User talk:PaulThePony

September 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! You created a thread called Assistance sought at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PaulThePony. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Scrima has been accepted

Andrea Scrima, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Paul das Pony

hallo im marvelsecetsource fühle mich frei, mit mir zu sprechen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesecretsource2 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, Thesecretsource2! I shall keep your name close by as I've just been offered some assistance but want to be sure it turns out well, so I may soon be in touch. By best to you. PaulThePony (talk) 03:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Paul[reply]

Lassen Sie mich wissen, wenn Sie Hilfe brauchen, die ich jeden Tag bekomme. Thesecretsource2 (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)thesecretsource2[reply]

I will, Thesecretsource2. : ) PaulThePony (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Paul[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! You created a thread called English-German translator requested for editing purposes at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PaulThePony. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get the help you needed at the Teahouse?

No one responded here and I'm not sure whether I know the answers. There is one answer I can give you. It is recommended that Wikilinks be included in the infobox. That's one of the exceptions to the rule about overlinking. People reading are likely to look at the infobox and the Wikilinks are easy to find there.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Vchimpanzee. I appreciate that info. PaulThePony (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Paul[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://progressive.org/dispatches/writer-indigenous-history-looks-america-s-future-sees-past/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Train of Knowledge🚆📚 Choo Choo🚂 Chugga Chugga🚉 07:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed a question on the Draft talk page for my submitted sandbox draft. Perhaps it would be more appropriate here. At this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PaulThePony#Copyright_problem%3A_Draft%3AAn_Indigenous_Peoples%27_History_of_the_United_States, I received this notice from you, Train of Knowledge🚆📚. In the notice you stated: "This article appears to contain work copied from https://progressive.org/dispatches/writer-indigenous-history-looks-america-s-future-sees-past/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies."

This is perplexing as I have read the web page's contents twice and see nothing there that is in my draft, let alone copied and pasted. Would you be able to highlight the precise passage that has been determined to be improperly brought into my draft? That would be helpful. If it is the case that I didn't do anything improper, re: that web page, how do I then get my article re-reviewed for publication? With thanks. I truly appreciate you doing this kind of careful review. --PaulThePony (talk) 20:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Train of Knowledge: your post above is incorrect. Please be more careful when making edits like this. MPS1992 (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With sincere thanks, MPS1992. Most appreciated. --PaulThePony (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, the draft still reads as rather promotional, and it may well end up being rejected for this reason. MPS1992 (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MPS1992. That concern is appreciated. I've taken steps to remedy that appearance issue. I welcome you letting me know if you find the edits insufficient in this regard. Thank you. --PaulThePony (talk) 16:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would suggest looking carefully at some of the entries in Wikipedia:Good articles/Language and literature#Nonfiction. I would argue that you don't need Awards, Media, or Interviews sections, but that some of the facts and references from these sections could be re-used -- in a different format -- in other sections. MPS1992 (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, MPS1992! I'll attend to that and will look carefully at examples found in the resource you linked me to. --PaulThePony (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! You created a thread called Submitted Sandbox draft for review... and nothing happened at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:

Avoid directly quoting reviews to avoid potential problems with copyright.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 06:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PaulThePony! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 06:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. Thanks! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 12:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States has been accepted

An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Harshil ^{want to talk?} 02:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned page

I linked the newly created page, An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States, from Native Americans in the United States, under Further Reading.--PaulThePony (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in process of adding book cover image to infobox

To editors: I am working out a problem with adding the image. It should be resolved on 1/9/2020. Thank you for your patience. --PaulThePony (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indigenouspeopleshistorycover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indigenouspeopleshistorycover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. TJRC (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, TJRC. Much appreciated. I have a follow-up to that. It has happpened several times that when I click Publish I get to the form requesting edit details and to tick whether the change is major or minor, as you note. Several times when I have clicked Publish it enters the change without the chance to document that information first. I think this most commonly occurs after checking the changes in Preview and then going back to the Publish page. Is there a way to go into that edit history and insert the reasoning, whether it's minor, etc.? --PaulThePony (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the web, there should be an edit summary area just above the Publish / show preview / Show changes buttons. That's where yo add your edit summary and/or tick/untick the "This is a minor edit" selector.

If you hit "Publish" it will indeed publish. It does not present you with a confirmation dialog. You can get that yourself by using Preview.

If you're talking about a platform other than web (e.g. mobile), I have little experience there. I hate typing on my phone or kindle, so rarely edit Wikipedia from the mobile platform. TJRC (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, PaulThePony. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 21:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! You created a thread called Name of page: when is a change appropriate? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! You created a thread called Usable images at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug Weller. Understanding that the notice doesn't mean I've violated any terms, I'm seeking your guidance. First, I am very glad such a system is in place. Yesterday, in fact, I was telling a friend about the changes to the administration of Wikipedia. This is one I'm most happy with. This is to say, I do not wish to violate it. I didn't see any alerts on the pages I worked on yesterday. Was that an oversight on my part? I believe all the changes I made were to make the pages more accurate (in one case with significant inaccuracies), remedy some small grammatical matters, to add historical information backed up with primary sources.

Who might I turn to for advice about such changes, even about those specific ones, so I can be sure not to violate the guidelines for editing this category of page? I would welcome reviewing those: I'm sure I would learn a lot. I believe I have a few hundred edits under my belt, which I recall being a requirement. With thanks for your assistance. --PaulThePony (talk) 16:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympia Dukakis still at Pride Parade, from film Olympia by Harry Marvomichalis.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Olympia Dukakis still at Pride Parade, from film Olympia by Harry Marvomichalis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article John Stoltenberg. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 11:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kuru. Thank you for bringing my attention to this. I agree about the necessity of avoiding and removing circular references. I wrongly thought that someone had lifted what was on another site and pasted it wholesale into the John Stoltenberg person page. I got tricked this time! haha I'll find another source for the information you have drawn my attention to. PaulThePony (talk) 05:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC) P.S. I'm having trouble finding the passage you are referencing. The website I got material from I no longer see in the list of citation sources. I could use your help locating this. Thank you. PaulThePony (talk) 05:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the John Stoltenberg article, the reference in question is the "jewage" source you added here, which notes "Article source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stoltenberg". A similar problem came up a few weeks ago here with the "en-academic" mirror. Both of these are "straight-up" mirrors that provide attribution back to here; they just lift the material directly out of Wikipedia and do not attempt to alter or disguise it. You should be able to find an exact match to our article if you flip back through the history - I think that's what you're asking. Kuru (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kuru. I see now where you removed that link in the View History. Thank you so much. Re, https://www.jewage.org/wiki/en/Article:John_Stoltenberg_-_Biography. --PaulThePony (talk) 23:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulThePony! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Borrowed material from another Wiki, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor means minor

See WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. David notMD (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello PaulThePony! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Co-editor, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]