Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicagoblok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chicagoblok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable block of flats where notability has not been ascertained. No relevant speedy deletion criteria. Wintonian (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The subject has significant coverage in these sources, has been the subject of a 65-minute documentary film and is described as both "famous" and "infamous". Phil Bridger (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Spatulli (talk) 01:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep subject to sourced improvements to content. Inclusion of Phil Bridger's links (above) might be useful. BlueRobe (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: per Phil. - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.