Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 16th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiaoya090909 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS: Low quality images only used for vandalism.

Mys_721tx (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Book cover. --Jaqen (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 5R-MFT (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I meant to add this file but the picture was not clear and also this is not the proper file I want to add about the Sasak people. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Maurigvv23 (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright photo uploaded by mistake Dhanushsdany (talk) 20:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No image content, out of project scope. Zppix (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Shizhao. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad name}} => {{duplicate|File:APA DAS DUNAS DE PARACURU FELIPE ROCHA DA SILVA (21).jpg}}

Já existe uma foto igual a essa enviada por mim. Ofeliperochaa (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, dupe of File:APA DAS DUNAS DE PARACURU FELIPE ROCHA DA SILVA (01) 21.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, concur with Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks well above TOO, false claims by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, concur with Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks above TOO, false claims & license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks above TOO, false claims, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pályi Jenő 1953-ban halt meg, így a borító még jogvédett, tehát nem lehet szabad licenc alatt feltölteni. Mellesleg Rejtő Jenő nem szerzője a borítónak. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Törölve. 2024 jan 1-jén visszaállítható. --grin 08:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Grin. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is redundant to File:Pilze im Sommer 2011 (cropped).jpg und was accidently uploaded due to it naming similarity. For most users this file will be not very useful due to it file type, therefore the rendered out JPEG version should be keeped. Sdicke (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zugeschnittene Datei hochgeladen Aagnverglaser (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.biyografya.com/biyografi/9352) MarinaMann (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.kirimdernegi.org.tr/duyurular/360-prof-dr-halil-inalcik-vefat-etti) MarinaMann (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This monument is from 2011 but there is no FOP in Russia (COM:FOP Russia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_Boris_Yeltsin_in_Yekaterinburg) 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 23:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Artist Fred Forest is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep For me, this looks like a work of engineering, not architecture. PaterMcFly (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Robertas Antinis died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Robertas Antinis died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Robertas Antinis died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania. Artist Robertas Antinis died in 1981 A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Luxembourg. Artist Pierre Berchem died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Luxembourg. Artist Pierre Berchem died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking at the source, this appeas to be a screenshot of a render of a 3d model from sketchfab. I don't see a valid free license at source, and this isn't claimed as own work, so this should probably be deleted as a derivative work of a non-free work. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Botswana. English Wikipedia article w:en:Phillip Gaonwe Matante International Airport states the new (current) terminal opened in 2011, so still under architectural copyright protection. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current terminal building opened on February 22, 2018, therefore still under architectural copyright. As there is no freedom of panorama in Botswana, a commercial license clearance from the building architect is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One undeleted, as per [1]. Yann (talk) 13:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree sculptural work. Per w:ru:Памятник Героям-Североморцам, защитникам Заполярья, the work was erected in public in 1973, with the sculptors w:ru:Нерода, Георгий Васильевич (died 1983) and Нерода, Юрий Георгиевич as authors of the statue itself. Russia does not provide commercial freedom of panorama for copyrighted monuments and sculptures in public places. The nominated photos show the work in a non-de minimis or non-incidental manner.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree sculpture, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the Heroes of Severomorsk for authorship details. Note the file name was previously occupied by a photo that was deleted by a former admin in circa 2009 because of same, "no freedom of panorama in Russia" reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LisaBGiamporcaro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably taken from https://artinamericaguide.com/listings/museobenini/ - PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find a CC license for this photo. Source is copyright Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2d images in public not covered by FOP in Singapore. This is part of a promotion for the Pokemon Go game. https://flying-pikachu.com/en/event/singapore/singapore_pokegenic.html Robertsky (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1993 photograph protected by UK Crown copyright. Site only allows non-commercial usage. Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution photograph whose metadata says this is from Facebook. Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a website titled Kobbize. I cannot find much information on it other than the domain no longer exists. Scope? Abzeronow (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a significant person, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a significant person, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Minecraft Trade (talk) 02:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's an advertisement 2600:4040:1422:2900:91BC:D219:B2BE:E33C 18:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Victory Monument, Minsk

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Belarus --2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 01:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I intend to nominate this for deletion because this file is taken from a very old website, and I do not want to use this file on Wikipedia and I dislike it on my upload's profile. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to delete this file because I will not be using it and I don't want it in my upload's profile. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination,l discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 17:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Please delete per nom. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a picture of me and I don't want it to be on Wikipedia Jakub Kurinec (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Невірна назва рослини Alicenorman (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Bohemia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Turkmenistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please speedy delete ... I accidentally typed totally the wrong place name ITookSomePhotos (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An Israeli model, "Miss Israel 2006", in a picture used in the cover of a major Israeli magazine, where it is credited to a photographer called Sasson Moshe (look here (the credit is in Hebrew in the bottom right)). This picture cannot stay in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps of Germany are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the designer. In this case the designer, Hans Detlefsen, died in 1992. So the image is copyrighted until at least 2063, if not later due to the URAA. Although I'll leave that up to the closing administrator. The same goes for the following files:



Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2063, 2065 and 2069. --Rosenzweig τ 18:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, probably also a copyvio by the Flickr user. --Rosenzweig τ 17:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 07:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded duplicate files. Vichycombo (talk) 13:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want this file deleted as I intend not to use it and I don't like it on my uploads. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, most likely a copyvvio like the other two. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I intend to nominate this file for deletion as it is a default file, and is taken from a website that is very old and I do not intend to use this file nor keep it on my uploads profile. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who Is this youngster? 186.175.98.227 11:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 04:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:2-Deoxypentose-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Netherlands should be relevant. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Netherlands should be relevant. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Czech Republic should be relevant but is hard to interpret. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, based on a plain reading of "a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author." I haven't seen this particular stylization of a stick figure before, so I'm guessing it's original, though correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The museum was completed in 1979 by Stamos Papadakis (1906–1992). There is no freedom of panorama in Greece. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2063.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BTS JungKook Solo Single 'Seven' Introduction Video

[edit]

License laundering. The copyright holder isn't TV10/TenAsia, but Big Hit Music. Big Hit sent the same video to multiple news outlets, and each of them uploaded it to their YouTube channels. See TongTong Culture, Pickcon, Newsen TV and Dispatch. Both TongTong Culture and Dispatch state, in the description, *제공/출처 : 빅히트 뮤직 (translation: *Provided/Source: Big Hit Music). --Chiyako92 (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The license was on the very bottom of the video description. It has the "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" license. Here's the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfzpj3mvtv4 Turniner (talk) 04:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Paper9oll 16:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash photos published after 2017 are not in the public domain; their new license is not CC compatible. SHB2000 (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 11:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 11:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Mạnh An (talk) 02:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by user:Amineelke

[edit]

Several of those preexisted on the Internet (tineye found older/less cropped versions for File:Khairi asfar.jpg and File:Asfar laghrissi.jpg dating back from 2014, for File:Lakred 2023.jpg dating back to 2022). One (File:Hadraf 40.jpg) has a direct copyright claim "© 2023 kooora.com" directly on the photograph. That leads me to believe ALL of these are not the uploader's own work. --Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Minorax. --Rosenzweig τ 09:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF this photo was published in social media. 186.175.98.227 11:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney characters are clearly copyrighted. So these images should be deleted per previous discussion like COM:CHAR and multiple DRs for similar images that resulted in delete.

Adamant1 (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Can your reference a matching discussion? COM:CHAR is not applicable here, because the stamp is unquestionably PD in the source country. We also keep murals of copyrighted artwork when the source country has freedom of panorama. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's been plenty of DRs for similar images over the years where the files were deleted. Otherwise I wouldn't have nominated these ones for deletion. If you want some examples there's Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disney characters on stamps and Commons:Deletion requests/Azerbaijan World Chess Championship set. There's also this under "Disney characters" where someone asked about the copyright status stamps containing images of Disney character and I suggested deleting them, which no one objected to at the time.
I don't really feel like getting down in the weeds about the law or whatever, but at least IMO the difference between stamps and murals of supposedly otherwise copyrighted artwork (I say supposedly because there's zero evidence that copyrighted artwork is covered by FOP. See COM:POSTER as one example) covered by freedom of panorama is that the whole point in FOP is that the work is created under a free license to begin with, which the artist knows about and consents to when creating the work. That doesn't apply to stamps of otherwise copyrighted characters though. Disney didn't create Mickey Mouse under the guise that the character would be become public domain if it was put on a stamp and there's zero evidence that them allowing it to be placed on one modifies the copyright status of the character. In fact, there's no reason it would. Just like if I were to write a book about Disney characters and release it under a PD license that wouldn't mean the original characters are no in the public domain. That's not how copyright works. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
which the artist knows: Not necessarily. If I draw Mickey Mouse on a public wall in Germany, I might have infringet on Disneys copyright, but to my understanding, a photograph of it is still covered by FOP and hence free to use. IIRC, Mickey will enter PD next year anyway. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Technically currect, but totally pointless in this case since it doesn't matter what license the person who took the photograph releases it under if what's depicated in the image is based on a copyrighted work. And maybe Mickey will be PD next year, but then there's reason the image can't just be undeleted if or when that happens either. In the meantime these are exactly the type of things the precautionary principle exists for and I don't really see any reason not to just delete the files until the character is actually in the public domain. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your logic here. If stamps of Azerbaijan are by definition PD then a picture of them is very similar to a picture of a painting of a wall. FOP just means that the copyright of the artwork is irrelevant for the picture to be distributable by the photographer for any purpose. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If stamps of Azerbaijan are by definition PD then a picture of them is very similar to a picture of a painting of a wall. Not really. That's why specific laws exist for freedom of panorama in the first place. Otherwise laws having to do with images taken in public places would just be under the existing ones covering public domain in general. Freedom of panorama is the legal right in some countries to publish pictures of artworks, sculptures, paintings, buildings or monuments that are in public spaces, even when they are still under copyright. Where as public domain has to do with creative materials that are not protected by copyright. In this case we know Micky Mouse is copyrighted and there's zero evidence the copyright is null and void just because Albania decided to print a stock image of the character on a stamp. Otherwise be my guest and provide a source to where Disney allowed Micky Mouse to be printed on these stamps and/or otherwise granted reuse rights of the character. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why Romania is a plush? 2001:448A:11A2:1970:3D1A:473C:AAA6:8004 02:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete; this is a derivative work without appropriate sourcing ("Source: 12 Countryballs in verious google images"). Omphalographer (talk) 07:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Kazakhstan.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free per COM:FOP Belarus. Author: Category:Sergey Selikhanov. 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 18:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free per COM:FOP Belarus. Author: Category:Sergey Selikhanov 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 18:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free per COM:FOP Belarus. Author: Category:Sergey Selikhanov. 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 18:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to low quality; enough good alternatives exist. U. M. Owen (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image is under a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license (no derivatives) Penitentes (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous deletion request (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Lenin_monument_(Freedom_Square,_Kazan) ) 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Judge via COM:TOO France? I'm afraid that @Yann: may argue that this type of sculpture may not exceed that TOO level? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want this file nominated for deletion because I intend to not use this file in Wikipedia for the Anuak Wikipedia page and I do not think it is appropriate for representation. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file should be deleted because this photo will not be used by me on Wikipedia and it is also not the photo I meant to add in the first place. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, copyright violation, "© 2023 Cultural Survival. All Rights Reserved" per source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, of someone in scope? 186.175.98.227 01:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image of the uploader, who was blocked in it.wiki for self-spam; also, pic is described as an own work of the depicted person (...), with insufficient licensing in VRTS. g (talk) 06:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: content created as advertisement (F10); see also Special:Contributions/Roberto Pistillo and Special:CentralAuth/Roberto Pistillo. --Wutsje 16:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is from the Bunka-chō website, but Gjstu-2.0 does not apply to it because it is not a copyrighted work of the Japanese government. This is a captured image of a TV program broadcast by Setonaikai Broadcasting. Nux-vomica 1007 (talk) 08:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 12:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot from the video game Elite: Dangerous, and not an original work. The game's EULA may be found here: https://www.frontierstore.net/ed-eula/ Rossilaz (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: it's a screenshot of a video game and therefore a clear copyvio. --Emha (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS, unused, and only used for vandalism. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 00:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: It is not a "vandalism image". If some user has used it inappropriately that is an issue with the user, not the image. --Emha (talk) 10:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Netherlands should be relevant. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Netherlands should be relevant. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Israel should be relevant. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Hungary should be relevant which links to a fairly simple logo that still was above the TOO. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since) however Pelmeen10 marked it with {{PD-textlogo}} so I guess it should be discussed. COM:TOO Moldova should be relevant but doesn't exist. Leave it up to an admin. Jonteemil (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trade as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; uncertianty over notability or educational value, put before community  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted mobile app screenshot (My Talking Tom) Nutshinou Talk! 13:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 15:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1920 photograph, certainly not own work. Would need publication before 1946 ({{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}) or OTRS permission. Buidhe (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  I withdraw my nomination See talk page, comments in Czech: Jachympe says that the image is from a family album. I think it is reasonable to AGF on this since the image has not been uploaded to the web before and the claims are plausible. Buidhe (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was uploaded by me (Jachympe). It is published in my article in the book (Small region, big history –⁠ Slaný and Slánsko in the 20th century. Slaný–⁠Otruby: Wotrubia, 2022.) and I do not wish it to be online here. 109.71.213.51 00:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The CC license cannot be revoked, the image is also "PD-Czechoslovakia-anon". Unless you were alive in 1920 to take the image, you can't be the person releasing it under CC. --RAN (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy Yann (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an older a lower resolution duplicate of File:El Delfin 7c+ 5.13a Mascun Rodellar Spain.jpg that is not needed Aszx5000 (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious flag (notice misspelled filename) – no evidence that it's used over the green used on File:Flag of Tajikistan.svg. SHB2000 (talk) 03:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems not own work. The image is captured from another phone (See icon on the top of the image) AntanO 04:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Unuseful. Mạnh An (talk) 10:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal logo, no educational value. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Josepsantacana.jpg. 186.175.98.227 11:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: already solved another way. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this an own work? Not too small? 191.126.166.100 14:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-notable person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   23:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Unuseful. Mạnh An (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Мокрицький Павло (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaelbyk9074 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all out of scope

Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaelbyk9074 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope / text

Nutshinou Talk! 13:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Мокрицький Павло (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete too blurry--Luda.slominska (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Such assessments of image quality as "poor quality" should not be the yardstick for deletion. On the one hand, this would open a gateway for the arbitrary exercise of discretion and, on the other, even images with minor technical characteristics can make an important contribution to documentation and illustration - you never know what might be used for what. --Anil Ö. (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused file, most of the text is unreadable due to poor quality. --Polarlys (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F5

Colorized circa 1900 German photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From the talk page of the DR "Das Bild ist mein persönliches Eigentum und muß nicht gelöscht werden Werbeliner berndi (talk) 19:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)" Abzeronow (talk) 23:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Werbeliner berndi Hmm... Does the original image give the name of the photographer? If not, it would be ok as Pd-old-assumed, but if so, we would need to know when he died. Just because you posess the image, doesn't mean you possess the rights to them, (unless it's likely taken by someone whose heir you are) PaterMcFly (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I inherited the picture from my grandparents. They bought it themselves and it was their property. I do not know the name of the photographer. Werbeliner berndi (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Ok, I marked the image as pd-old-assumed, because it's older than 120 years and it's reasonable to assume that the photographer is unknown. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, I would appriacet if the uncolorized photo could be uploaded as well. --Polarlys (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content since the description mentioned that this file was taken from a book NunoLuminari (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is seen here https://www.inotu.gob.cu/es/content/m-rodas, and doesn’t fall under PD-Cuba 2600:1006:B14C:AC9D:F034:4EF7:54B6:A98A 15:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lsadout52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lsadout52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A non-selfie cannot be of a person and by that person. And sole role here (xwiki) is to promote this subject, including sorce-forgery. See also their deleted contributions and other-wikis' edits.

DMacks (talk) 16:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo was uploaded for vandalism in ru.wiki EROY (talk) 18:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the text on the left of the cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License states it is PD due to 80 years since author's death, but author died only 50 years ago and date provided as being created was 1929, which is also not yet in the United States public domain release period. Source is a blog webpage which cannot be used to demonstrate copyright status. Bungle (talkcontribs) 18:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo piquée sur https://www.khaleejtimes.com/kt-network/gnankpe-sanni-unveiling-the-success-story-of-a-business-tycoon-in-luxury-travel-and-exquisite-autom Bertrand Labévue (talk) 18:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Bertrand.
Veuillez m'éclairer svp.
Ce n'est pas autorisé de prendre des photos sur d'autres site c'est ça?
Où pouvons-nous trouver des photos pour illustrer notre article dans ce cas ? Xgbenakpon (talk) 16:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manick22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - Low res, no camera EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Lollu Sabha Maaran at audio launch.jpg is a screenshot of this), user serial copyright violator, etc. Duck/PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 19:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manick22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope logos

-- DaxServer (talk) 13:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial image from the company in question, without a release under an open license. Same model can be seen here on their website https://kloxxado.com/how-to-get/ Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image was used with permission from Kloxxado brand manager at Hikma Pharmaceuticals, and is a different shot than that used on the brand website. Happy to reach out for a written release, if necessary. Responsory (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, false statements on authorship, no written permission to use file by copyright owner. --Polarlys (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

searching for this image shows it's older than its upload. unknown authorship. however, just as other Category:Genderbread Persons, it could be useful in Portuguese MikutoH (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, NETCOPYVIO. --Polarlys (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've not received a message like this previously. I'm not sure what issue has been spotted at your end.
I have not made the artwork but the record company for the album have purchased the rights to use the artwork directly from the artist. If I need to correct my entry, I am happy to do so and look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Avian100 (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, In this case, a VRT request needs to be opened as instructed at this address: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team. Please let me know if you have any questions. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible opyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover, The uploader is not the same as the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A synth and OR related map that does not adequately represent what the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict is about. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with this map? How can it be put right? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is no putting it right. The map alleges some countries are involved directly in this conflict like Germany, the UK, and the many African countries in blue. They are not. The only map that is right is the one already used on the article in the infobox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So the UK is supplying munitions to Saudi Arabia, is withholding £400 million that the UK agrees they owe to Iran, and UK citizens are being imprisoned in Iran as pawns in this, but you say that's "not involved"? Also, maybe try reading the infobox you cite (UK is third on the list) and also the titles for the images (they're not images of the same subject). Andy Dingley (talk) 14:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the sources on the UK. That's synth and OR. None of the sources actually tie into the proxy conflict. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The map is currently not in use. If you have arguments relating to scope, please nominate the image again. --Ellywa (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged for speedy delete and rejected. This was created by a sock account and should not be allowed on here. The creator has a history of spreading OR on Wikipedia which is what this map lies into. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear, what this file shows, statements unsourced. --Polarlys (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the auter is no the photographer or the the copyright holder, he is only a student in the yeshiva 2A01:6500:A102:AD69:8551:5083:280:741C 16:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per VRT ticket. -- Geagea (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted two-dimensional artwork is not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 01:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, no freedom of panorama in the United States for sculptures. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Adel Abdessemed is still alive, and there is no FOP in France. russavia (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleting as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 03:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination: recent sculpture w/o FOP in France. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a logo. Yona B. (t) 16:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel. Part of the logo is above COM:TOO. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit offir logo final 2.png. -- Geagea (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See de:Peterpaul Weiss, author died in 1977. Though stamps made before the start of 1966 may fall under {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}, there is also the problem of URAA, which guarantees a copyright of 95 years after publication.

Der abgebildete Text stammt von Rosa Luxemburg, ist also längst gemeinfrei: {{PD-old-100-expired}}. Der Rest der Gestaltung ist {{PD-ineligible}}.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die beiden Fotos sind offensichtlich von vor 1919 und die Fotografen sind unbekannt (vgl. File:Karl Liebknecht.jpg und File:Ms Rosa Luxemburg.jpg), es gilt als wohl {{PD-old}}. Der Rest der Gestaltung ist {{PD-ineligible}}.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 10:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: most, per nomination, kept two per discussion. In all cases, the URAA / US terms run longer than the German terms, so the files can be restored 95 + 1 years after their respective publication. --Rosenzweig τ 11:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/Pasztka

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. They are media type photos with no exif - File:Vox-media-2014 01.jpg was found here in April 2015, before upload - https://lebork.naszemiasto.pl/sprawdz-plan-leborskiej-majowki/ar/c2-3362720 I think we need OTRS to keep these and unfortunately it means the extracted images must also be deleted

Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism image Apache287 (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and poor quality. 20 upper 09:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, unless nominator comes up with a valid rationale. The image is perfectly in scope. If someone vandalized something with this image, it is not the image’s fault. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RodRabelo7. It is not a "vandalism image". If some user has used it inappropriately that is an issue with the user, not the image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Relisting for deletion. COM:PENIS, unused and only used for vandalism. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 00:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep High quality, only 15% of ALL images are ever used. People are using it for vandalism because it is hiqual. I can assure you they will find another image to use for vandalism, it isn't lack of body part images that stops vandalism. --RAN (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. the fewer images for vandalism the better. ltbdl (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete amateur porn, unlikely to be used constructively given superior substitutes Dronebogus (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This image is to show common penis and testicles of an adult male. Who’s says it’s up to you to decide on what’s educationally useful?! Dawgs16 (talk) 05:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Commons already had thousands of penis and testicle photos, we don't need those recent uploads with low quality and nothing special to be educationally useful. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly! There are already thousands of images, let people decide what they want to see. Who crowned you the arbiter of the what people can and can’t see!! Dawgs16 (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I would have voted weak keep if the uploader had a modicum of maturity. OMGWTFBBQ IM BEING CENSORED is an argument we’ve heard a million times that will never work. Dronebogus (talk) 18:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete uploader at least stops short of writing “DM me 4 hookups” Dronebogus (talk) 09:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and the image still has independent economic significance to the reusers that may put the heirs of the last-surviving architect in a disadvantageous state. For the author of the building, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Derzhprom. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:COSTUME. Mario is a copyrighted character and the costume is too accurate.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 13:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • And in addition, of course it can't be proven that this individual is part of Anonymous! Anonymous is a secret group of hacktivists that may skirt or violate laws in what they consider the public interest (think cybervigilantes) and zealously protect their anonymity, whereupon the name! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous requests https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Victory_Monument_(Moscow) 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia, contemporary monument. News report from its inauguration: http://ethnokongress.ru/actualtheme/22126-lik-stalskogo-ozaril-derbent.html 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 18:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia, 1957 monument in Russia 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 21:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia, 1957 monument in Russia ( https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83_(%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B8) ) 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 21:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep. This bench appears to be a work of artistic craftsmanship; there is FOP in the U.K. for such works. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 01:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP for art or posters in the US unfortunately Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 01:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality. There are much better photos of the same place in the category Lybid river source Luda.slominska (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep normal quality 白猫shiro nekoОбг. 23:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Such assessments of image quality as "poor quality" should not be the yardstick for deletion. On the one hand, this would open a gateway for the arbitrary exercise of discretion and, on the other, even images with minor technical characteristics can make an important contribution to documentation and illustration - you never know what might be used for what. It also should not matter if and if so how many better pictures it is, as this is not about VI --Anil Ö. (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; "poor quality" should mean like really blurry/dark/washed out/something really obvious. holly {chat} 01:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from a 2006 publication by the US state of Illinois which is neither in the public domain nor under a free license. So this file is a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 13:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://archive.org/details/annualreportofil2006admi/page/16/mode/1up?q=THOMAS+L.+KILBRIDE Please view this source it is in the public domain. BacktoSchoolForever0700 (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They say there Possible copyright status: Public Domain, but they don't say WHY this book is (possibly even) in the public domain. --Rosenzweig τ 21:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what you are saying is at first glance these sources may seem reliable but in reality its more complicated and deserves further research to prove otherwise. BacktoSchoolForever0700 (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically in this case, if some site says that something is possibly in the public domain that is definitely not enough. Also don't simply believe every claim some web site makes, but try to think about if it is plausible that something is in the public domain and why that would be the case. --Rosenzweig τ 23:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; works from certain states like CA or FL are public domain by law, but this is not the case in Illinois. holly {chat} 01:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from a 2015 publication by the US state of New Hampshire [2] which is neither in the public domain nor under a free license. So these files are copyvios and should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/
https://scholars.unh.edu/court/64/
Please view these links as they should confirm that the photo is in the public domain or has no known copyright restrictions. BacktoSchoolForever0700 (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BacktoSchoolForever0700: This is a claim by the University of New Hampshire that this material published by the state of New Hampshire has "no known copyright restrictions". They don't explain at all WHY that should be the case. --Rosenzweig τ 21:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So you are saying I should have asked more questions or done further research? BacktoSchoolForever0700 (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't simply believe every claim some web site makes, but try to think about if it is plausible that something is in the public domain and why that would be the case. In this case: Are works by the state of New Hampshire automatically in the public domain like federal US works (answer: they are not) and if this web site still claims some work is in the PD, why could that be the case? If you can't find a reason, it probably isn't true. --Rosenzweig τ 23:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:PCP directs us to delete files when there is significant doubt as to its freedom. Here, we have an academic institution which presumably has done its due diligence and was unable to find any copyright restrictions. holly {chat} 01:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Мокрицький Павло (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 01:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотографія не репрезентує пам'ятку природи взагалі, а лише небо десь над нею. Мокрицький Павло (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Google translation: "The photograph does not represent a natural monument at all, but only the sky somewhere above it." Not a deletion reason; edit file descriptions and categories as warranted and request a filename change if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Видаляйте якомога скоріше Alicenorman (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you want your upload deleted, but since you uploaded it 2 days ago, you will get your wish. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 70.68.168.129 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/celebrating-british-columbia/symbols-of-bc#flag, this flag is protected via Crown copyright.. Perhaps, but the source gives the flag's publication date as 1960, and COM:CANADA indicates that crown copyright lasts only 50 years post-publication (i.e. 2010). This may cause potential URAA issues, but that's a DR issue rather than a speedy deletion issue. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also going to note that source information has been radically changed over time; there may well be a past version of this that is re-created only by looking at the statutory text description of the flag, which would be perfectly acceptable. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also note this government website, which say The Provincial flag is public domain and not protected by the Provincial Symbols and Honours Act. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 01:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted art Ooligan (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomUserGuy1738. You did not comment here when you recently overwrote this file.
See: COM:OVERWRITE
"Blurring, cropping or otherwise obscuring unfree elements and any other unacceptable parts (like sensitive personal information) that would otherwise result in deletion or a deletion request, provided that the file is still useful and in scope after the offending element has been obscured."
Commons:Project scope#Examples
"Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose:
(...)
Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality."
This useful file here: File:20 09 2021 - Encontro com o Primeiro Ministro do Reino Unido, Boris Johnson (51497336014).jpg is very similar and taken within minutes of this cropped/ overwritten file.
This overwritten file is Out of Scope (COM:OOS)
-- Ooligan (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You think a photo of Boris Johnson standing by himself and a photo of him shaking Bolsonaro's hand are not educationally distinct? As for the painting, let's have a ruling from the closing admin on whether it's de minimis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They are not "Educationally distinct." The example photo is different. However, what additional educational value to Commons exists in this (now cropped) file of Mr. Johnson?
When comparing both photos- he is facing the same direction, toward the same wall, in the same room, on the same day, at the same hour. We have hundreds of photos of Mr. Johnson. One more photo of "mediocre quality" is "not realistically useful for an educational purpose" per (Commons:Project scope#Examples).
-- Ooligan (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave that decision to the closing admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep A photo of Boris Johnson (looking to the right) is educationally useful IMO. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-Commons already has him pointing right at the same wall, same room, same date: File:20 09 2021 - Encontro com o Primeiro Ministro do Reino Unido, Boris Johnson (51496841853).jpg
-Commons already has him shaking right at the same wall, same room, same date: [[:File:20 09 2021 - Encontro com o Primeiro Ministro do Reino Unido, Boris Johnson (51497336014]).jpg]]
After cropping, this file is redundant and out of Scope for not being educationally useful as there are hundreds of photos of this person facing right. COM:OOS
Again,
See: COM:OVERWRITE
"Blurring, cropping or otherwise obscuring unfree elements and any other unacceptable parts (like sensitive personal information) that would otherwise result in deletion or a deletion request, provided that the file is still useful and in scope after the offending element has been obscured." (emphsis added)
Ooligan (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: When we say something is "poor quality" that should be something really obvious, like very low resolution, blurriness, JPEG artifacts, etc. This doesn't qualify. Just because you don't like the composition doesn't make it "poor quality". holly {chat} 01:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep reasonably good image of a non-white penis Dronebogus (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Morocco.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 50 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ethiopia.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-incidental view of a modern and obviously-copyrighted architecture in Gaborone, the capital of Botswana which does not have freedom of panorama. Therefore, commercial license clearance from the building architect is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This momument is from 1998 but there is no FOP in Russia (COM:FOP Russia, article about the monument: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%89%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%83_%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%B5_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83) 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Russia, this monument is from 2019. The sculptor is still alive (https://tatarica.org/ru/razdely/kultura/iskusstvo/izobrazitelnoe-iskusstvo-i-dpi/personalii/gasimov-mahmut-matalitovich). 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Russia and sculptor died in 2006 (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE,_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87), per COM:FOP Russia 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous deletion requests https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Monument_to_the_Conquerors_of_Space 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original work is doubtful QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 00:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a book cover. How old is this book? Yann (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per ar:رياض_الصالحين, the book is from ~1200 AD, and its text is unambiguously free of copyright (and is on Wikisource as ar:s:رياض_الصالحين). But that still leaves the copyright status of this decorative cover in question. Omphalographer (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for your contribution. The book itself has no copyright neither the cover (no copyright mention). Indeed you can contact the publishing house throw this link and they will confirm my permission to take a photo of the cover throw their official Facebook page (messages). In the Arabic world Islamic book covers has no copyrights except for one publishing house wish is "دار الكتب العلمية". I'm not good in English but feel free to contact any Arabic admin in commons and he will share the idea and explain it better than me. أبو آسر (talk) 21:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
About the photo .. I own the book and I have a good Library that I can use for such useful and helpful photos. If it's deleted I'll have to upload it in the Arabic Wikipedia and the other wikis will not be able to have it in their articles. I'm an admin in wiki source and I have most of permissions in Arabic wiki (Editor/Uploader/Reviewer). أبو آسر (talk) 21:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@أبو آسر When was this edition of the book published? And in what country? PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Damascus, Syria, 1988. The current Edition (N4) in this link from the official website (the cover is not the same). أبو آسر (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This kind of decorative work is artistical but considered mostly as artisanry because the figures used are repeated in time by many such artisans. Nobody has copyright on them. They are not known with the name of an artist but of a "style" which does not exclusively belong to anyone. Make a change for once and listen to the advice of an IP. 191.126.139.11 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of bottles with obviously copyrighted labels. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 00:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Que petulância! Sturm (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; definitely above TOO US. holly {chat} 17:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. No metadata. Low resolution but otherwise it is a good quality photo, not everyone could take it. Date says "3 September 2010, 17:43:43" but description says 2002, most likely it was taken at the Ferrari Maserati Festival At Brands Hatch (compare it with this photo). This photo can be found in many websites, but since it was uploaded on Commons in 2013 it's diffult to find the source, it may not be online anymore. If this is deleted File:Jjcaleericclapton.jpg should also be deleted as a derivative work. Btw, I suspect that the uploaders of the two images are really the same user, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matthiasberoli/Archive and de:Benutzer:XanonymusX/Clapton. Jaqen (talk) 10:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider also the logs and the talk page of the uploader. --Jaqen (talk) 11:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I ordered a universal replace with File:ECStuttgart2004.jpg, as that's another picture of him from around the same timeframe (2004, close enough) with the same guitar. As for the derivative file, there's no need to delete. We can easily remake that with another of the multitude of Clapton photos that we have. I'll try to remember to do it later today. holly {chat} 18:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) UPDATE: I replaced the photo and rev-del'ed the previous version. holly {chat} 00:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

backside was wrong Ulanwp (talk) 10:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. We need more information onvthd Angel figure. Who is today artist and when it was made. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter PP, no metadata = dubious ownership claim Gyrostat (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear free license status. This is an import from English Wikipedia, first uploaded there in 2006, and claimed to be sourced from http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/marsh/lewisburg_tour/thumbnails/prison_jpg.jpg. Through extensive research over Wayback Machine, I found this page that uses the said photo (full resolution photo is here). But the said page (as well as the main page) do not contain any statement of either copyright statement or free license declaration. Further research on Wayback Machine, visiting the home site of the Bucknell University faculty (which hosted the Lewisburg Tour webpages) redirects me to this site, which has a copyright statement ("© Bucknell University All Rights Reserved"). Therefore, the commercial CC license claim on this file is dubious at the very least. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and replaced universally with File:United States Penitentiary Lewisburg.jpg. holly {chat} 18:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol Holapaco77 (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cargo-sur-la-Seine-devant-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0375.jpg ==> De minimis. --Pline (talk) 08:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
+1, and also more an image of an engineering work, not architecture. PaterMcFly (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This aspect of copyright law is clearly about works of art. If a bridge is primarily a work of art, why not a house, a car, or a tractor, which all have creative designers who care about their appearances? But with works of engineering, such as bridges, the design is driven almost entirely by the engineering options, and not by art. There is far less room for artistic creativity than with buildings and vehicles. So I would suggest that deletion requests like this ought to be driven only by copyright holders defending their copyrights, and not by a general approach which errs massively on the side of caution. Moonraker (talk) 03:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, French bridges are subject to their designers' copyright. Engineers can have copyrights over the works they designed courtesy of the very restrictive and suffocating French copyright law that does not suit to Wikimedia. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/04#Let's talk about bridges in France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per the April 2023 discussion. Yann's possible exception for "ordinary highway bridges" doesn't seem to apply here. Renerpho (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As I said in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pont de l'Iroise, I'm not convinced TOO has been met: this is a standard cable-stayed bridge design, so how does it have "imprint of the personality of the author"? holly {chat} 17:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per VPC discussion and Jwilz. I kept the first one since the bridge is de minimis there. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Right, but do you know when this church was constructed, or are you just requesting deletion to request deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately, I can't find anything on the age of the church. The diocesis, whose cathedral it is, was errected in 1968, but the curch could still be older than that. Many of those where built by Missionaries at the beginning of the last century. PaterMcFly (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A1Cafel, would you consider restricting your deletion requests of photos of buildings to photos of buildings whose age can be established by you? Otherwise, in your zeal to delete things, you risk needless deletion that injures the free exchange of information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I saw it was established in 1968, and I thought that was the year of construction. I will restrict to those buildings who looks not so modern, and no exact year of establishment. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The church looks like it was built in the 1950s or 1960s. Too young for us to assume that the architect died before 1973. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly public domain for now? TentingZones1 (talk) 03:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the same image was uploaded to it.wiki it:File:Play b palazzo delle esposizioni.jpg in 2009, but the source is not clear. ZioNicco (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was uploaded to en-WP first in 2006 and claimed to be "own work" by en:User:2d~enwiki. Is there any reason to doubt this? holly {chat} 18:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think we can trust this as an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A magyar postai bélyegek jogvédettek. Ez 1974-ben lett kiadva, a szerzője, aki nem a feltöltő, nem halt meg 70 évnél régebben.  Delete Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See you here: COM:Hungary. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This monument is from 2012 (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B5_%C2%AB%D0%9E%C2%BB) and there is no FOP in Russia (per COM:FOP Russia). 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 17:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright of the artist (Valarjan Dvarakoŭski, 1904—1979). I will immediately republish without his illustrations Yann (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2050. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are as far as I can tell logos/flags of national sports federations in Russia. Where I'm from the national sports federation are not owned by the state so they wouldn't be able to be licensed to the equivalent of {{PD-RU-exempt}}. What about in Russia? Are these logos/flags really covered by {{PD-RU-exempt}}?

Jonteemil (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined towards  Delete for these as these don't appear to be government organizations, but I'll defer to those who actually know more about Russia than my limited knowledge. Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needlessly minor crop of File:Linz-Kleinmünchen - Alleitenweg 11-17 (Ostfassade) b.JPG. Commons isn't a personal host and one image of this building from the same angle is enough. Especially since there's already 3 more that are extremely similar images to these ones, if not essentially the same. Adamant1 (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Equalized version. --Geiserich77 (talk) 11:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Equalized version. Meaning what exactly and how does it relate to why I filed this deletion request? The last time I checked the reason for the DR has nothing to do with it has nothing to do with the image equalized or not, whatever that means. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think Geiserich77 means they tried to apply perspective correction to the photo. However, it looks like they did too much, and the building now looks distorted (it appears to be wider at the top than at the bottom). holly {chat} 18:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that makes sense. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently the author is an unknown ognization, not this user themself 不慎言行非法师魔女 (talk) 04:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@不慎言行非法师魔女: Why do you say that? OK, most people don't save photos as PNG files, so I suspect this is probably a copyright violation, but I would like to see some evidence. holly {chat} 18:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Yann. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]