User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2009/May

User Page

I did in fact prefer it to be red. Not sure how I get that back though. Help? No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

You are forgiven. I'd still like to try to get it back to red though. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

All the cool kids have red userpages. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

It's an idea, but it would make me a poseur rather than the cool kid I used to be until someone decided to edit my userpage. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

You'll be happy to know I'm red again. You owe me one involuntary userpage edit. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Moving Lydda Death March to Exodus from Lydda

Given that this is yet another contentious I/P article I think you should have gone to great lengths to ensure that your move was first proposed formally and then discussed in detail between all concerned beforehand. It seems inevitable that we will now have the usual round of disruptions and recriminations resulting in all sorts of useless unpleasantness, while the article iteslef will probably degrade into something far less useful than the current version. The new title simply isn't suitable simply because the Exodus from Lydda is a separate matter, as is the massacre. Ian Pitchford (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ian, the move was discussed in detail at Talk:Exodus from Lydda#Title.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

It's linked from DYK on the main page now with the wrong title. I don't suppose we can do anything about it now - unfortunate though. I honestly thought it was going to be a good and rare example of collegial editing. Ian Pitchford (talk) 20:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't get to bothered about that. That frequently happens on purpose. See for example, the articles that are in the "In the news" section of the mainpage. Most, if not all, are pipedlinks. In any case, I also hope that the article will be a good example of collegial editing. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

edit war

you going to warn your friend too? 64.53.208.76 (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

He or she is an experienced editor and is well-aware of edit-warring rules. I see that you're an IP, which usually means you're a new editor, so I figured you may be unaware of Wikipedia rules. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

please see put up or shut up

just who do you think i am and if you think i am a sock puppet file a rfcu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gandusaleh (talk • contribs) 04:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

What's an "rfcu"? You're obviously a more experienced editor then myself and are better aware of these acronymic wikiterms. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

read this carefully; rfcu=request for checkuser; sockpuppetry is only an issue if i were to use multiple accounts in the same area, i freely admit to being an experienced wikipedian but i do not want all the bullshit associated with editing these pages to follow me around everywhere. i am not anybody who has messed with that page, but if you dont feel satisfied file a rfcu. but who do you think i am and please dont say crypt cause i am not making retarded rants about prophets and other such nonsense. Gandusaleh (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your teachings. However, you might want to see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Alternative accounts, in which multiple accounts to avoid editing patters (_{or as you might say "i do not want all the bullshit associated with editing these pages to follow me around everywhere}), are discouraged. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

having another account to edit in another area is absolutely allowed (there is in fact an admin using an extra account to edit in pedophilia articles), but dont worry i dont think ill be messing too much in this area so this account may well be retired before too long. but really, who do you think i am? if you dont think i am the same person as somebody else who has edited in the I/P area you have no cause for concern. if you do file a rfcu (you need to provide the username of who you think i am a sock of, no fishing trips, but you could probably get King Jay to do a hush hush CU) Gandusaleh (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Did you read the link provided above: Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Alternative accounts?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

yes i did, what is prohibited is using socks to give the impression of greater support or opposition, ie using multiple accounts in the same area. unless you are prepared to say i did that drop it. Gandusaleh (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Please read it carefully, especially the part of "avoiding edit history". --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

see legitimate uses 3 and so long as all my contribs in that area are under the same account that is all that is needed. there is no legitimate reason to trace through ones contribs in a different area. and sorry but there are some users such as CM and NC that are serial hounders that I have no wish to interact with outside of that area, so again if you are not prepared to say that I have operated multiple accounts in that area drop this. Gandusaleh (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

3 concerns real-world identification, which doesn't apply to your situation. And I'm not prepared to say that you operate multiple accounts, because I don't have to. You said so yourself. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

how do you know it doesnt apply? and i said multiple accounts in the same area, dont twist my words to fit your agenda. and really the point was either put up or shut up, you think a case can be made then make it Gandusaleh (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

You said you created this account so that your edits in the I-P conflict shouldn't follow you to other subjects. There was no mention of outside real life concerns, which is what the 3 exemption applies to. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

since youre unwilling to either put up or shut up im gonna get back to editing bye Gandusaleh (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Damn Trolls

as I half expected, he hit me no sooner than the previous had expired. What a pain in the ass troll. StarM 00:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, today I finally got the honor. Instead of exclusively poop pics, he's become more sophisticated. Now we're getting vaginas. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

didn't even bother with my watchlist today because it was all vandalism from this guy's rounds. Need semi? StarM 01:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I'm fine. Thanks. A little titillation can't hurt:) --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

cheap thrills :) StarM 02:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm amazed at the - who I think should be - the current front runner for both Cy Young and MVP. Remember, he's a slow starter. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

LOL. I'm amused at announcers predicting All Star game starter already. It's May. This game is going to *kill* me StarM 03:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Kevin maloney

Your account was used to create a Kevin maloney article that redirects to NYPD subway sodomy incident, but the current article doesn't mention "Kevin" or "maloney" once. I'll leave it to you to address it, or ignore it, however you see fit. Cheers. —BozoTheScary (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmmmm. I musta had a reason. I'm kinda busy with other stuff right now, but I'll look into it when I get a chance. If I can't figure it out I'll speedy it. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Now I see. He's the transit officer whose testimony collaborated the victim's accusation. [1] His name probably should be mentioned somewhere in the article.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

No worries. I was looking for a completely different Kevin Maloney and then I got spun up thinking that it might be vandalism, "huh, I'll redirect kev's name to a sodomy article, heh heh," but that seemed astoundingly unlikely coming from you. I'd say that this can probably wait. —BozoTheScary (talk) 06:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

lol. The redirect isn't important and if you want to hijack the redirect to create an article, then by all means......--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Palestinian Land Law

I removed the templates. If you agree with a rename, I will leave that to you to implement. --Orlady (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Kenny George's car/ride

Kenny George amptated his leg due to his speeding. Kenny George's car was Dodge Viper SRT-10.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.210.152.57 (talk • contribs)

Stop with the WP:BLP-violative nonsense or you'll get yourself blocked. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Brewcrewer. You have new messages at SarekOfVulcan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

The revert you did to Feloni

Earlier you reverted the page I was editing back to the last edit done by Smackbot and I just wanted to thank you because that was what I was trying to do. So, thank you for your helping me out there.I Feel Tired (talk) 23:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Btw, the last edit you made "reverting old vandalism", was not really vandalism, i think. The url "died" so I can't figure it out at this time (maybe later), but the article was about a lesbian rapper so the headline kinda makes sense. You can obviously revert my revert if you're sure I'm mistaken. I'll look into it later when I have more time. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)