Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Science
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Double Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable radio show; lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Only refs found in Google are mere mentions or are BBC links, which is not independent of subject. -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: all kinds of hits on the phrase, nothing found for a radio program. Lack of sourcing. What's now in the article for sourcing isn't helpful Oaktree b (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This was all I could find [1], still not a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_BBC_Radio_4_programmes#Sitcoms: listed there (merge whatever content can be merged). (FWIW, I had indicated a Redirect should be considered when I DPD the page (same nominator)) -Mushy Yank. 21:34, 11 December 2024 (UTC)