User talk:Jw93d59

Welcome!

Hello, Jw93d59, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page BBC Radio Oxford did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 09:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Cox (radio presenter) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Danny Cox (radio presenter). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to BBC Radio Lincolnshire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Your statements about coverage class as original research without clear references to support them 10mmsocket (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Gary King (radio presenter), you may be blocked from editing. SovalValtos (talk) 11:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ldm1954. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gary King (radio presenter) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop removing the notability tag. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary King (radio presenter). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It is highly inappropriate to continually remove the notability tag and also add unsourced material. You have asked for a peer review, you must wait for that and/or get concensus on the removal at the talk page. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I found it frustrating that the peer review had received no responses (it still hasn't, which is puzzling, given Gary King being quite famous), and I genuinely thought that I made the article meet the notability criteria, because I made quite a lot of changes. I recognise that I failed to act appropriately. Can I perhaps receive more clarification on what needs to happen for the article to meet the notability criteria? And are there any other ways the article can be improved? Jw93d59 (talk) 07:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Charles Carroll (newsreader)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charles Carroll (newsreader), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Phear moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Paul Phear. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jw93d59. Thank you for your work on Gary King (radio presenter). Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is a recreation of a previously deleted page. Notability is uncertain.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does "notability is uncertain" mean? Is the level of notability yet to be ascertained because nobody in a position to make that judgement has yet been able to ascertain the level of notability? Jw93d59 (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to the talk page of the article, Talk:Gary King (radio presenter), that is the appropriate place to respond to the original notability tag. In general other editors will not see questions or other responses on your talk page unless you specifically ping them. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gary King (radio presenter)

Hello, Jw93d59,

Thank you for creating Gary King (radio presenter).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Restoring notability tag that was removed without explanation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you suggest I look harder for secondary sources, which focus heavily upon Gary King, in order to ensure notability in the article? ~~~~ Jw93d59 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some changes to Gary King's Wikipedia article - I wonder if you could tell me if the tag of potentially unestablished notability can now be removed, or if you could remove it yourself if appropriate? -- Gary King (radio presenter) Jw93d59 (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your efforts regarding creating articles for UK radio presenters.

Some of the presenters, including Gary King, previously had articles but were deleted so keep all the articles you have created on your Watchlist in case any of these become targeted for deletion. Rillington (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have any of the others previously had articles about them deleted?

Also, does the Birmingham Mail count as a "tabloid" outlet? Jw93d59 (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A significant number of articles on UK radio presenters, stations and programmes have been deleted in recent times, and I unsuccessfully opposed many of these deletion requests, as you will see from my opposition to the previous successful deletion of the article about Gary King, and I am currently opposing the desire to get the article on Greatest Hits Radio Yorkshire deleted. It is therefore very possible that some of your recently created articles may also become targets for deletion, hence my suggestion that you keep any articles you create on your Watchlist. Rillington (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have read other Wikipedia articles about radio presenters which have considerable flaws (according to Wikipedia's standards) and they have remained up for several years despite these flaws. Jw93d59 (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]