Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floatigation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 11:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Floatigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable neologism. Google searches only find 26 hits - almost all by a single author. Facebook, linkedin, blogs, mailing lists but no significant coverage in reliable sources. No hits on google scholar. noq (talk) 12:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Well, there's Mariculture as a possible merge target but that appears to only cover salt water, apparently. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Is it part of Hydroponics or Hydroculture perhaps? PamD 08:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It seems to be a term only used by one person who I suspect is involved in the project referred to in the Decca Chronicle article - it does not appear anywhere else without the Dr. N. Sai Bhaskar Reddy name being mentioned. Only 26 google hits make it unlikely to be used by anyone else. noq (talk) 10:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Insignificant coverage in independent sources. utcursch | talk 03:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I think its just an application of Hydroculture where plants would be grown using water only and would have some floating devices along with them to enable floating in larger water bodies. Pinging editors who might help here @Shyamal and AshLin: §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as neither WP:GNG nor WP:DICTDEF. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.