Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Ruyer (Ruyal)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Alexis Ruyer (Ruyal) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity page about an artist with no indication of notability. I can't find any reference to him anywhere other than this page and phone directory–type pages. —Chowbok ☠ 04:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A part of the article is copypasted from here. The information on his awards and the other recognition (Medusa Aurea XXX etc.) is unverifiable. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for artists. The awards are not significant. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: While trying to find refs. for this page, I stumbled upon this, which appears to be the subject's own website. The translated version seems a lot like the Wikipedia article. Guoguo12--Talk-- 15:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The text on the Wikipedia article is an un copyedited machine translation, possibly not using Google, but something similar, so it's a copyvio of his own site..--Kudpung (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC) BTW: Any reason why it gets AfD exactly 2 years to the day of its creation?[reply]
- Nope, just a coincidence. I hadn't even noticed that.—Chowbok ☠ 06:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.