Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bupati Cup riots
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. As has been pointed out, seems fairly clear that it fails the criteria laid out at WP:EVENT. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bupati Cup riots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be non-notable riots. Likely to fade in a few weeks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete We don't even have a Bupati Cup article here, and the article submission was on its way to being turned down for In the News. Nate • (chatter) 04:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are a few sources from the 15th, but there is no evidence of lasting coverage and thus fails WP:EVENT. 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 19:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - if the region was clarified, rather than just the location - the info could possibly go into another article - there are other similar evenrts that dont deserve an article alone - but are sufficiently worth placing in a larger scoped article... sats 07:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.