighted (at least in Europe). Elly (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reupload of deleted file. No link to the source is provided and no proof that it is in PD Ercwlff (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a re-upload. Previous file was a .jpeg (see here [2]), this is a vectorized file I created on my own on Inkscape. The design is based on this link [3], which is clearly listed on the information of the file and the colour scheme is based on the national flag of Armenia thus the reference on the copyright law, and the design is a simple nordic cross which is too simple to be copyright protected. The copyright law covers btw the flag of Western Armenia as well which doesn't even use the same colour scheme (see [4]). I can't see any reasons to justify deletion of the file. --Argean (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add to the above it is clearly stated on this page [5] that whoever uploaded the image on the website that I used as a source encourages its "distribution and usage" without any mention to copyright restrictions. --Argean (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Aside to this, flag is not officially adopted and doesn't represents historical Javakheti (or Javakh) region. The title of this image is misleading as well as it represents fictious flag as official one. --Georgiano (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the flag is not official and not officially adopted is not a reason for deletion by any means. The title of the page can be changed if it's considered to be misleading. --Argean (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. If any of the above were good reasons for deletion the same would have been done with the Flag of Lazistan and Mingrelia which was nominated for deletion for similar reasons but was kept and renamed few years later. --Argean (talk) 13:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

kept - no reason for deletion, the current version shows a link to the source; the design itself can be considered in PD as it consists of simple geometric shapes. @Georgiano: , please consider renaming the file as you feel approriate. Elly (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by official version File:LACMTA Circle E Line.svg. This version has (slightly) the wrong color and is not necessary. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: I disagree with deletion. This version of the Expo Line "bullet" is within the same group as the old versions of the other bullets (which are pure color). I would instead recommend superseding it as you did with all those other bullets. GeneralPunger (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GeneralPunger: Fair enough. Which version (of this file) is better, the one with the letter or the one without? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AntiCompositeNumber: I'd say the lettered one since it was the one actually used by LACMTA before being renamed to the "E Line" along with the renaming and adding of letters to the other lines (the solid color aqua bullets were what was expected to be used, but either directly when or soon after the Expo Line opened, the E was added). GeneralPunger (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral Below the TOO in the United States, but such icons may have or have not benefits for drafts. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE, so DR is not the place to settle content disputes. --King of ♥ 16:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Keep everything. This user only seems to post bulk deletion requests and uploads no files, this looks more like a personal crusade against certain categories of uploaded pictures (cosplays and sci fi), rather than looking at individual cases. Files have been here for many years, I'm not sure whether all contributors still have an account at the wiki. Brinkie (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's a criticism of me, not a reason to keep these files. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly explain to me on every individual file why you want to see it go away. It is too easy to pick an entire category and nominate it for mass deletion, these files have been here for years, some have been in full exposure on many Wikipedia articles.
And yes, you haven't contributed a single file to Commons, you haven't participated in discussions except for reporting files or users, sending deletion requests right from the start. As many contributors seem to have lost their accounts because the files were uploaded many years ago, these actions will go unopposed. This raises an eyebrow with me. Brinkie (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For your information, and this is why I oppose your mass deletion request, File:Millennium Falcon in LEGO.jpg was NOT a toy but a sculpture made out of LEGO. Upon closer scrutiny, it seems that the country where the picture was taken (Denmark) does not allow freedom of panorama for sculptures, so I have uploaded a censored version. Brinkie (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely copyvio, should go away immediately. --Brinkie (talk) 08:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Please accept these results.
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Millennium Falcon.
The files have been deleted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Those files have been deleted either because no one dared to oppose or no one seemed to care. There was no discussion at all, nor any reasoning given, apart from a point to a generic article about derivative works. Sorry, but you need to be a bit more elaborate if you want to wipe out complete categories in my opinion. --Brinkie (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please read this sentence quotated from Com:Deletion_requests#Overview.
"Under the rules of evidence we apply here, the burden of showing that the file can be validly hosted here lies with the uploader and anyone arguing that it should be kept."
This means that in order to keep these files, you have to show proof that they are available under free license. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment following that reasoning, you might as well nominate all files on Commons for deletion and delete everything that remains uncontested. --Brinkie (talk) 10:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Millennium Falcon in LEGO.jpg because I created this myself, the blur in the background isn't recognisable and it uses an open source font. --Brinkie (talk) 14:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So @Yuraily Lic: Shouldn't you just cancel this one, just only this one, please? As the topic of this image is really created exclusively by Brinkie. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What is the point of keeping this photo. This photo is mostly blurred. I don't see the point in keeping it. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: FYI, You may read COM:CROP. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - copyrighted design by Lego, and per Com:Toys. Elly (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Those wishing to keep have failed to explain how this is not a COM:DW. File:Millennium Falcon in LEGO.jpg has been censored and thus will be kept; regarding whether it is useful or not in this form, it is currently still COM:INUSE and thus inherently in scope. --King of ♥ 16:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]