Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FoundersCard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article fails to establish notability and still contains significant promotional content. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FoundersCard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written like an advertisement, and the creator has done nothing to rectify. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 06:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - some phrases do read like an advert - but subject is evidently notable, and the appropriate sections have been tagged for improvement. Mike1901 (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam. Belongs on the org's web site, not in an encyclopedia. No indications of notability or significance either. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.