Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonakid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonakid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for notability . A line in the article on the company would be enough, but I don't think we even need a redirect. WP is not a directory, of brands or anything else. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails NCORP and GNG. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 07:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteLacks evidence of notability, such as multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable independent publications. Edison (talk) 03:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.