Jump to content

User talk:MIDI/2013

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ichagak(i), Kenya

[edit]

Hi Mattgirling, it looks like you created the articles Ichagak and Ichagaki simultaneously a few years ago. Someone has since tagged them for merging, which seems sensible, since they appear to be the same place. It looks like the latter is the actual name, based on volume of Google hits, but I just thought I'd check in with you to verify that—and since you made both articles at the same time, maybe that was intentional and they should remain separate. Just let me know and I'll be happy to perform the merge. Thanks, BDD (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably a mistake in my original document and so I support their merging. Thanks for flagging this up and offering to perform the merge. matt (talk) 12:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I've taken care of it. Only a redirect was necessary. --BDD (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Let It Be (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spencers Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

[edit]
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Well done Matt, according to records you claim about 40 or so DYKs and I'm impressed to see that they are a really eclectic mix. I particularly like the Rock Gongs as I saw some of these during the famous GLAMwiki backstage pass - and Google ART was an interesting subject too. Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Minneapolis Armory

[edit]

Hi Matt! Thank you for fixing that link. Yes, it was a semi-automated edit by using the Dab solver at toolserver.org, and no, I haven't edited other articles whit that same link. Anyway, What links here tool does not produce results, and this is good news. I'll now fix the disambiguationa page for The Armory. Once again, thank you. –pjoef (talkcontribs) 16:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Count off, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor and Splice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Count off

[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2013 World Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 20:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013 World Tour for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 World Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 World Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 15:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Little Mix

[edit]

Hi there, I've noticed some of your contributions to Little Mix articles, I was wondering if you perhaps have the album's CD liner notes/credits/where each song was recorded etc? It would help me so much in revamping the Little Mix wiki! Thanks -- Littlemixlove (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rebus (band)

[edit]

Hi. A few years back you created Rebus (band) as a redirect to Does It Offend You, Yeah?. I can't find the connection between them. Was it a former name of the band? Thanks, Captain Conundrum (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So I did! Crikey, that was a while ago. I've deleted the redirect—the two bands had one member in common, but not in such a way that could justify the redirect. matt (talk) 09:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Captain Conundrum (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Marathon Bombing suspects

[edit]

I re-directed the two articles, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, created about the Boston Marathon Bombing suspects to the main article, Boston Marathon bombings, for right now. I noticed that you deleted one. Another editor came along and re-created them. If you could assist in making sure that they continue to redirect to the main article for now. But you might have another idea to handle it.--ExclusiveAgent (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ken Scott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive jazz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Art Lassiter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington and Albert Cook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/César Portillo de la Luz. Thanks, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble14:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

[edit]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Art Lassiter

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Art Lassiter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Art Lassiter

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Theale, Berkshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Windsor, Turnpike, Englefield, Catchment area and Deeds

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coronation Arches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Botanic Gardens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southcote Lock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mothballed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of List of people who performed on Beatles recordings

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of List of people who performed on Beatles recordings at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gamaliel (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people who performed on Beatles recordings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slow Down (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of people who performed on Beatles recordings

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

.You may be interested in this. Regards,  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|20:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lutterworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peep Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the template is not for notifying of death, it is for notifying readers that content is likely to change quickly. As there was no content in the body of the article referring to his death, and a newsflash had just been issued by the BBC, I pre-emptively added the tag. As it happens, the content that followed was rapidly changed, so the tag was probably necessary. I worked from some intuition in adding the tag; the only two pieces of information on the article about the death were already conflicting, and neither sourced. If I had more time and resources (I was working from an iOS device on a limited wireless hotspot), I would have tried to extend it myself, but instead, I added the tag to make it easier for the doubtless surge of readers and editors arriving. I understand that this may not have appeared necessary at the time I added it, and your actions would normally be most suitable, but I'd appreciate a little more thought is taken before deleting a tag outright without first questioning why it was put there. Thanks, and I hope we can work together in the future!  drewmunn  talk  19:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I don't think that lack of content is a justification for the template, but I appreciate what you're saying about editing from a mobile device and that actually editing the article proper wouldn't really have been feasible. However, the RD template is certainly overused (per the template's documentation; it implies that readers should assume content may change at any time, regardless of a template), and I think at that time it was unnecessary in the Frost article. It's active now (I know know exactly when it was reinstated), but it's certainly valid now as we've had a high rate of edits yesterday and today (c. 300)—though I'd imagine editing levels will drop slowly now until there's more information (perhaps around the time of the funeral). I certainly did question why the template was there, but I drew the conclusion that it was unnecessary at the time. Thanks for messaging me—I suppose these templates are highly subjective, and one editors definition of "high level of editing" isn't the same as another's. I'll certainly be more questioning about removing these templates in the future, but in return I'd as for your edit summary (in such circumstances) to be clearer—perhaps with a brief justification? I don't know what the editing interface is like on mobile devices, so I don't know if that's awkward too! Thanks again, matt (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll certainly work towards improving my edit summary; it was only when you mentioned it there that I actually read it back and realised how stupid it was! I tend towards using the site when editing on mobile rather than the app, as I prefer the options it gives me, so it's not that difficult to write an edit summary; I'll endeavour to ensure they're better in the future. Thanks again!  drewmunn  talk  10:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback Tool update

[edit]

Hey Mattgirling. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Berkshire flag.svg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berkshire flag.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people who performed on Beatles recordings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bootleg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tilehurst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palmer Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:KACT.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KACT.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people who performed on Beatles recordings/List, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yellow Submarine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

[edit]
Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

key

[edit]

Hello, this key is between D minor and E-flat minor ? 166.48.193.127 (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The closest key is D minor (which is the same as E minor). It doesn't sound exactly in that key—there's a number of reasons why that could be, including using a standard other than A440 for tuning, or sample rate conversion or playback speed introducing a subtle pitch shift. Does this help? matt (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmIooB1yOXE
This song is not exactly in F major ? 166.48.196.131 (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That one is somewhere between F major and F major. The chord progression (in the key of F) would be F–Dm–Gm–C, if that helps (see I−vi−ii−V for more info). matt (talk) 14:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, matt. Could you look at this nom again, please? I think you looked at the wrong article. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bugger!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

. matt (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, matt. Don't trout yourself too hard. It wasn't that bad. Happy New Year. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 11:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Follow me to join the secret cabal!

Plip!