User talk:C.Fred/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

NH Roller Derby

Thank you very much for cleaning up the page today. We've had troubles with vandalism in the past so I check it frequently but you beat me to it! Anguissette1979 (talk) 02:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Kappa Sigma Pi-Kappa Chapter

Why exactly was the page deleted? It was in no way biased and provided viewers with a history of the chapter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bovino bria (talk • contribs) 02:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

RMURFC

Can you please explain to me why my page is up for being deleted? The history of the club was written by guys from the club. I have cited other articles written on the club from the university's own website. All pictures on there we're taken by me. And Wikipedia has a category called "University and college rugby union clubs in the United States"

Any help would be greatly appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmurugger (talk • contribs) 01:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

D. C. Douglas

Hello C.Fred, I just picked you out randomly. I came across the D. C. Douglas article a voice over actor who has been editing his own article. I thought this wasn't allowed. Has this rule changed? If not, Wikipedia will have very little respect left if this continues. I think this would be a bad precedent to allow some third rate actor to edit things "his own way" on Wikipedia. I find it highly arrogant on Douglas' part. I don't think he should be given the right to edit his own article if, in fact, it is still not allowed. Mr. Douglas brought attention to himself in the media by his own actions. Now he's trying to manipulate the article to justify himself. Perhaps, if he cannot stop editing his own article the article should be removed altogether. Anyway, I'd rather not be the only person to patrol this and thought that an administrator should get involved in a constructive way. I hope that you or another admin could look into this. Thank you for looking into this situation. Dwain (talk) 03:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Dwain and Fred, I have been trying to fend off vandalism of this page that I started. yes, I did. If I no longer can add info to it, then we should delete it since it has never been relevant before. I have entered a comprehensive and well sourced section regarding this episode. mind you, it was my press release that got the attention. Ergot, my info is what the Huffington Post based their article on.

Dwain, your entry was so simple and misleading that it was essentially repeating errors and conflations by Matt Kibbe. Please see my new entry and let me know what is erroneous about it. I believe I covered it quite well.

Fred, if it's true that the person a page is about cannot edit the article with new information,y et I was allowed to create the initial one, then said article shouldn't exist at all. It would just be Dwain creating it (for reasons I'd be interested in hearing about) and it would be me asking for libelous info to be dropped. I have also posted more info on the Biographies page for people like me upset with erroneous info reported by FOX News taken as gospel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterdc (talk • contribs) 05:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Phi Kappa Psi controversial section

Hello, I'm a member of Phi Kappa Psi and I posted an RfC at Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Possible move of the William Beebe rape section to new bio article three weeks ago to remove part of a section, and create a biography article that I believe is more appropriate to contain the incident. I then posted about this on the user pages of people who have been involved in discussions about this topic before. The only response has been another man who is also a member of my fraternity, and that response was not to the RfC.

If you could review this and provide some guidance, I would appreciate it. NYCRuss ☎ 13:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Some more info was added, so you can get a more complete view of the history of this issue. I also posted some questions. Please revisit Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Possible move of the William Beebe rape section to new bio article and chime in. Thanks, NYCRuss ☎ 19:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Wikipedia entry: TNVENT

I recently submitted an article on behalf of TNV Entertainment. TNV is an entertainment company. It is no less significant than other Wikipedia entries about other entertainment companies including Def Jam, Bad Boy Entertainment, etc. One could just easily make an A7 deletion on grounds of advertising for the aforementioned entries. I am requesting restoration of the tnvent entry.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colella.nicholas (talk • contribs) 05:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Liquicity!!!

Why o why have you deleted the Liquicity page are you mad!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbZbVnejkOk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.157.2 (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Acting like a record label does not make it a record label. With no reliable, independent sources in the article, there was no clear assertion of notability about the group, so speedy deletion criterion A7 applied. —C.Fred (talk) 23:04, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Wikipedia entry: TNVENT

On behalf of TNV Entertainment, I am requesting restoration of the Wikipedia entry. It said there was no explanation of the article's significance. I have two independent sources: http://www.bbb.org/boston/business-reviews/entertainment-bureaus/t-and-v-express-in-north-quincy-ma-114227/

TNV is a multipurpose entertainment company/booking agency. The EIN number is [redacted]. It is registered with all appropriate government agencies.

Thank you. TNV_Nick 00:38, 9 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colella.nicholas (talk • contribs)

Re: Notability

4.3: Products and services

http://tnvtv.webs.com/apps/testimonials/

Note that this page contains links to other Wikipedia entries that have been deemed notability; therefor, it is my assertion that TNV is vicariously notable. RE: Deletion was primarily on the grounds of notability not being demonstrated of Tnvent. There were no independent reliable sources provided to show that the company is notable, as are required by the general notability guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC) A listing with the Better Business Bureau is not an indicator of notability. Please review WP:CORP and indicate which of those enumerated criteria the company meets, or which independent reliable sources (e.g., newspapers) have given substantial coverage to the company. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC) TNV_Nick 01:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colella.nicholas (talk • contribs)

Phi Kappa Psi: more info and some questions

Please drop in to Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Possible move of the William Beebe rape section to new bio article and, if possible, answer my questions. Thanks, NYCRuss ☎ 00:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

claude gagna

hello, I'm helping a relative of mine who is a Student of Prof. Gagna at NYIT. This is part of her assignment - create a wiki page about the professor. I will not upload the pdfs again, but please do not delete his page, you are jeopardizing a students grade for a final exam.

Thanks, Sincerely, DMadhu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmadhu (talk • contribs) 12:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Phi Kappa Psi: San Diego State controversy

Hello, I just received a news link that makes me believe that Phi Kappa Psi#San Diego State University can be removed. A section on the talk page has been created here: Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Possible removal of San Diego State section. Please add your thoughts. NYCRuss ☎ 19:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Question for you at Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Possible removal of San Diego State section. NYCRuss ☎ 13:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

The (aptly-named) The Void

Please see The_Void_(band). — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of talk pages

Is it necessary to continue to have Talk:KinderUSA around anymore? The user does not appear to have comments coming from the author. Likewise, is this still needed? --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

AirTran Airways

Hey C.Fred, can you take a look at the history for AirTran Airways? If you recall, there was a user who sockpuppeted there in January. It appears that his main account's block expired (User:Airtran371), and began editing AirTran Airways again. He/she removed an entire section that was fully sourced, but negative towards AirTran Airways here. I undid that revision here. Airtran371 then logged out and "agreed" with himself as an IP here. This looks like sockpuppeting and a conflict of interest to me. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Cliff Stephens

Hi, could you provide me with the deleted article Cliff Stephens in userspace please? I may be able to produce a valid article about this person. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 00:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Teflon Don

Can I get a userfied copy of Teflon Don at User:STATicVerseatide/Teflon Don (album). I hope to get the sources and make a decent article and I will ask your permission so I can move it to article space when ready. STAT -Verse 01:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Can I have your help again?

Hi, you helped me before with a problem involving WNBA pages and User:Infonerd2216. I'm not sure if you remember that, but I need your help again. Recently, on the Connecticut Sun page, someone has been making continuously bad edits to one specific part of the page. Here: Connecticut_Sun#Season-by-season_records. The IP user 71.235.140.89 continues to put in information that is unnecessary, cluttering, and inconsistent with other WNBA team pages. Six times now, that user has made the same edit...myself and User:MR.Texan281 have both reverted the edits at different times, yet they continue to be made. I know you specialize in stopping vandalism so I wanted to come to you first to figure out what to do. Thanks! Nickv1025 (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

(Non-English)

Кто ты такой, что тебе от меня надо? Больше не пиши на моей стене —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.188.185.157 (talk) 18:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak Russian, so I can't help you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

And warnings will be left on your talk page if you do not edit constructively, as was done at your other IP address, 109.188.185.165 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). —C.Fred (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

One Tree Hill

Hello, yes it does say it. If you go down to underneath the schedule, it tells you the synopsis for the future season and the main characters, Lee Norris and Antwon Tanner aren't listed. Which is why I said they may possibly be recurring. I'm guessing you watch the show, on that note, I was going to say Paul Johansson has been removed too, the reason why I didn't include that was because I didn't know if he died or anything in season 7 or if he left?? If he has left in season 7 I won't add him with the others. Jayy008 (talk) 20:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Phi Kappa Psi: University of Arizona controversy

Hey C.Fred, if you could chime in at Talk:Phi Kappa Psi#Proposed removal or move of University of Arizona section, I'd appreciate it. I'd like your take about what I posted. Also, Tmpafford posted a question that you're better qualified to answer. Thanks again, NYCRuss ☎ 17:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I know that you're busy, but if you could take a look at this, I'd appreciate it. I'm trying to figure out what will be on Phi Kappa Psi and what will be on List of Phi Kappa Psi chapters and colonies before I make a deep dive into the latter to get it ready for WP:FLC. Thanks, NYCRuss ☎ 13:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

That IP on List of Jonas L.A. episodes

I really don't expect the IP to engage in the discussion but obviously you had to try. It's interesting to note that the editor is able to maintain the IP address for an extended period of time if she so chooses,[1] but when she decides to disrupt, the IP changes after only a few edits. This was the case at List of Jonas L.A. episodes, where a constructive edit under 74.12.10.181[2] was followed by a disruptive edit under a new address.[3] --AussieLegend (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Teen Sitcom Page Issues

I have been trying to explain to AussieLegend for the past couple days that I am only trying to improve the List of Jonas L.A. episodes page. I have been accused of vandalism, some of my questions have been ignored, and I am downright fed up. The ip on my computer changes frequently, but the first two numbers are always the same because my network doesn't change. I believe this user has assumed bad faith, possibly because I'm an anonymous user -74.12.5.123 (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

There's an open thread at Talk:List of Jonas L.A. episodes for discussion of the merits of the colour change, if you'd like to participate. Then we can just worry about things on a go-forward basis rather than try to unravel which IPs did what in the past. It may also be worth creating an account so you're not mixed up with any of the anonymous editors who have contributed in a non-constructive manner in the past. —C.Fred (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I do not want to create an account. I already have accounts on other wikis, and don't want to have to be answering people's questions on this site. I really don't have as much time on my hands as other users -74.12.5.141 (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Then you'll just have to accept the fact that your contributions will be intermingled with other contributions from your IPs, so you may be treated the way those other users are. Additionally, you'll have to accept that some editors do pay extra scrutiny/less attention to the contributions of IPs because of the ease of misuse. —C.Fred (talk) 18:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

My edited text was removed.. why?

Hi, I added content on the Jay Naidoo page which seems to have been removed. I referenced it properly and added links which would prove my content to be factual.

I added Jay Naidoo's blog The Just Cause on Wikipedia..

Please advise.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yolandi JvR (talk • contribs) 12:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok. I just need somebody to mediate. Thanks! -Peducte (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Westville High School

Thanks for cleaning Westville High School up for me I got into a bit of a pickle by mistake reverting back the vandalism. --Wintonian (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Music on your userpage

Yes I got a question. Can you put music on your userpage. Mr. Slinks (talk) 00:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay that's all I wanted to asked. Thanks anyway. Mr. Slinks (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

But however I still don't get what you said on my talk page. Can you explain to me what you said on my talk page. Mr. Slinks (talk) 04:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

iCarly Wiki

User:Night Fight and I are engaged in an edit war over an external link to the iCarly wiki. This user is getting other users to undo my edits to circumvent the three-undo rule, and in turn I deleted his/her talk page. We need to resolve this conflict. -- Confession0791 (talk) 22:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Confession0791 is a new user to Wikipedia. I'm not familiar with the use of wikis as external links, so I recommended that he/she ask you. From what I can tell, Night Fight reverted the addition, and asked that Confession discuss it on the talk page. Confession did so, but Night Fight will not discuss the matter and has started an edit war to keep it off the article. The latest removal is from the anon 85.179.108.91, whose only edit was to remove the external link. I find it highly coincidental that an anon would randomly appear to remove it when Night Fight is at the 3RR limit, but it is only circumstantial evidence. Anyways, hopefully your expertise can help with this situation. Ωphois 22:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree

Yes, let the tag be there for another 30 days and let us see how it works Akilash (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Bring Flashforward Back- Deleted??

http://www.seattlepi.com/tvguide/421194_tvgif4.html

There is one of MANY media outlets that have mentioned the campaign.

In this article it gives a link to the "Save Flashforward" site created by the "Bring Flashforward Back" Fan campaign.

The article is about a massive protest coming up created BY the fan campaign.

That is not a blog.

http://www.i-newswire.com/fans-plan-protests-over-cancelled/41228

Also-

7 More NEWS articles about the upcoming protest.

http://news.google.com/news/story?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Flashforward&ncl=dDS7v7iqOBDnMdMx7Glw7JbMdTh_M

Also- I am the head coordinator for the Detroit Protest and here alone as far as press coverage I have ABC News and The Oakland Press. I have an outgoing email to the Detroit Free Press and I am contact FOX and NBC News Monday. All of those are actual news outlets that will be covering our campaign.

WHY should it be recreated?

As people are reading about the protests and need a source to read about the campaign. About the Cause. The hope for result. What efforts have already been made. What future efforts are being planned, And a link for the campaign page to go to as a resource or to get involved.

That is why I created the page.

Kris

--Krisp8888 (talk) 23:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

My page...DELETED?!

Hey, C.Fred! I just wanted to know WHY THE HECK YOU DELETED MY PAGE?! It was perfectly fine, and then like 2 seconds after I published it, YOU DELETED IT!!! Here I was, sitting here all happy that I completed this fine piece of writing, and you had to ruin it. I don't even care if you delete this comment and/or my account. Fine with me. I just had to get this out, and let everyone using Wikipedia know to watch out because apparently you like to make friendly users mad!!!! >:(

 Warmest Reguards, Emergency123 (talk) 01:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

A Public Accountant

The guy (whose username I've forgotten) who was posting his client's accounts here has reappeared as User:Melons Accounting, doing the same thing and wondering why his stuff gets deleted. Acroterion _(talk) 02:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Lebanon Don was a recreation

My server timed out while I was trying to CSD Lebanon Don. I saw the creation within the last day or so. I think it's the same COI editor re-creating himself. I was going to tag him with a Create2 warning at the minimum. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I think you're right about those users. I've seen the music one around. Wouldn't surprise me if it was a sock. There is also a website called something like deletepedia that stores deleted Wikipedia files for their editors to recreate here. user:Nyttend, another admin, knows something about the site and its real name. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Reply to your comments on Bring Flashforward Back

Everything I wrote was from a neutral point of view.

No opinions were in there and by reading the article(Do not know if you did) you would not know whether or not I was a fan of the show.

I will give credit that it would be better as a part in the flashforward page versus it's own individual page.

I would like to create a "Fan Campaign" Part of that Wiki Page.

Is there anything I should know beforehand?

Thanks!

Kris

--Krisp8888 (talk) 04:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Hi C.Fred,

Can you please cite what was wrong with the article that was created for Injurylawyers4u?

Please can show me specifics including:

- what you deemed sales/promotion lead material or tone of voice
- references
- citations

I personally believe there was no reference to promote the business as it is a piece to show the existence of an established UK company. If this article has been deleted then may I point you in the direction of the article contained here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Accident_Helpline as the template and wording has been based on the grammar and content contained within this.

As you are a moderator can I assume that I will be given a full explanation?

Kind Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clyde the ghost (talk • contribs) 17:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

wow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.217.27 (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Northumbria Intra Mural league

I just wanted to ask why this page was deleted. Im new to this and as such perhaps am unaware fully however the page serves the purpose of establishing knowledge of the Northumbria Intra Mural League. Though im only dealing with the one league that is because I have knowledge of it and others intend to build up the other leagues. There isn't a great deal of information on it which is the crux of the matter as that is why I am writing the page. Though I have linked to the website that hosts the league table fixtures and results so it is obviously a legitimate topic.

Any feedback to make the page ok would be appreciated, and if I understand your intro on this a reply on this would be appreciated as I have no idea what my talkback page is!

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.d.robertson501 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Tyw7 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Jonas Color

I think I already explaind the reason why I keep changing the color. These users are making too much fuss ovr something insignificant, and I think they should just leave it alone - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.5.238 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

As was noted on the talk page, "I don't like it" is not enough of a reason to change the colour. —C.Fred (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah but that's the reason other users are making for changing it back - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.11.229 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Caitlyn Taylor Love

No problem. If it's not official. :) QuasyBoy (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome and alterations

Dear C.Fred
Thank you for the welcome. This is all very new to me so am still finding my way through all of the codes, and thank you for helping with the picture (I couldn't work out how to decrease the size)
In answer to your question I am not the subject of the page. I only know him from having seen his work in the theatre, and believe that he deserves to be listed on here. His body of work is steadily increasing along with the number of original roles he has created. Also, as he has now worked in both the UK and America I think it is another reason for him to deserve a listing.
I understand that you have to monitor the content and I would be happy to discuss any alterations that you think I should make.
I wasn't sure about putting the link to buy the cd on the page but am happy for you to delete it.
Regarding the banner that you inserted, I will remove it if you don't mind. I think that I have been very neutral as a start to this page and will now wait to see what others add.
Also, in terms of the photograph, in the UK an actor's publicity shot is allowed to have unlimited use on the internet.
Best Wishes
(Smcontracts (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC))

Thanks for getting back so quickly ... I understand about the pictures and so have taken them off the page in preparation for them being deleted.

Maybe I'll try and get his representatives to post something up that I can use instead.

(Smcontracts (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC))

Response To Query

I've responded to your query at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aspies_For_Freedom_(4th_nomination) TheZachDOTnet (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Justin Bieber.

When will the protection expire? I've got something that I think is sourced pretty good to add. - Donald Duck (talk) 16:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

The protection is set to expire at the end of July. If you've got something to add, use the {{editprotected}} template on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I had completely forgotton I asked this. Anyway, why would it be protected through July 31st just for vandalism? That's a common problem with Wikipedia, and there are other articles that are vandalized and end up getting protected, but just for two weeks or so, if not less. - Donald Duck (talk) 18:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

I thought it seemed a touch long for vanilla vandalism, but I wasn't worried enough about it to take it up with the protecting admin. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

I think you should pursue it. =) Oh, and although not as bad this time, sorry about my reply being a little late. I'm usually good at responding on the same day. - Donald Duck (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

GlassCobra said the expiry date is June 10 so I think someone got it confused - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.5.238 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

The protection was changed after I looked; no confusion. —C.Fred (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

And then, after the protection expired today, vandalism started back up, so the article has now been protected until September. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Some days I despair of ever being able to unprotect Disney Channel and Nickelodeon articles.—Kww(talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

They're the proverbial obvious target for t(w)eens looking to be destructive and mock something, so you're right: by their nature, they're more likely to need to be protected and stay protected than the average/random article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

September seems like a prety long time. When will these Bieber haters get the message?? - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.1.66 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

The problem is, there will probably always be a new batch coming along, so never—or not until the next popular boy singer comes along. —C.Fred (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

What a nuisance. Where are all the girls on this site? - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.1.66 (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Like everywhere else on the Internet, hiding to avoid unwanted attention from boys. :) —C.Fred (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Newsflash. I am a girl! And I know for a fact that all we want is boys (e.g JB) - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.1.66 (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

I know you and I don't always get along, but I want to thank you for helping me with Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety as its the first article I've created. ZacharyLassiter (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Removed Speedy Deletion for Hahn, Texas Communications

That's fine, but then someone needs to start working on the site to validate notability and eliminate advertising issues. And it should not be anyone with a COI relationship. To date there has not been one single edit since the original notices were placed about advertising, notability and deletion 15:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4804BT (talk • contribs)

Blackhawks Parade in Chicago

Is there an article or section somewhere regarding the parade in Chicago yesterday? My understanding is that the turnout was substantial (~2million). Would you be willing to get some free images of the parade on flickr, or somewhere else? Thanks in advance for the help! ---kilbad (talk) 15:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

what you did

Oi! you changed it all withut saying why! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.33.148 (talk) 09:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Changed all of what? I don't see any edits you made that I changed back. —C.Fred (talk) 12:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

TSLOD Episodes

Isn't "Breakup in Paris" the season finale? - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.1.66 (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

hey. you recently deleted a page i made of a band due to A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Could you tell me what would indicate the importance. Is there some sort of code i have to put in the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arabaturr (talk • contribs) 01:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...For reverting vandalism on my talk page; I owe you one! ;) Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 00:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Page protection

Due to you being a good insta-protector, you might want to attack Neutral Milk Hotel due to vandalism. There is also a user on IRC who is directing me to these articles. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

And on In the Aeroplane Over the Sea. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

And on Millionaires (band). Kevin Rutherford (talk)

And here: In the Court of the Crimson King. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Creed (band). Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Scott Stapp. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Pending Changes

I've removed the pending changes protection from In the Court of the Crimson King and replaced it with semiprotection. During the first week, only articles listed in the queue may be protected with pending changes. Nakon 01:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Invitation

Hi. Please join us in the discussion at Talk:Aspect ratio (image)#List_of_stations. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 23:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Total Drama World Tour

I'm just wondering really why you have reverted my acceptance of pending changes to Total Drama World Tour as to me there didn't seem to be anything obviously wrong or vandalish about them? --Wintonian (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, C.Fred. You have new messages at Wintonian's talk page.
Message added 16:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Total Drama World Tour Elimination Table

Excuse me sir, but you keep on putting the wrong information down for the teams on the elimination table. LeShawna IS on Team Victory, not Team Chris, Sierra IS on Team Chris, not Amazon(yet), and Izzy IS on Team Amazon, not Team Victory. I'm sorry if you think this i wrong, but watch the episode on YouTube or look up the information, because my info is correct. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.177.208.122 (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The reverts I've done have been for forecasted eliminations, for who will be eliminated beyond the first episode. —C.Fred (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Oops!

Wasn't thinking. :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 04:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I will drive you from wikipedia if it is the last thing I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaminade1 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Delete Me Please

Hello, I have had a page I spent a long time on deleted and I no longer wish to have an anything to do with Wikipedia. Whilst I understand that contributions to other pages will have to remain I wish my own user details to be deleted. I am furious that someone should decide my contribution is not worthy of being on here and I presume that they haven't seen some of the RUBBISH that has survived!!

(Smcontracts (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC))

KPDO

Hello - Although we are currently broadcasting at a low range we are licensed and approved to increase our signal strength, and will be doing so later this month. We do not wish to be branded as a "low-powered" station so that when we make the transition to the stronger transmitter (one that would not be classified as "low-powered") our branding and marketing is in line with the power and range of our broadcasts. KPDO is currently, technically speaking, broadcasting at a low power, but does not fall into the "low-powered radio station" category. Nlossing (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Agile-team page

Dear Fred, Thank you for your feedback to the Agile-Team page. We are working on it in accordance with your feedback. The references and additional content will be added. Safro Elizabeth (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Request

Do you mind intervening here - Talk:Baby_(Justin_Bieber_song)#Synthpop ? Thanks! Candyo32 (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: A revaluation of bartab's wikipedia entry

C.Fred,

I have redone the bartab wikipedia entry and would appreciate it a lot if you wouldn't mind taking another look.

Thank you,

Nate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Natejp24 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Editing Help

Dear C.Fred, Could you point me to someone who can help edit the Atlantic Airlines in Lakeland Florida on Wikipedia. We are stumped and trying to find someone who knows how to do this. I see where you work on AirTrans page. My e-mail: blanton@atlanticair.com Atlanticairlines (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

My Name

My name has the number 7 in it. So there are 7 7's whats so bad about that? 00:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutput7777777 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your suggestion and concern but I will not act on itNutput7777777 (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC) I am trying to change my name but am having trouble can you help me since you are the one who is wanting me 2. yours truelyNutput7777777 (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I HAVE FIXED IT JUST FOR YOU!YEAH YEAH NUTTY (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

THanks?????

Thanks for keeping an eye out for me...................... not thats it weird or anything.................. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutput7777777 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Familiar looking?

I had a brief run in with McYel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) yesterday. There's something about the snarky tone, pedantic edit summaries and sarcastic imagery that reminds me of someone, but I can't place who. Since he's editing mainly Disney type articles, I thought maybe you could recognize him.—Kww(talk) 17:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

LOL...I am NOT the "Disney Anon" :))

Bambifan? User:Bambifan101/User:Iluvteletubbies/User:Sjakoj/Junglebook2hater/65.0.181.192(READ THIS...[4]) is NOT User:McYel/72.178.5.68/me!--McYel (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Ratinator·Talk 19:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

If you hadn't moved List of characters in The Fairly OddParents to an inappropriate page title, you wouldn't have needed to be warned. —C.Fred (talk) 19:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Unfair Warning

You stated if I continued to move pages, which I have only done once, so a general note NOT a warning was needed therefore you are abusing templates. The move was in good faith because on the television line up, the title is clearly "Fairly Odd Parents" If you do check the television schedule it was correct so there. You need to think before warning. Ratinator·Talk 19:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please state

State those page moves then please. I believe they were fine. Ratinator·Talk 19:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:GREEN DAY

Hi, I've seen you frequently around the article Green Day and other related articles. Please consider joining the Green Day WikiProject, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage and detail regarding Green Day. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Regards, Rock drum _Ba-dum^Crash 19:36, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

editing

hello c.fred

i only defaced the Isaaq article because my article continues to be vandalised by evertfoot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatimamadar (talk • contribs) 21:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

i read it

i didnt like what he said i just doing may best that i can do i just dont whand to get in any trouble you see —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leer5454 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Rachael Faye Hill Article

Thanks for the changes you made to the Rachael Faye Hill article, is reads much better now!

MartinManson (talk) 22:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Guilty People

Please reconsider the speedy on this one. As the article itself states, it's almost exclusively an online publication that calls itself a magazine. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

If you can put a link to the online publication at Talk:Guilty People, that will make it easier to evaluate just what the publication considers itself—and whether the article is eligible for A7 as a web publication or a company. —C.Fred (talk) 23:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what that link would be - the only thing my search turns up is (http://www.guiltypeople.nl/#/home/), which is less than helpful on a lot of levels. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 00:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Rachael Faye Hill AfD

Hi. The Rachael Faye Hill article that you contributed to recently had been added as an AfD. I would like to invite you to contribute to the AfD discussion as to whether or not the article should be deleted here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachael_Faye_Hill. MartinManson (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Gandla redirected to ganiga.

Hi Fred -- Gandla is a famous sub caste of reddy caste in karim nagar and adilabad districts of andhrapradesh. Ganiga is actually oil ganiga group. Goud caste is known as goundla and not gandla. Please refer to reddyonline.com or other reddy websites about reddy sub castes .request not to divert it to ganiga .

Thanks reddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I can provide some more use full sites but please wait.

Fred -- Thanks for your quick reply ..please give me some time and i will provide you the details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Reddy has 52 sub groups and motati gudati and gandla are the famous sub groups.

Hi Fred- I will provide enough information to you soon and you can also verify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Apology

I apologize for this forum shopping incident. I personally think I do deserve the rights for the following reasons: Never misused the tool, been recently making good edits and reading the vandalism policy, reading when to use and how to use warnings. If I continue to make good edits like another administrator has said before, do you think it is possible I will get these rights back? --Ratinator·Talk 17:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Specifically

Are you saying that I shouldn't apply for only rollback rights, or can I apply for other things such as being a reviser? --Ratinator·Talk 18:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't why you trout slapped C.Fred. He did nothing wrong. About applying, don't waste your time applying for anything now. Nobody will even consider giving you rights after what you did today. You will have to wait for awhile for this to be forgotten before reapplying for anything, JDDJS (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

It's called a joke... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratinator (talk • contribs)

thanks

DougsTech (talk) has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rudy Gay Clause

The “Rudy Gay Clause” expressed by the user references an NCAA clause which banned colleges from scrimmaging AAU teams in November. Whether the clause is generally accepted as the “Rudy Gay Clause” is beside the point (and still not proven). No such clause exists, period. Associating the name to Rudy Gay is slandering his name. The secondary source is using opinion to back up this point of the argument; an argument to which references false information of a clause that does not exist per NCAA rules and regulations: http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/wps/wcm/connect/ncaa/NCAA/Legislation%20and%20Governance/Eligibility%20and%20Recruiting/Recruiting/recruiting.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 02:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually, yes, it does exist. It was proposal No. 03-92, which passed:

The Management Council approved another important proposal that affects men's basketball. Council members OK'd Proposal No. 03-92, which precludes teams from scheduling exhibition games against noncollegiate teams. The proposal alleviates pressure for basketball coaches to schedule exhibition games against "club" teams run by people with connections to high-school prospects.

Strikehold (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Teenage Dream

If you think the article is ready, it needs to be discussed somewhere other than the incubator talk page. WT:MUSIC may be the right place. I sense a process problem here: I don't know where to discuss whether an incubated article is ready.—Kww(talk) 22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

"Interested", certainly. Unbiased? That's what makes me hesitant. Asking about a Katy Perry album on a talk page dominated by Katy Perry fans just doesn't sit well with me.—Kww(talk) 22:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Cole World

The album was redirect by an AfD as you know. Well I have added more sources at my draft at User:STATicVerseatide/Cole World. Is it ready for an article? As of note about the title: Cha Cha Answers which is a free version of KGB said that a title had not yet been chosin. I dont know if there is enough sourcing to still pass WP:HAMMER Red Flag on the Right Side 01:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Rachael Faye Hill Deletion Review

Hi, as you were a significant contributor to the Rachael Faye Hill article and also contributed to the Rachael Faye Hill AfD, I would like to invite you to contribute to the deletion review to express your opinions.

The deletion review is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_July_15#Rachael_Faye_Hill

MartinManson (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

My tagging The Rugby Forum

Hi C.Fred,
If you think I just wasn't thinking straight when I added the WP:PROD tag (and with a WP:CSD reason)... well, erm, I completely agree with you! Also, thanks for not biting this oldie for a newbie mistake. What was I thinking?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

The Rugby Forum

Hi C.Fred, any chance you can point me in the correct direction to a possible guide for a layout of the forum? Rowlan placed an image in on the page and I would like to move it or at least align it to make it look a little tidier. Any help would be much appreciated. Welshman25 (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Jesse Goldwater

Hi-

As the contributor on the Jesse Goldwater page, I would like to have access to the text so I can resubmit it to prove significance to wikipedia. It was deleted under the terms that there were not sources provided, and that he was related to other people of merit. While he is indeed related to such people, the purpose of the article was not for those reasons. I would like access so that I might provide sources, along with a clean up of the article to establish him as a notable person worth of inclusion in wikipedia's archives. Thank you for your consideration.

Pennymoon (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Pennymoon

How can I make that right?

Thank you very much for your answer. However, I am not writing about my book … I am writing about science … If mentioning the title of my book as reference is a problem, I will not post it … However, readers will understand that the text is coming from the other references listed on that page … How can I make that right? Fhbrain (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Those who dwell under bridges

In case you missed it, the IP who has been posting to may talk page and removed content from List of Jonas L.A. episodes is a troll. "She" has posted on my talk page in the past.[5] She commits subtle vandalism,[6] like changing colours on pages for no reason. She seems able to maintain an IP for as long as she wants but changes it as soon as she's identified as a vandal or her edits are reverted, as she's done at the Jonas article. I'm not sure what to do about her. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Jason Steed (Book Series)

While I appreciate that you are keen to make Wikipedia a wonderful encyclopedia full of amazing facts, can I ask if you actually checked the article Jason Steed (Book Series) before you deleted it per "deletion discussion"? This delection discussion took place in June 2009 - more than a year ago - and, since then, new references have been added, a publication date set and tributes paid to the book by the author Joe Craig - who is officially considered 'Wikipedia notable.' Just thought I'd ask.--Onthemap (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Would absolutely love to C.Fred but, of course, you have deleted the page. So that makes it rather hard, or rather well nigh impossible, doesn't it???! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onthemap (talk • contribs) 12:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Could only find an old copy, but here are a couple of refs: This one [7] is a newspaper article which gives most of the details. This [8] gives details of the publishing deal and how the book is an "internet hit", this [9] lists the book as a finalist in the Indie Book Awards and this [10] is an official interview with the writer from TeensReadToo.com. is this enough to be getting on with?--Onthemap (talk) 14:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Jonas Color Revert

Is there a reason why everyone keeps reverting List of Jonas L.A Episodes? It's not vandalism, it's more of a 'edit war' which other users are doing, not me. As you know this user is being unreasonable about everything including sourcs for summaries for TSLOD episodes. I really dont know what his problem is - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.0.252 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

At least one of your edits today was more than just a colour change. It added stray episode blurbs outside of the table, so I know that was reverted as disruptive. As for the colour changes, it's the same as the last time you asked: you have failed to generate consensus at the talk page to change the colours. Likewise, as explained at User talk:AussieLegend where you asked within the past 24 hours, you have not provided reliable sources for the episode summaries. —C.Fred (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Samurai Sam's Article

I recieved your message about my edits to the Samurai Sam's Teriyaki Grill article and I am aware that companies are discouraged from making edits to their own page. However, I contacted the Wikimedia Support Team about making revisions of a factual nature and I was told that fixing factual inaccuaracies was allowed. I do not feel my edits were COI as they were simply correcting errors in a way directed by the Wikimedia Support Team.

JoanTeller (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Rudy Gay Clause

Now that you’ve done your due diligence instead of blindly taking a secondary source verbatim, we can discuss the real matter.

1.) Your secondary source calling the NCAA ruling “The Rudy Gay Clause” is not even noted by an author: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jan/09/20050109-125720-7898r/

The credentials of the writer are incapable of being ascertained.

2.) Apparently you aren’t a college sports fan. The source, while not specifying an author, is The Washington Times. Gary Williams of the Maryland Terrapins had a gripe against Rudy Gay for choosing Uconn over Maryland, and made his feelings know publicly concerning the recruitment process. College Park, Maryland (home of the Maryland Terrapins) is 15 minutes from the actual, physical, location of The Washington Post. Are you seeing where the local bias comes into play? Then is should come as no surprise that a source noted from The Washington Post would take creative license in an attempt to bash the former recruit that scorned his/her (gender is optional seeing as though no source is noted) team. Just because a bitter Maryland fan decides to adopt the term does not make this factual information. Rudy Gay has no clause for which he was named. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Please Explain

I was under the impression that Wikipedia was not a forum for humorous content, and that articles should be of an encyclopedic nature. If this is true, then why is the following article on Wikipedia?

[[11]]

Thanks!

Barshopdoyle (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

My photo uploads

PLEASE NOTE: The files I uploaded for Tim DeKay, Tim Omundson, and Willie Garson after I edited them from Tammyinlalaland's Flickr account were used *with her permission.* During the July 4th holiday, she and I corresponded via her Twitter account, which is the only way I have of contacting her. I just went on Twitter, and copied and pasted what I could find of our conversation regarding her Flickr pics.

@tammyinlalaland Luv ur WC Paley pics. I edit Wikipedia. May I post ur Matt B & Tim for profile pic w/credit 2 U? 6 minutes ago via 6:16 PM Jul 4th via web

@watsammatta_u sure... I posted them For fans to use 7:39 PM Jul 4th via TweetDeck in reply to watsammatta_u

Someone else posted a Matt Bomer pic since then, so I wanted to use the pics I uploaded. Do you need tweets for each separate picture, or what else can I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Watsammatta u (talk • contribs) 04:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for clarifying the wikipediholism page for me.

Barshopdoyle (talk) 20:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia and relevent authorites

Your message: Editors on Wikipedia who are having disputes, such as the one about the link, should settle them within Wikipedia. Threats of legal or similar outside action are not allowed; editors who make such threats are subject to having their accounts immediately blocked.

Hence I quoted Wikipedia and all other relevent authorites i.e. 'wikipedia chain of command' non legal. Read it properly please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John c mcglinchey (talk • contribs) 23:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Issue is resolved, Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John c mcglinchey (talk • contribs) 23:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Why has my page been deleted

Hi,

I wrote a particular page but it looks as though it has been deleted due to a copyright infringement. I wrote the article and I wish to post it on wikipedia and archiplanet. How is this an infringement if I wrote the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugosmart2009 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

iCarly.

Regarding season 3, episode 16, do you know why Jennette was in the hospital? If not, could you find out why? Thanks! - Donald Duck (talk) 00:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

You

You annoy me. I'm just putting it out there. No need to police someone's user talk page. I'm fairly positive that woul've been deleted in a day. Go scrutinize some iCarly articles or whatever it is you do. Rowlan (talk) 02:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

User Majorclanger_Jr.

Since you're the only other person (aside from me) to have any contact with this account, I'd like to bring this: [12] to your attention. I'd appreciate it if you could have a look. Majorclanger (talk) 23:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, sir! Majorclanger (talk) 23:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually, would you mind deleting his user page as well? As it stands, it's a direct copy of mine. Majorclanger (talk) 23:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Coming here because you have some history with this, and it would take too long to explain... This guy is back again as DoggieRunning, after a brief foray as StarkRunning. All of the edits from this sock have been insertion of false info, creation of useless templates (Template:Vandalprot), creation of a likely hoax page (Chris Phillips (voice actor) - note the external links have nothing to do with the subject of the article), and his usual messages to 24.44.119.71, who I suspect is his "good hand". Anyway, please do what it is you do! Majorclanger (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Why has my page been deleted

Hi,

I just tried to create a page and it was deleted as it has been tagged for quick deletion. I was just wondering why this is and whether there may be something that could be done to rectify the situation?

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanybdrummer (talk • contribs) 14:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Prod. Codes

I'm getting them from Showfax (before the pages got deleted) and from the Physical Copy of the Disney Channel schedule. Besides the fact that the prod. codes posted over at The Suite Life on Deck, Wizards of Waverly Place are not be referenced and yet they don't get reverted. I'll go ahead and revert all prod. codes on those pages since they are not referenced. Thanks for the help. - Alec2011 (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision deletion

Could you look at this DIFF and see if it qualifies for Revision deletion? TIA ----moreno oso (talk) 12:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Protection request

I've requested that Jennette McCurdy be semi-protected. --Confession0791 (talk) 00:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

David Amoo

It seems pretty likely that David Amoo has a chance of making him debut tonight for Liverpool FC. Any chance you can send a copy of the previously deleted article (which failed WP:ATH and WP:GNG) to my sandbox, so I can tidy it up in preparation for adding again this evening if he makes his first team debut. Many thanks Steve-Ho (talk) 05:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

List of Ice Age characters

Could you, please, defend your rush statements "..deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of Ice Age characters.. Some of the changes, such as from Neanderthal to Cro-Magnon, are clearly inappropriate..."?

Any references to Neanderthals still living 20'000 years ago (time of the Ice Age movie action), or possessing skills for making advanced tools and decorations of Upper Paleolithic, clearly shown in the movie, or domesticating animals (dogs)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.92.203 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The rest of the article uses the term "Neanderthal." Based on that, your spot changes are what appear inappropriate. Really, in this case, what's relevant is not whether Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons were the appropriate skill set but what the movie creators intended them to be; I'll go checking the reviews and secondary sources to see if they use one term or the other most of the time. —C.Fred (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Simon Birch

It may be time to semi-protect the Simon Birch page. IP 98.225.234.245 came back again and re-added the false information about Adrienne Bailon. Please re-block that IP addresses. - RRabbit42 (talk) 01:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Page Deletion

Hi, I am attempting to create a page for my fraternity called Tau Phi Sigma, the page was deleted and I am unsure of how to revise it. I have permissions to use the copywritten information on the national website . Must I quote the material Cite it in a specific format? Your input is appreciated

Regards Ivan Enriquez (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 30 July 2010 (UTC).

Highroad No. 28

Dear C.Fred The page "Highroad No. 28" was deleted on the basis of being (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

The band are well know in Australia, in particularly Sydney and Melbourne, and have released 4 CD's, 2 of which received international distribution Additionally, they have toured many parts of Australia and have a solid fan base.

Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Dearest Fred,

I understand and I will update the page with additional independent sources.

Warm regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Highroad No. 28 page redone

Hi Fred, I have just redone the Highroad No. 28 page again, this time including many more external links and details. Please let me know if their are any problems. I certainly have no problems getting more links to verify the bands authenticity and notability within Australia. Warm regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi again

Fred, I received another deletion notice. I believe the page fits all criteria- please let me know what the problem is and I will certainly rectify ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Free Images

Hi, a question again about Free Images. What makes something a free image? Is something from Getty Images free? I have an image for the Eddie Barlow page and want to know if I can use it. Thanks Welshman25 (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

User talk:LMGHS Webmaster

I have unblocked this user, after receiving the email that he sent to OTRS. Everything in that department looks to be on the up and up. I would very much appreciate it if you could continue to help him with his other issues with editing the article. Thank you, NW (Talk) 15:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Rudy Gay Clause

Now that you’ve done your due diligence instead of blindly taking a secondary source verbatim, we can discuss the real matter.

1.) Your secondary source calling the NCAA ruling “The Rudy Gay Clause” is not even noted by an author: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jan/09/20050109-125720-7898r/

The credentials of the writer are incapable of being ascertained.

2.) Apparently you aren’t a college sports fan. The source, while not specifying an author, is The Washington Times. Gary Williams of the Maryland Terrapins had a gripe against Rudy Gay for choosing Uconn over Maryland, and made his feelings know publicly concerning the recruitment process. College Park, Maryland (home of the Maryland Terrapins) is 15 minutes from the actual, physical, location of The Washington Post. Are you seeing where the local bias comes into play? Then it should come as no surprise that a source noted from The Washington Post would take creative license in an attempt to bash the former recruit that scorned his/her (gender is optional seeing as though no source is noted) team. Just because a bitter Maryland fan decides to adopt the term does not make this factual information. Rudy Gay has no clause for which he was named. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

First, verbatim quote from the story: "The NCAA has adopted the 'Rudy Gay' clause when it comes to scheduling November exhibitions." Second, the byline is the Associated Press; it's probably not a writer from the Post, much less one from the Times, who wrote the story. Even if it were, it's been reviewed and vetted not just by a local editor's desk, but by the national wire service desk. The source is reliable and neutral, end of story. —C.Fred (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Reverted your edits concerning fuze

My husband, who is an engineer and a recipient of the Charles Christian Lauritsen award, pointed out the misspelling. As he is a recognized expert in this field, I do believe he would know how to spell fuze. Here is the dictionary definition: [13] And as referred to in the article it deals with a proximity fuze. That is the correct spelling based on article usage and definition.

Respectfully,

LittleRedWriter (talk) 16:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)LittleRedWriter

Defintion and spelling of fuse at the Cambridge Dictionary. Respectfully, --Ischium (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

New IP, same user

Check the Simon Birch page again. You will see that 98.225.213.148 is adding the same false information as 98.225.234.245. - RRabbit42 (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Highroad No. 28- more citations added. Please let me know anymore needed.

Dear Fred, I have added extensive citations to the Highroad No. 28 page to conform to the expectations of Wiki.

You stated "None of your assertions about the band that you made on my talk page (international touring, multiple major-label albums) were present in the article text"

On the Wiki page I never made any assertions that the band were internationally touring, or had multiple major-label albums. The albums were released via independent label(s) DSM99 Records. Distribution of the albums are by WJO Distribution. They are additional labels and distributors I added their, with citations present.

All the citations (apart from the Myspace and Facebook ones- and they are external refernces) are from independent sources.

Can you please let me know if anymore needs to be done, because I cannot see how the page does not conform to Wikis standards. Many Thanks, Warm regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Bobby Brackins

This guy has a song on the Hot 100. Isn't that enough to be significant? Please undelete and I can add that line. Djbob (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

I Need To Help !!

Why deleted Aya Mamdouh Page ?

I tried to help The site and give him some information —Preceding unsigned comment added by SchalkeJWT (talk • contribs) 05:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Edge-Sweets Company Copyright Violation

I'm responding in regards to the Edge-Sweets Copyright violation you made me aware of.

I assure you this cannot be a copyright violation, as I am the owner of the site and was trying to update the Wikipedia article to better reflect that company and what it does.

Since I am the owner of the site, I am entitled to copy the data. I can confirm this information if you wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oppassum (talk • contribs) 19:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

C.Fred deletion of Mark Bowen Barron

Dear C.Fred

I was posting the bio for Mark Bowen Barron. It was flagged for copywrite issue with www.capitalcrew.com.

I was in the process of reading what to do about this as I do have permission to use the text from the website, but it was deleted by you before I could figure out how to remedy the situation.

After reading what is necessary to secure the needed permissions I will try and post this again in the future. I hope this deletion will not effect the future submission.

I thank you for your efforts.

DKEmery —Preceding unsigned comment added by DKEmery (talk • contribs) 04:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ContrillionAU

With 12 edits, this should be speedily closed. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Here is the link: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ContrillionAU ----moreno oso (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I've suggested to the user that he tag the page db-author. We'll see what happens. —C.Fred (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Either you're too kind or too nice. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

TDWT & Design Star

Hi C. Fred! We have come in contact with each other before with the Total Drama World Tour article! I was wondering, if you could maybe come back to the discussion about the elimination table? It would be of great help! Also, I have recently been constantly editing Design Star. The article is getting way too long, and I need your help. Can you create 5 separate articles for each DS season, and then place the info from the current main article in each of them? If you can, thank you so much! TDI19 (talk) 23:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Good point. When the storm calms down jump back in! Haha! I really could use your help on Design Star, if you are up to it! TDI19 (talk) 01:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Woodinville Repertory Theatre deletion

I would like to discuss with you why you chose to delete the article I wrote about WRT. WRT is, yes, a small little company in a small town outside of Seattle but that does not mean it is not significant. It is referenced in the Peg Phillips article but gives no other details. So I looked them up as a way to help honor her and her work.

Since you cited "Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" as the reason you deleted the article; could you please explain to me what would give you the impression of importance of WRT? I will happily find more information if needed.

I thought a small theatre company would be important. That they offer a scholarship would be important. That they were founded by an Emmy nominated actress would be important. I know there are not a lot of community theatre entries on Wikipedia and I feel that is wrong. I think more small companies, more mom and pop outfits should have an on-line presence that includes Wikipedia. This is a user generated site and what one person finds important someone else may not. Small businesses make up the majority of businesses in this country and the majority of employers. They sadly do not make up the majority of the economy, but that does not make them any less important.

The Village Theatre in Issaquah, WA has an entry and they started as a small community theatre. Everyone starts small and builds from there.

Your advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

nolagoatgirl14 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolagoatgirl14 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Brocket 99

Hi Fred

I simply added a relevant Brocket 99 news page link. Kim Siever and Frehley72 contunually undue my additional link and create a editing war. So I am unsure of what to do. If you could check the link I added and see for yourself if the link is relevant to Brocket 99 or not.

KangChulsu (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)KangChulsu

Rugby Forum

It is debatable whether a forum really merits an article but this article really ought not to be in the rugby league category as this is not a rugby league forum nor should it be in rugby football since that category is generally reserved for sports that are akin to rugby but aren't rugby or the game pre the 1895 great schism. Nor should "rugby" be used to stand for "rugby union" as this goes against the manual of style as "rugby" can be used to refer to rugby league as well.GordyB (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

It does not cover rugby league, you are allowed to discuss rugby league. I have yet to come across a rugby union forum that didn't have a rugby league subforum or a rugby league site that didn't have rugby union subforum but this is not a rugby league forum. It is 99% rugby union with rugby league given the occasional mention.GordyB (talk) 20:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Woohoo

It's not fan art, I just wanted a way for my image to stay as the cover, as x-tinas website claims it is offcial . --WikiGaGa (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Cole World

Hey could you keep an eye on Cole World like making sure there are no unsourced name or track changes cause i'll have no internet acess for about a week. Thank you in advance. Red Flag on the Right Side 21:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I came across this article about an unreleased album, and while there has been improvement since its AfD I think that it should be incubated until the track listing is complete. WP:NALBUMS does say that "an unreleased album may qualify for an advance article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it", but there's only a few sentences right now and the album's not to be released for about two more months. It can be covered at the artist's article until the track listing is complete. The artist's article should include a summary of the album anyway. Cliff smith ^talk 00:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Help needed

Please would it be possible for you to email me the contents of the deleted article Jason Steed (Book series)? (You deleted it in July). The book is due out in three weeks time and I gather wide-spread publicity may finally make this book Wikipedia notable. I want to use the original article as the basis for a new one when/if this finally happens. By the way, you deleted it under copyright infringement when, actually, it was released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License - as is everything written on Wikipedia.-- Myosotis Scorpioides 15:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Sigma Lambda Phi

Can you also help me in Sigma Lambda Phi? They claim to have been started in 1933 in Renfrew Ontario, but also take the history of a local *Sorority* at Duquesne as their own.Naraht (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

A-yup. If you want *really* ugly take a look at the Philippine Phi Beta Kappa...Naraht (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Well he gave up on Ontario, shall we try for 1933?Naraht (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for my mistake

Hi CFred, Listen I'm sorry for my copyrighted stuff I posted on Chris Burrous. My mistake. It won't happen again. Please don't ban me from this site. From now I will not post any copyrighted stuff on this site.

 -What was this guy eating? —Preceding unsigned comment added by What was this guy eating? (talk • contribs) 03:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

ZTA Notable Members

As a member of Zeta Tau Alpha, I can look up all members (living or dead) by name, chapter, or other demographics through the fraternity's official website ( http://www.zetataualpha.org/ ). Shannon James is not a member. There are five Shannon's from the chapter at the University of Central Florida (over years and years of members). None of them is a James. There has been one James in all that time, but, again, not Shannon.

It is common practice for a girl to RELINQUISH sorority membership if she chooses to participate in Playboy or other similar activities. So, even if she was a collegian member for a brief while, she is not, now. She can't be a notable member if she is not a member at all.

Austinzta (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Neither of the sources listed (Playboy's site nor her Model Mayhem profile) state anything about Zeta Tau Alpha. Her own site simply re-directs back to Playboy. Neither of the sources cited claim that she is (or ever was) a member.

Austinzta (talk) 21:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter

Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief	Features Infobox road upgrade Editing needed near bottom of leaderboard Junction list updates	State and national updates Project reports
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Bobby Brackins

Hey there. Sorry for the late response, but the link I gave was correct. Though it states that there is no news about the artist it also lists his charted song, which is currently #76 on the Hot 100 and #19 on Rap Songs.

Djbob (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

One Pinoy

Hi CFred,

Im a new contributor on your site. I dont know yet the full lists of allowed and not allowed. On the one pinoy contribution, it's an artcle id like to add (if permitted by you) regarding an advocacy which is now being promoted worldwide. I dont how you put an article without sounding like advertising it, your suggestion is very much appreciated.

Thanks

mmlazaro —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmlazaro (talk • contribs) 14:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Mmlazaro (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

How do u welcome ppl on Wikipedia before anyone else?

I just wanna have that good feeling of being the 1st to welcome someone. Respond on my talk page, if you will plz. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 11:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC))

AND HOW DO U BECOME AN ADMIN TOO? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealityShowsRock (talk • contribs) 11:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

URGENT NOTICE

RealitySHowsROCK has come up with a briliant idea called total drama roleplay where people on wikipedia act as characters! Act fast and message Realityshowsrock to choose who u want to be!Duncan is taken!--Antonio cruzazul (talk) 23:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not interested in any on-Wiki gaming. —C.Fred (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Whoops!

Sorry cfred, was meant to be in sandbox. U ok 2day? Master696 (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC) master696

Extreme Vandalism

Look at the last revision of Jennette McCurdy. It was reverted by a bot, but it was libellous and grossly defamatory. --Confession0791 (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

I'd eventually like to recieve rollback rights. When I visited the request page, the most common reason for denial was lack of experience. They suggest going to Recent Changes and revert 50 vandalisms. I went there, but found nothing to revert. Do you have any advice? --Confession0791 (talk) 02:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

please give clarity to why you deleted the Aaron Sledge content? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asledge (talk • contribs) 22:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

You better take a look at this hoax, administrator

Take a look at Total Drama World Tour Cycle 1. I already warned a user about the page, saying that you shouldn't create an article from imagination. If you happen to ban them, please don't ban them indefinitely. Admittedly, I've been banned before and have learned from my mistakes. Leave a message on my talk page about what to do with TDWT Cycle 1. Thanks for your time to look at this message, and I highly respect as an admin. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC))

PS. How do you become an admin? Do I need to have a certain edit count? Because I have heard things about low edit counts decreasing your fighting chance to be an admin. RealityShowsRock (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, C. Fred

Thanks for deleting TDWT cycle 1. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC))

Reality Island: Tahiti

You recently deleted a couple other articles I tagged for deletion, so I thought I'd ask you about this. It says it's a "wikipedia reality show"? It seems to be a Poptropica thing, but I really know nothing about it, so I'll leave it up to you. Nolelover 19:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Nvm. It was speedied. Nolelover 21:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Sorry. I will do that next time. But I would like the succession boxes in every manager that won the competition. I believe not only is it relevant but the template helps organize the navigational boxes.

As far as the admin, he is vandalizing a great deal of articles regardless of whether the edits are great, positive contributions or not.

As far as the table of results on the List of Copa Libertadores winning managers, the table at the bottom is a table of results; just a very basic one. I merely became more detailed. I want to ask you if you could help me fix a few details here and there on the list. It would make a great FL. Of course, I would be more than happy to help you promote anything you are working on as long as they meet whatever criteria required.

I am here to expand and help, not make enemies. Unfortunetly, some people (like the admin reverting like crazy) are more concerned with blocking then editing (look at the last 30 contributions).

Would you become my mentor? I still don't quite get why certain people on wiki are the way they are and I would like to have someone show me. You're the first one to actually be willing to talk about the edits. Super anode (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Super anode (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

LOL I think you are confused. The table is of results but of managers, not teams. Look carefully, my friend. The tables are highly relevant to the list itself. I took the liberty of reverting the article.Super anode (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Not to mention, the list is completely sourced; the tables at the bottom are there to facilitate the reader in figuring out basic info (who was the most successful coach, least successful, how many times have he won it); things that can't be done on the previous article. Super anode (talk) 17:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Plus, the Copa Libertadores article is full of details (the main reason why this sort of lists were created). It should be ready for FA status in a while so adding a really big table would dampen that goal. Super anode (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up Fred. Still trying to get accustomed to the site. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottCruz (talk • contribs) 21:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

redshirt, two uploads

We are the agency that took his photo, and have authorization to upload to his Wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikakeaulii (talk • contribs) 21:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Am I replying to the thread correctly?

Thanks for your help, and just to clarify: 1. re: pic - I must send email the photo granting permission 2. re: text - I must rephrase the text included, so as not to be a direct duplicate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikakeaulii (talk • contribs) 21:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the "point of neutrality" link. I have been trying to edit the text to be as neutral as possible and will review the material you've given me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikakeaulii (talk • contribs) 22:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for explaining the image process to Mikakeaulii, I was about ready to write something along those lines when I saw the COI tag added to the article :-) Regards Hekerui (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Total Drama drama

Can you please ban this user? [14] I am sick of revising their edits in the Total Drama articles. Thanks! TDI19 (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I am confused now. That IP that is banned was not the one I asked about. That's strange. The real one is 99.190.121.187. TDI19 (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok! I wonder why the IP blamed me for his banning? TDI19 (talk) 14:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Westville High School (a FYI)

Hi, I just wanted you to know that that vandal you reverted is actually a long term vandal named User:The South Boat Diet of Worms or his recent name, User:Slavemodsquad. He focuses on the Illinois cities, Danville and Westville. --Bsadowski1 02:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

icarly crossover

regarding this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICarly&curid=10292532&diff=383132887&oldid=383120997. so you know it is a 3 parter, since it is going take two weeks to be filed.

one reguar episodes take one week to film for the show two parter one hr movie's take 2 weeks two film. iStart a fan war is a two parter and it took two weeks to film. so the crossover will be a 3 parter 90 minute episode since it is going to take 3 weeks to filmSaylaveer (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Since you usually edit within this topic.

I was wondering if you would like to say your thoughts on a proposal on the talk page of Total Drama (series)? Nilocla ^{♈ ☮} 22:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Intuition pump

I was hoping you could help me understand how to improve this article.

It's not very long, but since the topic is a term coined by a specific person, it includes links to articles on two of his books, and a quote from each. It also has a direct citation for the term.

Now, we could add citations for the books, but they already have full articles, so I'm not sure how that will help much. What am I missing? How would you improve this article so that you'd be happy with the tag's removal? Dylan Flaherty (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your userpage being tagged

Looks like a sock may be at work. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Tau Phi Sigma

Hello,

This article was recreated again after your recent deletion. I suspect it may still be a copyvio, but the URL that it was previously copied from is now mysteriously no longer on the web server :) Is there any chance you could look at the deleted version and compare it to the current article? I believe it's still a copyvio if it's basically identical, even if the original page has been taken down.

(Prefer replies here, thanks!)

Thparkth (talk) 03:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

It's not identical. See my comments on the talk page, which include the updated URL for the about page. —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift response. I agree with all your comments. Thparkth (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

lady gaga

you want a source ? look at the video from her concert , behind gaga , 13 million albums http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwZcbPRyma4 now please stop change it !!!!! --Bar17 (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Bar17, YouTube is generally not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. The Daily News, however, is. –Chase (talk) 23:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

her label compeny gave it to her you cant see ??? 13 million albums , its from the 20.8.10 3 weeks ago her label know exactly how many gaga sold and they gave it to her !!!!! you try to tell me that her label dont know how many she sold and a lame news paper know ??? you source is an old source , i brought a new and reliable source her label compeny --Bar17 (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

What??? You deleted my post???

I am horrified that you deleted my post that was about to bring excitement and laughter to the class. Please put it back right, or you will regret it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theprankster2010 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Extremely Upset that you deleted my post.. It was my homework for my English class

Why did you delete my article!? I spent 5 hours researching this and interviewing locals. The Big Friendly actually did exist and was part of the longest running demin mill in the US, currently Mount Vernon Mills in Trion, Ga. My source was from an actual book written about the history of Georgia. This was for my college English class. Khjones53 (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I do not, as a matter of practice, send emails to Wikipedia users. You may request another administrator to mail a copy of the article to you at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. —C.Fred (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Quack, quack

I don't know if you care for these, but your talk page has more unfriendly **** than I've seen in a long time, so here's something that might balance it a bit. Thanks!

Hello C.Fred--can you please have a look at User:Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner and see if its plumage resembles that of User:Is It Raining Underground?? Thanks! Drmies (talk) 03:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Drmies, please WP:AGF. Some of us just normally like to edit via IP, but since there are enough account registration nazis these days, that seems not very possible any more. You'll notice I'm not even bothering to edit the article, simply suggesting that you could have caught more flies with honey had you paid attention to WP:BITE and not gone around poking the WP:BEAR. Thanks, Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (talk)

I do believe, Drmies, that calling someone names in a foreign language is still insulting and a violation of WP:CIVIL. Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC).

Maybe you should learn that language properly, and you'd know what it meant. Drmies (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

According to Google Translate and my superheroic supersense of common sense, it means that you're calling me - without justification or cause - a sockpuppet. The paranoia is unwarranted and you really should sit back, practice a little WP:AGF, and start treating your fellow editors with the respect you seem to feel you deserve. Practice the Golden Rule and it will work wonders for you. Again, catch more flies with honey... Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (talk) ]

I have blocked Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner indefinitiely for using Wikipedia only for trolling, so it doesn't matter whether it was a sockpuppet of Is It Raining Underground? or not. However, for what it's worth I am confident it was a sockpuppet. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks James. I should have stopped responding earlier; twice I stopped myself. FWIW, "poppetje gezien, kastje dicht" means "the show is over folks, nothing there to see." C.Fred, thank you for donating part of your talk page. Drmies (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm talking about bass

the bass fishing team is not a NCAA regulated sport they are only a club just like all the other fishing teams so delete my article from your page and stop redirecting it does not belong with the other regulated sports —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mary tolbert (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

it is part of UGA thats why it is the UGA Fishing Team but all the other teams are NCAA regulated it is not therefor it does not belong with the others and if your going to take my page you need to put more than one sentence about it. I care about the sport it deserves its own page just like the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mary tolbert (talk • contribs) 18:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

This site is to inform and thats exactly what I was doing informing anyone who wanted to know there is a fishing team and they are working hard to better themselves as fishermen and as men. Theses kids work hard and deserve it to be known you are taking that away just because you see no importance in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mary tolbert (talk • contribs) 03:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

the sources are notable as well as the team. They are a UGA team. You can check the FLW website. The boys have appeared on ESPN U while in the National Championship. If they are not notable then there is not any college team that is notable and all the sites need to be deleted. (Mary tolbert (talk) 03:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC))

Katy Perry album cover debate

It would be really helpful if you could give your opinion here. thanks. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism in TDWT

Plz help with the TDWT. A vandal who goes by the IP address of 186.83.11.25 RUINED the elimination table and the songs section. Can you please make sure this vandal doesn't do this again? Thanks, and repsond on my talk page. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 17:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC))

fatih rıfat ülküman

Hi C.Fred. There is no such person in the history. Please delete the page. Benvewikilerim (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

obviously its a fake article. so technically im not vandalising wikipedia now. 88.224.106.195 (talk) 15:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Perpetuating a hoax is a form of vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey Fred,

It's upsetting for me to see that someone can falsify and deny the existence of true Turkish novelist F. Rifat Ulkuman just for not to get punished because of the vandalism. I really wonder if you did a complete research about him before deleting his article .Just because some random person claims that he doesn't exist, shouldn't give you a right to delete the article of such a big novelist and politician. Labeling the life and publications of such a person as 'Hoax' is a serious claim which needs to be supported by a great research aand as i can see you haven't done that ,did you? Even though doing that research should be your job let me help you to realize what a serious mistake you have done.

[contact information redacted]

The Cankaya Tables - Mavi Sanat Yayinlari Contact Info: N/a due to coupe de etat of 1960

A copy of the book can be found in the library of University Of Istanbul.

I hope these evidences will help you revise your clearly faulty decision and restore the article to the version of 17 September 2010

—Alparslan @ —Preceding undated comment added 19:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC).

This is just funny. There is no such person in the history. Google gives 0 results for this so-called big novelist and politician.(except wikipedia articles and some other trollized turkish forum pages). This is funny. Please find that book scan and show it to us. Benvewikilerim (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Rights for reviewing

Hi :D I was wondering, are you able to give people the right to be an article reviewer? If you are, can I please have that right? I feel it would help out a lot in Total Drama World Tour. Thanks! TDI19 (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much!!! I will put it to good use. TDI19 (talk) 02:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The page of "Genesys Logic, Inc."

Dear Fred,

We would like to add the page of our company but has been deleted by you because of A7 issue. Could you please let us know how to prove our notability to let our information stay in Wikipedia? There is indeed another page "Programmed input/output" reference our company Genesys Logic (afterward I changed it to the correct name Genesys Logic, Inc.), so I don't understand what is the matrix to judge a company is not notability.

We also found a similar company JMicron as us, and they do have their own page to express their company even the product list on Wikipedia. Kindly let us know what else information we should prepare to pass the certification, and please write to my talk page. Many thanks for your help in advance.

BR, Ncperng. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncperng (talk • contribs) 04:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

• Response from the talk on 04:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your time and the clear explanation. We will investigate the rule again and see if we can meet Wikipedia's rule. Many thanks for your help again. Please feel free to remove this topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncperng (talk • contribs) 07:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

David Amoo

Thanks for moving the deleted article into my namespace - I've tidied the article up, removing the uncited parts and restored a version of it Steve-Ho (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy of Refund Home Loans

My mistake, c.fred. It was the first time using that template, and I erroneously thought it was for pages recently deleted by Speedy. I should have just used A7, instead of trying to get fancy. Sorry 'bout that. And no prob re: the exlinks on Torrie Wilson, I can see there was some shenanigans going on before my edit. Cheers, The Interior (talk) 03:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Jad Haber article

Hi C.Fred, Thanks for you reply regarding the entry of Jad Haber. I worked with this Director for couple of years and I learnt his recognition by searching him on the internet. I believe that his article could be improve and I will leave it for the user to collaborate on this. As per his recognition, I believe that he won several awards including the Murex D'or which has a great recognition. he won this award when he directed a music video for Darine Hadchiti. Please let me know your input. I am happy to discuss. Joudi29--mouni1 (talk) 04:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, C.Fred. You have new messages at WiZZiK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ridgeford Properties

Fairly new to Wikipedia and looking for adoption - can you help? Have worked on editing some existing property entries based on my decades of experience in the industry and am looking to create some entries from new. Just noticed this entry was deleted by you and wanted to ask if i can start this with your help?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by PropertyMike (talk • contribs) 20:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for the message, but I fear that this is somewhat drastic. - Zhou Yu (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Clique Girlz vs Destinee & Paris

The Clique Girlz as a group withhold sufficient informational, creative, and influential artistic value as an individual entity to merit their own Wikipedia page apart from Destinee & Paris. Destinee Monroe and Paris Monroe are two sisters who have now formed a duo of themselves, but this duo (called "Destinee & Paris") is not a direct evolution of the Clique Girlz. These two groups were established by entirely different contractual obligations and built on unique motivational foundations with distinct rosters and their identities should remain as so. It is incorrect to refer to Destinee & Paris as a group that evolved solely from a group that in the past had a different name (Clique Girlz) with additional members; it is appropriate rather to identify these two sisters as past members of the Clique Girlz by establishing a new page apart from the withstanding Destinee & Paris page. Crowdsurftn (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fat cow motel

Hello C.Fred. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fat cow motel, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 04:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Restore User:Afro55/Venom vicious

Hello,

This is Afro55. Can you restore this page User:Afro55/Venom vicious. I need to work on the userspace some more. Now I don't even see the user page at all. Please restore that because I want to put more information on it. This is only for the user page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afro55 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

FYI... a nearly exact copy of the user space draft was reposted into main space and I deleted it again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Cat:SSCS

Thanks for breaking it down for me. I misunderstood the issue. Being hounded by a particular editor did not help either but no excuses, the mistake was my own. Cheers for being an excellent wikipedian. 69.246.27.226 (talk) 23:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Twitter sources

I noticed your revert on Ariana Grande, and I was wondering if you could notify User:Active Banana about this exception. This user seems a little overzealous removing sources and external links that s/he considers "not kosher". Thanks. --Confession0791 ^talk 03:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Thrashers captain

Type in Trashers name Antropov, Ladd & Oduya alternate captains & sources will pop up, to support it. GoodDay (talk) 15:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I see that Ramsey is using the tired out cliche for his decision - the 'everybody is a leader' thingy. GoodDay (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

iCarly & Victorious

Hello. User Eagles247 told me to contact you with this question. Are iCarly and Victorious episodes notables by themselves? I'd like to make some episode pages. (REPLY ON MY PAGE) CrazyApple1998 (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

We're having a discussion about that topic, if you would like to comment. --Confession0791 ^talk 20:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Celebrities

Do celebrities, like Jennette McCurdy or such have talk pages on wikipedia so I can contact them? tell me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.132.200.159 (talk) 17:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

No. The talk pages relate to discussions to improve the article about the subject. Very few, if any, subjects actually contribute to their articles, much less read the talk pages. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

how can my article be uploaded

how come all the rental companies have a page and it is not considered advertizing? Since the goal of encyclopedia is to share knowledge in any level, should not any company have the right to be part of Wikipedia? How could I upload my article about a company that I find that interesting on wikipedia?

Thank you in advance!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mallias25 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

John Fisher School

hey fred, sorry to post on your page; i don't know how to use wikipedia.

I know you manage the john fisher school website can you upload the following school images? the first 'In Deo Fidemus' is the old boys association logo. the second is the school's crest.

Thank you Mrs Horan.

http://www.pjfrfc.co.uk/site/images/2/JFSOBS%20Badge.jpg

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://satoribroadcasting.com/user_files/jfa/cnt_731.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.the-jfa.co.uk/&usg=__K_TEOGsYUmvofl-PqAj5muTg4g4=&h=230&w=200&sz=34&hl=en&start=22&zoom=0&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=J71NSIQFy9YkJM:&tbnh=108&tbnw=94&prev=/images%3Fq%3Djohn%2Bfisher%2Bschool%2Bpurley%26start%3D20%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26ndsp%3D20%26tbs%3Disch:1

Or

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/profile-ak-snc1/object/1403/60/n2212949542_38204.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.195.2.181 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Old Boys' Association logo cannot be added, since there's no way to verify that's what it is. It's just parked at somebody's website.

The Association logo, by contrast, could be used, except I don't think the association is discussed at all in the article on the John Fisher School, and the association is a separate entity. —C.Fred (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

C Fred; The Old Boys Association is exactly that, an Old Boys Association for teachers and students in the English School Tradition, look at other schools if you don't believe me, Archbishop Tennisons in Croydon, Eton, Wellington College, Wilson's Grammar. All of these schools have wonderful crests and badges as does the John Fisher school. You however refuse to upload any of this wonderful history! I don't see why such a prestigious school is held hostage by you; are you even a former pupil? From what I gather you're American.

The graphic of the fish in a bed of reeds is the school badge, the school badge is also used by the association. Can you please provide this at the top of the page, because to be honest the John Fisher schools page looks drab and boring, there is only one terrible graphic of the comprehensive's headmaster.

MMHOran —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.194.129.225 (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen the graphic of the fish in a bed of reeds, and I'd be fine using that as an image on the school page; however, I'm not sure that the old boys badge that MMHORAN (talk · contribs) drew is usable. —C.Fred (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Faboost and Faboost wiki

Why is my Faboost Wiki up to be deleted please tell me so i can sort it out and stop what it is???

Thank you Arianinja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianinja (talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Covers

The new cover is of tooo high quality to pass WP:NFCC and covers without the parental advisory sticker are preferred. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

one can quite clearly see that the new cover has a much sharper contrast and color ratio etc. The older image is slightly blurier as well as more 'noisy' (to use a photoshop term), it would be classified as low quality whereas the other new one is much higher quality. the pixels refer more to relative quality to size. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Not a violation

I do not believe that my username violates the username policy as it simply suggests that I am an officer (not a wikipedia officer) for accuracy. I stated that I was Wikipedia's Accuracy Officer because my username is AccuracyOfficer and I have joined wikipedia. Just as, on a forum called ElfShine, if I am called Bobblegog, I may say "Elfshine's Bobblegog". —Preceding unsigned comment added by AccuracyOfficer (talk • contribs) 05:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

One of the definitions of 'officer' is 'act as the commander of (a unit)'. I am acting as the commander of my own one-man unit for accuracy on the world wide web. Anotehr definition is 'a holder of a senior post in a society, company, or other organization'. I hold the post of 'officer' in the Organisation for Improving Accuracy on the Internet (OIAI). Thus my name is not misleading at all.AccuracyOfficer (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but that just doesn't wash. On my Talk page you said "As Wikipedia's Accuracy Officer, I ask that you do not undo important edits in the future" - that is a clear claim to some position of authority on Wikipedia. If you do it again, you will probably be blocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

O.K. I added some personal analysis, but it was based on fact. Watch the video evidence. If you see a man looking at a giant orange, then to say it is obvious he would have seen teh giant orange is factually accurate unless he may have been blind. Summers was not blind. 'Apparently' simply means 'as far as one knows or can see' and therefore is not an attempt at asserting something as fact and so is NOT non-neutral. And other edits were changing bias in the article - such as the claim, without substantiation, that the pervert Summers "was not aware of" Nix's actions. There is no evidence whatsoever for that claim, other than the word of one woman, who incidentally refused to talk during an interview when asked how she could not have seen what was happening, so hardly a reliable witness.AccuracyOfficer (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Even if it turns out to be correct, you still cannot add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles - Wikipedia editors must not perform their own evaluation of the evidence or judge who is and who is not a reliable witness. Also, describing someone as "the pervert xxx" is pretty much conclusive evidence that you are editing from a biased point of view. If you want to continue to edit Wikipedia I'd strongly suggest you have a read of WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:3RR. If you fail to follow them, your days here are likely to be few. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

AccuracyOfficer

As the messages above indicate he wasn't heeding your warning, and as he was starting an edit war on that article, I filed a WP:UAA report and that account is now blocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sam Vaknin

Just noticed that you have deleted somebody's attempt to recreate Sam Vaknin. I think there is a good case for having a deletion review as (A) over 4 years has passed (B) a major contributor to the last deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sam_Vaknin was permanently banned user User:Zeraeph who seems to have tainted the whole discussion by influencing the vote of others.--Penbat (talk) 19:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

5.0 or Nelly 5.0

You might wish to look at this =) thanks -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Domino Lux Fraternity De La Salle University - Guam - USA

Hi Fred, Im trying to post some information regarding our fraternity. Info was taken from our website. Hope you wont delete it again.

Thanks Vitium91 (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

thanks

for digging a little deeper than I did in the statitical stuff at Mexican–American War. I do believe that I got it wrong and you have it right. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

English Mastiff

Hi C.Fred, I need help,someone needs to stop this unreasonable changes on English Mastiff article. This record part either should removed or clearly and fairly mention the records. I have both dogs and am fair enough, original text about Benedictine already says it is a claim and moreover it is recorder at December 17, 1970. Even this record valid and I know it is in some books since I don't have the soruce, am okay to keep it just as a claim. However, Collieuk's modifications are not fair and trying to show this claim is a lie which is not acceptable. I respect him and can see he is from England originally but this is not about it, it is about being fair. Thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mastiffkennel (talk • contribs) 11:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Zachary Richard

I am a founding member of Action Cadienne and was secretary for five years. I've know Zach since 1993 and live in the next parish. Zach's had a home in Scott - that his father built - for over 25 years. He also owns a place in Montreal. He's back and forth all the time.

˜˜˜˜SharAngela —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharangela (talk • contribs) 14:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Michael_McKenzie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Michael_McKenzie

I need to know what was in this article, Mark Michael McKenzie is the director of McKenzie & Gannon PLC and another LTD maybe Countrywide Capital. It would be good to know the article contents.

Paul. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.227.168 (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

If you were registered, I could restore the text into your user space; as an unregistered anonymous user, you don't have a user space to restore to. The article was only about two sentences long, so there's not much to start with. The two sources cited were companieshouse.gov.uk and whoknowswho.channel4.com. —C.Fred (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Great thanks, why was the article deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.227.168 (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Lack of notability: being a 19-year-old business owner does not make one inherently notable, nor does considering running for office. —C.Fred (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

LEPC

Hi C.Fred, Can tag at the top of the Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church page be removed now that there are more references, citations, etc? Thanks.HIS2008 (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter

Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Bot automates graphics creation, saves work Featured Article, eh? Reviews needed at ACR	State and national updates Project reports for Delaware Maryland Michigan Minnesota
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

akhmetov edit war

I already reported those 4 users for sock puppetry (one main account, 3 used solely for reverting the rinat akhmetov article). They (/he) keeps reverting each and every edit regardless of how well sourced or written it is, reverts when I fix numbers that are falsely sourced, etc. They don't respond on their talk pages and don't want to use the discussion page to explain the section blanking, just cite "vandalism" or "libel" and call it a day. It doesn't look like it's going to stop and he's just trying to own the article, unless there is a result on the sock puppetry case. What's the normal protocol I should follow for an impasse like this? --Львівське (talk) 03:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

thanks for all of your help. last time I requested protection on the article the disinterested admin put a full lock down on the article, reverted to Master's last version, and told me the onus was on me to prove how my edits are not vandalism and not the other way around....go figure--Львівське (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Here we go again...--Львівське (talk) 04:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my accidental revert of Rinat Akhmetov. You got there 30 seconds ahead of me. Cmichael (talk) 05:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for stepping in and (once again) deleting the page for the "Tamaskan Wolfdog" - we have been dealing with this individual for over 3 years now. Genuine and reputable breeders of the Tamaskan Dog are saddened and disheartened to see repeated vandalism and plagiarism of our Breed Page. No doubt he will continue to attempt to recreate his OWN breed page, which is essentially a spin-off "breed" (bred by him alone, at his Puppy Farm) that consists of Tamaskan Dogs mixed with various crossbreeds and real wolf hybrids. Thanks for being vigilant and helping to keep Wikipedia neutral and legitimate. Sylvaen (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

BS24, et al.

I'll assume your readd of tags to the Aces article was a good faith, non-disruptive edit. FYI User BS24 is an active sock of NYyankees51, as were ArchConservative93, and BBT2005 and many other accts. Currently BS24 is being investigated for sock puppetry and may or may not be blocked.[15]. The defense is that BS24 is a fresh start acct. Claiming so obliges BS24 to not return to editing the Aces article unless an admin approves. (In as short as possible terms, BS24 claims the the block for sock-puppetry was due solely to vandalism done to the Aces article This is untrue: the still indefinite block was actually placed last January for "abusive use of multiple accounts." Nonetheless, any editing of the Aces article by BS24, or socks thereof, would be an manifest abandonment of this defense.) If you see disruptive and sock-like behavior, you may want to inquire further. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

TOTAL DRAMA

Dude it is confirmed that Camp Wawanakwa has become radioactive for Season 4 and that the original cast will make cameos during the 13 episode season. Todd Kauffman confirmed it on his Twitter I believe, and it is also on the Total Drama Wikia. Do no unedit confirmed info, if it is confirmed, it can be put on Wikipedia.

http://totaldramaisland.wikia.com/wiki/Camp_Wawanakwa THIS IS THE LINK! CHECK IT OUT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.177.208.122 (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Please review the reliable source guidelines. The Total Drama Wikia is not a confirmed source. Statements on a Twitter are of marginal reliability; however, I've never seen Twitter mentioned as a source in any of the TD articles. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah well, Christian Potenza, in his TDR First Day of Filming Video, many people could see that the design for Camp Wawanakwa had been looking "weird." I submit that and Todd Kauffman and MArk Thornton confirming that Season 4's location will be radiated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.177.208.122 (talk) 08:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

See no original research: it "looking 'weird'" doesn't let us draw any conclusions. —C.Fred (talk) 14:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Wave (aka Tuffy)

Wave (aka "Tuffy") is a TDR Registered purebred Tamaskan Dog out of Tundra and Blaze, bred by Tarheel Tamaskan! His pedigree name is "Tarheel Rodanthe Wave" - in the article he was misidentified as a German Shepherd x Husky mix but in the photos (and subsequent newspaper articles) he has been correctly identified, including on the official NCSU gopack.com website: http://www.gopack.com/graphics/html_files/tuffy-page/index.html

His owner and his breeder are both members on the Tamaskan Forum: http://www.tamaskan-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=696 http://www.tamaskan-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=618 Sylvaen (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Would you like a copy of his birth certificate or registration papers? Sylvaen (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Sam Vaknin again

I left a message a week ago with the administrator User_talk:Johnleemk who deleted Sam Vaknin back in 2006 to reconsider the deletion for the reasons i have given at User_talk:Johnleemk#Sam_Vaknin but User_talk:Johnleemk has not responded and his account is semi-dormant anyway. Please advise about my next step to progressing this. --Penbat (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I came here because I was curious about Sam Vaknin because of this documentary. I would suggest that the 2006 AfD can no longer be considered relevant for summary redeletion.. BalthCat (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

See also User_talk:Penbat#Re:_Sam_Vankin. I agree. It was only at a much later date that User:Zeraeph was discredited and permanently banned and it looks very unlikely that the deletion would have happened without her influence. I wasnt involved and didnt know anything about the original afd and only happened to stumble upon it recently. Also since the afd Sam Vaknin has significantly increased Google hits so lack of notability as an argument for deletion doesnt stack up although I think his notability was high enough even at the time of the afd. --Penbat (talk) 08:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see(C?) C.Fred's alternate reasoning on your talk page. I don't know enough about him, but maybe you can create a sourced stub :) - BalthCat (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

As i said at User_talk:Penbat#Re:_Sam_Vankin it is easier to have something to work from and develop rather than start from a blank canvas. Why try and reinvent the wheel ? The AFD was about whether or not Sam Vaknin should exist or not, not an analysis of the quality of the article. --Penbat (talk) 21:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Ref Sam Vaknin it looks like User:Eugene van der Pijll produced a version of Sam Vaknin with private data stripped out.--Penbat (talk) 09:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

"deleting version with private information" and "143 revisions restored: Restoring all versions without personal info" tells me he stripped out all versions with personal data. Cant you "see" User:Eugene van der Pijll/to delete ? --Penbat (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

That was the piece of the puzzle I was missing. Restored and userfied at User:Penbat/Sam Vaknin. —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Much appreciated. I am in no rush to move it out to mainspace and i will try to improve it. His current notability is self evident simply by looking at Google. Im rather surprised that is currently in such a presentable polished state and well referenced.--Penbat (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Snell page

Hi, i've been trying to create a page for Snell Ltd, which you've deleted. Instead i've just gone into the snell & wilcox page and updated it so that it is now correct. However i need to change the page title to Snell instead of Snell & Wilcox but have no idea how to do it, can you help? Thanks kguysnell Kguysnell (talk) 15:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC) Thanks, if we can't just have Snell i think Snell (company) is probably the best.Kguysnell (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Message from Wolfdog406

Hi, can you please block this user from editing? Five times I had to revert this person's edit and I told them to stop on their talk page.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfdog406 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome

Question for you that hopefully you can help with... as an experienced editor, how do you usually handle people who use Wikipedia only to harass? I am trying to assume good faith, but it seems to me that given the edit history for User:Deepsix66, he is mostly using Wikipedia to further his own agenda - specifically, to promote Frozen North Productions/Flips Twisted World and to attempt to discredit Emily Schooley and anything to do with her. (Apparently she is also involved with Futurecon, the second article he has nominated for deletion in his short time as a member here.) Thanks, Edfan77 (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Kharne Question

Hello sir, The word kharne was not "just made up one day", it has been and is used by 100,000's of gamers every day. I have seen terms such as "newb" and "pwned" also written about on wikipedia, which is of the same as kharne. A slang term. I urge you to reconsider your deletion of the topic. Sincerly, Masterkharne (talk) 05:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Master Kharne (I made the account for this page solely, the name does not undermine the validity of the slang term)

See my reply on your talk page—if it's used so frequently, there should be plenty of reliable sources to document it. —C.Fred (talk) 05:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello re connie meade-edge

I have recently altered this page, and I am not regular editor of wikipedia. I am however the nephew of Walter Malocolm Edge who is mentioned extensively in this article. Mac dissapeared in 1963 and has not been heard from since. I have checked everything on this page, and the old page for Mac, and none of it is true after 1963. There was no ministry, no gospel hour not 9 children. Nor can I find any mention of connie meade-edge, outside of this Wiki article. I am not real computer savvy and hope to nominate this artcle for deletion, or to encourage anyone to verify any information in this piece. I thank you for your time and any help you may be able to provide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carnieguy (talk • contribs) 15:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

I dont have any newspaper clips because i do not get on here always. But I have spoken first hand to the mans wife he abandoned, his daughter joyce, and got this information. Joyce wrote up about it in the Horry County newspaper. They have verified it. The truth is this man who claims he is a nephew likely had no idea what happened to Walter after he left and his mother Sabina died without knowing. So its ailen information to them but a detective located all of this for $400. The detective was hired by his wife Janet and he tracked all of this down. CarolinaManMusic (talk) 04:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

National University Hospital

Admire your patience. My compliments. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

UKGameshows.com

I really think you should look closely at Sotto's analysis of the sources and tell me how you think any are significant coverage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Issue on U.S. governor page

Today I went on the List of current United States governors page and it was all messed up. Since you're an administrator I was wondering if you could go on there and make everything how it should be.Treyjag (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry?

I'm sorry C.Fred. I realize tha you have a job to do. I'll stop screwig around, but you should know, J-Nasty is me. Yes, I know it's surprising but it was me all along. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoBones (talk • contribs) 05:07, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Penbat/Sam Vaknin ready for mainspace ?

I have done quite a lot of work cleaning up and updating User:Penbat/Sam Vaknin. I have tried to be balanced and NPOV. I think it is ready to be moved to mainspace and hopefully others will then work on it constructively. Unless you have any objections, please can you do the move and "watch" its progress ? I would be most unhappy if somebody tried to delete it, citing the old AFD. Obviously anybody is free to start a new AFD but see no chance that one would succeed. It may be that the article in mainspace attracts vandalism in which case semi-protection may be necessary.--Penbat (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

I am centralizing all discussion here for the purpose of being able to follow the thread, since multiple editors are likely to participate; talkback tags but not replies will go to other participants' talk pages.

The major objection I have at this point is the introduction. The first sentence of it should make very clear why the subject is notable. All the current lede states is when and where he was born; it does not make clear why he is notable.

The article's current structure is likewise not clear, as the first body section is "A varied life". While it may be appropriate to start the body of the article with early life of the subject (birth, schooling, etc.), it may also be useful to start it with the section about why he is most notable. That's my big concern right now—it's not clear for what thing(s) he should be considered notable. Is it as an author, for his film appearances, or for something else? It almost feels like the introductory paragraph needs to be something along the lines of (references omitted for convenience):

Shmuel "Sam" Vaknin (born April 1961) is a journalist and author with a particular interest in narcissism. Vaknin claims to be a self-aware narcisisst, whereas most narcisissits lack self-awareness, and can give an inside look into the condition. Vaknin was also categorized as a psychopath in a documentary film, though he disputes this claim.

This sets the framework for the article: he's an author, and it's for his work on narcissism that he's most notable. He's also appeared in a film that diagnosed him as a psychopath. Does that framing of the article make sense? —C.Fred (talk) 15:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

The lead says that he is primarily an author and journalist covering diverse subjects such as such as history, philosophy, politics, finance and mental health - that pretty much covers most of the ground. He has written about 20 books, written countless articles as a journalist in diverse high profile publications such as Global Politician of which he is Assistant Editor, he has had a Economic advisor government post in the Macedonian government. He must have been written about by every one of the worlds quality newspapers - such as NY Press, UK Guardian, UK Financial Times, UK Sunday Times etc etc so he is clearly notable as far as they are concerned. There is a lot of media interest in him. Ref also his CV - Sam Vaknin CV for things i have missed. The narcissism angle is probably the thing he is most well known for but he also writes about history, philosophy, politics and finance in his capacity as journalist and author.--Penbat (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

I have changed the orientation of article to deemphasis narcissism and emphasise that he is primarily an author and journalist of diverse subjects.--Penbat (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

If he's spread across a breadth of topics, then the question becomes, is he a notable author? Does he meet WP:AUTHOR? —C.Fred (talk) 17:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

He has had a long high profile career as a journalist. I think that alone makes him notable and he has managed to maintain that career. As for his books, each one stands or falls on his own merits. He does have a lot of citations and testimonials to his books by other authors and academics so they are generally well received and respected.[16][17][18][19][20]--Penbat (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Just to add that Vaknin claims to have an IQ of 185. That could be a fabricated boast but I can readily believe that he does have a high IQ and that supports his ability to have a diverse portfolio of expertise.--Penbat (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

That's why we like to have secondary sources in the articles and not just the subjects' claims. —C.Fred (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Yep and that claim isnt in the article as i couldnt find any verification for it. However the idea that he has a high IQ seems quite credible to me.--Penbat (talk) 10:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Well ?--Penbat (talk) 21:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

There seems to be foot dragging here.--Penbat (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

This is getting very silly. Shortly I will be getting the involvement of other administrators.--Penbat (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

At this point, that may be the best thing to do. I don't see where more secondary sources have been brought in or the claim of notability is bolstered. I would suggest taking the matter to Deletion review, as in its current condition even if I didn't delete it, another administrator is likely to. —C.Fred (talk) 15:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Well i can count 12 or more secondary sources. Vaknin has much higher notability than plenty of other Wiki articles. Take this one I spotted last night Chris Williams (cricketer, born 1983) - a cricketer whose sole claim to fame is that he played in 1 professional cricket match. I cant see any possible objection with the article. As i said before I have no problem with some body doing a fresh afd but the original afd was seriously tainted by a banned user and should be disregarded.--Penbat (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

And I disagree that the AfD was tainted. Given that I don't see any more secondary sources than were in the version deleted at the prior AfD, if you think the article should be restored, open a report at DRV. —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

undo article

Hi C.Fred,

I've tried to change the page of Copenhagen Business School, as the figures and numbers that are currently there are outdated and wrong. I have spend a lot of time updating and trying to make it perfect however, only to find that you deleted all of it - is there any way that the new and updated version can be viewed? Perhaps if I deleted the links to the web page in the article, it would be lesser "promotional" and more focused on facts and figures? Or what can I do? Since I would like to add this more correct info for interested readers. I have btw changed my username now as you refered to not being according to username policy. As this is my first post on wiki I surely don't know all the rules and customs so any help is much appreciated. Thanks a lot. Kommunikation (talk) 00:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Rusted AutoParts

Now he's edit warring at The Wolfman (2010 film) over howling. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Jennette McCurdy is being vandalized daily. It might need permanent protection. --Confession0791 ^talk 03:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Fred, you are quickly deleting the page of Ethiopian Global Initiative without fully understanding the impact that organization has on Ethiopia. It operates in 10 countries and engages in a lot of very important social entrepreneurial activities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethusa (talk • contribs) 06:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion regarding Maine gubernatorial election 2010 article

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Maine gubernatorial election, 2010#Kevin Scott. BMRR (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Double standard

Sorry, But, North wiki said, "I suggest you raise the issue of significance in the discussion page and seek consensus" same thing apply at hond pages.

1. Honda recalled 57,000 faulty brake = significant.
2. hyundai recalled 17 faulty horse = Is it significant?

Why my edit is bad, North wiki's edit is good? please explain this. Go porch books (talk) 19:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

(cur | prev) 19:14, 11 November 2010 C.Fred (talk | contribs) (37,318 bytes) (Undid revision 396177551 by Go porch books (talk) - not vandalism, a source is present - please discuss the issue on the talk page) (undo)

My edits are also valid. not vandalism, a source is present.

1. Honda recalled 57,000 faulty brake = significant.
2. hyundai recalled 17 faulty horse = Is it significant?

Sorry to bother you. But I still can't understand double standard. My edit is not vandalism, a source is present Go porch books (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Vegeta

Is there a reason you reverted my edit to Vegeta's ability list? I corrected SEVERAL inaccuracies in the translations... :/ Linkdude20002001 (talk) 18:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Where can I see this consensus? And as I explained in the talk page for Vegeta, ギャリック (gyarikku) does not mean garlic; garlic in Japanese is ガーリック (gārikku). Not only do Japanese dictionaries backup my claims, but the show itself does: Garlic Jr's name is written ガーリックJr. (Gārikku Junia) in Japanese. ギャリック砲 (Gyarikki Hō) translates to Gyallic/Galick/Garrick/Gyarik Cannon/Gun. The FUNimation's subtitles use Gyallic Cannon, and their English dub uses Galick Gun. Both use correct transliterations of ギャリック (Gyarikki). I don't know where people got the "Garlic Gun" idea from... :/ Linkdude20002001 (talk) 22:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright. If you're not going to reply, I'm just going to make these translation corrections again. I brought up the "Garlic Gun" mistranslation on the Vegeta talk page four months ago and waited this whole time, but no one cared enough to discuss the issue with me, so obviously nobody cares. Besides, this isn't Dragon Ball Wiki; the pages shouldn't have mistranslations like this. I hope you understood my explanation as to why and how ギャリック (gyarikku) does not mean, and does not transliterate to, garlic. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Islanders' Injured Reserve

Neither MacDonald, Okposo or Streit has been activated off Injured Reserve; they would be two players over the 23-man roster and none of those players were listed on the gameday roster as scratches:

http://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlreports/20102011/RO020243.HTM

The site is not reliable for designating players on the IR. Raul17 (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Oluchi Onweagba

Your edit to Oluchi Onweagba has been reverted because it fails to cite a reliable source for the information. Blogspot is not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

And again.Instead of reverting, why not venture to find a reliable source? The blopspot is quoting from THISDAY uk newspaper. Sheesh !69.140.210.255 (talk) 21:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

As was noted on your talk page, the burden of proof is with the editor who adds the claim to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: logo use

I don't interpret the related Wikipedia rule as you do. And I don't think that your rationalr is correct:

"If four people have removed the logo, it's a good sign that Hammersoft is interpreting the Wikipedia guidelines correctly: club logos may not be used on the articles about the clubs' seasons. Generally, they are on the main article only, unless it's a one-off anniversary logo that clearly relates to one season only. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)"

Logos are not determined for one year and many people may make the same mistake.

Thank you. (Red devil 41) 22:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes

Randolph3 made this edit on October 2, 10, 13 and then again today.[21][22][23] I don't really see the issue with the citation as ratings figures rarely, if ever, state whether they're talking about a new episode or a repeat. (Do they actually rate repeats?) The citation is for an episode on a day during which a new episode just happened to air so I think it's safe to assume that the citation is talking about the new episode. Do you have any thoughts on the matter? I'm a tad reluctant to approach the editor on his own as he tends to be somewhat dogmatic. It took an AfD to get rid of the template he insisted was absolutely necessary. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I have written permission to use the copyright material from The Denver Post, Sept. 28th, by Lynn Bartels, and was told to edit the B.J. Nikkel site this way. So quit erasing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betterbee (talk • contribs) 01:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

George Eayre

I must have been tagging this article as you were deleting it. You may need to delete it again. Sorry. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 05:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I've deleted it (G6, non-controversial maintenance). —C.Fred (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

BeaverTails

Hello C.Fred, I am new to Wikipedia and I was editing the fried dough entry. It suggests beaver tails is a generic term. BeaverTails is in fact a trademarked term in reference to fried dough products and restaurants offering such wares. BeaverTails Brands Inc. owns trademarks in Canada, the United States and numerous other countries throughout the world. BeaverTails Brands Inc. licenses the use of such trademarks to BeaverTails Canada Inc. (which franchises and licenses BeaverTails operations in Canada, the US and Saudi Arabia, as can be referenced at www.beavertailsinc.com). Please let me know if you have any questions on this. Thanks & good night! Adiioia (talk) 04:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Regarding History of Myanmar

Hi C.Fred!

How are you? I am a guy from Myanmar. Regarding Cyclone Nargis in History of Myanmar, the estimated loss form Burmese official newspaper is $ 4 billions. It is true that government overestimated the loss to $ 11 bn immediately after it happened in the hope that they would receive more international help. But after 6 or 7 months, I definitely read in official newspaper by government that it was only $ 4 bn. I do not remember the date of the newspaper but it is The Mirror. I changed the actual fact and so marked minor change.

I'm a total new user on wiki starting from today. So I'm sorry if I make some errors. I'm learning.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel7785 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Erik Shaw

Mr Shaw was and still is featured on the HIRE HEROES USA website and has been featured in the following.

Forbes Magazine "Job Relief For Battle Weary" 2/23/08

GI Job Magazine July 2009

North Hills Monthly November 2009 Local Magazine in Western PA.

KDKA News Radio in August, November of 2009 and in May of 2010. He still advises this CBS affiliate in Pittsburgh PA.

He was featured on the CBS affiliate 5:30 newa in Washington DC back in 2006 for an unrelated issue.

New at this whole wikipedia thing I do apologize. Mr Shaw is a know entity in the Veteran community and will be even more upon the release of his book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Govguy (talk • contribs) 06:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Erik Shaw

Is re-submission possible with the addition of the sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Govguy (talk • contribs) 06:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Help!!

Sir,

Can you help me capitalize the S in shaw? I can't seem to figure out how to do that.. I would also like to add a photo..

Thank you!!! I am going to bed once that's fixed so i won't bother you anymore! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Govguy (talk • contribs) 06:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Protect Total Drama (series)

Should we protect this page since there are too many edits being reverted and that there has been only 1 constructive edit out of 25 edits, we should at least semi-protect it until Total Drama Reloaded airs Giggett (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Help with INKAS

I was wondering when the consensus can come up with a final verdict for the wiki? I want to remove the deletion tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dillonraphael (talk • contribs) 19:17, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I am Paolo De Vera and I created my own Wikipedia Article, so please don't delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Directorapolodv (talk • contribs) 20:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I understand, but my name still comes out when i search it and it says that the article is deleted. I think it would be more appropriate to delete it completely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Directorapolodv (talk • contribs) 20:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! It really helped me. Thank You God Bless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Directorapolodv (talk • contribs) 20:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Advice

I am interested in becoming an administrator in the future. Do you have any advice? What projects can I get involved in? --Confession0791 ^talk 01:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any suggestions of any WikiProjects I could get involved in? --Confession0791 ^talk 01:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Sigma Kappa Alpha questions on article

So someone other than anyone in our fraternity has to write an article about us.... I am not falsifying information people don't know enough about our fraternity to make a complete wikipedia article so I can't write this article or do i just need to do it in a neutral tone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lspsurfer (talk • contribs) 00:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Check "University of Redlands" wikipedia page or google "Sigma Kappa Alpha redlands" the reason why don't show up is because of another fraternity Kappa Sigma Sigma is too close to our name. We have several notable members that are pertinent, our founder for instance was one of the main developers for the maverick missile. Yes we don't have a website right now but the fact that we are apart of a major California University I think we should be able to write a article. I apologize if I am being a bother I just think that if other fraternity's at the University of Redlands have pages we should be able to have one as well. Lspsurfer (talk) 21:32, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

How so not notable

Those two were arguably the greatest athletes to ever come out of Delasalle both are playing at major universitys and achieved great things at Delasalle —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mart1266 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Kylejumper

There have been obvious partisan changes to Jerry McNerney and David Harmer Wikipedia pages due to a contentious race. However, as an expert editor would you please step in to provide equal treatment to changes to pages and people who violate guidelines on specifically citations. User:Kylejumper has engaged in an editing war without following guidelines.

Please review The vandal that wrote "I suck at editing wikipedia entries." on my profile is as trustworthy as the vandal that is editing the David Harmer and Jerry McNerney entries. for POV and poor citations. If you compare his changes on Jerry McNerney you will find there are POV statements. Kylejumper does not incorporate what is on the web page he cites, just selective phrases. That category is much more extensive that is shown there. For American politics it is important to have all the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Demshield (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes

I'm not sure why these IPs are going to so much trouble to change the writers and directors. I have all of the episodes on my server so it was a fairly easy exercise to confirm that everyone of the changes they've made are wrong. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

How to link

Good afternoon.

Please can you advise how to link Patrick Waugh to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pop_(fashion_magazine) as he is the art director and we would like to confirm his position on Wikipedia, as well as make his Patrick Waugh wikipedia page permanent.

Kind regards

fashion@thepop.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick M Waugh (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "User:Gods10rules, User:KeptSouth, User:Kelly, and User:Johnuniq".The discussion is about the topic Bristol Palin.Thank you. 184.59.23.225 (talk) 10:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Help with vandalism

Hi, I saw that you recently warned a user about his behaviour on the project (User talk:Co3yy). However, I noticed several examples of vandalism by this user (e.g. Eric Campbell Geddes) and was wondering if you could tell me what the appropriate actions would be now or maybe even put them into effect. I don't have a lot of experience with wikipedia in general and these things in particular, so I thought you might be the person to talk to. Thanks. PINTofCARLING (talk) 17:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Help with deleted page

Hi Fred Talk, You deleted a page Louis Camilli but the page still shows up with your comments. How can this page be deleted for good? ~~~~' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipepalladi (talk • contribs) 21:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

IP vandal

The same IP range keeps vandalising iCarly articles. --Confession0791 ^talk 22:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

NASCAR on CBS

http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/65203 NASCAR on CBS —Preceding unsigned comment added by TruckMatt (talk • contribs) 22:32, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Thomas Esposito

You just reverted this article to a version that although being a sub-stub is still factually incorrect. Congrats. I've been working with several admins on this. I guess I'll just have to take it to AfD if the admins can't help me out and delete it themselves. PBF1974 (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

• • Yeah, fair enough for now, I suppose, although it is still unsourced yet totally true. It still violates WP:BLP, but it's not as nasty or wrong as it was. I'm going to back off on this matter until the admins I have contacted can resolve it for me. If the article can't be deleted or courtesy blanked and salted, I'll just have to let Mr. Esposito himself handle it, if he cares to. My impression of the man tells me that he would either do nothing and try to ignore it, or he would go the legal route and have his legal counsel (probably bro or sis) talk to Wikipedia's counsel and take care of it peacefully behind the scenes. I may actually have to contact him to let him know how he stands with regard to Wikipedia policies, which I know fairly well, but I don't know him, so I'm just going to back off and wait. PBF1974 (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

PBF1974, as the admin you contacted, I am not going to resolve this to your satisfaction, contrary to your hopes above. I'm a volunteer busy doing other things. Please follow the instructions I gave you at User talk:PBF1974 to get this matter looked into. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Supporting Defamation

Defamation is illegal, please be sure your "reverts" are not promoting defamation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.163.255.25 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, we had concern over the term "vandalism" by our members, as we viewed it simply as a difference of opinions, however, this clears up our issue. (134.163.255.25 (talk) 04:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC))

Thank you, yes, I understand after reviewing how wikipedia works. I also see that you were just doing your administrator duties. You have a great page going here. We have had problems on other sights involving interests, and negative writing, but I can see that is not the case here, I'm sure you understand :) Everything on this end is done in good intentions, as I'm sure yours is also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.163.255.25 (talk) 05:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

St Kilda editor

Hello C.Fred. I am inclined to block User:AAC1996 as a sock of User:BrianBeahr. Do you disagree? Here is the background:

• BrianBeahr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• AAC1996 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of BrianBeahr
• Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BrianBeahr
• WP:Sockpuppet investigations/BrianBeahr/Archive

The common element is the constant editing of St Kilda articles with no regard for consensus (and the denial of being BrianBeahr). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks to the diff you found, I would be more inclined to put him in the 'Confirmed' sock category :-). EdJohnston (talk) 05:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed new Yazino page ready for a review

Hi C.Fred hope you're well. We've had another go on a new wikipedia page for 'Yazino'. I created it in my user space and would like to send it live as soon as I possibly can: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kat4PR

Can you please review it and give me some feedback? I am more than happy to work on this with you.

The page 'Yazino' has been taken down before - this is a chat you had with my colleague Phil here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Theredrocket#Recreating_an_article_on_Yazino

P.S.: I'd also like to add Yazino's company logo...not sure how to do it at the moment.

Please let me know Cheers,

- Kat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kat4PR (talk • contribs) 16:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 

BLP

Yes, I know all that. I read the policies, as any reasonable person would do. It's really rather insulting to my intelligence to post boilerplate on my talk page. I'd really prefer you email me, and I think I made that clear at the top of the talk page. This is an extremely sensitive issue, and I quit. I tried to make the article truthful by telling the whole story. The current entry contains lies by omission which, as I'm sure a smart guy like you would know, are still lies. PBF1974 (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Fred, I spent some time looking at articles on Esposito and posted links to them on the talk page. Everything PBF1974 has written is verifiable based on those sources; I suspect he's probably unfamiliar with the technical arcana of our citation templates. I suggest we cut him some slack and work with him on the article talk page, letting him do the research and writing, with the more experienced of us helping with the wiki-specific clean up. The fact is that the most notable thing about Esposito is his work on behalf of the FBI as a "sting candidate", not his paying a $6500 bar tab for someone else. The changes PBF1974 are a definite improvement in substance, if not necessarily wikiness.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

That's why I told him he needs to provide sources to back them up, rather than just say they're verifiable. I agree that his work as a sting candidate makes him notable and warrants mention in the article; however, it's a claim that BLP requires to be backed up by reliable sources. I do not feel that the story about the Kennedy election is relevant to Esposito—though if it's covered in another Wikipedia article, a one-sentence mention and a link to that article would be appropriate. —C.Fred (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Tour de Munster

Thanks for your reply re tour de munster, not sure where I should post this. I have already posted it on my talk page... Gonna post it here, but any advice you could give would be great.

• 15600 hits on "" in Google..... I'll get back to you, thanks

Irish times '08

Irish times '09

Irish times '10

Irish Examiner '08

Irish Examiner '09

Irish Examiner '10

The Nationalist

Spin south west radio stn

Cork Independent

Google search

Discover Ireland

Some other coverage incl TV and paper cuttings

PS... I keep finding my photos of the tour on the net since I went searching for you !!

Cheers

mpodonohoe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpodonohoe (talk • contribs) 22:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

tour de m

But the entire article from the Irish times '10 was about the cycle..... I can't cite everything in the time they( the Mods) seem to give after creation of the page.....

Mpodonohoe (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)mpodonohoeMpodonohoe (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Not the link you gave above (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0813/breaking26.html). The only thing mentioned was a fragment of a sentence: "On the sporting front, there's racing at Tramore and Dundalk, the hurling All-Ireland minor and senior semi-finals at Croke Park, the Tour de Munster cycling event in Co Cork and the Tomás Mulligan Memorial Cycle from Dublin to Wexford and back." Nine words. —C.Fred (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry my mistake.... Irish Times....Irish Examiner. You are of course correct.... On the other hand Irish Examiner, corks 96fm and spin south west gave been our media partners of the last number of years, I personally think somewhat to the detriment of coverage in the other national papers...

So radio coverage along with high profile coverage in the Irish Examiner and Tv coverage every year except 2009 does not do it for Wiki...

Mpodonohoe (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)mpodonohoeMpodonohoe (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn at Home 8-12

Hi. Thanks for your adition to the 'pages is need of attention' list at WP:WPSCHOOLS. The irony is, that in spite of 327 so called project members, I'm the only Wikipedian actively working as caretaker of that project! I need all the help I can get there, because even the bots are down and I also have to find time micro-manage another Wikipedia project, and also clean up NPPfrom the bottom of the pit.--Kudpung (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Dtriles

Considering the article he just created, I think a welcome is wasted on him... HalfShadow 06:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I think that, unless the user is getting a 4im warning, a welcome is useful. It provides some direction on how to do things the right way, and it removes the "nobody told me" defence for having read the key guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Though having looked at the deleted edits of this user, I think the uw-voablock template was more called for here than welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 06:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Eh, it's a gift. Vandal-sense. You should see it; these squiggly lines come out of my head. Scares the crap out of anyone who sees it. HalfShadow 06:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for that. I occasionally forget that there's more than one Newcastle (deliberately ambiguous). :) -Danjel (talk) 14:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Advice on CfD

Fred, could you take a look at this CfD and give me some advice? I recognize that I should have tagged each and every sub-sub-subcat, but no one is making an argument for why they want to keep the useless category. It was poorly populated, duplicative, and surely overcategorization. If I am just flat-out dead wrong, I can accept that, but I would rather an admin take a look and advise me. Thanks!!!! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

External links

RE: [24] Please read Wikipedia:External_links#Official_links "Minimize the number of links If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate. However, Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Wikipedia does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says.

More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites." Active Banana (^bananaphone 00:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes I messed up in the edit summary. The twitter reference in the ELNO section is not as clear as the content I provided above from the Official Links section.Active Banana (^bananaphone 00:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)