User talk:Anna Frodesiak: Difference between revisions
Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
:::So? Are you going to do what you agreed to do? [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak#top|talk]]) 23:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
:::So? Are you going to do what you agreed to do? [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak#top|talk]]) 23:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::I actually recall you promising me several times that you would do anything so that I don't have to tiptoe or jump through hoops. We agreed that I don't edit war – I reverted back '''once''' and ever since, have been engaging in a constructive and civil discussion on the article talk page. Avoid anything hot... I doubt it's a constructive suggestion for me to edit [[Mary Had a Little Lamb]]. I'm avoiding hot behavior, as we agreed, and will keep avoiding it '''because I tend to keep my promises''', but topics? That's my prerogative, and mine alone. [[User:Hearfourmewesique|Hearfourmewesique]] ([[User talk:Hearfourmewesique|talk]]) 05:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter == |
== Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter == |
Revision as of 05:40, 28 October 2013
|
Bayanshamal page
Hello sir, Recently i create a page by the name of Bayanshamal,but it has been deleted by your user could you please tell us what was the problem with the page or it is not matching the requirement of wikipedia site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ath666 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello to you to. :)
- I deleted Bayanshamal because it was written in a completely promotional way and had no references. I see you just recreated it. It is still the same.
- Is this also you? User_talk:Bayanshamal
- Please read WP:42 and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. If you can find suitable references and write it neutrally, then maybe it can remain. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes sir i recreate again the page, let me give you some information about our page we have News Website by the name of www.bayanshamal.com/en i am ahmadullah hottak this is my user i just wanted to create a page for our website, if there is problem please i need your guide and support how create a page for our website.
- regards,
- Hottak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ath666 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again, Hottak. I don't think you can have a Wikipedia article. Please answer this question: Do you wish to use Wikipedia for advertising to promote your company? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oh! I see it has been deleted again. I think you should not recreate it unless it is written neutrally and with lots and lots of references. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Summary of accounts
- Registered 7/6/2013 Ath666 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Registered 9/28/2013 Bayanshamal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Registered 9/28/2013 Bayan 88.5 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please don't create any more accounts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Good morning
Greeting sir, it is pleasure to meet you again as i mentioned it is A News Website we want to promote and advertise our website by using Wikipedia as you asked question "" Do you wish to use Wikipedia for advertising to promote your company?"" Yes we want to advertise and promote our website so, what do i need to prepare for this page.
regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ath666 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Good morning to you too. :) Thank you for finally answering this, and for being so clear. Allow me to be clear:
- You may not use Wikipedia to promote yourself or your website. This is an encyclopedia, not your local newspaper.
- Do not create any more accounts.
- Do not create or edit any more pages related to you or your business.
- You are welcome to help build this encyclopedia as long as you don't violate the above points.
- Please acknowledge that you understand this. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Greeting once again from bayanshamal
oak i noticed recent points related to Wikipedia rules and regulation that i cant advertise or promote my Website, so lets end the topic Is it allowed for me to create a page for our Website because there many websites that has Wikipedia page for readers information like, Khaama press, Tolo News, and many more, my point is also same like them that i want to have a page from our website in Wikipedia of Bayanshamal need your support, i am very pleased that you waste your precious time for cooperating me i am very thankful.
best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ath666 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Just because other articles exist, it does not mean you can have an article. Please read WP:42 and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. If you can find suitable references and write neutrally, then maybe it can exist. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting my request of indefinite semi-protection of Otomedius Excellent
Well, I guess title say it all. Thank you very much: it was becoming a frustrating issue. Have a nice day. --Canyq (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Happy to help. That article sure has a wild history. Perhaps in several months, we can unprotect it and see what happens. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I am not very optimistic, but who knows... --Canyq (talk) 14:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
'Shopno'
Dear Anna Frodesiak, thanks for deleting the article named Shopno. I found this article's link in a facebook movie review group. There people were making fun with its producer Ananta Jalil. I came to this article and found a lot of baseless information was given here. thats why I was trying to tag it article with speedy deletion tag and putted a message on that talk page. I am not from any group as you mentioned here [1]. Thank you.--FreemesM (talk) 10:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you very, very much, my friend for clearing that up. I realized after that you didn't belong on the list. All the others registered at one of two times, and very recently.
- I was just on IRC trying to find out what the connection was. I'd guessed it must have been some sort of mass social media thing.
- Let's keep an eye on the name and variants. Very best wishes, and thank you again. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- You are most welcome dear. I'll keep an eye on the name and variants. :) --FreemesM (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Unrelated to the notable and featured MissingNo. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Unrelated to the notable and featured MissingNo. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, Freemesm. Followup: I struck your name from that list. I checked the contribs for the rest of those editors, and they all seem to have left, probably forever. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, Could you please watch Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niloy229. User talk:Movieeditor229 and others you mentioned in talkpage, may be all are sock. Thank you. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 09:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Janet's page
Anna, thanks for fixing the page, but I still don't see that the page is up and running on Wiki. Obviously, I'm clueless with this technology, but take pity on me:) I type in Janet Bennion and nothing comes up on Wiki. The whole point was for my students and colleagues to see my work. If you fixed the references, and all is good, why doesn't it appear for the masses? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.42.215.43 (talk) 15:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) The information is still at your user space. You have to move it into the main space to make it appear when you type in Janet Bennion. Hope this helps. Miss Bono [hello, hello!] 15:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, it still needs to be approved and is not located elsewhere. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
I have now fixed the edits of my page, username Janet Bennion. The only trouble is, I can't submit it. Can you advise?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janet_Bennion
Janet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janet Bennion (talk • contribs) 22:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Janet, The master copy is here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janet Bennion (2). Please don't use your user page to create another draft. I added a reference to the master, but did not approve it for the main encyclopedia. It remains a draft.
- We are hunting for good references. Right now, I feel like the draft may be challenged and deleted if added to the main encyclopedia right now. It really needs more references. However, I am considering approving it myself. Please be patient. We are working on it. Do you know of any non-Internet media pieces that discuss you in detail? There are lots of things you've written and about the things you've written, but we need more pieces that were written about you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I moved it to the mainspace. It is now an encyclopedia article: Janet Bennion
- Do you have a photo of yourself that is not published anywhere else? If you add it to http://tinypic.com/ and give me the link, I will upload it for you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
photo
Can't do the tinypic. Can you pull the photo from http://www.7dvt.com/2012love-plus? Or just google image and find the dominant black and white photo of me and the drum? Same one as at the love plus location.
Thanks so much!
Janet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janet Bennion (talk • contribs) 20:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid it says "Courtesy of David Ballou". That's copyrighted, right? If David would release it into the public domain, fine. But, otherwise, no.
- Do you have email? That's another possibility. You could email me a photo that you own and I could upload it for you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- I just emailed my email address to you just in case. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- I received the picture you emailed. I'll reply here in case you didn't get my email reply. It's the same as http://www.7dvt.com/2012love-plus which is owned by David Ballou, so we can't use that. Do you have a picture that you own? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Image uploaded
Please check your email. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taylor Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TED (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Hunting for edit-required articles in English Wikipedia
Hello!It's long time after we talk in wiki pages.I want comtribute more time into English Wikipedia in my whole Editing time.But seemly all articles are accomplished....I don't know which field need much editing.How can I get the answer?Thank you! BreakdownDiode (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello there. Long time. Well, first please read User talk:BreakdownDiode#Your recent edits again and then tell me what you are interested in. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Bayanshamal
Greeting sir,
Good Morning hope you are doing well sir, i was waiting for your reply concerning our The Bayanshamal Page what do i need to make this page i need your cooperation.
Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ath666 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Read above. I've told you several times. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
RE: A barnstar for you
Thanks for the barnstar! :) --Bleff (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't give it to you. User:Northamerica1000 did. I just said that it is well deserved. It is. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
An accident waiting to (not) happen
Hi Anna. As per our agreement, I would like to draw your attention to the latest developments on Talk:Jodie Foster. I was already threatened to be reported to BLPN, and the editors in question are both pushing for a speedy closing of the thread, in spite of the fact that I have presented all the policies that back up my version of the article. Also, my comments are being edited under the guise of BLP violation, but it's not nearly enough to justify breaking WP:TPO. I'm taking you up on your offer and asking for your help regarding this matter. Thanks in advance. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 06:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I can help if you're being attacked and not responding with your own attacks. We all would help in that case. But this is about article content, and you're battling, again. Others don't seem to always find themselves at that one article, fighting over that one bit of content, caught in a battle. This happens to you. The way to stop that? Well, this is the part where you bite your lip and walk away from the article. Can you do that? Can you make edits that don't end up disputed? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I thought you would help me in cases just like this one, when I go about the Wikipedia way – i.e. citing policies that justify my edit – where I'm not supposed to bite my lip just because a couple of homophobic fanboys think that inserted well cited material is defamation. Can you please help me actually do the right thing and benefit Wikipedia? Hearfourmewesique (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Dear, oh dear. For me, this is a cost-benefit thing. I invest an hour and hope to get a return for my time. That return is more than an hour of your productive editing without you getting blocked forever. Well, thanks a lot! Ten edits and back to warring. Writing that deal cost me more than half an hour. And now here goes another ten minutes. Don't make this into a bad investment.
- The deal is not about you being polite but still fighting and expecting allies to rush to your side because you are polite. Sure, you are being polite and citing polices, but you are also right back at editing hot content at a hot article and fighting. That article also has had Darkness Shines, Delicious carbuncle, and probably others all over it. The deal you agreed to contains "...You totally avoid all your old adversaries even if that means never editing articles they edit....", "...You work hard to be a different kind of editor....", and "...No more warring, period....".
- I'm trying to introduce you to the only kind of relationship you can have with Wikipedia going forward. That is you editing non-controversially. That means no hot content at hot articles.
- Two ways:
- 1. Indef block, and that would be it. No chance of return. You mentioned socking several times if that happens. Ha! You love Wikipedia. (Socking sucks resources and hurts the project.) You are smart. (Socking is a losing game.) You don't want to feel shame. (Only losers sock.) You are not selfish. (Socking is about trying to get what you want, personally, and not about trying to help.)
- 2. You avoid anything hot.
- Permit me to shout a suggestion: PICK #2!! PICK #2!! PICK #2!! PICK #2!! PICK #2!!
- So? Are you going to do what you agreed to do? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I actually recall you promising me several times that you would do anything so that I don't have to tiptoe or jump through hoops. We agreed that I don't edit war – I reverted back once and ever since, have been engaging in a constructive and civil discussion on the article talk page. Avoid anything hot... I doubt it's a constructive suggestion for me to edit Mary Had a Little Lamb. I'm avoiding hot behavior, as we agreed, and will keep avoiding it because I tend to keep my promises, but topics? That's my prerogative, and mine alone. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 05:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- So? Are you going to do what you agreed to do? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Read the full newsletter
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The Legal Wife Image
Good Day Anna! This is about The Legal Wife.jpg. I have re-uploaded a new version with a new license for the logo. It's the official logo for the new TV series, The Legal Wife. I suppose its the appropriate license. Thank You Anna. Six Horizon (talk) 03:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello. I'm afraid it's not suitable for Wikicommons. A low-resolution version may be uploaded to Wikipedia with the correct license. Find a similar image to know how the license should look and upload an image no larger than 400x400. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)