User talk:Stickguy

Welcome!

Hello, Stickguy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 02:50, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the Call-Net/Rogers Telecom changes

I knew that I was putting outdated information, but since Rogers didnt give info about the key people and public/private company, I just put old information until I got more. Your changes were well needed and tank you for changing them. TorontoStorm 13:53, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Spotlight Television, The Canadian Film Channel, etc.

To be perfectly honest, I'm not convinced that proposed networks should be getting Wikipedia articles, because then we run into a problem if they're not licensed. I really don't think that a new channel application should get an article until the CRTC approves its license. But I suppose you're free to differ in your opinion... Bearcat 20:28, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring NPOV

The Thomson Corporation - (and that is definitely the name). The short-lived sentence you killed looked like what a bored gossip columnist might have written 30 years ago. Robin Patterson 21:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite explicitly against Wikipedia policy to begin an article title with the word "The" if it's not necessary (as in being part of the title of an artistic work or a newspaper, or the like -- eg. The Handmaid's Tale, The Globe and Mail.) Per Wikipedia policy, in this case the article properly goes at Thomson Corporation. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name). Bearcat 22:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, btw, just so you don't think I'm nothing but a whining pest...great job on the A-Channel updates. Excellent idea to comment the changes in early. Bearcat 17:31, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Dutch Shell

Did you merge Royal Dutch Shell with Royal Dutch/Shell? --129.173.105.28 00:46, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Renaming_.28moving.29 . Never copy and paste a page to move it. There is a forum where you can get admins to do complicated moves. When in doubt seek help. --129.173.105.28 03:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will be more careful in future. Stickguy 04:39, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Gazette

One question: are you absolutely certain that no other publication in the entire world uses the name The Gazette? Are you absolutely certain that a city name isn't needed in the title for disambiguation purposes? Unless you can definitively prove that to be the case, the article has to be titled either Montreal Gazette or The Gazette (Montreal). "Use the official name" is an important rule, but "disambiguate when necessary" trumps it. Bearcat 01:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FM/TV and the CBC

Yeah, I actually realize that...I just wasn't sure if it was best to go with "do it anyway to keep the naming format relatively consistent", or "stick with the canonical form even if the situation is confusing to people". I reluctantly decided to go with the former, but wouldn't particularly object to the latter. (Except that if we don't have a consistent rule, it may very well empower the "but nobody calls it CIVT; the title has to be Global BC" crowd.) Some kind of move still realistically had to happen, so ultimately they'll have to be at either CXXX-TV or CXXX (TV)...and even if we used (TV), policy would permit a redirect from the expected -TV format anyway, so it's not as though those would need to be deleted if you or I were to move the CBC sticks to (TV) instead.

FWIW, Wikipedia doesn't actually have a policy that the official name of something always trumps considerations such as common name or consistency of naming format within like categories; in fact, Wikipedia policy quite specifically subordinates official name to other considerations when there's a conflict. So, in reality, situations like this bring up some complex decision-making about how best to handle the specific circumstances -- "what the CRTC uses is automatically Wikipedia's title, case closed, no exceptions" simply isn't how Wikipedia works. The CRTC, for example, will never have to render a decision concerning the Chicago Board of Trade, so it doesn't need to disambiguate CBOT from anything. But we do, whether the CRTC uses a suffix in that instance or not. And I personally wouldn't be comfortable leaving most CBC stations at undisambiguated titles unless somebody can prove that nothing else in the world actually uses acronyms like CBAT, CBLT or CBST. I think it's better to prepare for that eventuality now, rather than set up potentially problematic situations in the future. But YMMV, I suppose. Bearcat 18:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we're actually disagreeing as much as it may seem...I think the biggest real difference of opinion here has to do with how readily we can assume that the four-letter callsign without the TV or FM suffix is actually a unique name. If I do a Google search on CFTO, for instance, I do mostly get refs to the TV station, but there are a few cases of it being an acronym for something else. I'm not sure if those other things deserve their own encyclopedia articles or not, but I'm reluctant to assume that the undisambiguated title CFTO should be the TV station rather than a dab page.

The example I'm coming from is CKY. For the longest time, the article there was the TV station in Winnipeg, but then somebody blanked out the TV article in favour of a rock band that I'd never even heard of. They didn't even move the TV station to another title; they just erased it. I fixed the problem, but the thing is that I had originally written the article not even knowing that a dab page would be necessary. And because nobody had the page watchlisted, it sat for a couple of weeks without anybody noticing what had happened.

So, in reality, I'm just trying to avoid such a situation happening again. I'm probably just being unnecessarily cautious, I admit. I'm open to using a different format for the CBC stations that don't actually use the -TV suffix, but basically I'm just trying to make things as clear and straightforward and not-overly-confusing as possible. Bearcat 22:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CBOT

Just noticed your edit to CBOT. Thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks don't go on disambiguation pages. One wikilink per entry is appropriate. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) has more info, and I'm always happy to disucss disambiguation.--Commander Keane 23:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of CW affiliates

Have a look at the comment I added to the article. Do you think this will help in deterring unwarranted additions? More specifically, does this allow us to remove the bit near the beginning about how existing affiliation is not a guarantee and the technicalities of the deal don't make it automatic and yada yada yada, which seems more geared towards editors than general users? I can understand why general users would want to know that, but I had thought I had already added it (it happened on a day Wikipedia was having technical problems) and I want your opinion on whether it's sufficient deterrent. Morgan Wick 04:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The NBC Thing

To be honest, I can't remember why I did it.

If a history page of cable TV in the St. John's area was possible, we might be able to give my new info a new home.

MapleLeafFan04 02:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Srcsmall.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Srcsmall.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Ronald20 05:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Saryn Hooks

You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CHUM/Bell Merger

I have a question: Should we add the information about Bell Globemedia intending to buy CHUM Limited to the CJON-TV page? MapleLeafFan04 23:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Rcsswest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rcsswest.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Between a rock and a hard place (NTV)

It seems like NTV is in a no-win position should they drop CTV's newscasts for Global's. Considering there's three separate OTA stations in St. John's (one of which is a repeater), and both rival private networks end up doing what is mentioned in the article (both networks applying for their own stations), what would NTV do, if we assume the CRTC gives the green light for both networks, and St. John's could likely end up with five stations (and a crowded cable presence as nearly every channel from 2 to 62 and maybe beyond on the cable dial has been claimed)?—Preceding unsigned comment added by MapleLeafFan04 (talk • contribs)

List of flops in entertainment

Apropos of The One, you are, of course, altogether correct, and I am, to be sure, an idiot (or, at the very least, someone who ought not to edit when ridiculously tired). Thanks, in any case, for fixing my error...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahiegel (talk • contribs) 14:09, 23 August 2006

Network affiliate lists

After seeing you re-arrange the Fox affiliate list into "DMA style", I am working on an ABC affiliate list in DMA style on my sandbox. I copied and pasted the table from the Fox affiliate list, but I have added the ABC stations in the top 35 markets and some others in the Midwest. Feel free to add more stations to the list and replace the ABC affiliate list with the one in my sandbox when finished. I plan on making all of the network affiliate lists in DMA style eventually. --grejlen - talk 02:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bragg Communications Inc.

I do agree with your Eastlink renaming . I will do a little more investigating on Bragg Communications Inc. they seem to name Eastlink as "Eastlink Communications" or "Eastlink Cable" or "Eastlink Limited" on the website or as they bill thier customers for cable TV ,internet and phone all the same bill but not the Long Distance . Its confusing to all of us .--Bill 03:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message

The reason I linked to that page on my blog is because it provides an imperical look at what the markets are doing. The data is aggregated from our local MLS (of which i'm a member), and allows people to measure buyer intensity in a non objective way (i.e. its a better method than saying 'gee there are a lot of for sale signs up' although that may be true too). As far as I know, there is no other way to visually guage the local market currently being offered.

Thanks Benjamin

Tim Hortons

You have edited this article in this past. Decimal10 is causing problems over at this article again (both through his account and his IP address). If you have time, I was wondering if you would help me keep an eye on the article. For more background, take a look at the lengthy message I have left on his talk page, which details all of his inapprorpiate behaviour (User talk:Decimal10#Your vandalism of Tim Hortons), a message he may erase (or just as likely ignore). Additional details are on Bearcat's talk page, relating to one particular issue (User talk:Bearcat#Tim Hortons). I'm just getting tired of dealing with him (he called me a "nutcase" this morning in an edit summary), and I could use a hand from some experienced editors familiar with the article (not to mention some third party input, just in case I am losing perspective). Thanks. Skeezix1000 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's great. It is always helpful to have third parties get involved. Skeezix1000 00:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TV/radio station moves

Hi! Just want to let you know that I think you've misinterpreted the naming conventions. Per WP:NAME:

All full-power Canadian FM and commercial TV stations have a (-FM or -TV) suffix... most U.S. and many Mexican stations, do not.

A quick search of the FCC TV Query for, say, WAGA shows that the correct call sign is simply "WAGA"; compare to the results for WDIV (which lists the station as "WDIV-TV").

The section you pointed to in your edit summary is meant to give guidelines if there are multiple stations with the same base callsign. It doesn't mean that all TV stations should have titles with the "-TV" suffix, because many do not.

It's a common mistake, but the distinction is important. Happy editing! — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 22:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stickguy, thanks for the message. You should probably contact Taestell about this; I'm really just carrying out his orders as I'm an administrator and can move pages over other pages. I'll review the moves that I've performed now :-) —Mets501 (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Académie française

Hi!

Did you see my response to your arguments? --Espoo 10:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cbctelevisionlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cbctelevisionlogo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Awcanada.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Awcanada.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 07:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment Now

A company being non-operational is not, in my opinion, a valid reason for it not to be acknowledged. I don't feel the article was written as an advert but please feel free to edit it, I simply see no reason why the article cannot exist (even on an disambiguation page) considering there is no other entry for Entertainment Now other than a re-direct, which is a link to an organisation no longer affiliating themselves with that name.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cokecompany.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cokecompany.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Srcsmall.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Srcsmall.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CBC_Radio_3.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CBC_Radio_3.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 17:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cica.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cica.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo-haveys2005.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-haveys2005.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo-haveys2005.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-haveys2005.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CTV and A-Channel

After the recent ruling where CTV was forced to sell the five Citytv stations (to Rogers), there's another problem I think few are aware of... If CTV is allowed to keep the A-Channel station in Ottawa, they would own two stations there, as they already own CJOH. What do you think about that? Maple Leaf fan '04 13:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random philosophical questions for the day...does this mean CTV is going to change ASN from a de facto Citytv to a de facto A-Channel? What happens to CP24, since none of the media reports have said anything about it? And since Citytv and A-Channel have always served the secondary purpose of being an easy place for CHUM to throw on repeats of stuff from Space and MuchMusic and the like, what happens to Citytv if there's no longer that avenue for filling holes in the schedule?

Gonna be interesting, that's all I have to say... Bearcat 01:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GlobalNational.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalNational.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CTVgm.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:CTVgm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Awcanadaconcept.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Awcanadaconcept.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Awcanadaconcept.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Awcanadaconcept.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North American TV

you sir, are a genius in making the template within the template collapsable for those that wish to see the information, and still have it take up minimal space! EXCELLENT JOB! :D RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 21:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GlobalToronto2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalToronto2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Showcaselogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Showcaselogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Achannelnew.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Achannelnew.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WAGA

The portion of DeKalb County that WAGA is in, is within the city limits of Atlanta. Atlanta sits in both Fulton and DeKalb counties. --Mhking 15:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CBCRadio3.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CBCRadio3.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Breno ^talk 09:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Global2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Global2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vocm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vocm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ontlogo.png

I have tagged Image:Ontlogo.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 14:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CFDR radio

C.A. ("Arnie") Patterson coined the slogan C-F-("Big D")-R, almost from day one of operation. The reason the call sign CFDR was chosen originally was CF Dartmouth Radio. Not sure if you've ever heard CFDR, but it was Arnie as well who coined the slogan for "Wood Motors Ford... where else?" Cheers! Aloha27 (talk) 04:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cjon.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cjon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

moving of C-61 bill

While I see that it's appropriate, is there a reason why the older page simply redirects to the new place while there isn't a disambiguation page? I really fail to see a reason other than article name clarity, unless you are reserving it for future bills with the name (which I wouldn't know if there will be other bills, but its probable), just asking based on your edit note. Noian (talk) 04:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ShaunaMacDonald.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ShaunaMacDonald.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 09:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:YRT Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:YRT Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 07:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cineplexentertainment.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cineplexentertainment.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of CW affiliates

I have nominated List of CW affiliates, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CW affiliates. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ViperSnake151 12:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:HBO Canada

Hey stickguy, I don't see the need in having a separate article for HBO Canada when it is only a multiplex channel of a premium tv network. I do see the uniqueness of this, but they are two separate channels from two separate premium networks. There's no guarantee that HBO Canada will be exactly the same on both networks, I'm sure they will air the same content, but it will be for the most part separate schedules. I think it would be easier to have an HBO Canada section within both the TMN and MC articles, so it can be updated and changed on an individual basis specific to that network, there's no guarantee that when one thing changes on one network that it will change on the other. I also think there really won't be much need to update both anyways, I mean, really, how much new content can be written up about this, other then maybe update the carriers? The content regarding Playhouse Disney Canada in the Family article really hasn't had much updating since it was first created, even so I don't think it would be too difficult to update both at the same time.

Anyways, i'll look for next messge and see what we can do about this. Later! musimax. (talk) 02:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deep Roots

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deep Roots, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-01t12:11z 12:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Deep Roots

I have nominated Deep Roots, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Roots. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Jeandré, 2008-10-01t19:23z 19:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sthubert.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sthubert.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ozfm.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ozfm.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CJBN.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CJBN.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalBC2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalBC2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalEdmonton2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalEdmonton2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalLethbridge2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalLethbridge2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalMaritimes2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalMaritimes2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalOntario2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalOntario2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalQuebec2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalQuebec2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalRegina2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalRegina2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalSaskatoon2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalSaskatoon2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GlobalWinnipeg2006.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:GlobalWinnipeg2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wiclogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wiclogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Srctv.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Srctv.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bbs.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbs.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama question

Hello, I noticed that you just edited the Barack Obama article. Did you see the floating box of vandalism that I wrote about on the talk page? I saw it earlier and tried to remove it from the article but I couldn't find it. I don't see it in the article history. I want to make sure that no one else is surprised by the box. Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 03:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Canwest Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Canwest Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CIGM

The funny thing is I had checked the CRTC site just this morning to see if there had been an approval on it last week or not. Bearcat (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carleton University Students' Association

Why have you put a "sic" on the motion? Just curious, I don't see anything obviously wrong. --Padraic 17:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Metrobus logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Metrobus logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CBCRadioOne.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:CBCRadioOne.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cbcradio2.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cbcradio2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:CHCA.png

A tag has been placed on File:CHCA.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:CHCA.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 20:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HLN Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:HLN Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Française des Jeux

Hi. I notice you remade the article on the cycling team as a one-sentence stub on its title sponsor. Such is yours or anyone's prerogative, and I'm not going to weigh the merits of such an action, but one relic of it is that the nearly 200 internal links to Française des Jeux are now pointing at the wrong article. A similar situation existed with Caisse d'Epargne - that's been quasi-solved by having Caisse d'Epargne redirect to Caisse d'Epargne (cycling team) with a hatnote linking to Groupe Caisse d'Epargne. Might a similar solution be feasible here? Perhaps La Française des Jeux as the title for the lottery, with Française des Jeux a redirect to Française des Jeux (cycling team)? Or does one of us have to roll up their sleeves and get those 200 links pointed to Française des Jeux (cycling team) manually?

Let me know, one way or another, how this can be resolved. Thanks. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 12:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bell Canada 2008.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Bell Canada 2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TorontoOne-original.png)

Thanks for uploading File:TorontoOne-original.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CBEF.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CBEF.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CBF.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CBF.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CJBC.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CJBC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hudson's Bay Company

I noticed your change to the official name of the Hudson's Bay Company, and, quite frankly, I'm appalled that it's happened. Should it be true, it means that the company known as "The Governor and Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson's Bay" chartered on May 2, 1670 is no longer in existence. The company registered under the Canada Business Corporations Act called "Hudson's Bay Company" came into existence on April 12, 2006. As such, it's a slap in the face to anyone who cares about continuity and the claim that HBC is North America's oldest company. And the name was just cool, too. Lexicon (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bell Canada.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Bell Canada.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:American broadcast television

Template:American broadcast television has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:GlobalCalgary2006.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GlobalCalgary2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 00:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CHFD-TV

Dougall Media released a statement today (link) explaining the affiliation change. The channel is branded on-screen as "Global Thunder Bay" (Using a logo like this but with Thunder Bay below) but that change hasn't appeared on their website. vıd ıoman 22:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CPAC's non-political programming

Hey, since I believe you were the one who started the non-political programming section in the CPAC article, I thought I would come to you. I was wondering if you had any idea whether or not CPAC has aired any Canada Day coverage before. They were given approval for it on June 29, 2009, the decision is here, however, I'm not sure if they had aired any yet. I was going to add it to the article, but I'm not sure if they have aired any or not yet. I though I'd ask you and maybe you'd know, and then maybe I'd add something on it to the article. musimax. (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

K, thanks for the info. musimax. (talk) 23:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harveys.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harveys.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Canwest vs. Shaw Media

Hi. OK, I see your points. I'd be fine with having separate articles for both companies. musimax. (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, I do think the List of assets owned by Shaw Communications and Corus Entertainment article should be split back up into two separate articles for Shaw Media and Corus because they are considered two separate companies. Corus may be controlled by the Shaw family, but is considered independent from Shaw Media. I think it's best to keep the two separate. musimax. (talk) 17:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizzapizza.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pizzapizza.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Target Canada

Thank you for creating the Target Canada article.

However I was a little concerned about "Proposed locations" sub-section. First, it partially violates the WP:NOTDIRECTORY guideline. However, my biggest concern is that the references you've added do not prove without a doubt that all of these stores will become Target outlets. For example, the Ivanhoe Cambridge reference lists the exact same locations as the ones that were listed from media outlets on May 26, 2011 when Target target revealed the leases it had acquired. I've noticed the same pattern for the references from Homburg and all the other landlords you've provided on the "confirmed" section; they all list the same locations (without any exception) as the ones listed from media oulets. But I seriously doubt that Target will truly open stores on all the locations of the "Confirmed" section, especially given that the company plans to open only 150 stores and that it hasn't even pick up yet its second lot of leases. At this point, I doubt that the landlords or even Target itself exactly know which stores will really become Target stores. I wouldn't be surprised that the landlords think that just because Target acquired the leases in their malls, they are assuming that all of these locations will automatically become Target stores past 2013.

I know that you've put a lot of work and effort on this section. But in order to conform with the WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL guidelines, I propose that we remove the delete "Proposed locations" section altogether. If you insist on keeping the "Proposed locations", I think that we should at least remove the distinction there is between the "confirmed" and "unconfirmed" and merge all the locations together in the "Proposed locations" section.Farine (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Burning Log (TV program), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Community channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

risotto & icecream

I saw your edit about Showcase. Awareness is one thing. Generally hating Super Channel is another. When the media report it like the show is only now finally available in Canada and the Showcase is the saviour for deprived fans of Angie and Sasha across the country do people never know that series 2 has already been shown and they missed it. The thing is, Shaw mislead everyone about the date it would be on Showcase. It actually was on Showcase on 2 January 2012 at 6pm ET even though the advertised and heavily promoted première was 3 January 2012 at 10pm ET. Not unlike how they advertised XIII as premièring on Showcase on 20 April at 10pm but actually had it on Mystery on 19 April at 10am. Also, there is a chance that risotto & icecream has been edited in various places as the line 'why don't we just show him our tits and let him decide' that is in the Super Channel trailer and in the episode from TNT wasn't in the episode when shown on Showcase. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 00:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zone Reality, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spy (TV series), Skin Deep and The Zoo (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premchaine.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Premchaine.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited CKCO-DT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A-Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for quickly noticing my typo on Microsoft PixelSense. It was a really embarrassing mistake. Edits like that are really helpful, so I think you should have a barnstar for it! Josh (Mephiles602) 12:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ntvscreen1.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ntvscreen1.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chartis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CBEF.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CBEF.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Space (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showcase (TV channel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Channel (Canada), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Family Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MuchMusic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you!

I present this award to you for this edit: [1] Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CIVT-DT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV News Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Late Night with Seth Meyers

Hi there, I'm trying to restore the affiliate mugs to the list of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes after a bit of a talk, but after adding the {{{AffiliateMug}}} parameter to the Lnep/seth template, I didn't know what to do to make a column header for the mug appear, so I reverted the template. What should I do to define a column header? Thank you! Pdxuser (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canal Indigo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of French-language pay-per-view programming in Canada until late 1999, when Bell ExpressVu (now [[Bell TV]] launched its bilingual [[Vu!]] service, replacing Canal Indigo on that provider. On

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sportsnet PPV may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

available in Canada|list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canadianbusiness.com/technology-news/wwe-rogers-10-year-deal/|title=Working

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 9(1)(h) order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV News Channel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HBO Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second window. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CBC News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CJBC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CJBC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vocm-fm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vocm-fm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead-out

You're probably not the person to ask, but the term was used when you created the article/list of Super bowl lead-out programs. It is not immediately obvious to me that any other Wikipedia article even defines the term. Even more amazing is the fact I can't find anything else for the term "lead-in"

There must be ways to deal with this through hatnotes or redirects. I wouldn't even know how to begin to create an article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stickguy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Stickguy, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:The Biography Channel (Canada), regarding the movement of The Biography Channel (Canada) to a new article on Viceland (Canada). Your input would be appreciated. musimax. musimax. (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Stickguy, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:Gusto (TV channel), regarding the merger of M3 (Canadian TV channel) to the Gusto (TV channel) article. Your input would be appreciated. musimax. (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Out of the Fog (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out of the Fog (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out of the Fog (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stickguy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links. Also, your signature has unescaped pipe characters (|), which must be coded as | to avoid messing up templates.

Please change your signature from

— <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;">[[user:stickguy|<span style="font-family:Arial;background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;color:#000000;">stickguy (:^›)—</span>]]</span> || [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] ||

: — stickguy (:^›)— || talk ||

to

— [[user:stickguy|<span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa; font-family: Arial; background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; color: #000000;">stickguy (:^›)—</span>]] &#124;&#124; [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] &#124;&#124;

: — stickguy (:^›)— || talk ||

— Anomalocaris (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Stickguy, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:Disney_La_Chaîne#Merger_proposal, regarding the merging of Télétoon Rétro with Disney La Chaîne. Your input would be appreciated. musimax. (talk) 17:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Me-123567-Me. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Interac e-Transfer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stickguy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soundfm.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soundfm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HBO Max, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of transmitters of CHAN-DT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of transmitters of CHAN-DT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of transmitters of CHAN-DT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 01:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Comcast info

Thanks for deleting my addition. I didnt noticed that someone had already added that info before me Sir Sheep (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shauna MacDonald

The article Shauna MacDonald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page does not establish any notability, nor are there any references that reference MacDonald specifically.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Factfanatic1 (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shauna MacDonald for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shauna MacDonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shauna MacDonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Factfanatic1 (talk) 21:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television § Changes to Infobox television channel?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television § Changes to Infobox television channel?. Raymie (t • c) 03:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited V (TV network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Presse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change Viacom International to ViacomCBS International

That edit you made for the Viacom International to be changed from ViacomCBS International is not true. I have evidence to show to you that the season 2 premiere of Blue's Clues and You end credits had the new name.

You can see for yourself by purchasing episode 8 from Prime Video. https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B084GD4W5P/ref=atv_yv_hom_c_unkc_1_1

I would show you a screenshot but my computer won't capture the video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.156.156.129 (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, and I have no reason to dispute that program uses that name, but the Delaware corporations registry is also showing there is still only a "Viacom International Inc." and not a "ViacomCBS International Inc.". I suspect whoever was working on that program did a find-and-replace on "Viacom" that is not actually applicable (at least yet).— stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 17:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help Moderating 2021-22 network schedules

Greetings, Stickguy! I am reaching out as you have recently contributed helpful edits to the 2021-22 United States network schedule (late night) page. As you may have noticed, this page is starting to become subject to some vandalism. User Hoopstercat has repeatedly added excessively detailed, unsourced, and incorrectly formatted information to several current network schedules. The worst instance of this is the late night page which was never separated by day of the week. Now there are four separate schedules on the late night page. It’s simply too much and there is very little variation in the schedules. Moreover, as I’m sure you know coming from a background in television and streaming, some of the programs being added aren’t network programs but merely syndicated shows only airing on select stations. I have brought this issue up on the talk page along with user MrE. Unfortunately, I do believe Hoopstercat’s erroneous edits will persist unless we can find a third moderator/supporter of at least combining the Friday and Monday-Thursday schedules. I ask that you consider replying on the late night talk page so that we can start making headway on reverting the edits without immediate pushback from Hoopstercat who’s simply undoing our reversions. If you have time and are interested, we would also greatly appreciate your help in moderating such pages. Thematrix92498 (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, I will keep an eye on it when I can. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 23:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FX on Hulu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mrs. America.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anything But Conservative for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anything But Conservative, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anything But Conservative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star TV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sportscope Logo Screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sportscope Logo Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Showtime (upcoming TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Showtime (upcoming TV series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Showtime (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Geezer teaser

Hello, Stickguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geezer teaser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stickguy,

I delayed deleting this article because I thought there might be something there. I hope you return to this draft and submit it to AFC. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder! — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 11:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Jeopardy

I looked and looked. Don't know how I missed it. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! 🙂 — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 02:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that the there were subsections with different types of celebrity tournaments. It's easy to see once I know where to look— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MHA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Member of the House of Assembly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Last of Us (TV series)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Last of Us (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I believe the edit was done in good faith, unfortunately in my skimming of the article I missed the information already referenced regarding episode titles. I thanked the reverting editor once I saw the revert message indicating why it should not have been added, and did not attempt to reinstate it. Have a good day. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 02:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Surrogate advertising

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Surrogate advertising, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:27-Team bracket templates

A tag has been placed on Category:27-Team bracket templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not sure why Template:27TeamBracket-3way is not populating there yet but I had added the category to that template. Unless I did so incorrectly? — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Canadian Spelling Bee" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Canadian Spelling Bee has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19 § Canadian Spelling Bee until a consensus is reached. Merko (talk) 18:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TNT Sports 4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TNT Sports 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNT Sports 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

S. Salim (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dominion Stores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:February 2025 sports events in Canada

A tag has been placed on Category:February 2025 sports events in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CJOL-FM

The article CJOL-FM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is way too early—the station is not even on the air—and even unlikely that this station can reach notability standards. A mention of this should be in Vermont Public, given that there is already a section on Canadian listenership/viewership on the TV side, and there should be a mention in Arsenal Media, the most likely redirect target.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good with going by whatever the current policy is. I was under the impression that it was safe to create an article for a licensed radio station as soon as it was approved, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIND-FM&oldid=511972493 (which was created as 88.1 FM Toronto, Ontario even before a callsign was assigned), but as that was 12 years ago my understanding may be out of date. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 17:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that under WP:BROADCAST, stations are generally not considered notable until they are on the air. I won't contest the PROD. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 17:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]