User talk:Treyt021

Your edit to Pell city high school

Your recent edit to Pell city high school was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

Hi, if you are interested in deleting a particular page, follow the instructions here. Please note community consensous is necessary before an article can be deleted on Wikipedia, so please keep that in mind. Continuously blanking pages is grounds for vandalism and you could be blocked. If you have any questions let me know. --Pilot|guy 17:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. Community consensous is not necessary in this case. Just add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. --Pilot|guy 17:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:1561121 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1561121 l.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

University of Tampa

Thank you for helping flesh out the UT article. People seem to be more interested in just copying and pasting from websites, and you took the time to actually write a pretty solid entry on it...thanks! Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure the McKay auditorium is still there? I had never heard of it before I read about it in this Wikipedia article. In looking through the archived news articles on the UT Web site, it sounds to me like they replaced the auditorium with the Sykes College of Business ... Maybe I'm wrong, but just want to be sure. -Dan S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.174.20.60 (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the Sykes College of Business is the auditorium. They just gutted it in the 90's and partitioned the inside into class rooms and lecture halls. The exterior remains essentially the same and it give the inside a unique circular layout. Same thing as Plant Hall and the College of Liberal Arts is the old Tampa Bay Hotel. (Although with somewhat less remodeling.) if you go inside the biz college there are a few pictures of what it used to look like hanging on the walls just past the lobbyTrey (talk) 14:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of all that vandalism that showed up on the UT page this weekend. -Dan S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.174.20.60 (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Trey. The logo on UT's page is old. They have a new version that they're using (basically the only change is that it is black and white). I want to add it to the page, but I can't because I'm a new Wikipedia member. Is there a way I can send it to you so you can add it? UTdan06 (talk) 14:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Phi Epsilon

Hey, just a couple things I wanted to let you know regarding the SigEp article here, which youve made a few changes to. First of all, I changed the motto slot back to "no public motto", since listing the mission statement as the motto is inaccurate, and there is no way to change the entry in the infobox to show a "mission statement" instead. Also, as i said on the talk page, it is my feeling that the VDBL founding principles are more similar to what is typically used as a "public motto", and those are already included in the infobox. If you disagree, lets talk it over here or on the talk page so we can avoid a revert war on this. Second, regarding the removal of private information: It happens. I watch pretty much all the major fraternity and sorrority articles, and i cant count the number of times ive removed mottos, handshakes, meanings, etc. The real problem is that these things stay in the revision history of the pages, so anyone can find it by going through the history of the page. This is why generally i think its better NOT to use an edit summary when removing such things, to make it harder for soemone going through the history to spot that info (for instance, your edit says "remove private info", which while accurate, makes it very easy for someone scanning the pages history to find it. Just a suggestion. Thanks for getting rid of it, either way. Sucks to see that publicly viewable :( -Lanoitarus _^(talk) .:. 01:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I totally agree on the motto issue I didn't add the Building balanced leaders bit in the first place just learned the hard way that you can't change the info box the reflect that. Although on reflection of the issue I do realize that SigEp does indeed have a motto at least the Balanced Man chapters do. It’s our publicly stated motto and you can look it up in our public guide book. "Sound Mind, Sound Body." I feel this is much closer in sprit to a motto than VDBL which are our guiding and founding principles. I would add this now but since it doesn't technically apply to traditional pledge chapters which although make up only a small percentage of the overall Sigma Phi Epsilon population are still in fact there. Any Thoughts? Also thanks for the advice on the secret info stupid of me to put that tag and after I looked at it I realized it. No help for it now I suppose.

AfD Vote

Just a comment. Your opinion only counts if you make it on the AfD project page. I just wanted to make sure that you knew that. Regards,Alphachimp ^talk 02:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfield University

I have been working on this page for a long time and had everything the way I wanted. I can't believe you changed the pics around. Now the page looks terrible. I am going to try and reverse what you did. Stagophile 02:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the defense of the Sigma Phi Epsilon page! I to am a SigEp and keep a close eye on the page. If you want, you can add a sigep userbox to your page. Here is the code for it {{User:Chrislk02/userbox/spe}}.

ΣΦΕ

This user is a member of a Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity.

 If not, thats cool and keep up the cool work! Thanks bro. Chris Kreider 00:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Innapropriate content

There is an anon that keeps adding "innapropriate" content to the SigEp article. I am just reverting his changes but just keep an eye on it for when he strikes again. He has done it twice already today. Chris Kreider 18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I actually traced the IP to Loyola Marymount Univeristy. There is a chap there and i would bet there is a disgruntled individual that is posting the innapropriate content. No problem with the ubox. Feel free to pass it on. Chris Kreider 19:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feed the trolls

It's great that you're reverting vandalism (and so quickly too) but reversion comments like "removed the suck" only feed the trolls. Try reading No Feeding Policy; I myself find it hard not to insult them for being annoying, but it just encourages them. --Iriseyes 20:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right on, dude. Thanks for repsonding. --Iriseyes 22:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SigEp vandal

The guy that keeps adding unsourced invalid information to SigEp articles is back at it. I reverted his edits several times. Being that it is unsourced and invalid, I am warning them as vandals for adding junk and innapropriate content to articles! Just keep an eye out for those out of place additions. Keep up the great work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. -- lucasbfr ^talk 08:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

addition_to_fiona_fight

Hi,

could you have a look at :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shrek#addition_to_fiona_fight

and help me with the wording ?

thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LelandParrish (talk • contribs) 02:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

> i added it back but it still needs a reference check. also please make sure i put it back in the right spot.Trey 03:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

this is the right spot, thanks. by reference check, you mean add pictures of the three fights to show the references ? at least the fights from GITS and 5th element ?

--LelandParrish 03:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 08:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Thanks...

For reverting vandalism to my userpage. :)- Hdt83 | Talk 03:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries happens to everyone just like to keep an eye out for people

Cropwell Baptist Church

The article Cropwell Baptist Church has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Note that this article had not been substantially changed since July 2006. If you want to repost the article, you will need to explain why this particular church is notable (and I don't think having been the largest church in one county qualifies). NawlinWiki 20:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work

Hey. Just dropping a line to say good job on the reverting vandalism, cleaning, and general good upkeep and additions to the different fraternity article pages. It's nice to see that differences in fraternal memberships don't carry over in a bad way to Wikipedia. Jmlk17 22:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bolos

Hey, I made a section on Talk:Bolo (tank) for the etymology discussion. I think it's pretty straight forward, but better to discuss it there at least than in edit comments back and forth! Cheers. --Falcorian ^(talk) 13:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Lambda Beta

Shouldn't they be considered High. They have 83 active chapters —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Occasio (talk • contribs) 00:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

- Your right so I changed it. Thanks for the heads upTrey 16:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hello,

My name is Mike Halterman. I’m an administrator on Wikipedia (User:Mike Halterman), and am currently interning at the Wikimedia Foundation office in St. Petersburg. We would like to organize more frequent Wikipedia Meetups in Florida. The Foundation would like to gather contact information for local Wikipedians. If you are comfortable, please e-mail your contact information to Sandra Ordonez, communications manager for the Foundation, at sordonez@wikimedia.org. If you have any questions, you can also contact me at jhalterm@mail.usf.edu.

Thank you for your time.

Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New photograph

I just now added a photograph and a UT link to the Gravity Research Foundation page. Use and edit as necessary. -- Nice work on the UT page. - A. Nonymous 15:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Alabama

Hi Treyt021! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on Alabama related articles. We need your help at the Alabama WikiProject! This is a new WikiProject and there is much work to do. Please head over to the project page, add your name, and help us enhance and increase the coverage of Alabama related stories.
JodyB_{yak, yak, yak} 15:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		Thanks for helping to clear out the backlog for the Fraternity/Sorority articles! Your help is appreciated! miranda 10:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UTSpartan.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:UTSpartan.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hola

Hey - I noticed you mentioning The Machine in a AFD on a student organization, so this is just a greeting from another UA-alum. --Lquilter (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well Hey then. Native Alabama or transplant?. I'm a native that went to Florida so i didn't graduate from there but i spent a full year there as a inactive SigEp from another chapter and worked for University Programs during my undergrad so i got an earful about the politics of the place. Going back to UA soon hopefully to wrap up my Masters program.Trey (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Class of 1990, then got the hell out. <g> The politics certainly were interesting. --Lquilter (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tally logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tally logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BamaSeal.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:BamaSeal.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all!

We're going to be having our first Mississippi meetup next month, and I would love it if you'd like to come out! A few of us will be staying overnight, so if you feel up to it, we could have a meet and greet that night and then breakfast the next morning and talk about Wikipedia and everyone's areas of expertise. Let's show 'em how it's done Southern-style! Mike H. Fierce! 22:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ut color.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ut color.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Treyt021. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<.

Ikip (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not advertising...simply adding a link to information/sites that are relevant to the topic

Why are you removing my external links and threatening me with being blocked/blacklisted/etc.? Please explain to me how the addition of my link is any different from that of a chapter website link, a social "in circle" website link, a philanthropic website link, etc. that I see on all of the fraternity wiki pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greek Challenge Coins (talk • contribs) 23:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on your talk page for your convenience please feel free to continue the discussion thereTrey (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Gamma Phi

I am very angered and disappointed with what you did to my fraternity's page the Tau Gamma Phi. You totally changed and re-wrote it to suit your taste. With disregard to the author who spent hours not to say months researching and writing those contents. What will you feel if I edited and re-wrote your fraternity page the Sigma Phi Epsilon and totally put words there that will make you feel offended? I know you will think that it's vandalism...but isn't that what you did to our page? Isn't it a form of self-gratifying and over-righteous vandalism?

Why don't you stick to your frat's page and leave other orgs alone. Our page have been here for a while and Wikipedia does'nt even edit us like what you did...and then suddenly here you are feeling like you have the power over all articles here in wiki and just started chopping our article like a crazy newspaper editor. I appreciate it if you give respect to other people's articles. We have also rights to be heard and known. We are not grand standing...like what you said, but just stating the facts. What is written in our pages is backed up by references and facts. We don't invent these things.

Again thank you for you consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TriskelionTarantula (talk • contribs) 17:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my response on your talk page.Trey (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for advice

Hey, Trey, my name is Ks64q2, and I noticed you're a member of the ARS Squadron as well! I've got an article I wrote going through AfD- pretty contentious, we have some headstrong deletionists working feverishly to find reasons to kill it, heh. But what I was wondering is if you'd take a look at the arguments I'm making and see if they are cogent and make sense- just so I can better get an idea of what I need to address. Since I see you have an extensive editing history, I thought I'd ask you for your thoughts. The forum is at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Motley_Moose. Anyway, any suggestions you can make would be extremely appreciated. Thank you! Ks64q2 (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Beta Kappa

Hello, Trey. I've seen the Mediation Cabal case requested for Phi Beta Kappa Society here, and I'm glad to take the case. It appears that you have engaged in discussion about the issue, and I have listed you as a party. I have reviewed the relevant discussions and am looking forward to working towards an ultimate resolution. Regards, Jd027 (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Pi Lambda

Trey, I did add info about charities and other stuff but you deleted it. I will fight your edit war and could care less about the 3 revert rule or getting blocked since I have an endless supply of IP addresses to play with. My web browser opens to the article's history. In 2 sec I can undo the anti-greek propaganda which Candice vomits and you support. Why do you feel the need to edit someone else's fraternity info? Maybe I should flank you by undoing your fav contributions. Did you write the original article? I didn't - I just added some positive info from FIRST HAND knowledge and deleted the death thing b/c it added more negativity to an already negative article. Just b/c its cited doesn't mean its in proper context.

I agree that my article's version sucks almost as much as the other. I will work with you on this and keep the death info, but not the sensational superfluous details about the body being found in an alley, ect.. I will heed your advice about adding pics and alumni info. For your part please carefully read my additions as they come and make individual contributions instead of reverting the whole thing back to the negative version. We can make this page more informative and interesting. Silens-Mortalis (talk) 02:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hostile... classy move. I responded on your talk page for your convenience also i didn't put this in but don't say its FIRST HAND knowledge. That's the quickest way to get something taken out of Wikipedia admins really don't like first hand stuff.Trey (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Citation Barnstar
		For taking the initiative to provide citations on articles when others did not or were unwilling to. --Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 00:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the star, i think I've been a bit grumpy about a few things of late. sorry but its always nice to get a bit of notice. My attitude has improved immensely :)Trey (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acacia

I feel your pain. There's an editor on a page I watch that does nothing but revert and tell me (the seemingly only other editor) what s/he doesn't like about what I do without ever bothering to make substantive, contributive edits it herself. Just deletion, reverts, and demands. There ought to be a policy against such things or at least the right to ignore such people outright. At least people in the Acacia talk were citing policy/guidelines. --Lhakthong (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i know the feeling. Still like you said at least this guy was on policy i just get annoyed when people want to delete good info over a technical matter and then do no work to resolve it. Anyways thanks for the comment nice to know we're not alone in our annoyances here all the time. Trey (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of the Philippines (UP) and UP–related articles and thought you might want to support our recent proposal to create the WikiProject University of the Philippines. We've recently revamped the proposal and started a drive to push the approval of this project. We have a lot of articles that may be under this project and we would like assistance and support for its approval. Hope we'll have a very positive response. Go Fighting Maroons!

P.S. You can look at the preliminary drafts of the project in here. Thanks!--The Wandering Traveler ^{WIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!} 04:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Phi Delta Theta

Hello. As a significant contributor to this article, I thought you would want to know that it has been placed on hold as a result of its GA Sweeps Review, which can be found here. –Whitehorse1 01:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to Get Your thoughts

Given you are involved in WIkiProject Sorority/Fraternity, are you at all involved in Project Universities? Im looking to create two task forces, one for community colleges, one for financial aid. Your thoughts?IlliniGradResearch (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Not sure what your asking on. is there a need for a community college group? yeah i think so. my knowledge in that area is limited but i'd be happy top help where i could. They are a huge factor in the American education system and are growing more important by the day. As far as financial aid goes, I've never given much thought to that being on wikipedia. are you thinking about a project to make new pages on this subject or primary patrol and improve the existing ones? Trey (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Treyt021! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

John H. Sykes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors wanted in Troy, Alabama

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian in Alabama. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Troy University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

I know Alabama is a big state, but if you happen to live near Troy and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from Troy who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FL Zeta Group Picture Spring 2006.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FL Zeta Group Picture Spring 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]