Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 10:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cage Rage 19

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

only gets coverage in MMA [1]. lacks third party coverage and thus fails WP:GNG. having notable fighters does not mean automatic notability. also nominating:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 03:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Routine sports coverage of events promoted by a second tier MMA organization. Astudent0 (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Only hits on these events are result listings (same as the articles themselves), promotional pages on DVDs of the event and forum postings. Little to no coverage of the actual event. --TreyGeek (talk) 03:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as WP:RECENTISM and WP:UNSOURCED. Sherdog is a fine source, but all these linked articles are merely WP:ROUTINE sports coverage, and don't demonstrate any satisfaction of WP:EVENT. Possibly merge to Cage Rage Championships. Even though many may be WP:VERIFIABLE, not every sports event is notable. BusterD (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.