Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD Nation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Tekzilla. Black Kite (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- HD Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Fails WP:WEB & WP:GNG. No sources found. Otterathome (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- One of at least six nominations by the same nominator for programming by Revision3 : Web Drifter AfD, Infected by Martin Sargent AfD, GeekBeat.TV AfD, Thebroken AfD, HD Nation AfD, IFanboy AfD. Anarchangel (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFanboy by the same nominator, another production on the Revision3 network, and therefore eligible for the same Time magazine citation. The sources are not so good in News as for Ifanboy, but it is not inconceivable that they are available. WP:DEL#REASON "Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources". Anarchangel (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I cannot find anything in the Time's link you provided that mention this show. Although it does mention 'DiggNation'... If sources are available, add them, see WP:BURDEN. Just because Revision3 is notable, doesn't make all of it's productions automatically notable, see WP:NOTINHERITED.--Otterathome (talk) 18:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Tekzilla. It's now a segment of the larger show. DarkAudit (talk) 04:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. Stedrick (talk) 14:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Tekzilla per DarkAudit. Nate • (chatter) 02:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Tekzilla per DarkAudit. I couldn't find any useful independent sources to prove notability (the Time Magazine source doesn't mention it), but I think it would be worth a mention in the Tekzilla article. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 13:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.