User contributions for 174.23.160.130
Appearance
Results for 174.23.160.130 talk block log logs global block log filter log
30 May 2016
- 09:2509:25, 30 May 2016 diff hist +100 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 09:1909:19, 30 May 2016 diff hist −2,023 User talk:174.23.160.130 Bogus warning. Put it in sro's little page where it belongs.
- 09:1809:18, 30 May 2016 diff hist +20 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 09:1509:15, 30 May 2016 diff hist +4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 09:1409:14, 30 May 2016 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 09:1309:13, 30 May 2016 diff hist +707 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 09:0809:08, 30 May 2016 diff hist +316 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 09:0609:06, 30 May 2016 diff hist +599 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 08:5608:56, 30 May 2016 diff hist +343 User talk:Spacecowboy420 →Your warning to the other one?: new section
- 07:4007:40, 30 May 2016 diff hist +150 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 07:3707:37, 30 May 2016 diff hist +14 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:3607:36, 30 May 2016 diff hist +235 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:3207:32, 30 May 2016 diff hist +15 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:3007:30, 30 May 2016 diff hist +4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:2907:29, 30 May 2016 diff hist +138 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:2807:28, 30 May 2016 diff hist +416 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:1907:19, 30 May 2016 diff hist +1,612 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents No edit summary
- 07:1507:15, 30 May 2016 diff hist +473 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Sro23 reported by User:174.23.160.130 (Result: )
- 07:0907:09, 30 May 2016 diff hist −6 Ray Combs If you think so, then post something to the talk page about it and edit only that part, rather than all the other edits with it.
- 06:5006:50, 30 May 2016 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 06:5006:50, 30 May 2016 diff hist +30 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!
- 06:4906:49, 30 May 2016 diff hist −1,699 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Okay, removing duplicate.
- 06:4706:47, 30 May 2016 diff hist −1 User talk:174.23.160.130 No edit summary
- 06:4706:47, 30 May 2016 diff hist +138 User talk:174.23.160.130 No edit summary
- 06:4506:45, 30 May 2016 diff hist +1,580 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents No edit summary
- 06:4206:42, 30 May 2016 diff hist −6 Ray Combs Ridiculous.
- 06:4106:41, 30 May 2016 diff hist +2,507 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 06:4006:40, 30 May 2016 diff hist −74 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard No edit summary
- 06:4006:40, 30 May 2016 diff hist +1,752 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User falsely reverting perfectly good edits as "test-edits"!: new section
- 05:5105:51, 30 May 2016 diff hist −6 Ray Combs How do you figure? You just assume my IP is static? And what should that have to do with anything? You're saying that even if I _were_ new, for some reason my edits wouldn't be allowed because of that? You're not even making sense.