Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allotriphobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snow, NFTphobia. TravellingCari 22:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allotriphobia

This neologism (acknowledged as such in the article's talk page) is not a word. It doesn't exist in the OED and there are no hits on the word in Google. Even if it were a word, it would not be notable. Bongomatic (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Made up term. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Pegasus «C¦T» 03:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per TPH and his otters. Completely fails Google Test. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 08:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Equendil Talk 08:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: probably a made-up word. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of sources. It technically doesn't satisfy the speedy deletion criteria, though. Huon (talk) 09:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The word xenophobia would cover this pretty well. As with the word "gullible", you can check all the dictionaries in the house and not find this one. Mandsford (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, seems true and notable, let's be a bit more inclusionistCdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

erm, how?? TallNapoleon (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of references. See also WP:NFT. Stifle (talk) 21:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this made-up term. Cliff smith ^talk 21:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.