Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Yekinni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Leave the socks, the consensus is for Delete Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 11:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Yekinni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG & WP:BLP - article has no reliable verifiable sources Amsaim (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing to indicate notability. Roles appear to consist of a minor film role (listed 80th on the cast list at IMDB), a small part in a 15-minute minor short film, and playing "Jane Doe" in one story from the series Medium. --Michig (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No assertion of significance in the article and I can't find any coverage in relaible sources to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ 12:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does't pass WP:ENT. No sufficient sources that might establish notability --Spatulli (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly sourced article about a non-notable actress. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously needs considerable cleanup, but her notablity seems of no question. Has appeared in a tv series, and a few films. Passes notability for me. BerylTurns50 (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the last entrant. Am surprised that there seems to be so much insistance on delete - there's actually quite a lot out there on her... I may be wrong, but I definitely vote keep. Keith1234 (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~P.S. - The notablity has already been asserted by Spike Wilbury after the nomination for speedy deletion was declined?!?!~~ Keith1234 (talk) 22:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails notability criteria for actors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 03:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes notability, just. Wikitrueforever (talk) 11:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - My referencing was poor, but with improvement I strongly think this article would qualify. Maybe editors can help contribute? YellowPlains (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: no roles that meet the notability criteria. Jarkeld (talk) 13:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed:

BerylTurns50 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Keith1234 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Wikitrueforever (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
YellowPlains (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Socks have already been indefinitely blocked by yours truly; sockmaster (BerylTurns50) blocked 1 week. –MuZemike 17:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Commment striked comments made by sockpupets of a banned user. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. All socks aside, this individual's very short career[1] fails WP:ENT and her lack of coverage[2] fails WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She's not there yet Vrivers (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.