Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Gamble
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Seeing as the sources raised by Atlantic306 were not contested Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Deadly Gamble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cable movie which fails WP:NFP with no secondary sources (nj.com/allinmag.com sources are all interviews with the director). Film does not appear to meet the "full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics" (or any other criteria) or WP:NFO, Rotten Tomatoes list no critical reviews. McGeddon (talk) 12:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep firstly the nominator is aware that I was more or less canvassed to comment here as shown here but had this on my watchlist anyway so it did not make any difference. While WP:NFILM may not be passed, I think there is enough for WP:GNG to be met which overrides project specific guidelines. There is a Hell Horror review here, Scared Stiff review here, coverage here, Horror News Review and here Atlantic306 (talk) 00:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep the movie seems to have good sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.61.211.5 (talk) 11:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.