Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geobrowsing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I am not inclined to relist this a third time; there is clearly no consensus to delete.. I am not relisting this a third time; there is clearly Stifle (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geobrowsing

non-notable neologism. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 20:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lego K^ontribs T^alk M 00:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it actually would appear this is a new technology, not just a neologism. See the following news items: 1.) Sprint unveils location-based ‘geobrowsing’ on eve of WiMax launch (Yes, that's a blog post, but it is from a highly respected computer tech site, ZDNet), 2.) Sprint Assembles broad range of partners to deliver “geobrowsing”, 3.) In the Wireless World, 3 Things Matter: Location, Location, Location, 4.) Leading Location-Based Service Providers Turn to Eventful for Comprehensive Local Event Content. Now, it could well be that these are all articles stemming from a single press release, perhaps by Sprint, but it does bear further scrutiny, and if kept, the article would most certainly need to be re-written. Ariel♥Gold 04:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 18:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- The thousands of blogs and what not in G make the good stuff hard to find . GScholar [1] shows 29 items, including several peer reviewed papers and a number of good conference proceedings. . --The product giving rise to most of the ghits in plain G is actually XOHM, see [2]. it appears to be on the point of being introduced [3] - Probably an article for XOHM would be appropriate. Very oddly, nobody seems to have tried yet, but there are several hundred thousand ghits [4] in addition to their own site. and 255 GN items [5] not all of them press releases. DGG (talk) 22:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.