User talk:Esperfulmo

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Late Bohairic pronunciation

Hey @Mahmudmasri,

Thank you for your effort in adding IPA to Coptic toponyms. I got question – why are you using "Late Bohairic" pronunciation and not Classical Bohairic? Ⲫⲁϯⲟⲩⲉⲣϣⲓ (talk) 18:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, well since Late Bohairic is the only pronunciation documented without any speculation or reconstruction, and since it survives to a limited extent to this day. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "documented"? To my knowledge it was reconstructed primarily by Emil Maher Ishaq. And what do you mean by it "surviving" to this day? Coptic is a dead language as far as i know (apart from it being a liturgical language of the Coptic Church). --Ⲫⲁϯⲟⲩⲉⲣϣⲓ (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So as George P. G. Sobhy's work. They actually documented what was still pronounced by those who haven't adopted the Greo-Coptic reformed pronunciation in monasteries. Also, since it is the last form of Coptic, why provide a pronunciation of an older form of it? --Mahmudmasri (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

Hey, I accidentally wiped your latest contributions to Israel when I edited mine. You can paste them back in or I can do it at a later point, just giving you a heads-up about it.

➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 05:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, go ahead and paste it. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 06:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Representation of Arabic

Hey, it looks like we pay attention to some of the same articles. I thought I should send a message. I reverted the changes you made to Halaib & Port Sudan. For Halaib, the reasons are explained in greater detail on the Talk page: Basically, MOS recommends against using alternative spellings in the lead sentence, so I had moved these to a special section. For Port Sudan, you gave an IPA pronunciation citing the MOS on Arabic. WP:MOSAR actually recommends a specific Romanisation—not IPA. Additionally, I used to live in Port Sudan, & I've never heard anyone pronounce the name with a voiceless initial /p/. People pronounce بور exactly as it's written. If you want to discuss these issues further, we should probably talk about them at the Talk pages of the respective articles, but I wanted to drop you a note. Hope you're well. Take care. Pathawi (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Port Sudan is just like Port Said in the way they were named and alternatively pronounce with [p]. The majority don't utter [p] at all, but still a few would still pronounce it. Since you were there, did someone actually say [buːr] rather than [boːr]? In romanized Arabic, both are distinguished which makes būr a wrong, misleading transcription. This particular mistake is habitually repeated on Wiktionary, too. People see و and always use ū.

On the other hand, IPA is important when names are confusing or too difficult to infer from transcriptions, such as in the case of, I don't know who preferred that spelling, Hala'ib which suggests a glottal stop, commonly spelled with an apostrophe, as in Qur'an. There is no rule to prohibit IPA notations, if you didn't like them, you don't need to wipe them out. Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think people actually say either [boːr] or [buːr] in colloquial speech: They say [bur]. In Fuṣḥā (eg on al-Jazeera) you'll hear [buːr] & [boːrt]. No one ever says [p] in Port Sudan: For most people in the city, /p/ is not in their available phonemic inventory. You can absolutely add IPA if you want—I have no objection: The core MOS issue is that it shouldn't replace Romanisation. Pathawi (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

& yes: Hala'ib is absolutely wrong. Unfortunately, it does appear in English writing. Probably someone with a small amount of Arabic knowledge who assumes that whenever they hear [aːji] in Egypt it's Fuṣḥā /a:ʔi/. Pathawi (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The argument about whether to transcribe toponyms in Arabic speaking countries with a Literary Arabic pronunciation or not is problematic for two main reasons:

People normally pronounce names, including personal names in their respective native dialects, including when saying a prepared speech in Literary Arabic. The same is also mostly true for saying numerals.
Often, too many names are not Arabic and an Arabized form is fabricated to fit Literary Arabic phonotactics, i.e. to sound and look Arabic.

For /p/, one could say the same on every Arabic dialect, including Egyptian Arabic, however it is commonly found in loanwords and educated people can pronounce it with varying degrees. So, for example, the word "port" in Port Said, Port Fouad, Port Sudan, is pronounced either [poːɾ] or [boːɾ] by Egyptians. The word "port" here is actually a French loanword which means the same in English, just pronounce with an ending /t/. Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Cairo Cities/Satellite Cities

Hi, I saw your recent edits on Greater CairoGreater Cairo cities and satellite cities and believe they are incorrect.

Helwan used to be a city, but was recently demoted to a district in Cairo city (see Helwan)

New Heliopolis, Madinaty and Rehab are real estate developments within ElShorouk and New Cairo and not cities themselves (see the hyperlinked pages). Overall, the 'new cities' can be found in this government list. Ypedia1 (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I indented some of them under their cities. Thanks for noticing

I indented some of them under their cities. Does that still make them appear as if they are separate entities? Thanks for noting about Helwan. It was changed many times, I'll fix this. It is also confusing, because some maps used on Wikipedia have wrong borders, like incorporating a part of Giza governorate. --Esperfulmo (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Helwan is quite confusing. If the real estate developments are to be included, that should better be based on some standardised reasoning and applied to all satellite cities. One metric would be area, but again what would be the rationale to choose it: over 1000 acres, 5000, etc?

I also noticed you removed 15th May, even though its on the list and on Cairo's map. Ypedia1 (talk) 20:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 15 May, because it was defined as part of Cairo, just like Helwan. --Esperfulmo (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes another confusing informality. 15 May was supposed to be devolved to Cairo Governorate from NUCA, so Cairo Gov set up the district (hayy), but was never transferred and remains run by the gehaz. Ypedia1 (talk) 22:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll source that in the article. You know, it's hard for me when official sources claim something else and occasionally Wikipedians frown upon sourcing Facebook and other social networks, even if official pages. Actually, I find your research complementing. Why haven't you already used these sources in the article? --Esperfulmo (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lycée La Liberté Héliopolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Literary Arabic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arabic International Phonetic Alphabet

The article Arabic International Phonetic Alphabet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article subject is non-notable. I cannot find any references to AIPA other than from the creator and his institution. I am also unaware of any usages of this transcription system.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edderiofer (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't initiate the article, however it was published in academic sources in Saudi Arabia. It seems that in the other languages of Wikipedia it was allowed to remain for years. If you still think it has to be deleted, then open the discussion and see other people's input. Thanks. --Esperfulmo (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of radio stations in Egypt

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of radio stations in Egypt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BBZ (disambiguation)

The article BBZ (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

KHW (disambiguation)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Wiki & I love you! ASAP1123 (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]