Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icebreaker International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Icebreaker International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I could not find any RSes to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG per the following: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] ~Kvng (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Satisfies GNG per Tiny Mix Tapes review and Stylus Magazine review.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:GNG per a review of available sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The content found by Kvng seems like local coverage and it did not appear in my Google search, possibly because it's behind a paywall, but it is good. The content found by The Cross Bearer. Nomination withdrawn. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.