Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aloriah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No prejudice to recreating the article if the game does attain enough coverage to meet notability requirements. Mandsford 01:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aloriah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB/WP:N and WP:V: Non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, third-party published sources. I've looked through the WikiProject Video games guide to sources and found nothing. Using the WikiProject Video games custom Google search returns a single hit and it's a forum post, not a reliable source at all. Wyatt Riot (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete - A single hit would never be enough to satisfy WP:GNG, even if it was a reliable source. --Teancum (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm finding a lot of coverage of the word and (36K ghits) and some coverage of the game in blogs and the like, but nothing reliable. [1] includes 2 non-English sources that might be of some use, but... delete Hobit (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's definitely a lot of chatter about the game, so it may become notable some day. Quite honestly, the game does look pretty interesting to me, but of course that has nothing to do with notability. I looked at those links, wondering if we could pull some information from them, but one is a press release and the other links back to BBGsite, which is specifically excluded as a reliable source by WikiProject Video games. Maybe sometime in the future it'll get some proper reviews. Wyatt Riot (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.