Talk:STS-121

Timeline

I'm thinking if we could move the timeline to a separate page so we can have the article as short as possible. Could any administrators do it? Thanks. Big top 06:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's now a separate page STS-121 Timeline, so the ==Timeline== section needs to be cut down in this article to just a summary, to avoid duplicating all that information. 131.111.8.98 17:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on STS-121. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on STS-121. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101231062751/http://www.space.com:80/missionlaunches/sts121_rtf_story_archive.html to http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/sts121_rtf_story_archive.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline merge proposal

It seems that this is the only space shuttle mission for which there's a separate timeline page. I understand that the split was proposed for purpose of main article brevity, but is this necessary here? The timeline section on this page is still quite long already. Slovborg (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think that seems logical. If there's not any other kind of precedent for a split like that, I agree in that it doesn't really feel necessary, even if the main page is getting a little long. It makes more sense for the one page to be a little bit longer rather than have two pages that kind of regurgitate the same information (bad comparison, but descriptive, I think.) XFalcon2004x (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]