User talk:Dcw2003

Welcome

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Dcw2003. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 21:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dcw2003/sandbox/ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dcw2003, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless

Please read this. An image that old can be safely uploaded to the Commons as public domain. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Norfolkfight2.png

Thanks for uploading File:Norfolkfight2.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abraham Jacob Hollandersky (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abraham Jacob Hollandersky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abraham Jacob Hollandersky has been accepted

Abraham Jacob Hollandersky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jimmy McLarnin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Crowd Roars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate categorization

Please read WP:DRAFTNOCAT. There is a good reason for that and once your article is accepted (see no reason it shouldn't be) it can be properly categorized. The policy is clear - Draft articles are not supposed to be categorized. Let me know if you have any questions.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Palitz has been accepted

Dave Palitz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 16:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austin Rice has been accepted

Austin Rice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 21:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You know what you are doing. Start as a Draft: article by all means, but, when you are ready, assuming it to be of this standard, simply go ahead and migrate it to main name space. There is no need for the Articles for Creation banners and approval scheme for your work.

I start all articles I write in my own user space and them over them when I am ready. Fiddle Faddle 21:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dcw2003. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 21:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 21:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Jacob Hollandersky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Dixon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Dcw2003! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 19:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have some further advice for you

Actually, "father advice"

When creating articles, know when to let go. I don't mean you should stop adding useful information, but know when to be the article's father, not its mother. It has to run free and scrape its knees, not be wrapped in soft towels. So be a father, not a mother, and step away from every article you create as soon as you deem it to be capable of surviving a deletion discussion. You will be amazed how some will catch people's imagination and they will improve them beyond your wildest dreams, and others will seem to languish for years unedited by a single other editor.

As with all advice, feel perfectly free to disregard it, but examine it closely before deciding. Fiddle Faddle 21:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mosey King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where we have common names...

... we use disambiguation pages to differentiate between the articles on Wikipedia. George Fried, currently, is th only gentleman with a WP article, so, by convention, his will take precedence, and all the others will be names with some sort of qualifier in parentheses after them, eg George Fried (acrobat), who may or may not exist. Ideally, the editor creating probably the third George Fried article will create George Fried (disambiguation), which will list all the folk so named.

There's more to learn than you can shake a stick at, and that is fine, because there is always someone who will solve the problem if you get it wrong. We expect folk to get it wrong. It;s the getting of it wrong in the same manner twice that makes folk wonder, not the first time ,

All successful editors here have made enormous errors at the start. You've not even scratched the surface of the error lake!! Just keep on enjpying editing Fiddle Faddle 07:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jimmy McLarnin

added links pointing to Jim Jeffries and Manuel Ortiz

Abraham Jacob Hollandersky

added a link pointing to Max Baer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:JackSilverBoxer1.png

Thanks for uploading File:JackSilverBoxer1.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Phil Bloom (Boxer)

added links pointing to Al McCoy, Southern Exposure and The Day

Joe Glick

added a link pointing to Al McCoy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JackSilverBoxer1.png

A tag has been placed on File:JackSilverBoxer1.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JackSilverCallahan.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JackSilverCallahan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VinceDundee.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VinceDundee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 ^Talk 02:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mushy Callahan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Al McCoy and Jim Jeffries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:JackThompson.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JackThompson.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting this image. The rationale for use in the article Jack Silver (boxer) is not adequate. It fails our non-free content requirements because there's no contextual significance. Seeing an image of a fighter he met in a boxing match does not increase our understanding of the article topic (Jack Silver), so it fails NFCC #8. Sorry, -- Diannaa (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:OaklandJimmyDuffy.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OaklandJimmyDuffy.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:BoxerJackSilver2.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BoxerJackSilver2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the description carefully. The picture is the most critical photo in the article, as it identifies the boxer Jack Silver. It is from 1925, according to the book from which it was taken. Of course the book was published after 1923, but it states specifically the image was created in 1925 at the latest.

The image is the only identifying photo of the boxer i have been able to locate. It is historically significant as it illustrates the article for EDUCATIONAL purposes, and it is holds a critical place in the article. It illustrates the existence of Silver as a boxer. It is also nearly public domain anyway as the book indicates it was taken around 1925, only 2 years from being fully public domain anyway. It is also cropped from the original picture, and is used SOLELY to identify Jack Silver to the reader. Please consider keeping it. Thank-you The origial picture was owned by Jack Silver according to the caption. He is deceased. Please consider keeping the image. I have also searched the library of congress for LOC public domain copies and found none. Thank-you.

Non-free rationale for File:BainAbie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BainAbie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosenbloom.Maxie.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosenbloom.Maxie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BainAbie.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BainAbie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abiebainmuscle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abiebainmuscle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving from Draft

Just in case you don't already know - the best way is to use the move function when shifting an article from Draft to Article space. That keeps the history intact. The move function can be found under More in the Top Right corner of the page. I would also suggest putting in Project Tags on the Talk page to make sure the article is properly integrated.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer from my talk page

You must excuse wikipedia - there are guidelines that are open to interpretation, some are acted upon, and some are not. Up-loading pictures is subject to this and I have never quite understood the ins and outs of the process. This is the bane of multi-contributor wikis with no single czar. Wish I coulde be more helpful.

With regard to notability and your articles in general I will say that personally I like your contributions. Well written, referenced and interesting subjects. However, for wikipedia the main arbitrator of notability is the WP:GNG with the various guidelines such as WP:NBOX designed not as a hard and fast rule but to help define what is likely to be notable. So you could have boxers which don't meet WP:NBOX but have more than enough reliable third party coverage to meet WP:GNG and they should be kept (this may be debated in AfD) and conversely boxers who meet WP:NBOX but without much in the way of coverage being kept on the assumption that more is out there. With all your articles so far, even the once who don't strictly meet WP:NBOX I think a good effort has been made to supply the needed references. I hope this helps.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Abie Bain, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 01:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sid Terris. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dcw2003, I'm not sure why you refuse to acknowledge edits I make to your articles or just ignore any attempts to explain to you that Wikipedia has a manual of style that articles follow. It's only a simple policy, WP:HEAD states that headers follow sentence case not title case, so only the first word and any proper nouns begin with capital letters. Look around at other articles if you don't understand what I mean, or maybe read the policy so you know what it says. I have already left two low-level warnings because often times newer editors don't know about policy before making the edits, but I have also mentioned to you over-and-over again in edit summarys what the policy is and you keep changing back to incorrect style. Just because you create an article doesn't mean you own the article and can have it appear anyway you want. Any other editor can edit the articles you create. I really don't want to add other warnings because I don't want to cause problems for you because you have created some very good, well re-searched articles, and I want to see you create more of them. That's why I am leaving you this message, to try and reach out to you in the hopes you will work together with other editors like me who are only trying to follow policy when editing. Other editors have also fixed headers in your articles, so that should tell you there must be something to this. If you haven't read the policy, please do so, and if you don't understand something, all you have to do is ask me. I'm only trying to work with you, not against you which is how you make it seem when you ignore editors wanting to help. Cmr08 (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dcw2003 I am rather certain you did not specifically state that headers follow sentence case. This is unusual as I have worked as a professional writer for many years, and have never seen this convention. I was not trying to ignore you. I would appreciate it if you would be more patient in your reprimands, and more specific. Thank-you for your interest. I was completely unaware of this convention, and you did not specifically mention it in any of your comments. Thank-you for your words of praise. I can only say you may need to more specific in your critiques.

Thank-you

Actually there were no reprimands or criticisms, it was just attempts by another editor to inform you of Wikipedia's manual of style. The reason it seemed like you were ignoring me was because I had fixed the headers in numerous articles and cited policy in the edit summary but you kept adding them in all caps. Also, I am rather certain that I did specifically state that headers follow sentence case, and can show proof. You must have just missed it. In this edit[1] to Abie Bain, I left a link to the policy and told you in edit summary what the policy was. In Sid Terris article as well with this edit [2], other edits I made I pointed out the WP:HEAD policy, and in others I left an edit summary explaining my changes by stating that only the first word and proper nouns begin with capitals. It took two low-level warnings, numerous reverts and edit summarys and finally a long note explaining my edits to get you attention. Maybe I should have left the note at first and skipped the warnings, but the warning are not a big deal and not really all that much of a warning, there really just messages to let an editor there might be a problem and there usually enough to get the editors attention. Now, higher level warnings can cause problems and even lead in some cases to blocks which is why I left the note rather than keep warning. The last thing I wanted was to cause problems for you because as I stated earlier, your articles are very good and want to see you continue here. I came across Jack Silver by chance, which is why I checked for other articles to read them but when I see anything that needs to be touched up, I do it. It's not meant as criticism, and most of the time it's just mistakes the editor doesn't even know they made. Other editors will also do this. Trust me when I say this, compared to the manual of style I have to fix on a lot of other articles, you have nothing to worry about. If there is ever anything you need help with, or other problems you come across, I have no problem helping you out. Just leave a message on my talk page, and I look forward to working with you here and to read your future articles. Cmr08 (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, sorry for the length of my reply. I have a habit of rambling on. lol Cmr08 (talk) 23:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hi Dce2003, the edit summary is the box directly above where you save page at the bottom. Whatever an editor writes in there will appear on the articles history page next to their edit. Cmr08 (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your first barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for contributing so many good articles, Keep up the great work! — Cmr08 (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dcw2003. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 20:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dcw2003. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style editing, warnings, etc.

Hi again, I want to make something clear about what I left on your talk page above. There were two low-level warnings, not three as you said on my talk page. The third was not a warning, it was a message trying to explain manual of style to you, where I even stated I was leaving the message because I did not want to leave a third warning. By leaving the warnings, I was doing what I am supposed to be doing. I left the level-one warning, when you continued, I left the level-two warning. The wording is from templates where each level gets a little stronger in tone. The list of warning templates can be found at WP:WARNING. If you find the wording vague, hard to understand, or negative in nature, I'm sorry but sending the template messages is the normal way to let newer editors know about policy. You can always go to the appropriate noticeboard and make your case there, or open up a report on me and see what happens. I doubt much since I don't believe I have done anything wrong. You can also go to the help page, and there are ways there to ask questions of other editors and get advice on editing. However, the best thing may be for you to just remove the warnings from your talk page as if they were never left there, and for me to refrain from copyediting any of the articles you wrote. Will you agree with me on this? That way the problem is solved. Cmr08 (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SollySeeman2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SollySeeman2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BernsteinJack.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BernsteinJack.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TerrisSid.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:TerrisSid.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Glick.Joe.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glick.Joe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SollySeeman2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SollySeeman2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expired copyrights

You say "it is more than likely the original COPYRIGHT EXPIRED AND WAS NOT RENEWED" which says to me you don't really know if it was renewed or not. That is not good enough. You need to actually research the copyright status instead of making assumptions. Eeekster (talk) 01:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dcw2003. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 11:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 11:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Benjamin (boxer)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ramnath88 (talk) 07:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:HarryLewis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HarryLewis.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcw2003: I've fixed the issue by adding a {{PD-US-1923}} license tag per your text-based license statement. In the future, to avoid the ire of the bot and comply with the image use policy, you'll need to pick a machine-readable image license tag (directory of tags here) when you upload files, in addition to explaining the license status in words. Cheers, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 18:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:SullivanMikeboxer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SullivanMikeboxer.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Jacob Hollandersky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack McAuliffe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solly Krieger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mickey Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RayBronson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RayBronson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloom2.Phil.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Bloom2.Phil.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TodoMoran.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:TodoMoran.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mosey King

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mosey King".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joe Glick concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joe Glick, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Captain George Fried concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Captain George Fried, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Glick.Joe.TheBowery.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glick.Joe.TheBowery.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Glick

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Joe Glick".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benny Valger concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Benny Valger, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benny Valger

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Benny Valger".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Bloom Phil boxer.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Dcw2003}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jamesrisden.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Jamesrisden.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stanwass.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stanwass.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:Stanwass.jpg. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Evidence of the permission needs to be provided. The best way to do this is provide the permission to OTRS. Whpq (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Please have a look at WP:DCP for more details. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mosey King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack McAuliffe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Jacob Hollandersky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Venice Borkhorsor

The article Venice Borkhorsor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 22:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Jacob Hollandersky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taboga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Captain George Fried concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Captain George Fried, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bloom2.Phil.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bloom2.Phil.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Durante.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Durante.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Captain George Fried

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Captain George Fried".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FrankieNeil.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FrankieNeil.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abe Attell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Dixon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GoldsteinAbe.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GoldsteinAbe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:HollanderskyMayflower.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HollanderskyMayflower.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abe Goldstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Martin (boxer)

Hi, when moving the Eddie Martin (boxer) draft from Draft: to mainspace, you forgot to remove the AfC template. Next time, please remember to remove the line that has {{afc submission}}. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Martin.Eddieboxer.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Martin.Eddieboxer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need History Merged for New Article, Jimmy Walsh (American Boxer)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Jimmy Walsh (American boxer) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Jimmy Walsh (American boxer). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dcw2003 (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Austin Rice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Sullivan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young Griffo

Hi there, when editing an article that is already using a set date format, please stick with that format instead of changing to one you prefer. The dmy template has been at the top of Young Griffo since July 2013, so that's the format you should be using when adding to that particular article. I have fixed all the date formats to day-month-year format, so there is nothing to worry about, just use that date format when adding further content to that article. Cmr08 (talk) 02:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==Reply for Young Griffo== dcw2003 Sorry Cmr08, but before reading your note, I changed the format back to US date format. Griffo lived the great majority of his life in the United States, and died there, and was a US citizen. (From age 22 to 56) The US uses the date format in the document as it stands now. I'm sorry to waste your time and apologize. I appreciate your note, and wish I'd read it in time. If you keep the tag out of the document at the top that switches it to European date format, of course it should remain in US date format. Feel free to change it back if I have violated some Wiki rules, of course, but I'd hate to take more of your time. Again, I apologize for the change. I've always greatly appreciated your time and attentions.

The general rule when it comes to dates is that we don't change to another format if an article is already following a certain date format, but you have explained why you made the changes, so I will not revert. However, it should be pointed out that the article existed for almost 8 years and was tagged for 3 years before you ever edited the article, so there are editors who do pay attention to this. You probably didn't notice when you were editing Torpedo Billy Murphy, but the same thing occurred. You removed the tags and used a different date format and another editor came along right away and fixed template damage with this edit. [3] So, it's still possible and maybe even probable that another editor will come along and revert your edit, but like I said, I understand why you made the change so I won't revert. Also, even after your edit, I see a couple of dates still in the other format, so you might want to check this so they are all in the same format. Cmr08 (talk) 11:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The date template you removed has been re-added by another editor. If you have a problem with the change, then take it up with that editor, rather than changing back. Cmr08 (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BenJordan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BenJordan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddie Santry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Bernstein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Service Award

This editor is a
**Yeoman Editor**
and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

Hi Dcw2003, since you haven't added or been given a service award yet, I will give it to you. There are many different levels of these awards (19 I believe) and you move up levels as you meet certain requirements (edits / time served). Right now you are at level 5 (4,000 edits / 1 year of service). You have already exceeded the edit requirement for the next level (6,000), so in 3 months, you can display level 6. These service awards are awards that we can also give ourselves, so when you reach the next level, you can go ahead and change the template yourself to display the higher level. You can check out WP:Service awards where this is all explained. Cmr08 (talk) 06:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from talk page

Hi Dcw2003, you can write about pretty much anything, as long as the subject is notable enough for an article. You don't even have to create the articles, if there are other topics you are interested in, you could always find stub articles created by someone else and expand them into more detailed articles. I'm sure you would have no problem finding articles to edit in the areas you mentioned on my talk page. Cmr08 (talk) 01:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boxing barnstar

		The Sport Barnstar
		Awesome work creating/restoring articles related to boxers whom history has unfairly obscured! MaxPayne888 (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Steve.Sullivan.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Steve.Sullivan.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie Klick

Hi Dcw2003, I'm not really sure what to do here. I see the Frankie Klick (boxer) article, and the Frankie Klick article which you redirected, but I'm not sure what you mean by German language article. Are you referring to an article on the German Wikipedia or did someone add an article on this Wikipedia but wrote it in German? I'm not seeing any other Frankie Klick on the English Wikipedia, so a disambiguation page would not be needed. If this is the case, then the article you wrote would not need the (boxer) disambiguation, just the name. We only disambiguate pages if there is another article with the same name. All I get when I try to fix this is a message that says I don't have permission to move because another article with the name exists, and it can't be done manually because it would mess up the article history. The best thing to do is go to Wikipedia:Requested moves and see if an administrator can help. Cmr08 (talk) 21:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you meant if I went to google and searched? I now see what you mean, but it doesn't matter what the titles are in other Wikipedia's, they are different websites, we are only concerned with the English Wikipedia. A disambiguation page on the English Wikipedia only lists the articles on this Wikipedia. Further to your original message, the problem with the disambiguation (boxer) can probably be easily fixed, but like I said above, it's not possible for me to do that, you will need to ask an administrator on the page Wikipedia:Requested moves.

By the way, thanks to the barnstar. Cmr08 (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counts

Hi Dcw2003. If you click on contributions on your toolbar you will be taken to a new page with your recent edits. On the bottom of that page is a User Info panel. Use the 'Edit Count' and 'Articles created' sections to find some wonderful data about all your hard work. Cheers FruitMonkey (talk) 13:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards.table

Hi Dcw2003, I just reverted these edits you made on the service awards/table page as unexplained. You removed the requirements and some of the badges for the experienced editor award level. Were you really trying to remove these or was it just a mistake? If it was a mistake, don't worry it's fixed, if it wasn't a mistake, you'll have to explain the reason. Cmr08 (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no big deal when you make a mistake. All you have to do is click on "undo" next to the edit on the history page and it will take you to the edit window where you just click "save" like you do when saving your other edits. Doing this reverts the edit. Cmr08 (talk) 00:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Salica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Ortiz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pinky Silverberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Bill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dcw2003. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JackSharkey.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JackSharkey.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:EricLichtblau.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EricLichtblau.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:EricLichtblau.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EricLichtblau.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alan.Furst.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alan.Furst.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BernabeVillacampo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BernabeVillacampo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Alan.Furst.png

Thanks for uploading File:Alan.Furst.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EricLichtblau.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EricLichtblau.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PanamaJoeGans.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PanamaJoeGans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patsy Sweeney.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Patsy Sweeney.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Dcw2003}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Chip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Castle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your addition to Stanley Levison has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JackSilverBoxer1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JackSilverBoxer1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin.Eddieboxer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Martin.Eddieboxer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Venice Borkhorsor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Venice Borkhorsor.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your addition to Jack Greenberg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dcw2003. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Papke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Sullivan, Max Baer and Ed Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Papke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richie Lemos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Covina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Knight (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al McCoy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RobertCohen.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RobertCohen.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EddieSimms.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EddieSimms.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Morton.irwin.birnbaum.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Morton.irwin.birnbaum.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasky.Art.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Art Lasky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Baer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Artie Levine.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Artie Levine.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben.Goldberg.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benny Goldberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Ortiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Artie Levine.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Artie Levine.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WolfeJack1920.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WolfeJack1920.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morton.irwin.birnbaum.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morton.irwin.birnbaum.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:FrankieConifrey.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Dixon (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry McGovern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PT-109 and PT-59

I appreciate the detail you added as to Kennedy's wartime serve in his main article. If you have time, have a look at Motor Torpedo Boat PT-109 and Motor Torpedo Boat PT-59. I have worked on both over the years to improve them and to add WP:RS cites. As with many articles, they can use some additional work. Kierzek (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PT-109 is looking better. When I have time, I will do a little clean up, sfn the cites you added. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 13:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PT-59 before conversion.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motor Patrol Boat 159 as gunboat design.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warfield.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warfield.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PT-109 Design1943.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

px values at PT-109

Hello. Thank you for your diligent work on Motor Torpedo Boat PT-109. I've removed your px values from thumbnails twice, here andhere, with a clear edit summary and a link to the applicable policy in both cases. And yet you're still adding new px values, eg here. Have you not paid enough attention to the page history to see my corrections? Can I do anything to help you understand the use of |upright= or the need for its use? ―Mandruss ☎ 21:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I've changed all the px values again. I'll emphasize that edit summaries are an important part of communication between editors (nobody works in isolation here), so monitoring the page history is part of the necessary routine for experienced editors. It's the first thing I do when I start a new "day" at an article where I've been active—I check to see what's been done while I was away, with the option to view individual edits using the "prev" links at the left edge.
Also, most editors respond to a user talk post under it, rather than going to the other user's talk page; that way discussions are not fragmented. An editor posting here would generally be expected to watch the page for awhile for your response. If there's any doubt, you can use {{Reply to}} (or any of its popular aliases including "ping") within your reply to send them a notification of it.
Happy editing! ―Mandruss ☎ 22:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:59large40cal.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Motor Patrol Boat 159 as gunboat design.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Motor Patrol Boat 159 as gunboat design.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:59twin50s.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:59twin50s.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Twin50s.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twin50s.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Twin50s.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Twin50s.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BobGodwin.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BobGodwin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tankroom2.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MickeyDuff.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mickey Duff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monte Attell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PT-159 HarlemRiver.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Mason (boxer)

I would invite you to discuss changes on the article's talk page rather than just re-adding the same text with incorrect date formats, grammatical errors, and unnecessary sub-headings. I don't think anything I changed was particularly controversial, so please take any issues to the talk page. --Michig (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NelTarleton.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:HarryStein.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoeBurman.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnnyErtle.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HollanderskyMayflower1908.png

Thank you for uploading File:HollanderskyMayflower1908.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpeedyDado.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:HarryReeve.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnErtle.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lou.Ambers.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BabyArizmendi.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mushcallahan1.png

Thank you for uploading File:Mushcallahan1.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Dundee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dcw2003. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dcw2003. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeLevine.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Freeman (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ike Weir

Someone gave me a ton of news reports of Ike Weir. If you want we could sort something out so I can get them to you. Bitplayervesti (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BenBrill.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:BenBrill.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HollanderskyMayflower1908.png

The file File:HollanderskyMayflower1908.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JackOrtega1900.JPG

The file File:JackOrtega1900.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Stone (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tallis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Llew Edwards.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Llew Edwards.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PT-109 Collision.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SydneyStadium1913.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SydneyStadium1913.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tom Johnson.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Johnson.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GentlemanJackson.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GentlemanJackson.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tom Johnson Corrected.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tom Johnson Corrected.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Tom Johnson.jpeg

The page File:Tom Johnson.jpeg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Johnson (bareknuckle boxer)

Hi, I'm sorry but I am having to revert an awful lot of what you did yesterday at Tom Johnson (bareknuckle boxer) and wonder if you are making similarly suboptimal edits to other boxing articles. I've given rationales for my changes thus far in the edit summaries, which is always a good idea & something I would encourage you to use in future. - Sitush (talk) 11:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:BenjaminBrain.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BenjaminBrain.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jacob Hyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lancaster County

Tom Hyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lancaster County

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NewsboyBrown1924.JPG

The file File:NewsboyBrown1924.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:William Perry.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:William Perry.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paddy Ryan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Dwyer and Jack McAuliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:WilliamPerry2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WilliamPerry2.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Section headings

Hi, I know you thought my section headings too brief and too few but, honestly, I think you're making a hash of changing the layout of these boxing biographies. Have you read WP:MOSHEAD? Have you considered what happens when a long section heading is viewed using the mobile app? I see that you are doing it to a swathe of articles and it really is not the improvement that you seem to think it is. - Sitush (talk) 15:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GentlemanJohnJackson by Percy Roberts.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GentlemanJohnJackson by Percy Roberts.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harry Broome and Orme, 1853.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harry Broome and Orme, 1853.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Broome and Orme Lithograph for publication 1853.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Broome and Orme Lithograph for publication 1853.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Coburn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consumption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:PT-59 Gunboat Design.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:PT-59 Gunboat Design.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Determining file licensing and copyright vs. public domain status

Hello! I noticed that you'd had several images deleted, including several which are almost certainly in the public domain rather than nonfree due to their age. I certainly realize that copyright status is a difficult, complex subject, so you're always welcome to ask at the media copyright questions board for some editors experienced in that to help you make a determination. Additionally, the Hirtle chart is a useful reference for determining if an image has aged out of eligibility for copyright. Some of the ones you've found are real gems, so I hate to see them deleted when that may not even be necessary. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DickCurtis.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:DickCurtis.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dick Curtis publicdomain.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dick Curtis publicdomain.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DickCurtis.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DickCurtis.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HarryBroome.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarryBroome.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Hyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dick Curtis publicdomain.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dick Curtis publicdomain.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (📧) 09:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:YankeeSullivan.jpg

The file File:YankeeSullivan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tom Johnson Corrected.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Johnson Corrected.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzanne wasserman.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suzanne wasserman.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Barry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spike Webb moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spike Webb, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PrussianOwl (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Spike Webb 1939.jpg

The page File:Spike Webb 1939.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Burman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:KilbaneJohnny.jpg

The file File:KilbaneJohnny.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinky Silverberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Bill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billy Soose.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Billy Soose.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at File:Billy Soose.jpeg. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I was informed today I was blocked for saving the file Billy Soose as Public Domain. I was informed by another knowledgable wikipedia user that a photograph that has no author or photographer listed and is 70 years or more from publication can be considered public domain in the United States. The user that blocked me gave no response as to whether this is a valid permission, at least not a detailed one. I promise I will no longer set as public domain published photographs that were published after 1923 until this issue is resolved. I did not think it was necessary to block me. Thank-you for your consideration!!!! I am a senior editor in terms of the amount of edits I have on wiki, and was a bit disappointed to be blocked without a more detailed explanation of why the permission I stated was not valid. Thank-you for your consideration, I do not mean to cause trouble! }}

Dcw2003, the template you used states that it is for works published anonymously before 1924. Further, List of countries' copyright lengths states 95 years from publication for works published 1964–77; 28 (if copyright not renewed) or 95 years from publication for works published 1924–63 (Copyrights prior to 1924 have expired, not including copyrights on sound recordings fixed prior to February 15, 1972, covered only under state laws.), not 70 years as you have stated. Based on your talk page history, you seem to get a lot of warnings about image licensing problems. Why do you think that is? ST47 (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also not able to verify the source you have provided for File:Harry Broome and Orme, 1853.jpg. I believe you that it is is PD, but it does not appear on the page of the book you have linked. ST47 (talk) 23:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maurice Holtzer 1930.JPG appears to have the same problem as the Billy Soose photo, I have created Category:Images using PD-anon-expired which are less than 95 years old for this problem. ST47 (talk) 23:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am disabling your unblock request, as the block has expired. However, considering the number of messages you have received about copyright over the course of the last four years, it is astonishing that you have not been blocked previously. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 13:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WalterEdgerton.jpeg

The file File:WalterEdgerton.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dcw2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

JBW I think you have misunderstood what happened. I had no intent of uploading another photograph or file, nor did I. Please note that no new file was uploaded to wiki. I am certain the file said 70 years before I modified it. I did not upload a new file. I have been a faithfull contributor to wiki. Only once has a reviewer explained to me that 90 years is the acceptable time period for allowing public domain from an anonymous work and you were that reviewer. The request was only made after I was blocked which seems a bit unfair. I have not uploaded another file since I was blocked. I have never intentionally uploaded a file that I thought was not public domain. My uploaded files have always had very detailed permissions, unlike many others. I really did not upload a new file since you blocked me and this seems unfair considering my many many contributions to wiki. Please at least respond to my unblock request. You misunderstood what occurred. I have added over 100 quality articles to wiki, and your blocking me without understanding what occurred is very discouraging. Please at least respond to my request. I have uploaded 100s of photographs with very few being blocked and all having very detailed explanations. My articles are good, and in many cases outstanding. You simply misunderstood what occurred. I would greatly appreciate a response. I was contrite and considerate in my last unblock request as I am trying to be in this one. Thank-you, David

Accept reason:

David, the edit I referred to was just reverting an edit of your own, and I wouldn't have blocked you if you had not made either edit, which would have had the same final effect. I have therefore decided that the block is not justified, so I shall unblock your account. However, I hope you will be very careful about everything to do with copyright, to avoid further problems. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jimmy Barry Army 1917.JPG

The file File:Jimmy Barry Army 1917.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The copyright statement is inaccurate. It says "In America, public domain is extended for works 70 years from Publication if the artist is anonymous", but in fact the figure is 95 years from publication for works published 1924–63, as can be seen at List of countries' copyright lengths. This file is stated to have been published in 1943, which is less than 95 years ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Paddock and Broome.jpg

The file File:Paddock and Broome.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NatLangham.JPG

The file File:NatLangham.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dick Curtis.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dick Curtis.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aby Belasco

Hello, Dcw2003,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Aby Belasco for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 21:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas Owen boxer.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Owen boxer.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcw2003

Thank you for creating Abey Belasco.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Cracking article. That boxer must have been tough as nails.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 11:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment

Dcw2003 (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC) @Scope creep: I'm glad you liked the article. The table is a bit redundant I guess, but I included it anyway. I think it is one of my best boxing articles. Thanks Scope Creep. What is a page curation process?[reply]

Thanks dcw2003

Lengthy headings

Hi, I remain unhappy with your edits to boxing biographies and in particular the ridiculously lengthy section headings now in use, eg at Daniel Mendoza. Have you ever tried viewing this stuff using the Wikipedia app which, I'd wager, is how most people would view it? Are you aware of WP:MOSHEAD? - Sitush (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation, does not have sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 17:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Compromised.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Compromised.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saving Freedom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George McGhee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GeorgeSorosBookCover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GeorgeSorosBookCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GeorgeSorosBookCover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GeorgeSorosBookCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UnprecedentedBook.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UnprecedentedBook.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including George Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including George Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dow. You should be aware of talk pages as you have commented on few several times before: [4]. But in either case, see Help:Talk pages. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unprecedented: A Simple Guide to the Crimes of the Trump Campaign and Presidency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unprecedented: A Simple Guide to the Crimes of the Trump Campaign and Presidency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unprecedented: A Simple Guide to the Crimes of the Trump Campaign and Presidency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UnprecedentedBook.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UnprecedentedBook.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from John F. Kennedy into PT 109: An American Epic of War, Survival, and the Destiny of John F. Kennedy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

===dcw2003 responds to Dcw2003 (talk)I believe I was indeed the sole author. Check the history of the PT-109 article, and you will see pages and pages of edits from dcw2003. Actually the text I copied was from the PT-109 article I wrote most of, not the John F. Kennedy, although I wrote much of the section on PT-109 in the John Kennedy article as well. I greatly appreciate your advice and information.

As a secondary issue, I was wondering if you knew the tag to use if you are making extensive edits on a page, particularly one you have just begun and moved to article space and need time to complete your edits before you are deluged with warning tags for missing categories or references or other essential information. I usually keep my new articles in Draft: mode, but sometimes I upload them and don't have time to complete them before getting deluged with comments while I am trying to complete the article. Thanks!!!!

Template:In use is what you are looking for.— Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 11:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Your edit to Bernard Museum of Judaica has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Morrisabram.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Morrisabram.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everette Lee DeGolyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats for modern US military

Looking at this edit and many similar, I thank you for your detailed work on this article but note that WP:MOSDATE in particular WP:DATERET are intended as guidance to retain an appropriate and uniform date format throughout an article. --Pete (talk) 23:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Great job on John R. Thistlethwaite - keep up the good work! Meatsgains^(talk) 00:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John R. Thistlewaite

Hello, Dcw2003,

In the future, if you disagree with an editor moving an article you have created into Draft space, please simply inform the editor and move it back. Otherwise, we are left with two versions of an article, one in main space and one in Draft space. It's better to retain the page history rather than have you do a cut & paste and create a new version of an article. Thanks very much for your new article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dcw2003,

Okay, so now we have both John R. Thistlethwaite and John R. Thistlewaite. Please select the article with correct spelling of this person's name and change the other page into a redirect. We can't have two identical articles with different spellings of a person's name. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sal.Bartolo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sal.Bartolo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your edit to Patrick E. Haggerty has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick E. Haggerty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Jonsson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. Clarence Karcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Jonsson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John R. Thistlewaite

Hello, Dcw2003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John R. Thistlewaite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John R. Thistlewaite

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John R. Thistlewaite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Caleb Baldwin boxer.PNG

The file File:Caleb Baldwin boxer.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded y File:Caleb Baldwin (boxer).jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freddie.Steele.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freddie.Steele.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Weissmann's Where The Law Ends

You are, of course, aware that WaPo, The Atlantic, Slate.com, are all Leftwing progressive sources. Sad you saw no need to cite non-biased sources. I'll try to fix that but then I guess any sources I use (National Review, Victor Hanson Davis, Washington Times, etc.) will all by adjudged non-RS, unreliable, etc. I guess Larry Sanger is right. MurrayGreshler (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your comments, and apologize for what may be adjudged Liberal Sources. I also quote a Federal Judge, but then I guess you'd consider her biased because she's from a District of Columbia Court. Murray, there are no non-biased sources in a larger sense, my friend when it comes to politics. And yes National Review is one of the most conservative newspapers in America, and was once the brain child of William F. Buckley, one of the most conservative, if brilliant, political commentators in America. I appreciate your work. All the facts in the document have been verified hundreds of times by all kinds of sources. Manafort himself admitted he gave polling documents to Konstantin Kilimnik, so I would think he's a reliable source. He's admitted it more than once. If the FBI isnt a reliable source than I guess we're all sunk and they've given the odds that Kilimnik was a Russian agent at about 80% reliable. So I'm not certain sourcing is the only issue here. BY THE WAY I GREATLY APPRECIATE YOUR WORK AND YOUR ATTENTION TO DETAIL!!! Good luck to you and thank you for holding wiki to high standards. You are a gentleman and a scholar. My best to you always!! Dcw2003 (talk) 13:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

At ≈300kb, thought you might find this link useful. - wolf 03:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PT-109 Panama.png

The file File:PT-109 Panama.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per comments on talk page, this doesn't appear to actually be PT-109, but a low-rez crop of an image of PT-105. Also, the ref used to support this image doesn't actually support it, and beyond that, the source has been determined to be generally unreliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:GersonSamuelOlympian.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:GersonSamuelOlympian.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MeyerFrederickJOlympics.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MeyerFrederickJOlympics.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill.Brennan.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill.Brennan.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Izzy.Jannazzo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Izzy.Jannazzo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your edit to George Gulack has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Bill.Brennan.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Bill.Brennan.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MeyerFrederickJOlympics.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MeyerFrederickJOlympics.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AxlerodAlbertFencer.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AxlerodAlbertFencer.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChalkyWright.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChalkyWright.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MasterEdith1976OlympicTeam.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MasterEdith1976OlympicTeam.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:MCQ § US Olympic Committee photos

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:MCQ § US Olympic Committee photos. Marchjuly (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GulackGeorgeOlympian.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GulackGeorgeOlympian.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MasterEdithOlympian.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MasterEdithOlympian.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lemos Richie.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lemos Richie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lawson Robertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Clarke.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abe Simon boxer.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abe Simon boxer.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lou.Ambers.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lou.Ambers.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scalzo Petey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scalzo Petey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Louis.Salica.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Louis.Salica.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeymourSteveOlympian.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeymourSteveOlympian.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dcw2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not blocked Dcw2003 (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because it seems like you solved the problem yourself by turning off your VPN. VPN services usually route their traffic through data centers, and, for security reasons, we block any IP addresses assigned to data centers as we find them. You won't be able to edit Wikipedia from any IP address that we suspect is a proxy, data center, or hosting service. Stick to the IP address assigned to you by your ISP, and you should have no problem editing Wikipedia. If you need to use a VPN service for some reason, you can request IP block exemption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I filed an unblock request but found after rebooting I was no longer blocked from editing. There may have been a VPN button on my Bitdefender Browser which may have temporarily caused a block. I will no longer use Bitdefender Browser to edit wikipedia as it can cause blocking issues as if is seen as a Virtual Private Network at times. Not sure why else there could have been a block.

There is no current block after a simple reboot. I am a dedicated wikipedia editor and have many high quality pages I have written or edited. I have worked largely in Sports.

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungJFK.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungJFK.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:PrinsteinMyerTrackGear.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:PrinsteinMyerTrackGear.JPG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 08:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on William Kuhlemeier

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William Kuhlemeier, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeligmanEdgar.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeligmanEdgar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AmyotJacques.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmyotJacques.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LucasKannou (talk) 17:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:GyorgyBrody1932.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GyorgyBrody1932.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

File:JackThompson.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JackThompson.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Please don't copy material from elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Please be aware that we use a detection system to generate reports of potential copyright violations; all edits over a certain size are being checked. So please, no more copying from your sources, of you risk being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your comments. I am a former professional writer, and try diligently never to reference material from other sources including online documents without completely re-writing in my own words. However, I write long wiki articles and a few parts of a short sentence may remain in tact. I will endeavor to insure that I modify any material referenced from online sources so that not a single short phrase of the online source remains in my wiki version. I am sorry for this matter taking your time and appreciate your efforts. Certain phrases or long words like the name of an honor in the honors section may remain the same words, and these can be several words, if so, I put them in sentences that are not included in the source material. I will study the wiki copyright policy more carefully. Thank-you again for your comments. I do occasionally quote from online sources, but I use quotes around the text and do this only for direct quotes from individuals. I will stop this if required.Dcw2003 (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to use short quotations where there's no alternative. Otherwise please write your own content. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:GenterSteveMarkSpitzWernerLampe1972.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GenterSteveMarkSpitzWernerLampe1972.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:TaylorStella.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaylorStella.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TaylorStellaChannel.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaylorStellaChannel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Abiebainmuscle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Abiebainmuscle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 07:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AshworthGeraldH.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:AshworthGeraldH.JPG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 19:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Flanagan (swimmer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Marsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AshworthGeraldH.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AshworthGeraldH.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to Bonnie Adair has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dianna-

Thank-you for editing wikipedia articles. I'm afraid I have some information to convey to you which you may not like hearing.

The entire first paragraph of Bonnie Adair (which I did not write) is copied from the following website word for word with not a single modification:

www.usms.org/fitness-and-training/articles-and-videos/articles/profiling-bonnie-adair?Oldid=1544

This is common in most of the wikipedia websites I've seen and edited, but since the source is not carefully or fully cited, editors like you rarely comment. I've edited over 1000 wikipedia articles and written over 120 from scratch. I know what I'm talking about.

My edits were modified in sentence structure, grammar, and order, but were entirely deleted because I was careful to include the full path to the source as I always do.

This seems a bit odd to me, but then I probably edit more articles than most editors. Actually it seems very odd and discriminatory. Perhaps you can see why. I apologize for the tone of this note. Dcw2003 (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me also add that the entire Bonnie Adair article as it now stands is copied word for word from the sight I listed below without a single word being modified. But you didn't catch this because the source article in Masters swimming was not properly cited. I mean every single word!! Dcw2003 (talk) 10:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dcw2003. The reason your edit got flagged is because we have a detection system that uses the Turnitin service to locate copyright violations. It compares all additions over a certain size to material available online. It does not compare with citations present in the article; it compares with the rest of the Internet and content they retain in a database. In other words, it would have detected the overlap even if you had not cited a source.

The article from its creation was copied from this website so I have listed it at WP:CP. You are welcome to do a rewrite if you wish. See the template below for instructions. — Diannaa (talk) 15:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dianaaa-

You didn't seem to read or understand a word of my note. The entire document Bonnie Adair is PLAGARIZED word for word. I didn't write any of it. According to your response, it should have been caught. IT WAS NOT. It rarely is. EVERY SINGLE WORD. This is a direct contradiction of what you replied to my note. Perhaps it is difficult to communicate through these text messages.

www.usms.org/fitness-and-training/articles-and-videos/articles/profiling-bonnie-adair?Oldid=1544

The source path is directly above. Word for word copyright violation, but no flag at all. Completely contradicts everything you said in your note. And you also verify what I've said. My flagged violation was flagged by a computer program not a human being. Please be a human being and try to comprehend what I'm saying here. Sorry for my tone. Dcw2003 (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I acrtually do think I understand what you are saying: You are saying that there was copyright content in the article before you even arrived. I checked, and that is true. It was copied from this website right from the very first edit, which took place in 2007. The source document is dated 2002. So this is what we call a "foundational copyright violation". It was not caught by our Turnitin service in 2007, because that system was not in place until June 2016. I know it is not your responsibility to re-write the article but you are welcome to do so if you like. If nobody cleans the copyvio, the article will either be deleted or trimmed back to a stub by the patrollers who work the cases listed at WP:CP. The template below implies that you added the copyvio, but I know that's not the case. I only added it here because that's where the instructions are located for how to properly do a rewrite. — Diannaa (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding and insightful reply. I'll stop bothering you. I see frequent serious copyright violations in wikipedia articles written before 2016. I sometimes change or modify them but that would take eternity. I strive to never copy information word for word from a newspaper or online source. Ever. Never. Thanks for your understanding. I modify the text in a number of ways; sentence structure, order, wording, grammar and frequently content. But a computer program may still consider my text changes a form of plagiarism. Thanks for reading this. A computer program is not a human editor. I am. Thank-you. Dcw2003 (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Bonnie Adair

Hello Dcw2003! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bonnie Adair, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.usms.org/fitness-and-training/articles-and-videos/articles/profiling-bonnie-adair?Oldid=1544, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Bonnie Adair and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Bonnie Adair, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bonnie Adair. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Bonnie Adair with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Bonnie Adair saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine so you found where it was plagarized from. I already told you this in my note previously. Can you imagine my frustration? I edit text from an online source carefully, add a few bits from newspaper sources, and get cited for copyright issues, when the entire article initially was COMPLETELY PLAGARIZED word for word!! How do you know the program was citing the part of the article I NEVER WROTE? Thanks for reading this. Dcw2003 (talk) 15:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you deleted what I wrote, but the ACTUAL COPYRIGHT VIOLATION WAS NEVER CITED, DELETED OR FLAGGED!!! I hope I'm making myself clear. Dcw2003 (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my frustration. I did not write the portion of the article that was plagarized. I did note it was plagarized but left it alone, though it was annoying to me. Don't know why the truly word for word plagarized portion of the article was never flagged until recently. The portions of the article you deleted were not plagarized. I changed the text dramatically from the sources I used. I always do this. I hope this doesn't aggravate you, but its difficult communicating via text messages. Thank-you for your consideration. Dcw2003 (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Juan.Zurita.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Juan.Zurita.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eithan Urbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Marsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BabyArizmendi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BabyArizmendi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Boomer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clifford Township.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Petey.Saron.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Petey.Saron.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into John Trembley. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dcw2003,

If you object to an article being moved to Draft space, please move it back to main space rather than starting a new article in main space. As it is, we have two articles on the same subject with different page histories which should be avoided. It's fine, especially for an experienced editor, to object to a draftification but please just move the article back. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Someone inadvertently moved this article to Draft space before I could complete it. I should have started it in Draft space rather than Main Space, but I was in a hurry I suppose. I'll be careful about this in the future. I follow your line of reasoning thoroughly. Dcw2003 (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Gambril, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunnar Larsson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ben.Goldberg.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ben.Goldberg.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maurice Holtzer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maurice Holtzer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Vogel (swimmer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Mann

Why are you inserting spacing between periods and citations as here? Cbl62 (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll stop this practice. I just type quickly. Dcw2003 (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still actively editing the Mann article. I've had it on my "to do" list for years and will take a crack at picking up where you left off. Cbl62 (talk) 17:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it a little bit. I've added quite a bit, including all of the infobox on right, death information, honors section. He was an amazing coach. I worry that a previous writer may have included a lot of pledgarized material, so I've reworded some of it. I hope you don't rewrite or delete much of my additions, but I'm confident you'll do fine. Thanks for your help. Dcw2003 (talk) 17:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to interrupt your flow. Go ahead and finish your efforts and I'll come back to when you're done. (It's been on my "to do" list for about 15 years, so I'd have to say there's no rush at my end. Cbl62 (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It had NO references when I started or practically none, which was a frustrating experience. It was also challenging piecing together his coaching resume in the infobox, but I think I'm extremely close to where he coached and when. Prior to University of Michigan and Detroit Athletic Club, there were many teams and places he coached, like Harvard and Yale, but few exact years of service. I looked through many many newspaper articles and online articles to find this information. No place of birth or death either before I started, which wasn't too hard to find since I use newspaper archives extensively. Dcw2003 (talk) 18:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It even lacked birthdates and death dates Dcw2003 (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For such an important figure, it's surprising that the article was left for so long in such a sorry state. Cbl62 (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Most of the sources I've encountered refer to him as "Matt Mann". The differential on Newspapers.com is more than 10-to-1 in favor of "Matt" over "Matthew'. See here vs. here. Per WP:COMMONNAME, articles should be titled according to the name by which a historical figure was commonly known. E.g., Bill Clinton (not William), Jimmy Carter (not James0, etc. What has your experience been in terms of which is more common here, Matt or Matthew? Cbl62 (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Matt Dcw2003 (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most of my newspaper articles come from newspapers.com.............And I've read at least 30 on Mann by now. Dcw2003 (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CristyJim1932.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:CristyJim1932.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gus Stager, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jonty Skinner

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jonty Skinner, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungCy1952Olympian.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungCy1952Olympian.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DallandPeterSwimCoach.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DallandPeterSwimCoach.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —holly {chat} 03:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Bobby Patten. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your kind words. Perhaps we can correspond more occasionally. Do you know much about copyright issues with photos? I'm learning more, but I've had trouble finding photographs that fit the proper copyright requirements. I'm looking for paths that have lots of public domain photos of swimmers or swim coaches or Olympians. Anyway, Thank-you, Thank-you, Thank-you

Dcw2003 (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:

Thank-you for your kind words. Perhaps we can correspond more occasionally. Do you know much about copyright issues with photos? I'm learning more, but I've had trouble finding photographs that fit the proper copyright requirements. I'm looking for paths that have lots of public domain photos of swimmers or swim coaches or Olympians. Anyway, Thank-you, Thank-you, Thank-you

Dcw2003 (talk) 16:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course we can correspond more, just get me on my talk page. I am not well-versed in photo copyrights, but I will try to help if I can. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Lindsay Benko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CarettoPattySwimmer.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:CarettoPattySwimmer.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Bill Diaz

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bill Diaz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MattsonBobSwimCoach.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MattsonBobSwimCoach.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jimmy.Carter.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jimmy.Carter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick Hannula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miriam Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeymourSteveOlympian.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeymourSteveOlympian.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Trembley

Hello, Dcw2003. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Trembley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Dick Shoulberg. BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11:

You're welcome. I greatly appreciate your appreciative comments!!

I work really hard at this and have been writing wiki articles now for close to 10 years. I was a technical writer previously. I was a college swimmer and a masters swimmer and I've been writing articles on swim coaches now for a couple of years. I try to find 20-30 references per wiki article I write, and piece together as much information as possible.

Thanks again

Dcw2003 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC) dcw2003[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Barr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Red Barr. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on George McMillion. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you so much. I worked hard on both these pages. Did you find any spelling or grammatical errors?

Thanks,

D. Wasserman

Dcw2003 (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Castellani.Rocky.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Castellani.Rocky.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Trembley

Hello, Dcw2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Trembley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Bill Palmer (swim coach). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KawamotoCharlesSwimCoach.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KawamotoCharlesSwimCoach.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Dick Jochums. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your review, and have a great day yourself!!!! Dcw2003 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nort Thornton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Smith (swimmer).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Jack Ridley (swim coach). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Kris Kubik. Another editor, Lightburst, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the article about the coach in the Texas Sports HOF!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dcw2003 (talk) 14:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)You are welcome.[reply]

Thanks for your review!!!!!!

dcw2003 Dcw2003 (talk) 14:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your addition to Ann Marshall has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases, especially if they are not attributed to their source, may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments and review.

I write a great deal, and try very hard to change the contents of online sources I use as carefully as possible, but sometimes things slip through as I write relatively long wiki articles.

I've added two sources for Marshall's 4 x 100-meter freestyle world record. Actually, I believe we can quote Wiki as a source if we quote the source used by wiki instead of wiki itself. I couldn't find the wiki source on the page. The information on Marshall's 4 x 100 freestyle world relay record I provided was accurate according to the two new sources I've found to support Marshalls 4x100-meter freestyle relay world record. As the meet was with East Germany, the dual match in 1974 was significant and prophetic. East Germany, also known than as the GDR was the American Women's team closest rival in the 1976 Montreal Olympics. The East German women's team was later found to have been using steroids, though they won nearly all the Gold medals, and the American team performed below expectations as a result. Shirley Babashoff wrote a book about the 1976 Olympics and her belief that the East German women's team had been using steroids, which has since been verified. The Olympic committee never changed the official results, though they tried to make certain ammends to the American team. Dcw2003 (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dcw2003 (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Sorry, forgot to include my return address.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dan Harrigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChristensenDevereWaterPoloOlympian.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChristensenDevereWaterPoloOlympian.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KnoxEdwinWaterPolo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KnoxEdwinWaterPolo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dcw2003. Thank you for your work on Charles McCaffree. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I sense there are more links that could be made to other Wiki-articles on swimming (I made some myself). thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000:

Dcw2003 (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aszx5000-- Thanks for your review. My articles are long and detailed, so I REALLY appreciate your edit.

I have around 10 more that need to be edited. Please feel free to edit another if you have time!!!!

Thanks!!!!! Dcw2003 (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should copy-and-paste whatever your working on from your user page to either the draft namespace or a userspace draft before the page gets tagged for speedy deletion per WP:FAKEARTICLE. If you're not sure how to do this, you can ask for help at WP:HD or WP:THQ, or by posting a {{Help me}} template here on your user talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm not entirely sure how to open a draft space to write an article. Could someone tell me step by step??

The Article Wizard is pretty simple to follow. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can put [[Draft:Title of draft]] on this page and then go to the link it creates, but then you would need to put the submission template in manually that is provided automatically by using the wizard. 331dot (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm interested in starting an article without using the article wizard, but using a Special:MyPage/sandbox|user sandbox. Is sandbox the only variable to change to my username dcw2003, or is MyPage also a variable? Thanks!!!!!!

You can put it in any subpage of your userspace, which is done by using a slash. So, creating User:Dcw2003/Example would create a subpage in your userspace called "Example". You could change "Example" to anything you like. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just going to add that you might want to check the name you want to use for your userspace draft by doing a search for it before creating the draft. If another article with the same name already exists in the mainspace, you won't be able to WP:MOVE your draft to the mainspace without first changing either the name of the already existing article or the name of your draft. Particularly when it comes to articles about people, you'll often find multiple articles about people who have the same name and Wikipedia:Disambiguation being used to differentiate between them. Since changing the name of an existing article can sometimes be contentious, it's probably better to disambiguate your userspace draft first and then resolve the disambiguation issue through article talk page discussion or WP:RM after you moved your userspace draft to the mainspace. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HenningHaroldDr.Swimmer.png

You might want to recheck the licensing of File:HenningHaroldDr.Swimmer.png because the {{PD-US-no notice}} license you're using seems like it's incorrect. Individual newspaper articles or photographs associated with such article weren't required to have individual copyright notices under US copyright law at that time; they were covered by the copyright notice for the entire paper. It seems very unlikely that this issue of the Chicago Tribune lacked such a notice, and this is something you can't simply claim because there's no visible notice in the photo you uploaded. It's also not clear whether the photo was taken by one of the paper's own photographers or whether the paper got it from a wire service or some other third party. I suggest asking about this at WP:MCQ or even better c:COM:VPC because this file might need to be deleted if it can't be relicensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask for it to be deleted. Dcw2003 (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it if necessary. I don't personally see how someone could tell whether the photo was from its own photographers, a wire service, or a third party just by looking at the pages in the Tribune. Dcw2003 (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you scan this photo directly from the Tribune article you've given as its source or did you get it from some other website? If you scanned this directly from the article, then perhaps the photo was attributed. Newspapers usually attribute the photos they use in stories in some way (e.g. "Staff photogrpaher", "AP photo", "Photo courtesy of XXX"), but wesbites hosting photos often crop stuff like that out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw no attribution on the page itself, and don't know how to find one. It was from newspapers.com like most of my photos. I don't think newspapers.com crops stuff out, as it is directly scanned from the newspapers sources, and is not a website that just uses the occasional photo. I do not check every page of the newspaper though, which I geuss is what would be required.

Any additional comments would be appreciated.

Thanks,

David Dcw2003 (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did the article where the photo was used have a named author (i.e. a by-line) or was it attributed to a wire service? If it was written by a Tribune writer, then perhaps the photo was in-house. If the article came from a wire service, then perhaps the photo did as well. According to a response to your post at COM:VPC, that particular issue of the Tribune is protected by copyright until 2060 which means any original content created by the paper's staff would also be protected until that time. The photo, however, looks more like a portrait photo than something a newspaper staff photographer would take, and might've come from somewhere else. If the Tribune got the story off the wire, then it (and the photo) probably appeared in other papers around the same time, and one of them might have attributed the photo. I don't have a newspapers.com account, but I posted at WP:RX#December 1964 Chicago Tribune article to see whether someone who does can check to see whether the article was picked up by any other papers around that time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was no listed wire service or author's name on the article; I believe this is indicated in the photo File being referenced under source. I appreciate your help, as you seem to be more knowledgeable in this area. Thanks again. Dcw2003 (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone responded to my request at WP:RX#December 1964 Chicago Tribune article, and it looks like this was an original article by the Tribune's staff. So, without knowing any more about the provenance of the photo itself, it's probably best to assume that it also was first published in that Tribune article, which means it also falls under the copyright of that particular issue and will not be within the public domain until issue itself enters the public domain on January 1, 2060. In this case, the photo would need to be treated as non-free content, but probably can't be used per WP:FREER because there's already a public domain image of Henning being used in the main infobox for primary identification purposes. My suggestion to you would be to request that the file be speedily deleted per WP:G7 because trying to convert it to a non-free license is likely going to lead to file's deletion for being non-compliant with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Bill Harris (swimmer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bill Harris (swimmer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Frank Booth (swimmer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Frank Booth (swimmer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FisslerGeorgeSwimmer1932.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FisslerGeorgeSwimmer1932.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Glick, lightweight boxer in the 1920's.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joe Glick, lightweight boxer in the 1920's.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using the "PD-US-no notice" license

Hi Dcw2003. You recently have uploaded several photos which look to be newspaper clippings under a {{PD-US-no notice}} license, but you seem to be misunderstanding how that license applies to such things. US copyright law only required separate individual copyright notices for advertisements appearing in newspapers and other printed publications during the 1929–1977 (both years inclusive) period; it didn't require individual notices for photos being used in newspaper articles. Such photos were covered by the copyright notice for the publications as a whole much in the same way the text of the articles themselves were also covered by such the copyright notice for the whole work. Moreover, the notice for the publication itself would only apply to its own original photos, and not necessarily to photos it received wire services like the Associated Press or other third parties. It's possible that some of the photo you uploaded are public domain for some other reason (e.g. {{PD-US-not renewed}}) but that might take a little more digging on your part to sort out. Before uploading any more files under this license, it might be a good idea to ask about it first at c:COM:VPC because files licensed as either {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}} are OK for Commons and should really be uploaded there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you. How then does a person (writer) find the copyright liscense for the newspapers for which I'm claiming are public domain? I assume some of these publications (newspapers) do not have copyrights that cover the photos and the print portions for those years. Is it possible to determine this quickly? Until then, I'll refrain from uploading such photos from newspapers. Thank-you again. Dcw2003 (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dcw2003 (talk) Dcw2003 (talk) 16:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you claiming the photos you're uploading are public domain or the newspapers they are taken from are public domain? I assumed you were just making such a claim for the photos, but doing the same for the newspapers is something altogether different. Most print publications seem to have a copyright notice or claim of copyright on one of their inner pages. A book, for example, may have a copyright notice on the page where it includes information about the publisher of the book. A newspaper can have such information on its front page near its masthead or on one of its inner pages where it contains information about the newspaper's publisher. If you have a book or newspaper handy, you should find its copyright notice if you look through its pages. It can be hard to find such a notice unless you're able to see every page, but pretty much anything that you would consider to be a regular newspaper ever published in the US almost certainly had one, and you should assume that's the case and work backward from there. If you find such a notice, then PD-US-no notice can't really be used, but it's still possible the publication is within the public domain depending upon when it was published and whether its copyright was renewed. Checking for copyright renewal tends to be much harder because it usually means looking through online records or databases. Anything with a copyright notice published prior to January 1, 1929, is too old to be still eligible for copyright protection since US copyright law at the time granted copyright protection for 28 years after the date of publication plus an additional 28 years if the copyright was renewed. Anything with a copyright notice published from January 1, 1929, until December 31, 1963, could be within the public domain if its copyright wasn't renewed by its copyright holder. Anything with a copyright notice published after January 1, 1964, is likely still protected by copyright since US copyright law changed in 1978 and the initial 28-year term or protection and the 28-year renewal requirement were gotten rid of and different term requirements were established. US copyright law changed again in March 1989 and different requirements apply to works today. All of this applies, in principle, to original photos taken by newspaper employees (i.e. staff photographers) appearing in newspapers since newspaper employees are typically work for hire, but photos provided to newspapers by wire services or other third-parties might be copyright protected separately from the paper itself for different reasons. All of what I posted only cover papers published in the US; other countries may and most likely do have different copyright rules. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again; left this out;

Dcw2003 (talk) Dcw2003 (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC) Is there a quicker way than checking every page in the newspaper?[reply]

Thanks!! I wasn't saying the newspapers were public domain, but rather asking how to quickly determine where a copyright would be. I use online newspaper archives so going through every page of a 50 page newspaper is rather time consuming, but I think you're saying check the front page first. Wish there was a quicker way than going through every page of the newspaper. Thanks again for your response. Dcw2003 (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of any "rule" that requires all publishers list copyright notices in the same place; so, where it ends up most likely varies among publishers. I'd imagine most newspaper publishers list the notice somewhere on the front page or whichever page they list publisher related information, and they probably do it on the same page for every issue they publish. So, perhaps the only sure way to check is to start on the front page; if you don't find it there, look on the next page and keep looking on subsequent pages until you do find it or run out of pages. Archive sites like newspapers.com seem to make it possible to see entire papers; so, even though it might be tedious to check, it seems possible. On the other hand, sites that only show article clippings or photos are much harder to check unless they provide some information on the provenance of the clipped article or photo. It would be a mistake, in my opinion, to just assume that an old photo found on some website is "PD-ineligible-no notice" just because there's no visible notice on the photo itself because the photo could originate somewhere else, could be cropped/modified, or the host website could have no connection to the original copyright holder. Anyway, I'll ask some others to take a look at this discussion and see if they want to add/correct anything. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There were some rules based on the type of work -- for books usually around the title page. The regulations can be found in the Copyright Compendium chapter 22, see section 2207 and all its subsections there for details. You should not have to search all pages of a newspaper but the masthead page, and maybe where the publishers were listed, or the first or last page. If they were AP or UPI photos, the lack of notice in the newspaper probably does not mean anything -- they would likely not lose copyright (as those were published in many newspapers, most with notice). Newspapers before 1964 have the additional possibility of not being renewed; UPenn has a periodicals list where they note renewals of various periodicals. If not listed there, there was likely no renewal. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern and the depth and clarity of your reply. Your response was great, but its no easy fix determining if a newspaper photo from any era particularly recent is public domain. Dcw2003 (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually kind of easier to do so for recent photos (photos taken after March 1, 1989) because current US copyright law no longer requires copyright notices or copyright formalities (registration, renewal, fees, etc.) at all; everything considered eligible for copyright protection is assumed to be protected essentially the moment it becomes fixed in a physical medium of some kind (print, online, digital, etc.). This was pretty much the standard worldwide for countries that signed the Berne Convention, but it became the standard for the US as well when it signed the convention with the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988. So, pretty much any photo you find online or in anything published in the US after March 1, 1989, that was taken after March 1, 1989, is going to be assumed to be copyright protected unless its copyright holder clearly states otherwise or the photo itself has entered into the WP:PUBLICDOMAIN for some statutory or other reason. The length of copyright protection can vary a bit based on certain factors, though; for example, a photo taken by a known author would be eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law for 70 years after the death of its author, whereas a photo taken by an unknown author or corporate author is considered eligible for copyright protection for 95 years after being first published or 120 years after creation, whichever is shorter. FWIW, some creators do still add copyright notices and still register their works just to emphasize their copyright ownership and perhaps make it a bit easier to defend their rights, but they're no longer legally required to do so under the copyright laws of most countries. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed the point of my remark, "its not easy to determine copyright". I meant its not easy to find a recent photo that is eligible to be used by wiki, since all of them are copyrighted and don't require any notice of that copyright. I'm trying to find groups of photos that AREN'T copyrighted in any way. These include government photos, military photos, and a few in the Smithsonian, but its a small and very special subset. Know of any other places to look to find UNCOPYRIGHTED photos on famous people? Thanks if you get to this. Otherwise, thanks for all your help!!! Dcw2003 (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]