User talk:Marokwitz/Archives/2011/July

IDF sulfur accusations at Freedom Flotilla II

Hi. I approve of your additions to my edit about the IDF sulfur accusations to this article, but your changes cause me to wonder whether you read Hebrew? I was relying on Google translate, for the Yedioth Ahronoth Hebrew language article I added. In referring to cabinet members, it renders the second paragraph, as:

Some of them even accused the government institutions and military spread the information the finest example of "media that is part of what they call propaganda hysteria around the flotilla, in an attempt to influence the image and draw a violent flotilla." (emphasis added)

Google translate also has the sub-head/summary of the article saying that some cabinet members warned against "hysteria propaganda around the flotilla".

Was the word being translated as "propaganda" actually "hasbara" in the original? If so, then your substitution of the word "spin" makes sense to me, but if you don't read Hebrew then I think we'll need to find someone who does, to clarify.

Also, please note that this sulfur accusation doesn't really belong in the "preparations" section. It's also currently mentioned under the "reactions" section, viz. reactions from Israel, and I think it fits much better there. But the JPost article quoting IDF chief Benny Gantz to which the sulfur accusation is cited in our "reactions" section seems a poor reference for it, given that it mentions the accusation in just a single sentence there. If the sulfur accusation currently in the "preparations" section is moved to the "reactions" (by Israel) section, as I think it should be, the ref for the article about Gantz shouldn't be deleted, it should just be added to the sources already listed for the now-updated sulfur passage I initially added. Feel free to reply here; I've temporarily watchlisted this page.  – OhioStandard (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

According to what I read about the topic, Hasbara is the Israeli name for pro-Israel propaganda. There link to the article about it seems sufficient. I don't object to moving it out of the preparations sections, or to the the word "propaganda" if used properly based on RS. Marokwitz (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Turkish statement on sabotage

Hi Marokwitz,

the remarks by the Turkish authorities are related to an Irish ship anchored in a Turkish port, not to the ships anchored in Greece. Please see Talk:Freedom Flotilla II#Wrong information about Irish ships.  Cs32en Talk to me  13:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Merge of MV Saoirse and 2011 Flotilla

Can you please add your thoughts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:MV_Saoirse#Proposed_merge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob drobbs (talk • contribs) 00:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all the hard work you do! Shrike (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! I appreciate it. :) Marokwitz (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Marokwitz/Archives/2011. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

thanks for the welcome

Hi Marokwitz ... thanks for the heads up. i'm fairly new here so still learning the ropes. will take your feedback and make the necessary changes.

thanks Kudosmia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kudosmia (talk • contribs) 14:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of CTERA Networks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CTERA Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTERA Networks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- samj _in^out 20:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)