Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aruna Dhathathreyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aruna Dhathathreyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not establish notability. Streesakthi Science Award is not a national award in India for science and technology. Fails WP:ACADEMIC Educationtemple (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! ^(Y) 21:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:PROF: only 572 citations with a h-index of 13, and no other significant impact as covered in reliable sources, thus failing WP:PROF#C1. WP:PROF#C2 isn't fulfilled because the awards are not highly prestigious. The subject also most likely doesn't meet any other WP:PROF criteria. The subject also fails WP:BASIC, no coverage in reliable sources. Esquivalience ^t 00:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience ^t 00:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.