Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ente Upasana
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 13:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ente Upasana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Only just enough content to avoid being tagged for speedy. Contains nothing but an over- elaborate plot summary. HJ Mitchell (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - IMDB entry, which is the one external link on that article, suggests the lack of notability. Possible notability to Malayalans, but this isn't established in the article. ~Excesses~ (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 16:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 16:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficiently notable film. I have added a couple of sources. Salih (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sourcable notability. Since AfD is not Cleanup, let's tag it and improve it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.