Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Hallay
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Amanda Hallay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability guidelines. Can't find any third-party sources about her other than her college website. Chris (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Main source is web page entitled "Our Authors." Fails to clear the notability bar, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for actors and academics. Armbrust Talk Contribs 18:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An adjunct professor at a school not notable enough to even have its own article seems far below the bar for WP:PROF, and working for some magazines also isn't good enough, nor is writing two as-yet-unpublished novels. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Incidentally, since when is Lim college a leading college in NY? Adjunct faculty w/o significant publications are generally not notable Vartanza (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.