Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Dang Nguyen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not presently meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hung Dang Nguyen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. created by a single purpose editor. Has not held any high academic positions like professor. He is only the lead author on 2 of the quoted articles. Also an orphan article LibStar (talk) 13:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable medical doctor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree, nothing shows notability as the article currently stands. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources that show notability. -- Dane ^talk 05:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete nothing notable here. run of the mill doctor. Jytdog (talk) 03:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.