Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Trade Centre
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hong Kong Trade Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable building: Fails GNG, no widespread coverage in reliable sources. Not to be confused with the World Trade Centre (Hong Kong). ► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 06:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 06:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. ► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 06:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. This building, built in 1982, is on a major thoroughfare, Des Voeux Road, in Central Hong Kong, but is no different from many buildings there. It has not received specific, detailed coverage in independent reliable sources, although the information provided is certainly verifiable. The lack of citations is understandable, most of the mentions were in Chinese, but not significant. --Bejnar (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. I've been there, it just a small shopping mall with offices above. I couldn't find any sources to establish notability so it should go. Rincewind42 (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Just another
nondescriptoffice building. -Zanhe (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Although I agree with @Zanhe:'s suggestion that the article be deleted, the building is not nondescript. See, e.g., Hong Kong Trade Centre. Here is an excellent image. Compare with File:HK Des Voeux Road Central 161 Hong Kong Trade Centre POSH Office Furniture Shop.JPG. Because of its distinctive architecture, the building can frequently be picked out from quite far away. It just has not had significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction! I've stricken out "nondescript". My original vote still stands. -Zanhe (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Although I agree with @Zanhe:'s suggestion that the article be deleted, the building is not nondescript. See, e.g., Hong Kong Trade Centre. Here is an excellent image. Compare with File:HK Des Voeux Road Central 161 Hong Kong Trade Centre POSH Office Furniture Shop.JPG. Because of its distinctive architecture, the building can frequently be picked out from quite far away. It just has not had significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.